Ideas in Ecology and Evolution is a new Open Access journals which is also experimenting with the review process.
Bob O’Hara and commenters go into details. I hope it does not end like Medical Hypotheses: a great source of blog-fodder for snarky bloggers and not much else. We’ll keep an eye….
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Postscript to Pittendrigh's Pet Project - Phototaxis, Photoperiodism and Precise Projectile Parabolas of Pilobolus on Pasture Poop
- E.O. Wilson wins 2007 TED Prize - watch his acceptance speech
- Does circadian clock regulate clutch-size in birds? A question of appropriatness of the model animal.
- Local blogging - what's new
- The Public Park Parable of Political Psychology
- The Lark-Mouse and the Prometheus-Mouse
- SBC-NC'08 - we have a sponsor!
- Books: "Biased Embryos and Evolution" by Wallace Arthur
- My picks from ScienceDaily
- The Scientific Paper: past, present and probable future
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






I am the editor of Medical Hypotheses – Hi!
I agree that the journal does seem intensely to irritate a certain kind of science blogger – some of whom have apparently had their sense of humor excised along with any scientific adventurousness thay may once have possessed ;=)
However, the Thomson ISI Impact Factor of 1.3 and c. 45000 article downloads per month are objective evidence that Medical Hypotheses also plays a significant scientific function.
Peer review is neither necessray nor sufficient for science, and not all journals should be peer reviewed. There is space for a diversity of editorial evaluation processes, surely?
Live and let live…