Do you remember when Mitch Waldrop wrote a draft of an article about Science 2.0 and asked for community feedback? He got 125 comments. Using them, he has now finalized the text and it appears in today’s edition of Scientific American: Science 2.0 — Is Open Access Science the Future? Is posting raw results online, for all to see, a great tool or a great risk?
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Postscript to Pittendrigh's Pet Project - Phototaxis, Photoperiodism and Precise Projectile Parabolas of Pilobolus on Pasture Poop
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- ScienceOnline2012 – interview with Sarah Webb
- Sunday Carnivals
- New election rules?
- Welcome a new SciBling
- SBC - NC'07
- My picks from ScienceDaily
- A Bar Around The Clock
- Clocks and Migratory Orientation in Monarch Butterflies
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter





