That is, in a nutshell, the conclusion of this study. If you have free access to a lot of literature, you are much more likely to click on links and download PDFs (which hopefully means you will read the papers, learn from them, improve your science, and cite them when writing your own manuscripts). If you know that most of the time you will see a “pay $60” page instead, you don’t bother clicking anyway.
Also, this mainly applies to the new papers – the older papers are rarely looked at – so there is no real need to keep archives TA for any lengthy periods of time.
Peter Suber comments.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,499 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Fighting Giraffes
- Biology and the Scientific Method
- The 50 Most Important, Influential, and Promising People in Science
- What is a Science Blog?
- NeuroBlogging of the Week
- 42
- No more science on CNN!
- ScienceOnline2010 - Writing for more than glory: Proposals and Pitches that Pay (video) - Part 1
- Blogrolling for Today
- Why can't journalists call it as it is?
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter





