You may remember this chart from three days ago. Now, Rob Loftis updated his chart after the inputs of a number of bloggers and commenters over the past few days, and John Dupuis has his own chart he uses in teaching about the flow of scientific information.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Favourite Science Books
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- 2012 in review
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Cooling The Balls
- Happy birthday, Sinclair Lewis
- Blogrolling for Today
- Today's carnivals
- Ignorance, arrogance or scientific fraud?
- Is this something that NYTimes editors proudly allowed to get published?
- Happy birthday, Anton!
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






As someone with a tendency towards what is apparently Blasphemous among scientists (namely Generalism and/or interdisciplinarianism), where does “groups of scientists in different fields communicating amongst each other” fit in? Or does it at all?
(Should there be some kind of mediation group or groups to allow that to happen, or do Balkanized groups of scientific specialists just not want to talk to each other very often?)
Coturnix: Check the modified chart I have made on the above idea. I think it now has better clarity, but would love to hear your opinion…