That is, in a nutshell, the conclusion of this study. If you have free access to a lot of literature, you are much more likely to click on links and download PDFs (which hopefully means you will read the papers, learn from them, improve your science, and cite them when writing your own manuscripts). If you know that most of the time you will see a “pay $60” page instead, you don’t bother clicking anyway.
Also, this mainly applies to the new papers – the older papers are rarely looked at – so there is no real need to keep archives TA for any lengthy periods of time.
Peter Suber comments.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Clock Quotes
- Lefty and Righty excesses of pseudo-science
- The Lark-Mouse and the Prometheus-Mouse
- Science Blogging Conference - who is coming? (National Center for Science Education)
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- My picks from ScienceDaily - circadian edition
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Postscript to Pittendrigh's Pet Project - Phototaxis, Photoperiodism and Precise Projectile Parabolas of Pilobolus on Pasture Poop
- Clock Quotes
- Shirky and Rosen, chatting about journalism
- Urban Raptors - the new PRI/BBC/World podcast and forum
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter





