That is, in a nutshell, the conclusion of this study. If you have free access to a lot of literature, you are much more likely to click on links and download PDFs (which hopefully means you will read the papers, learn from them, improve your science, and cite them when writing your own manuscripts). If you know that most of the time you will see a “pay $60” page instead, you don’t bother clicking anyway.
Also, this mainly applies to the new papers – the older papers are rarely looked at – so there is no real need to keep archives TA for any lengthy periods of time.
Peter Suber comments.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- ZooBorns!
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- Alert! Some Big And Important And Exciting News!
- Web breaks echo-chambers, or, 'Echo-chamber' is just a derogatory term for 'community' - my remarks at #AAASmtg
- Is education what journalists do?
- Science Blogging Networks: What, Why and How
- My first post at ScientificAmerican.com
- The Big Announcement, this time for real: The Scientific American Blog Network has launched!
- Links 'n' Thoughts on emerging science blogging networks
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter





