When a newspaper publishes a column about religion (in their Religion section) that takes into account only the Christian point of view, someone is bound to object.
When the newspaper rectifies the error by publishing an article by an atheist, then, of course, some Christianists are going to object as well.
Discussion follows – kinda basic, embryonic and naive compared to informed and sophisticated discussions we often have on atheists blogs – but a discussion nonetheless, involving local (Greensboro NC) readers of the paper.
Hat-tip: Ed Cone
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- New and Exciting in PLoS this week
- Who gets whose Last Name at the Wedding?
- Blogrolling for today
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- A Brief History of Pretty Much Everything (video)
- How to write and publish a science book?
- Housekeeping
- Skeptical Blogging of the Fortnight
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






The comments to the Christian responders LTE are pretty amusing:
This is why I’m for mandatory classes on logic and argumentation as part of the standard school curriculum. It would really help quite a bit if people understood that circular reasoning is fallacious.