…does not mean we should. Actually, as their lying is supposed to be their downfall, we need to make extra care not to provide any contra-examples that they can use against us in order to immunize themselves from the charge.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Drumroll, please! Introducing: Scienceblogging.org
- Some fun stats about the participants of ScienceOnline2011
- Science Blogging Networks: What, Why and How
- The Big Announcement, this time for real: The Scientific American Blog Network has launched!
- Web breaks echo-chambers, or, 'Echo-chamber' is just a derogatory term for 'community' - my remarks at #AAASmtg
- The Open Laboratory 2010 - now up for sale!
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- Alert! Some Big And Important And Exciting News!
- Today's carnivals
- Scientific Communication all-you-can-eat Linkfest
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






It’s called snark, There are plenty of diarists over at kos that use it, and that label their diaries as such.
Perhaps the diarist did not make the distinction clear enough, as some commenters did not recognize the snark either, but it’s hardly a lie.
Yes, but this has to be made super-obvious, so the other side cannot quote it out of context.