Category Archives: Blogging

Anthology Deadline has passed…

…right now.
The list of all nominations is now up to date.
Ten of my friends are already busy reading all the posts, helping me decide which 50 to include. I will make the final decision by the end of the weekend and post it here. All the other finalists will be linked from the book website once it is up. Of course, once the book is done, I’l let you know where and how to get it.
Thank you all for participating – I had a great time reading all these posts and I wish I could include them all!

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Alisa White is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Science Blogging Conference Update

NCSBClogo175.pngThe conference is only 19 [13] days from today! It’s getting really exciting!
The program is shaping really well:
On Thursday (January 18th) we will have a teach-in session. About 20 people have signed up so far (update: 30, thus the session is now full). We’ll use WordPress to help them start their own blogs, so I’ll have to make one of my own in advance and play around to figure out the platform before I teach others.
On Friday (January 19th), we’ll have dinner and all the bloggers present will read their posts. We have not decided on the place yet, but perhaps a site that has wifi, or a screen and a projector would be good as the posts can be seen as well as heard.
On Saturday (January 20th), we’ll have a busy program. We have two speakers: a scientist – Hunt Willard (director of the Duke Insitute for Genome Sciences & Policy) and a science blogger – Janet Stemwedel (Adventures in Ethics And Science).
Then, we’ll have four (or five) break-out sessions in an Unconference format – the participants take the lead and the leaders guide and moderate.
We decided not to have these sessions cover different areas of science, but different ways blogs, podcasts and other internet technologies can be used: a) research (e.g., using a blog as a public lab-notebook, online publishing), b) teaching (using the online technologies in the classroom), c) popularization of science (how to blog well, including the importance of visual props – illustration) and d) informing the public (e.g., public health, medicine, countering un-scientific forces in the society, etc. perhaps broken into wo sessions: one on science, one on medicine and public health). We have lined up four excellent people to moderate these sessions (not everything is on the wiki-page yet but will be soon).
Afterwards, we will go to dinner. If you have registered already, or plan to register soon, please do not forget to sign up for one of the dinners. Just edit the wiki and enter your name where you want.
At this moment we have 109 people registered (update: 127 and the limit is 150 so hurry up!) for the conference. Some locals will probably sign up at the last minute. Some of the people coming from very far away may still be waiting for good deals on plane tickets before they sign up. If you are considering this, it would be good if you could sign up as soon as possible so we have a good idea how many people to plan for in terms of space, food, swag, etc.
If you browse through the list of registrants, you will see what a great diversity of people there will be, a potential for cross-fertilization leading to high hybrid vigor! There are people from four continents coming to Chapel Hill in January to meet with us, as well as people from a number of States. There are science, medical and technology bloggers, web-designers, research scientists working in academia, government and industry, physicians, postdocs, graduate and undergraduate students, even high school students. There will be editors of science and medical journals and magazines, journalism professors and students, local journalists, and science writers. There will be science teachers at all levels – elementary, middle, high school and college. There will be local elected officials, and staff of state departments. And, I hope, you will be there as well!
We have attracted quite a lot of cool sponsors for the conference, so you can excpect some really good stuff in your swag bags! Still, both Anton and I are quite bad at begging for money. We do need a little bit more – can you or your organization be a sponsor, or donor, or host? If so, let Anton know as soon as possible.
And we may just be able to pull it off to have the The Science Blogging Anthology ready to be distributed at the conference.
Technorati Tag:

SciBlog Anthology suggestions so far

Update: Deadline for submissions is January 2nd at noon EST.
Wow! I posted the call for suggestions on Friday night, it is a weekend and a holiday, the traffic is down to a half, yet I got so many suggestions already, both in the comments and via e-mail! I am also very happy to see how many people are suggesting not just their own but other people’s posts. This is going to be heckuva job for me! All science bloggers are my friends and I will have to dissappoint so many of them in the end. I wish I could collect 500 posts instead of just 50.
As I stated in the original post, I am looking to showcase the diversity of science blogging. I got a lot of it already, but some things are dominating, while others are still missing. Can I get a poem? Something funny or satirical? Something about teaching science? A how-to recipe for a science experiment to do at home? Science for kids? Some history and philosophy of science? Check the original post for more ideas.
I understand that posts debunking Creationism and other types of pseudoscience are very popular. So are the posts dealing with political/religious assaults on science. A few of those will certainly make it, but there is a wealth of such stuff out there, the competition is really tough. On the other hand, if you can think of something unusual or unique, something that nobody else does, it may have a greater chance of making it into the blook than your best smack-down of Dembski.
I will try to find a way to let you help me make the choices, perhaps with some kind of a poll later on that will cut down the numbers to a little bit over 50. But in the end, the final fine-tuning of the final 50 will be up to me. While some bloggers are more popular than others, except in a case where a 2-parter can be fused into a single post, I don’t want to include more than one post by the same person. I still want more suggestions – keep them coming. Dont’ forget very old posts from 2, 3 or 4 years ago! Not everything needs to be from the last few months.
Below the fold are all the suggestions that have arrived so far (and I’ll keep adding more over the next few days as they keep coming in). Hover the cursor over the title to reveal the name of the blog. Checking these out may give you an idea of what is missing – what areas of science, what types of posts. Some of these posts may refresh your memory and remind you of another post that is really good. Alternatively, you may want to browse the archives of Tangled Bank, Grand Rounds, Carnival of the Green, Skeptic’s Circle, Mendel’s Garden, Bio::Blogs, The Synapse, Encephalon, Animalcules, Circus of the Spineless, I And The Bird, Panta Rei, Philosophia Naturalis, Change Of Shift, Pediatric Grand Rounds, Radiology Grand Rounds, Four Stone Hearth and Festival of the Trees for inspiration.
[Originally posted on Dec 23 at 2:52pm]
[Updated and placed on top on Dec 25 at 2:52pm]
[Updated and placed on top on Dec 28 at 2:52pm]
[Updated and placed on top on Jan 01 at 9:52am]

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Xan Gregg is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Robin Mackar is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Stephanie Holmgren is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Welcome a new SciBling!

Martin Rundkvist is a very smart guy. By renaming his blog from Salto Sobrius to Aardvarchaeology, he has displaced my blog from the vaunted #1 spot on the alphabetical list of SB blogs on the front page! Go say Hello and Welcome to this great addition to the Seed blogging family!

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Becky Oskin is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Welcome a new SciBling

Go say Hello to Developing Intelligence!

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Marissa Mills is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Fiona Morgan of Independent Weekly is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

A Question

What is the oldest science blog?
Not medicine, not technology/gizmos/gadgets, not conservation, not nature writing, not atheism – a real science blog?

What should be the title of the Science Blogging Anthology?

Here is the background information and here is the growing list of nominations.
I am still looking for a poem, a post about women and/or minorities in science, something from chemistry, geology and/or ecology (not environment/conservation), and a post about stereotypes of scientists in the society (e.g., movies, TV).
I have realized that having an online poll and asking people to evaluate 100+ posts will be too unwieldy, so instead I asked several of my friends, including a couple of SciBlings, several science bloggers not affiliated with Seed, a non-science blogger and a non-blogging scientist to help me evaluate all the entries.
Now, what should be title of the book? How about “The Open Laboratory” or “The Online Laboratory” suggesting both that it is about science and that the Web is a place for experimentation with a new medium and new ways of communication. What do you think? Any other suggestions?

Meta-Blogging

Meta-BloggingThis is so old (January 02, 2005) yet quite prescient…

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Patty and her mother Kim Gainer are coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Ready for the Koufaxes yet?

Now that the 2006 Weblog Awards are over (and congratulations to all of my favourites for wins or good showing), we are all warmed up and ready for the Real Deal – the Koufaxes!
First, and most importantly, go over to Wampum and hit their PayPal button (on the left top side-bar), or their Amazon.com donation button, and hit it with as much as you can. The way Koufaxes are done is real – no paperless voting machines there! And that costs. And it helps the community if the good folks of Wampum have enough money for the generator (yes, they make their own power!), servers, new hard-drives and everything else needed to do it right.
Second, go to this post and this post and answer some questions. What past categories need to be changed or eliminated? What new categories should be included (keeping in mind that every new category costs money and time)? Go tell them what you think.
I really like the idea of a “Human Equality” category that someone suggested, incorporating blogs fighting against inequalities based on gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, body type, etc., though I am afraid that the feminist and LGTB blogs would sweep the board – blogs like Pandagon, Shakespeare’s Sister, Feministe, Echidne of the Snakes, Majikthise, Bitch PhD, Pam’s House Blend, etc., are so well-known compared to blogs that deal with other equality-related matters, e.g., racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. Perhaps the two should be separated into two: “Best Gender/Orientation Equality Blog” and “Best Race/Class/Personal Appearance Equality Blog” categories. What do you think? Go tell it to the hosts and readers of Wampum.
Also, “Best Single Issue Blog” and “Best Expert Blog” have always seen a big overlap. People who constantly write about a single topic are, almost by definition, if nothing else due to time spent on it, considered “experts”. On the other hand, experts on a particular topic do not necessarily write only about that (see my own blog – my expertise is in animal physiology/behavior/chronobiology yet I write about politics, religion and many other topics all the time). So, in the past, many blogs have been nominated in both of these categories. I’d like to see, instead, something like “Best Social Science Blog” for topics like law, history, philosophy, ethics, economics, sociology, cultural anthropology, social psychology, political science, archaeology, linguistics, education, etc., and “Best Natural Science Blog” for math, science, medicine, nature, environment, science education, politics and policy of science/helath/environmet, skepticism and skeptical analysis of religion. (That way Juan Cole and PZ Myers can each win one category instead of duking it out every year).
A one-year cooling-off rule for overall categories (but not posts/series) is fine with me – this means that last year’s winners are not eligible in the category in which they won, except in categories of individual posts (best post, most humorous post, best series).
A way to set a precise criterion for who is “Deserving of Wider Recognition” is also a good idea as I agree with other Wampum commenters that some quite well-known and respected blogs tend to win that category. Perhaps Technorati rank is the best criterion, although imperfect. That is certainly better than the TTLB Ecosystem which many liberal blogs are boycotting.
Also, is the “New Blog” the same as the “New Blogger”? In other words, although I’ve been blogging since 2004, could I enter this blog (started in June 2006) as a New Blog or is that not fair to others because of my prior experience and name-recognition?
Finally, starts thinking now of blogs (and their individual posts or series) you want to nominate. Start making your own list and have it ready for the time the nominations open.
This will be the first year I will not have a series of my own to nominate (but I am thinking of nominating Echidne’s statistics series and Sara Robinson’s “Wall” series – still have to see how Dave Neiwert’s new series will look like once it’s finished). Unless you like my entire BIO101 class notes! As for individual posts, I will push Pledge of Allegiance as it appears to be quite popular, although you are free to check here or my current blog archives for something else from 2006 you may like better (re-posts of stuff originally published before 2006 are not eligible).

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Terry Smith is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Nicholas J. Meacham is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Lilyn Hester is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Help me put together The Anthology of the Best Science Blogging!

You may have seen (or even bought and read) those annual collections of science-related articles that were published in print press over a course of a year, e.g., The Best American Science Writing 2006 or The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2006. Wonderful stuff, written by real pros.
But we are bloggers – the TIME persons of the year! We think differently. We want amateurs, not pros. We want best in the world, not just American.
The idea about an anthology of best science writing came from Lulu.com, a local online publishing company, which has initially offered to print a collection of 50 best science blog posts of all time and donate a free copy to all participants at the Science Blogging Conference, then have it for sale (paperback – quite cheap) from their website afterwards.
Well, the time is short – one month exactly. Since it is possible that it will not get done in time for the conference, Lulu decided to sponsor the meeting in a different way, and we will talk to Lulu.com about some other way to make the book available when it comes out.
Lulu.com needs only a few days at the end of the process, but having the material ready for them will take some time. It may or may not be doable, but I want to try it anyway. Since I am organizing the conference, the whole blook-editing business somehow fell into my lap by default. Let’s see how I manage to do it. If this works out, we should do this every year (and do it a little bit before the holidays so it can be given as a present) with a different person serving as “editor” each year. Also, next year’s editor will have an easier time – only one year of posts to choose from. I’ll have to choose from all science posts ever written!
It would be really easy to get one post from each blog here at Seed and put them together into a book, but we represent only about 10% (at most) of the science blogging universe and there is great science blogging outside of SB empire as well (anything you can do to spread the word will be appreciated). So, this is a call for suggestions. From you!
Suggest your own best post of all time. Then suggest a few more unforgettable posts written by others over the years. Post links in the comments here or e-mail me. I guess a 2-part series can be fused into a single post and count as one. You can use this series of links or my new blogroll to organize your searches if you want.
Lulu.com can handle images, but cool photographs will probably not turn out too well as the images will be rendered in black and white (color is prohibitively expensive), so you may choose to change an image in your post into a version that renders better in b&w. Each post will have a URL printed and a disclaimer, if needed, to go online to see the images in their full beauty. We’ll also have a book webpage that will link to each of the 50 posts.
Copyrighted material may also be trouble. As you may be aware, it is impossible to embed audio or video files, polls and other interactive stuff into printed paper. Links also do not work on paper. So, try to choose posts that are text-rich and image-poor, with few or no links (we can place some URLs as footnotes). Certainly not posts that are totally dependent on the context provided by the stuff that is linked in it. If you want, you can mildly edit your own post to better fit this criterion and send me the final version as an MSWord file by e-mail. I will also ask each author of the final 50 chosen posts to give me and Lulu.com a permission to republish the work.
Let’s try to cover as great diversity of topics and styles (serious, chatty, satirical, funny) as possible:
Think of posts that cover math, astronomy, cosmology, physics, chemistry, earth science, atmospheric science, marine science, various subdisciplines of biology, psychology, anthropology, etc.
Think of posts that cover history, philosophy, ethics and sociology of science.
Think of posts that cover the life in academia, women and minorities in science, science education and teaching, open-source publishing, science writing, blogging and journalism.
Think of posts written from the perspectives of tenured and tenure-track professors, adjuncts, postdocs, grad students, undergards and high school students, administrators, researchers working in the industry or government, science teachers in elementary, middle and high schools.
Think of great nature writing, posts that combine science and literature (Cocktail Party Physics?), science and art (Chaotic Utopia, Rigor Vitae, Olduvai George?), science and poetry.
Think of posts that destroy arguments by Creationists, global warming deniers, and other examples of pseudoscience and quackery.
Think of medical case-study posts from the perspectives of physicians, nurses and patients.
Think of posts that focus on a political attack on science.
Think of posts that are about science (and scientists) in the popular culture: literature, movies, SF.
Think of posts that translate the scientese of a paper into English readable by lay readers.
Think of posts that show that a hot new paper is not as good as the hype suggests.
Think of posts that rail against the way media misrepresented a paper.
Think of posts that summarize a whole area of research, or even can serve as primers or teaching assignments.
Think of posts that contain unpublished data, or detail one’s current research.
Think of posts that contain information useful to the public, e.g., on Bird Flu.
If I get more than 50 suggestions (and the posts can be as old as you want), I can put them up for a vote or something and you can help me choose the top 50. Oh, and BTW, we need a good catchy title for the book!

