Science Communicators of North Carolina meeting at NIEHS

The March SCONC meeting will be Wednesday, March 5, at 6 p.m. at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) in RTP. The evening will include presentations on how NIEHS research impacts public health, the new NIEHS Web site and highlights of a few of the Institute’s important research programs.

Books on careers in science

Anne-Marie reviews two books that appear to be useful in thinking about one’s career in science: The Beginner’s Guide to Winning a Nobel Prize, by Peter Doherty, and The Chicago Guide to Landing a Job in Academic Biology, by Chandler, Wolfe, and Promislow. Read the review and, if you think this is something you need, buy the books.
And, if you have additional recommendations, let Anne-Marie know in her comments.

Today’s carnivals

The latest Festival of the Trees is up on Orchards Forever.
The 26th edition of Gene Genie is up on ScienceBase

ClockQuotes

Lives of great men all remind us
We can make our lives sublime,
And, departing, leave behind us
Footprints on the sands of time.

– Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

My picks from ScienceDaily

Fighting Australian Crayfish Do Not Forget The Face Of Foes:

The fighting Australian yabby, a type of crayfish, smaller than a lobster but similar in appearance, does not forget the face of its foes says new research from University of Melbourne zoologists. The two year study involving over 100 pairs of yabbies revealed that the species Cherax destructor is capable of facial recognition of individuals, particularly its opponents.

Why Juniper Trees Can Live On Less Water:

An ability to avoid the plant equivalent of vapor lock and a favorable evolutionary history may explain the unusual drought resistance of junipers, some varieties of which are now spreading rapidly in water-starved regions of the western United States, a Duke University study has found.

New Theory For Dogfish And Skate Population Outburst, Off New England Shore, US:

New research by scientists at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Chesapeake Biological Laboratory questions the long-held belief that a lack of predators and competitors was the primary cause for the increase of skates and dogfish observed in Southern New England’s George’s Bank following overfishing of commercially important species in the 1980’s.

Evidence Of ‘Rain-making’ Bacteria Discovered In Atmosphere And Snow:

Brent Christner, LSU professor of biological sciences, in partnership with colleagues in Montana and France, recently found evidence that rain-making bacteria are widely distributed in the atmosphere. These biological particles could factor heavily into the precipitation cycle, affecting climate, agricultural productivity and even global warming. Christner and his colleagues published their results on Feb 29 in the journal Science.

Building Brains: Mammalian-like Neurogenesis In Fruit Flies:

The nerve cells in the brain of Drosophila are generated by neural stem cell-like progenitor cells called neuroblasts. In the currently accepted model of neurogenesis, these neuroblast divide asymmetrically both to self renew and to produce a smaller progenitor cell. This smaller cell then divides only once into two daughter cells, which receive cell fate determinants, causing them to exit the cell cycle and differentiate into postmitotic neural cells.

Enormous Jurassic Sea Predator, Pliosaur, Discovered In Norway:

Natural History Museum in Oslo, Norway has announced the discovery of one of the largest dinosaur-era marine reptiles ever found – an enormous sea predator known as a pliosaur estimated to be almost 15 meters (50 feet) feet long.

Chimps May Have A ‘Language-ready’ Brain:

An area of the brain involved in the planning and production of spoken and signed language in humans plays a similar role in chimpanzee communication, researchers report.

What Caused Westward Expansion In The United States?:

Western Expansion during the nineteenth century was an important determinant of geographic distribution and economic activity in the United States today. However, while explanations abound for why the migration occurred– from the low price of land to a pioneering spirit — little empirical work has been done to determine which specific market forces were the most important drivers.

ScienceDebate08 – the warm-up act

You probably heard that representatives of two presidential campaigns showed up at the AAAS meeting last month in Boston and partipated in a panel, which may lead to the ScienceDebate08 becoming reality. Now, The New Scientist provides the video of this event with some commentary:

See all the videos here.

Today’s carnivals

The First Anniversary edition of Scientiae is up on Rants of a feminist engineer
Four Stone Hearth #35 is up on Archaeoporn
History Carnival #62 is up on Spinning Clio : Where History and Politics Meet
Friday Ark #180 is up on Modulator

ClockQuotes

Two things are aesthetically perfect in the world – the clock and the cat.
– Emile Auguste Chartier

Blogrolling for Today

The World We Don’t Live In


Michael Nielsen


A & A’s Excellent Adventure


Ecosystems and Poverty


Rat in the Lab


The Biology Refugia


Fresh Brainz

New and Exciting in PLoS Genetics

Two of the papers published today in PLoS Genetics (now on the TOPAZ platform) got my attention:
Redundant Function of REV-ERBα and β and Non-Essential Role for Bmal1 Cycling in Transcriptional Regulation of Intracellular Circadian Rhythms:

Circadian clocks in plants, fungi, insects, and mammals all share a common transcriptional network architecture. At the cellular level, the mammalian clockwork consists of a core Per/Cry negative feedback loop and additional interlocking loops. We wished to address experimentally the contribution of the interlocking Bmal1 loop to clock function in mammals. Because behavioral rhythms do not always reflect cell-autonomous phenotypes and are subject to pleiotropic effects, we employed cell-based genetic approaches and monitored rhythms longitudinally using bioluminescent reporters of clock gene expression. We showed that REV-ERB repressors play a more prominent role than ROR activators in regulating the Bmal1 rhythm. However, significant rhythmicity remains even with constitutive expression of Bmal1, pointing to the resilience of the core loop to perturbations of the Bmal1 loop. We conclude that while the interlocking loop contributes to fine-tuning of the core loop, its primary function is to provide discrete waveforms of clock gene expression for control of local physiology. This study has important general implications not only for circadian biology across species, but also for the emerging field of systems biology that seeks to understand complex interactions in genetic networks.

Identification of the Yellow Skin Gene Reveals a Hybrid Origin of the Domestic Chicken:

Many bird species possess yellow skin and legs whereas other species have white or black skin color. Yellow or white skin is due to the presence or absence of carotenoids. The genetic basis underlying this diversity is unknown. Domestic chickens with yellow skin are homozygous for a recessive allele, and white skinned chickens carry the dominant allele. As a result, chickens represent an ideal model for analyzing genetic mechanism responsible for skin color variation. In this study we demonstrate that yellow skin is caused by regulatory mutation(s) that inhibit expression of the beta-carotene dioxygenase 2 (BCDO2) enzyme in skin, but not in other tissues. Because BCDO2 cleaves colorful carotenoids into colorless apocarotenoids, a reduction in expression of this gene produces yellow skin. This study also provides the first conclusive evidence of a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. It has been generally assumed that the red junglefowl is the sole ancestor of the domestic chicken. A phylogenetic analysis, however, demonstrates that though the white skin allele originates from the red junglefowl, the yellow skin allele originates from a different species, most likely the grey junglefowl. This result significantly advances our understanding of chicken domestication.

Greg Laden explains.

Don’t try this at home

See the moment when the lion recognizes the guys who raised him as a cub:

Hat-tip: Melissa

You cannot resist the power of The ScienceBorg!

Just try this link: http://scienceborg.com

Rita Colwell on ScienceDebate2008

See all the clips here.

Happy Leap Day

Though, at some times and places in history, February 24th was considered to be the Leap Day. For the more science-oriented folks, Phil Plait explains why we have leap days.

Awesome! In a scary way….

Watch to the end to see how just huge this thing is!

From Frischer Wind, via Page 3.14

‘Insomnia: A Cultural History’

Book excerpt in today’s Wall Street Journal: Chapter 6: Wired:

It is likely that insomnia will increase with the expansion of the 24-hour economy into more and more lives, and more of each life, because wakefulness and the wired world go together. The more interconnected we are, the more we communicate, and the more we communicate, the more we rely on our interconnected powers of thinking. In addition to work, many of our leisure pursuits, while seemingly soporific, actually undermine the likelihood of restful sleep, from drinking alcohol to surfing the net to watching thrillers on late-night television. At the same time, these are often required to enable the passage between our increased workday and our decreased sleeping night to occur at all. In some cases, our leisure and workday activities may be conflated by medium — many of us use computers or mobile phones at work, and go on line or into text-mode for personal, leisure-related reasons as well. Or our sleeping times may be disrupted by shift work necessarily done while others sleep or in cognisance of the fact — as in the financial sector — that at any moment somewhere in the world the populace is working and awake, and that there is no time to lose in speculating upon its — or its capital’s — futures.

It is longish but worth your time.

Darwin Quotes

Charles_Darwin.jpgHere we see how potent has been the effect of the introduction of a single tree, nothing whatever else having been done, with the exception that the land had been enclosed so that cattle could not enter. But how important an enclosure is, I plainly saw in Farnham, in Surrey. Here there are extensive heaths, with a few clumps of old Scotch firs on the distant hill tops: within the last ten years large spaces have been enclosed, and self-sown first are now springing up in multitudes, so close together that all cannot live.
– Charles R. Darwin, Origin of Species, p.123
Support The Beagle Project
Read the Beagle Project Blog
Buy the Beagle Project swag
Prepare ahead for the Darwin Bicentennial
Read Darwin for yourself.
Hat-tip: Tom.

On this day in history

150 years ago Alfred Russel Wallace sent a letter to Charles Darwin, describing natural selection.
55 years ago, Watson and Crick announced the structure of DNA.

Various updates

First, the interviews will continue….when I get some answers from one of the six people I sent questions to…. I will also be sending questionnaires to more people soon.
Second, there are some responses now to the 1-2-3, the Goosed/Book meme. First, Chad Orzel provides several interesting quotes. And now Tom Levenson responded with not one but two elaborate, illustrated posts: I’ve Been Tagged! Reading and writing and all that jazz. and I’ve Been Tagged! — Darwin follow up. Update: Eric Roston and Jennifer Ouellette did it, too. And Vanessa as well.
I was also tagged by another meme, about a historical figure, and once I picked the person I realized I first had to order and read a book! So, this will take a fe wmore days.
Third, I will reciprocate to Arunn and write a BPR3-style post soon. I have a stack of printed-out papers as well as half a desktop covered with icons of PDF files of papers accumulated over the last six months or so that I want to comment on. I’ll try to find some time very soon to do this. Perhaps more than one.
Finally, the conversation about What is a Science Blog? continues, so check out the posts by Greg Laden, Mike the Mad Biologist, PhysioProf (and again), John Hawks, Mike Haubrich, Razib, ~C4Chaos and Julia . Update: Janet Stemwedel and John Wilkins add their thoughts. As do Abel and Brian…And Jason and Selva and Greg again. And Lim Leng Hiong, Michael White and Ignored Ethos…And Greg and Chris…And Chad and Arunn….

My picks from ScienceDaily

This Is Your Brain On Jazz: Researchers Use MRI To Study Spontaneity, Creativity:

A pair of Johns Hopkins and government scientists have discovered that when jazz musicians improvise, their brains turn off areas linked to self-censoring and inhibition, and turn on those that let self-expression flow.

More coverage from Smooth Pebbles, Mind Hacks, Wired Science, Neurophilosophy, Science A Go Go, PsychCentral and The Rehearsal Studio
Evolution Of Aversion: Why Even Children Are Fearful Of Snakes:

Some of the oldest tales and wisest mythology allude to the snake as a mischievous seducer, dangerous foe or powerful iconoclast; however, the legend surrounding this proverbial predator may not be based solely on fantasy. As scientists from the University of Virginia recently discovered, the common fear of snakes is most likely intrinsic.

By Sixth Grade Nearly One In Six Children Are Alcohol Users, Study Shows:

A study by the University of Minnesota School of Public Health and the University of Florida suggests that ‘tweens’ should receive alcohol prevention programs prior to sixth grade, when nearly one in six children are already alcohol users.

Chad Orzel comments.
Polluted Prey Causes Wild Birds To Change Their Tune:

Considerable attention has been paid to the effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals in aquatic environments, but rather less attention has been given to routes of contamination on land. A new study by researchers at Cardiff University, reveals that wild birds foraging on invertebrates contaminated with environmental pollutants, show marked changes in both brain and behaviour: male birds exposed to this pollution develop more complex songs, which are actually preferred by the females, even though these same males usually show reduced immune function compared to controls.

Catching Rats’ Twitchy Whiskers In Action:

Rats use their whiskers in a way that is closely related to the human sense of touch: Just as humans move their fingertips across a surface to perceive shapes and textures, rats twitch their whiskers to achieve the same goal. Now, in a finding that could help further understanding of perception across species, MIT neuroscientists have used high-speed video to reveal rat whiskers in action and show the tiny movements that underlie the rat’s perception of its tactile environment.

Spread Of Bird Flu Strains Slowed At Some Borders:

Several strains of the bird flu virus that raged across southern China were blocked from entering Thailand and Vietnam, UC Irvine researchers have discovered. This first-ever statistical analysis of influenza A H5N1’s genetic diversity helps scientists better understand how the virus migrates and could, in the future, help health officials determine whether efforts to thwart its spread were successful.

From Sharks To Microbes, Key Data At Central Pacific’s Line Islands Archipelago Captured:

An ambitious expedition led by scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego to a chain of little-known islands in the central Pacific Ocean has yielded an unprecedented wealth of information about coral reefs and threats from human activities. The exploration of four atolls in the Line Islands, part of a chain approximately a thousand miles south of Hawaii, has produced the first study of coral reefs comprehensively spanning organisms from microbes to sharks. This in-depth description was replicated across a gradient of human impacts, from uninhabited Kingman Reef to Kiritimati, also called Christmas Island, with a population of 5,000 people.

More from Resilience Science

Today’s carnivals

The 30th edition of Circus of the Spineless is up on A DC Birding Blog
Berry Go Round #2 is up on Further thoughts
Skeptics’ Circle #81 is up on Conspiracy Factory

Darwin Quotes

Charles_Darwin.jpgA man’s friendships are one of the best measures of his worth.
– Charles R. Darwin
Support The Beagle Project
Read the Beagle Project Blog
Buy the Beagle Project swag
Prepare ahead for the Darwin Bicentennial
Read Darwin for yourself.

Blogrolling for Today

SECular Thoughts


Free Range Academy


Nimravid’s Weblog


Thesis – with Children


Frontal Blogotomy

What is a Science Blog?

