Was Clinton’s interview with Mike Chris Wallace good or bad?

Opinions are split.
Matt Nisbett think it is bad here, here and here.
Sara Robinson thinks it was good here and here.
Although I have no great love for Bill Clinton, I am siding with Sara here (read her posts to see why), just on gut feeling. But also, check out this AOL poll (never known to be a bastion of liberalism):
Who do you find more convincing?
Clinton 62%
Rice 38%
Total Votes: 67,769
Do you blame either administration for failing to prevent 9/11?
Yes, the Bush administration 39%
Yes, the Clinton administration 22%
Yes, both administrations 22%
No 16%
Total Votes: 69,827
What’s your impression of Clinton in this interview?
Mostly positive 62%
Mostly negative 38%
Total Votes: 45,960
What’s your impression of Wallace in this interview?
Mostly negative 61%
Mostly positive 39%
Total Votes: 44,447
How fairly do you think journalists treat politicians?
Somewhat 52%
Not at all 40%
Very 8%
Total Votes: 42,719
How fairly do you think politicians treat journalists?
Somewhat 60%
Not at all 23%
Very 17%
Total Votes: 42,332
This suggests that Sara is more right than Matt, methinks.