Hear the amazing story of Darwin’s finches when legendary evolutionary biologists Peter and Rosemary Grant present highlights of their life’s work on Monday, April 11 at 7pm in the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences auditorium, downtown Raleigh. Free.
Peter Grant is professor emeritus of zoology, and Rosemary Grant is a retired senior research scholar, both in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Princeton. In their dogged study of a population of birds popularly known as “Darwin’s finches,” the Grants have won renown for detecting and recording evolution in action, and proving and extending the theories of pioneering evolutionist Charles Darwin, work for which they were recently awarded the prestigious Kyoto Prize.
For much of the public, the work of the Grants first came to light in Jonathan Weiner’s Pulitzer Prize-winning account of their efforts, “The Beak of the Finch.” Published in 1994, the book detailed the couple’s arduous, yearly six-month stay in tents on Daphne Major, a desolate volcanic island 600 miles west of Ecuador. There, since 1973, they have undertaken what was described in Weiner’s book as one of the most intensive and valuable animal studies ever conducted in the wild.
“We choose a single group of related species for close scrutiny,” the Grants wrote, “and attempt to answer the following questions: Where did they come from, how did they diversify, what caused them to diversify as much as they did (and no more) and over what period of time did this happen?” What the Grants have shown through their relentless study and cataloging of 14 varieties of island finches is how beak size and shape evolve through natural selection within a dramatically changing environment, according to certain mechanisms and conditions.
This presentation is made possible through a partnership between the Museum, North Carolina State University’s WM Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, and the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent).
My HomepageMy homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.
Search This Blog:
There are no public comments available to display.
- BIO101 - Physiology: Regulation and Control
- Food goes through a rabbit twice. Think what that means!
- BIO101 - Physiology: Coordinated Response
- Quick & dirty: misleading sex surveys in women's mags (video)
- BIO101 - Protein Synthesis: Transcription and Translation
- Biological Clocks in Protista
- Scienceblogging: The Lay Scientist (and The Guardian) – a Q&A with Martin Robbins
- Science Blogging Networks: What, Why and How
- BIO101 - From Two Cells To Many: Cell Differentiation and Embryonic Development
- Agricultural science is back in fashion for college students: Here’s why geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/10/30/agr… 56 minutes ago
- What’s so “natural” about “natural crop breeding”? bit.ly/1rDwkTN via @GeneticLiteracy 1 hour ago
- Science as profane: What superstition of 1752 and 2014 share in common bit.ly/1wKe69o via @GeneticLiteracy 1 hour ago
- @ElenaBlume Trustworthy or Newsworthy? Hard to do both. I start at ScienceSeeker.org, perhaps @SciAmBlogs as well. 1 hour ago
- Quarantines: Chaos and Confusion blogs.scientificamerican.com/molecules-to-m… 2 hours ago
- In science, popularity breeds unreliability sciencenews.org/blog/context/s… 2 hours ago
- Before the “teaching model” of journalism education: 5 questions to ask nie.mn/1wgiNrE via @NiemanLab 3 hours ago
- This is Why There are So Many Defibrillators in Casinos gainesonbrains.com/2014/10/this-i… 3 hours ago
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.