If so, you should read this, print it out and stick it on the side of your computer monitor. Then re-read it every time you sit down to write a post discussing actual scientific research.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Drumroll, please! Introducing: Scienceblogging.org
- Some fun stats about the participants of ScienceOnline2011
- Science Blogging Networks: What, Why and How
- The Big Announcement, this time for real: The Scientific American Blog Network has launched!
- Web breaks echo-chambers, or, 'Echo-chamber' is just a derogatory term for 'community' - my remarks at #AAASmtg
- The Open Laboratory 2010 - now up for sale!
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- Alert! Some Big And Important And Exciting News!
- Today's carnivals
- Scientific Communication all-you-can-eat Linkfest
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






What if you want to write for a scientific audience ? Blogs are not only useful for science dissemination.
Sure, that is a different style altogether.
But most of us (at least at this point in the history of blogging) write mainly for the lay audience. Or for scientists in different fields who would not otherwise be able to understand the actual papers – we bring in the history and context to explain why the presented work matters.
I posted a comment over at Cognitive Daily. Dave’s description is way too long to post on the side of my monitor. If you want the short version, according to me, it’s “get the science right” or,
ACCURACY, ACCURACY, ACCURACY
Ha! Of course. Without it all else is superflous. But once you get Accuracy right, Dave’s advice is golden.