Update:
Comments with multiple links automatically go to moderation. I will check the folder a few times a day and have your comments published as soon as I get to them.
Also, it may be a good idea to set a deadline. How about January 2nd at noon EST?
Update 2: I have started collecting links to submitted posts here.

Help fellow bloggers

Mr. Shakes had a traffic accident. Help the Shakes manor with a little donation on their PayPal button.
Also, Wampum folks need money for the generator in order to run the Koufaxes. Choose between PayPal button and Amazon.com button. While there, make suggestions for new categories and take a poll about it. How about a Science category? The righties had it this year and it is WE who are supposed to be “reality-based community”.

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Donna Sawyer is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

What not to blog about?

Here is one person’s view. I agree on being careful about revealing personal stuff (especially about other people), but I found that I get lots of comments on those rare occasions when I post a picture of a cat, so there must be a large audience for it out there. I have also been asked to write more about myself and often got links and comments on the most personal posts, so there must be a large audience for that kind of stuff out there. What do you think?
He also links to two interesting and informative posts on ProBlogger about what to do with your blog while on vacation and how to get more comments. What do you all think?

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Chris Brodie of the American Scientist magazine is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

FemiBlogging of the Week, Month, Year and Forever

The 29th Carnival of Feminists is up on The imponderabilia of actual life containing posts by several of my favourite bloggers, including Zuska who has her own pick of favourites there.
Speaking of Zuska, she also has a cool article in the inaugural issue of the new science-culture Inkling Magazine, the brainchild of the magnificent blogging Trio Fantasticus of Inkycircus.
And while we are on the topic, Razib exhibits a complete lack of sense of irony, i.e., the inability to see sarcasm and seeing seriousness instead.

