That is, in a nutshell, the conclusion of this study. If you have free access to a lot of literature, you are much more likely to click on links and download PDFs (which hopefully means you will read the papers, learn from them, improve your science, and cite them when writing your own manuscripts). If you know that most of the time you will see a “pay $60” page instead, you don’t bother clicking anyway.
Also, this mainly applies to the new papers – the older papers are rarely looked at – so there is no real need to keep archives TA for any lengthy periods of time.
Peter Suber comments.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,499 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- ScienceOnline2010 - interview with Tara Richerson
- Biophilia? Not what E.O.Wilson had in mind!
- BIO101 - From Two Cells To Many: Cell Differentiation and Embryonic Development
- Sharks down => Rays up => Scallops down
- Scienceblogging: LabSpaces – a Q&A with Brian Krueger
- Strange Search Queries...
- Two new posts on the SciAm Guest Blog
- ClockQuotes
- ScienceOnline2011 – interview with Seth Mnookin
- Congratulations to Karen James!
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter





