Why, oh why, have a FoxNews-hosted Democratic debate?

Posted on March 7, 2007 by | 7 Comments

At least Edwards refuses to participate. Let’s hope that all the other candidates also decide to refuse to participate in that charade.

This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

7 responses to “Why, oh why, have a FoxNews-hosted Democratic debate?”

  1. Deep Thought's avatar Deep Thought | March 7, 2007 at 8:56 am |

    Maybe its because Fox News has more regular viewers than MSNBC and CNN combined?

  2. coturnix's avatar coturnix | March 7, 2007 at 9:03 am |

    CNN and NMSNBC are only marginally better – they are all shills for the GOP, just that Fox is much more blatant about it. And why are Fox ratings tanking over the past year or so compared to the others? Why is O’Reilly falling while Olberman rising month after month? Is it because people are finally waking up and realizing they’ve been duped?
    I say – one debate: PBS only.

  3. Robert P.'s avatar Robert P. | March 7, 2007 at 9:30 am |

    There is talk of an e-debate, streamed on various web sites only.

  4. coturnix's avatar coturnix | March 7, 2007 at 9:34 am |

    Yup. I heard of that – tree or four different online entities jockeying for position to get it – why not have them all host one. Why not 3-4 e-debates?

  5. Deep Thought's avatar Deep Thought | March 7, 2007 at 9:59 am |

    So…. In your world, who *isn’t* a chill for the GOP? I mean, CNN (the station founded by a guy who gave billions to the UN and liberal causes) is called a Liberal shill by Republicans, and you call it a GOP shill. Which is it?
    And as for the edebate – if it happens it will be an unmitigated disaster in the greater election. While there are more and more homes with internet access, even broadband, use online political wonks are a thin crowd. You think CNN, ABC, or the New York Times is going to give *favorable* reviews to an edebate when there will be a vast majority of Americans who didn’t see it and it is an encroachment on their cash flow? Not gonna’ happen. The MSM will, at best, spin it for their preferred candidates and, at worse, use it to make Democrats look elitist.

  6. Mark's avatar Mark | March 7, 2007 at 1:03 pm |

    I agree, Coturnix. Fox News is absurdly, comically, outrageously biased. And, no, CNN is not a liberal shill. They haved been trying to position themselves as Fox Junior because of the success of blatantly-conservative “news” media. Unfortunately for all of them, it’s getting harder and harder to put a positive spin on the doings of the republican party. Did you see the news crawl on Fox saying that Scooter Libby had been acquited of lying to the FBI? That’s sure the lede, given his conviction on the other charges and the potential 25-year sentence for those convictions.

  7. whig's avatar whig | March 7, 2007 at 10:12 pm |

    I assume that Barack Obama wouldn’t be planning to participate in a FauxNews hosted event either, so the candidates participating would be kind of restricted. Hillary, perhaps, since she’s taken Faux money.