CBC has started a series of interviews (later available as podcasts) with scientists and others about the nature of science, the public undrestanding of science and related issues. Let me know what you think and feel free to blog about individual interviews if you particularly like or dislike what someone there said.
(Hat-tip)
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Clock Tutorial #14: Interpreting The Phase Response Curve
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- Clock Quotes
- Tweetlinks, 10-01-09
- ScienceOnline'09 - Saturday 2pm, and on the organization of an Unconference
- ScienceOnline2010 - interview with Misha Angrist
- It's getting hot - submissions for Open Laboratory 2011 are flying in by the dozens per hour... how about you?
- The Scientific Paper: past, present and probable future
- Obligatory Readings of the Day
- Why hibernating animals occasionally wake up?
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






I listened to the first interview with Simon Schaffer (with particular interest because the book in question, co-authored with Steven Shapin, is on my reading list for my candidacy exams) and found that it raised some very intriguing and important issues about how we understand how science works and why this doesn’t at all relegate science to being just another way of looking at the world, on equal footing with, say, astrology.
thanks for the heads-up! right in line with what we’re doing at SCC…