Archy sums it all up in An object lesson in Wiki research. Nice to see a professional historian take a look at history of pseudoscience.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,499 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- Amanda behind the scene
- NYC SciBlings MeetUp - Saturday meeting the readers
- Lindau blogger meetup
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- Open Laboratory 2011 - submissions so far
- Social Jet-Lag
- Obligatory Readings of the Day - the Ken Hamm and Beyond edition
- The Virtual Computing Lab
- And I'll Huff, And I'll Puff...
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






To be fair, Arch doesn’t really focus on pseudoscience, but on the inappropriate addition of material to Wikipedia.
The article is more about catastrophism, than Velikovsky per se. More about Velikovsky and pesudoscience and can be found in the “Pseudoscience” article at the Velikovsky Encyclopedia at:
http://www.velikovsky.info