Dan drew this (click here to see big):

Explains why Siegel is utterly wrong.
Related…
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,504 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- BIO101 - Cell Structure
- Does tenure need to change?
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Postscript to Pittendrigh's Pet Project - Phototaxis, Photoperiodism and Precise Projectile Parabolas of Pilobolus on Pasture Poop
- Today's carnivals
- OADay winner: My Father the Anthropologist; or, What I Offer Open Access and Why
- Another Pretty Bird
- No, light behind the knee does NOT shift the clock!
- Science Blogging Conference - Lab Tours on Friday
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- My picks from ScienceDaily
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






Dead-on analysis, as usual. Speaking as someone in the media, anyone who is not participating/investing in online media and community building (blogs, etc.) is in deep, deep denial about where things are headed.
Spiegel had a Q&A in New Scientist recently, BTW, reiterating his lame self-defense. He’s attempting to rehabilitate himself, I guess… with about as much success as one might expect.