Archy sums it all up in An object lesson in Wiki research. Nice to see a professional historian take a look at history of pseudoscience.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,499 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Save the Mountain Walrus
- Clock Tutorial #16: Photoperiodism - Models and Experimental Approaches
- ScienceOnline2012 – interview with Sean Ekins
- LaTeX fan? You can now use your favourite software to submit manuscripts to PLoS ONE
- Who are you, dear readers?
- Math 2.0 Webinar tonight
- I am practically famous!
- Written In Stone: interview with Brian Switek
- And now the scientists will do whatever they damned please (start shouting, most likely)
- Today's carnivals
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






To be fair, Arch doesn’t really focus on pseudoscience, but on the inappropriate addition of material to Wikipedia.
The article is more about catastrophism, than Velikovsky per se. More about Velikovsky and pesudoscience and can be found in the “Pseudoscience” article at the Velikovsky Encyclopedia at:
http://www.velikovsky.info