Science in the Media: Rude or Ailing Health? was a panel that recently convened in the UK, in a response to a recent UK government report on science in the media . You can watch the video of the entire thing at this link.
The panelists were Natasha Loder of the Economist, Andrew Jack of the Financial Times, Fiona Fox of Science Media Centre (and the author of the report) and Ed Yong of Not Exactly Rocket Science blog.
It is interesting to watch and there is much one can say. But it is unfortunate that there was a part of the panel proceedings that descended into the old tired journalists vs. bloggers trope. Most of us are over that. Have been over that for a few years now. But there are still people around, it seems, who just don’t get it. So, it is not surprising that there was a lot of reaction to this, especially to Fiona Fox’s repeat of the tired old idiocy that ‘bloggers cannot be journalists’ which she reiterated in her subsequent
article blog post. See these excellent reports and reactions here (I wanted to have them all in one place, for archival purposes – one-stop shop, single link, to all of it – if I missed something, please let me know so I can add the link):
The Science Media Debate: Is this blog journalism or not? by Charlotte King.
When is a blogger/journalist/communicator not a blogger/journalist/communicator? by Harriet Vickers.
Bloggers vs. Journalists: A Response to Fiona Fox (and Richard Littlejohn) by Martin Robbins.
On the bowls versus ice-cream debate by Ed Yong.
Investigative science journalism by Christine Ottery.
Who is to Blame for Bad Health Journalism? by Le Canard Noir.
Bloggers, journalists, same difference? by Grant Jacobs.
Jack of Kent: Orwell Prize Shortlist – and why blogging is *not* the new journalismby Jack of Kent
More on Blogging vs Journalism by Martin Robbins.
An outbreak of crankiness – UPDATED by Dr Aus
My HomepageYou can find all about my online presence at http://coturnix.org. Views presented on this blog and all other online spaces are mine and do not represent the views of Scientific American or its owners (NPG and McMillan).
Search This Blog:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Please, do explain.… on About matjaz zivkovic on About
- BIO101 - Physiology: Regulation and Control
- Food goes through a rabbit twice. Think what that means!
- ScienceOnline2011 – interview with Alice Bell
- Conference Blogging
- ScienceOnline2011 – interview with Jessica McCann
- Stick Science cartoons
- Carnal Carnival - everything you ever wanted to know about poop you will be able to learn in ten days from today
- Carnal Carnival #1 - Essentials of Elimination
- Scienceblogging: science3.0.com – a Q&A with Mark Hahnel
- Fiddler On The Roof
- Fat Tuesday: Hungry for love bit.ly/10SGmUB by @illusionchasers at #SciAmBlogs 1 hour ago
- @davidmanly make sure you have a glass of milk ready! 1 hour ago
- What is this, three posts per day on the Guest Blog are now the norm? bit.ly/pmiqiK If this persists, I'll need an intern! 1 hour ago
- RT @Sci_Phile: If the Earth was a bowling ball, its finger holes would change your view of the moon ow.ly/lfIm3 XKCD 1 hour ago
- @switterist she was so nice - I'd not have so sweet... 1 hour ago
- RT @romenesko: NPR is looking for someone to say "This is NPR" and “Support for this program comes from…” bit.ly/10jws1H 1 hour ago
- RT @jayrosen_nyu: Read it. RT @joshtpm And with this post all journo colleagues and press freedom supporters can officially hate me. http:/… 1 hour ago
- Dog? @TetZoo ? RT @kTraphagen: Need hivemind help to ID this bone/skull ow.ly/i/2aDyv 2 hours ago
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Thank youThanks to Arikia Millikan for helping with setting up this site.