Year in Review Meme

OK, everyone is doing this (Janet was the last one I saw), so I’ll do it, too. Instead of writing a creative year in review, just copy the first sentence of the first blogpost of each month in 2006. Until June 9th I had three blogs, so I have to pick the first sentence from the first post on each! Since then, this is the only one. Here are mine (I skipped quick shout-outs to carnivals and such):
January
I am obviously using the extended holidays to recharge my blogging batteries.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute which funds a number of researchers in the field, has made, a couple of years ago, an excellent website about circadian rhythms.
Look at these different views on the same incident (a student expelled from Le Moyne College in upstate NY for writing a paper endorsing corporal punishment)
February
Give up on working today…as there is just too much cool stuff to read!
Interesting, but not surprising, though the mechanism may be different in SAD and other disorders.
I will be hosting the sixth edition of the Teaching Carnival on Science And Politics (my ‘home’ blog) on February 15th, 2006.
March
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
The very first circadian rhythm ever observed was a rhythm of opening and closing of leaves of a mimosa plant.
Rob the Dirty Liberal has some interesting and thought-provoking ideas about a college freshman science course – or how one can be designed: University Science Education: A New Approach.
April
I don’t know how much that will help in the future, but nobody beats John Edwards in Internet savvy.
This being the National Sleep Awareness Week and in the heels of the recent study on sleep of adolescents, it is not surprising that this issue is all over the media, including blogs, these days.
This being the National Sleep Awareness Week and on the heels of the recent study on sleep of adolescents, it is not surprising that this issue is all over the media, including blogs, these days.
(actually, the two posts are completely different except for the first sentence)
May
Videos from this conference can now be found here.
I wrote before about the effects of circadian time and/or body temperature on time perception.
This is the summary of the first part of the first lecture in Introduction to Life Science (this is a science requirement for non-science majors at an accelerated adult education program at a community college).
June
After enjoying Bryant Park for a while, taking pictures, and exchanging presents (actually, receiving presents, including chocolate bananas) it was time to move on.
Interesting idea, via Sleep Disorders blog: a pre-recorded morning talk-show puts you to sleep because it is a distraction from Real Life worries that may otherwise keep you awake at night, yet no need to worry that you’ll miss something interesting.
Biology is concerned with answering two Big Questions: how to explain the adaptation of organisms to their environments and how to explain the diversity of life on Earth.
OK, let’s try to figure out this Movable Type thingie.
July
Go here to see what the best strategy is for maximizing the impact.
August
A couple of days ago I took my son to see “Monster House”.
September
First seen on Thought From Kansas.
October
Wow, it’s been a while since I last hosted the Tar Heel Tavern.
November
Yikes! I hope nobody gave you this candy last night!
December
Genes may help predict infidelity, study finds: Could DNA tests tell you your risk of being cuckolded?
Hmmm, it seems I almost never start a month with a decent post! I’ll have to try better next year for the sake of this meme!

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Neil Gussman of the Chemical Heritage Foundation is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Blogrolling: Z

We finally got to the end of the alphabet. Now I’ll try to put everything together and provide a link to a complete blogroll. But you can keep telling me what good blogs are missing…

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Laurie McCauley from Lee County School is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

No Blogger MeetUp tonight

We will not be meeting tonight. Check http://www.blogtogether.org for further annoucements.

Blogrolling: Y

Almost there….

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Katarina Aram of Purdue University, a commenter on Panda’s Thumb is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

NC blogging of the week

Ah, everyone is too busy getting ready for the holidays to remember to send their entries to the Tar Heel Tavern, so, this week, it is pretty small, but I am glad to see that I am not the only one writing about driving and traffic.
BTW, do not forget the Chapel Hill/Carrboro Blogger MeetUp tonight at 7pm at the library.

Blogrolling: X

I know only these two – do you know any others:
Xark!
Xenogere / strange behavior /

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Boris Hartl of North Carolina Biotechnology Center is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

I am the TIME Magazine’s Person of the Year!

And so are you!
Blogs rule!

Blogrolling: W

Almost there! A couple of more days and we’ll be done! So, check out the W-list and suggest some more.

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Brian Hayes is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Today is “Reveal Your Blog Crush Day”

December 15th. Officially. Fire away. Viaviavia (read thos “vias” for more information about what it all means).

Blogrolling: V

V-V-V, vot begins with V? Very vicious veblogs! V-V-V!

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Tong Ren is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Blogrolling: U

Any other notable blogs starting with U?

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
Joy McCracken is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

The State of Our Cephalopodion Is Strong

It’s not just PZ any more. The Scienceblogs.com will now see twice as many squid, cuttlefish, octopuses and nautiluses than before. How? Why? Because the reinforcements are here! Welcome our newest SciBlings, the Deep Sea News!

Blogrolling: T

OK, is there a blog missing from this list?

Continue reading

SBC – NC’07

NCSciBlogging.jpg
David Elstein is coming to the 2007 North Carolina Science Blogging Conference. Are you?
Technorati Tag:

Rockridge Nation Blog

When the Rockridge Insitute was first founded, there were forums on the site for a few months, which were then shut down. Today, the Institute starts a new blog/forum Rockridge Nation, “a community of progressives working to frame the issues and restore our values to the heart of public life. This blog will draw attention to some of the interesting questions, stories, and analysis that members of Rockridge Nation contribute.”

Eponym Blog Directory

There are not enough science blogs in this new directory. Perhaps we can all do something to change that. Feel free to use my “blogrolling” posts for ideas.

Blogrolling: S

S is the most popular initial letter for blog names, it appears! Can you even wade through all of these and remember those I missed?

Continue reading