Neil Fraser was curious about this question, so he built a centrifuge at home and recorded a lava lamp at 3G (which is higher than Jupiter, actually). He explains the details here.
[hat-tip]
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- Little Red Riding Hood explained
- BIO101 - From One Cell To Two: Cell Division and DNA Replication
- Obligatory Reading of the Day: Crayfish tail-flip response
- Weather prognosis for Chapel Hill NC for the next five days
- The Confederate black soldiers were really Union black soldiers
- New post on the SciAm Guest Blog - Anasazi
- Sex On The Brain (of the science reporters)
- Clock Tutorial #15: Seasonality
- 2011 in review
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






It must be a lot more fun to be a mad inventor nowadays when you can show the result of your wierd experiments on youtube and get an audience 🙂
Niel should send this to the Mechano folks (since it looks like a mechano set was used. Seriously it does suggest that the density contrast in the Lava lamp is to large to work as well at 3 g as one g. Which is not surprising, given the greater forces involved. Clearly one could build a lava lamp for Jupiter, but might want to pick materials where the force difference was more equivalent to the difference in forces on the earth. This does suggest that if one went up much further in G forces the lamp would cease to work as the materials permanently stratify after the heat reaches equilibrium.