Blake wrote a long and excellent post about the question. Brian, swansontea, SciCurious, PZ Myers and Chad have more. What they say….
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,499 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- How the Giraffe Got Its Neck?
- ScienceOnline2011 - introducing the participants
- The 'Bloggergate' and related links
- Tweetlinks, 9-22-09
- Best of May at A Blog Around The Clock
- In Memoriam: Charles Frederick Ehret, 1924-2007
- Today's carnivals
- New and Exciting in PLoS Community Journals
- BIO101 - Evolution of Biological Diversity
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






I gotta say, I feel a little glum that so few of the responses I got addressed anything other than the behavior of science bloggers. For example, what about the flaws in textbooks, or the issue that we rely on Wikipedia to supplement our blogging when it is also the concretion of many small bits of volunteer labor? Or the influence news reports have over which scientific papers get cited? I guess it’s foolish to expect science bloggers to talk about any medium besides the blogosphere. . . .