Archy sums it all up in An object lesson in Wiki research. Nice to see a professional historian take a look at history of pseudoscience.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,504 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- Today's carnivals
- Best posts on Media, (Science) Journalism and Blogging at A Blog Around The Clock
- Open Laboratory 2010 - two weeks to go!
- UC Berkeley Genetic Testing Affair: Science vs Science Education - guest post by Dr.Marie-Claire Shanahan
- BIO101 - Physiology: Regulation and Control
- Clock Quotes
- A “sixth sense” for earthquake prediction? Give me a break!
- ScienceOnline2010 - introducing the participants
- Are cryptochromes involved in magnetoreception in migratory birds?
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






To be fair, Arch doesn’t really focus on pseudoscience, but on the inappropriate addition of material to Wikipedia.
The article is more about catastrophism, than Velikovsky per se. More about Velikovsky and pesudoscience and can be found in the “Pseudoscience” article at the Velikovsky Encyclopedia at:
http://www.velikovsky.info