A blog is software.
Importantly: a blog is free software.
Everyone can use it in any way they want. If there are 100 million blogs out there, there are 100 million blogging styles and 100 million ideas what blogging “is”. And anyone who dares tell others how to do it incurs the wrath of the other 100 million who are NOT going to be told what to do. Blogosphere is democratic – the voice of millions of individuals who finally have the ability to have their voices heard. They will never accept any authority telling them how to do it and what they can or cannot write.
This means that one also cannot define the sub-nodes of the blogosphere. If you say “I am a science blogger”, you are. Technorati will not remove your “science” tag if you are spewing creationist crap every day. That’s just how it is. But if you do post creationist screeds, don’t expect not to get called on it or accepted into the science blogging community. And who is the science blogging community? People who consider each other members of it.
So, what is a science blog? A blog that is written by a scientist OR a blog that more or less regularly covers science-related topics, links to and gets links from other science blogs. It is about perspective. A scientist has a scientific outlook on life. A scientist even does LOLcats differently than others. And every science blogger does it differently which is his/her prerogative.
Which brings us to the most recent upheaval, coming from this post on Bayblab. Greg, Chad, Brian, PZ, Dave, Ian, Larry, PhysioProf, Michael and DrugMonkey give good, useful and, of course, being bloggers, idiosyncratic responses.
Of course, this discussion is nothing new. We had a big one a couple of years ago – if you missed it, I have collected all the links here.
And what came out of that discussion? A bunch of stuff:
1) Two Science Blogging Conferences and some very informative discussions coming out of them – see the blog coverage from the first one and the second one. See the series of post-Conference interviews for a variety of opinions about science blogging.
2) We (and by we I mean science bloggers, not sciencebloggers) collectively edited two Science Blogging Anthologies – see the OpenLab 2006 and OpenLab 2007. Less then half of the chosen entries are from SB bloggers in both books. If you look inside, very few of the chosen posts are comments on the latest paper. They cover some aspect of science, often much broader than a single paper, often from a historical, philosophical, political or personal perspective. They explain something scientific, or some aspect of the business of science, or the life in science, in a personal voice, often with humor, but also always with authority. These are the posts that most people liked and agreed were the best that science blogging has to offer.
3) Scienceblogs.com grew from 14 to 71 blogs. Yes, a few invited bloggers refused to join and a few left, but for the most part, this is the place to be and a great honor. The overall traffic skyrocketed. A number of us commented how much more careful we are about mouthing off on various topics, scientific or not, since we joined as our scienceblogging peers are right here and quick to point out our BS. And yes, we are a community, we are friends, we meet each other in meatspace whenever we can because we have common interests and similar outlook on life. That is good, what blogging is all about, not cliquishness.
4) Others are forming science blogging communities and trying to learn from the success of scienceblogs.com. See how bloggers on Nature Blog Network are using our experience to build a stronger community there. Reading each other, commenting on each others’ blogs, linking to each other, and meeting each other in meatspace – all those are important elements of building a community.
Scientificblogging.com is another blogging community. They have a different model. Almost all of it is commentary on the freshest papers. This is fine, but is unlikely to draw much of an audience. Popular magazines, like Wired, are trying to do the same.
What we do is draw people in with things they are interested in, then deliver them to science posts and show them it is exciting, interesting and fun – and they did not even know it before. They came by googling for “Britney Spears” or “naked Harry Potter” or something about creationism or atheism, and they stay to read posts about science. That is one of the services we as science bloggers provide. And once we draw those readers in, we also send them, via links, to other people – both inside and outside our network – to read about even more science, perhaps to bloggers who do not like to blog about LOLcats or politics, but do a good job covering latest research. There is a role for every style.
And, as SB is the most popular such network (The Borg) we are very aware of our responsibility to not let the bloggers outside bite our dust. We consciously link to non-SB bloggers all the time. Scroll through my front page and compare the number of links to Sciblings and a number of links to outside bloggers. Check my blogroll. Do the same exercise on other SB blogs. Don’t use postgenomics (great tool, but does not even try to measure the popularity of individual science blogs) to order the blogs – check their traffic, see who links to them using Technorati. Yes, some of the best are here, but also, some of the best are not here. The editors are trying to put together a diverse group – diversity in topics, styles, formats and voices. They often listen to our advice when choosing who to invite next – thus people we read and linked to before, when they were outside, our now SciBlings and we continue to read each other. And meet for beer when we can. That is how a community organically grows. Nobody is snubbed a priori. There is no closed impenetrable circle. Write a good blog, let me know and if I like it I’ll link to you and blogroll you – you all know this by now. If I really, really like your new blog and keep liking it for several months, you bet I will be bothering the overlords daily to send you an invite – it worked for several people already.
Another way we support the broader science blogging community is by starting, organizing, hosting, participating in and linking to science/nature/medicine/education blog carnivals (see this, this, this, this and this to see how carnivals build community).
Oh, yes, we get paid. My blog is usually one of the top 10-12 blogs here by traffic and what I get paid on a very, very good month (i.e,. getting slahdotted, dugg, stumbled, reditted, linked from DailyKos, Pharyngula, Pandagon, Shakesville, etc.) pays for a quarter of my rent. When I first moved here, I earned about as much as I did through blogads on the old blog. I forget about it on most months and am surprised when I find the check in the mail. The only thing when signing the contract, I think they pleaded with us not to post porn. We can do with our blogs whatever we want. SB can be considered just a blogging platform for us, with tech support, and the fact that many of us feel like belonging to a community is a definite plus.
It’s been a while since I last wrote a post on a recent paper. I post a lot of other stuff and almost all of it is somewhat related to science. My readers include scientists and science bloggers, but also liberal and atheist bloggers, North Carolina and Balkans bloggers, and my Mom. Some of them like my Quotes, others like personal posts, others like a good political rant (rare these days, I know), some use my blog to keep up with what’s new in Open Access and PLoS, and others just like me for idisyncratic reasons. So, yes, I am a science blogger but not ONLY a science blogger. I am a more complicated person, and I will let all those complications get revealed on the blog. People like to see that I am a human, not just a pipetter.
My most popular post ever is this one – it combines science, society, sex, personality and even literature in one long post. It mentions several scientific papers, including one that was published right around that time, but it also summarizes the results of decades of research in several areas. And it still gets hits three years later.
About a third of my daily traffic goes to my BIO101 lecture notes – no blogging on recent papers there. Every now and then someone teaches a chronobiology course and my Clock Tutorials get some traffic. The Lysenko post is used in a California class every year. Science posts covering the basics, infused with personality and humor, seem to be the most lasting posts, with the greatest long-term impact. Harry Potter posts, just like posts on the latest scientific papers, come and go fast. Nothing wrong with blogging on both, and I did it a large number of times, but those are peripherals for me. Building and keeping a community, making friends, networking, proselytizing my pet causes (e.g., Open Access) and making good clear explanations of basics easy to find by Google are reasons why I blog. And I will never tell you how and why you should blog yourself. None of my business.

Today’s carnivals

Carnival of Education #160 is up on the Sam Jackson College Experience
Carnival of the Liberals #59 is up on The Largest Minority

Lawrence Krauss on ScienceDebate2008

Check all the video clips here.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Bats Use Magnetic Substance As Internal Compass To Help Them Navigate:

They may not be on most people’s list of most attractive species, but bats definitely have animal magnetism. Researchers from the Universities of Leeds and Princeton have discovered that bats use a magnetic substance in their body called magnetite as an ‘internal compass’ to help them navigate.

Or, if you prefer a much livelier take, with context, check out Pondering Pikaia
Why Do We Love Babies? Parental Instinct Region Found In The Brain:

Why do we almost instinctively treat babies as special, protecting them and enabling them to survive? Darwin originally pointed out that there is something about infants which prompts adults to respond to and care for them which allows our species to survive. Nobel-Prize-winning zoologist Konrad Lorenz proposed that it is the specific structure of the infant face, including a relatively large head and forehead, large and low lying eyes and bulging cheek region, that serves to elicit these parental responses. But the biological basis for this has remained elusive.

Dave Munger explains.
Antidepressants Only Benefit Certain Depressed Patients, Study Suggests:

A new study suggests that antidepressants only benefit some, very severely depressed patients. “New generation” antidepressants, such as fluoxetine (Prozac) are widely prescribed for the treatment of clinical depression. However some studies have suggested that these drugs do not help the majority of depressed people get better by very much. Irving Kirsch, from the University of Hull, and his colleagues, studied this question in closer detail, looking at whether a patient’s response to antidepressant therapy depends on how badly depressed they are to start out with.

More coverage by Ben Goldacre, David Dobbs, Kevin Drum, James Hrynyshyn, Henry Gee, Greg Laden, Jonah Lehrer and Socratic Gadfly.
How Skin Color Is Determined:

Skin color is one of the most visible indicators that helps distinguish human appearance, and a new study provides more detail as to how one protein helps produce this wide palette.

Children Who Do Not Get Enough Sleep Sustain More Injuries:

Lack of adequate sleep can lead to increased injuries among preschool children, new research shows. This study shows that the average number of injuries during the preschool years is two times higher for children who don’t get enough sleep each day as described by their mothers.

Lemurs’ Evolutionary History May Shed Light On Our Own:

After swabbing the cheeks of more than 200 lemurs and related primates to collect their DNA, researchers at the Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy (IGSP) and Duke Lemur Center now have a much clearer picture of their evolutionary family tree.

Cutting-edge Communication at Duke: Interview with Karl Leif Bates

Karl Bates is the Manager of Research Communications at Duke University where he is involved in a number of very cool new online projects. He is also a “repeat offender” – his experience at the first Science Blogging Conference did not stop him from attending the second one last month.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your scientific background? What is your Real Life job?
My name is Karl Leif Bates (Leif has a long A like “safe”). I’m the science editor in Duke’s news office, where I edit press releases from research communicators across campus, including the medical center, engineering, environment and so on. And I do some reporting and writing and web video myself. I’m looking for the overarching trends and themes that could help distinguish Duke from other schools. I also edit our new on-line research magazine – Duke Research.
I came at this whole thing after 15 years in the rapidly-drying pond of newspaper journalism, where I specialized in science, environment and medicine stuff. Aside from standard college prep and liberal arts fare, I don’t have any formal education in science; just a willingness to admit I don’t understand and to ask questions that might be considered too basic. (I’d rather look stupid in front of one professor than thousands of readers.) I did take a fellowship out of journalism ten years ago to study up on genetics, genomics and such — just to fill in the gaps in my self-education.
What did you do before coming to Duke University?
I was director of life sciences communications at the University of Michigan — again, sort of a keystone predator position where I monitored research findings from many departments. Our coolest thing there was a Flash tutorial on stem cells.
I mentioned a couple of times before – and correct me if I am wrong – that Duke recently made a 180-degrees turn in regards to the Web and blogs. From being one of the most resistant to becoming one of the most cutting-edge schools in terms of the use of the Internet in disseminating information about the research and teaching going on at Duke. How did that change come about?
Errrr, I think there would be a lot of people here who would take umbrage at being characterized as resistant to Internet communications. Compared with a lot of our benchmark schools, we’re pretty far ahead on the technology curve. Our news site was built on a content management system several years ago, making RSS feeds plentiful and diverse. Our multimedia maven, James Todd, regularly gives talks on how to get your university into YouTube, and we were one of the first schools to mount a site on iTunesU.
When I got here in January 2007, I inherited the plans to launch an ambitious online-only research magazine. We jazzed the concept up a bit with some Web 2.0 features and a companion push product, but it was all here when I arrived.
As a university, we’re not where I’d like to be in sharing coursework online or having an enterprise solution to blogging, but those things will come. Our new VP for public affairs and communications, Mike Schoenfeld, totally gets the Internet thing.
The Duke print research magazine stopped its publication a couple of years ago. You just started a Web-based research magazine – Research Duke. Tell us more about it?
We’re having a blast learning how to tell stories with more than text. I shy away from the term ‘magazine,’ because we can do a lot of things a dead-trees magazine can’t, but it is a monthly periodical. We’re putting a human face on research by letting you see and hear the scientists in their own words, in their own environment, talking about what they do and why they love it. You can post questions or engage your fellow readers in discussion. You can embed our videos in your blog. You can play with Duke data and compare it with other data sets through a really cool web 2.0 thing called Swivel.com.
I really think the American public needs more exposure like this to understand why science matters, why we need to spend tax dollars on it, and why it’s a great thing for a young person to aspire to. We’re trying to do our small part in all of that.
superfan.jpgYou recently hired a veteran science journalist Tom Burroughs to run the Duke research blog. What is the goal of this blog?
(laughing) I love that moniker I’ve stuck on Tom — Veteran Science Journalist. It means he’s old, okay? Tom’s semi-retired from a distinguished career as a science reporter and editor. Before I got here, he was filling in as Duke’s science editor.
We wanted some authentic voices to be a centerpiece of the Duke Research site. But having failed so far in my attempts to get Duke faculty to spend the time blogging about their work or the wider world, I enticed Tom to try this blogging thing with a very modest retainer, set him up with a Blogger page and let him loose. He engages in the sorts of topics we science writers end up talking about around the office. (“Hey, did you see that thing about the appendix? How cool is that?”) He goes to lectures on campus, digs deeper into a news release, or pulls some Duke commentary into a wider issue, and then he shares his ideas. I’m loving it so far and he seems to be having fun too.
The goal? It’s another flavor of content about the Duke research enterprise; it’s like delicious frosting on our cake. The blog brings out stuff that we haven’t traditionally covered, and I hope it encourages engagement.
What do you want to do/be when you grow up?
Who said I wanted to grow up?! For now, I’m doing what I love to do, which is following science the way a sports writer follows sports. I can’t play the game, and never could, but I enjoy it immensely — especially since I don’t have to spend an entire year on one question! I can flit around and sample everything. I enjoy sharing what scientists do and what they’ve learned with a broader public. Rarely a day goes by that I don’t learn something myself. In the back of my head, I have a fantasy about spending the last few years of my career teaching junior high science.
Duke University is actively encouraging students to blog about their research and educational experience.
Thanks for the plug, but we’re hardly unique in this regard. Lots of schools are doing the same things.
Last summer, you managed a very interesting experiment with a number of Duke undergraduates blogging their summer research experiences. How did that go? What did you learn from this? Have any of the students continued blogging on their own and may be ready for prime time in the science blogging community?
Aren’t those the coolest? Mary Nijhout, who runs our undergraduate research program said she learned things from the blogs that she had never heard in some 20 years of running these programs. Again, it’s all about authenticity. I thought it would be cool to tap into this “transformative experience,” as the academic types like to call it. What happens the first time you have to snip a mouse tail? How hard is it to set up an assay? Does spending an entire week on one experiment suck or do you want to make it your life’s work? The responses are all over the map, as you’d expect, but they’re all sincere and real. A couple of students blogged one or two more times over the break, and I encouraged them all to get going again this fall, but I don’t think any of them have really gone to town on it. A lot of them are still in the lab, though!
We’ve had a few field blogs from students too – a bunch from the Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences just got back from Midway Island and posted some great stuff. And student Sarah Wallace did a fantastic blog of her summer work in Chernobyl
Duke did a similar thing with local high school students blogging their experience at Duke. How did that work out? Will you do it again?
I wasn’t involved in this project, but it turned out pretty well, I thought. (It could have used more pictures.). Again, blogs are a great new tool a lot of schools are using to give readers a sense of what it’s really like at a place.
Coming up, the big blogging enchilada combo plate here will be the Duke Engage program, which sends students all over the country and world. They’ll all be set up to blog, which could be very cool. I imagine connectivity will prevent some of the more exotic sites from participating, however.
When and how did you discover science blogs? What are some of your favourites? Have you discovered any new cool science blogs while at the Conference?
Gosh, I’m not sure I remember my first. I had read some blogs and found them a bit bewildering (still do, in fact). The first NC Science Blogging conference was about two weeks after I arrived in N.C. and I thought I’d stepped into the coolest place to communicate science in the world. My counterpart at UNC, Clinton Colmenares, has recently signed up a bunch of us to blog on Science Crossroads as an experiment to share our best stuff.
I enjoy Dave Munger’s Cognitive Daily and Sheril Kirschenbaum’s Intersection; browse a few dozen more. I’ll admit my Google Reader tends to pile pretty high — I’m not on blogs every day.
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
Oooh, wow. Any transformative experiences? Um, no, no lightening bolts. But lots of nice conversations and stimulating sessions. It’s always nice to associate the organisms with their avatars, I think.
Duke offered three awesome tours that were well attended, but sparsely blogged … you know who you are!
It was so nice to see you again and thank you for the interview.
Well, you didn’t actually *see* me, we just traded emails. …Bora, are you having trouble separating the real and virtual worlds?
============================
Check out all the interviews in this series.

Imitation is the Highest Form of Flattery: Blogging like a Coturnix!

As John quips, who is crazy to try to blog around a clock like Coturnix? Not me, for sure. But Arunn is, at least for one day! In the past 24 hours Arunn has posted 15 (fifteen!) posts on his blog. I hope this did not disrupt his marital harmony too much!
OK, so here are the fifteen posts – go check them out:
Bora At My Blog
Nature India
IITM Blogs a partially differentiated list
The silliness of WLAN
Introduction to Microlithography
How to make a gun with a hankie
Notebook Quotes
How to do Research
Snake Ears and Magudi Music
Science Writer Reading List
My Science Daily picks for Today
Contemporary Science Popularizers
First Harmonic Guru
For Sri Nameless Freedom-fighter
I am a Gemini and Geminians don’t believe in Astrology
and the sign-off:
BAMBing Complete
Wonderful! Now, Arunn, go get some sleep. You need it. And next time, use automated scheduling of posts…that’s what I do.

TOPAZ Upgrade and other Big News from PLoS

It was a heroic (and sometimes nerve-wrecking) couple of months for the IT/Web team at PLoS, but the fruits of their labor will shortly be visible to all. PLoS Computational Biology, PLoS Genetics and PLoS Pathogens will soon migrate onto the TOPAZ platform. You are familiar with TOPAZ already as PLoS ONE, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases and the PLoS Hub for Clinical Trials are already on this platform. The remaining two journals, the two biggies (PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine) will migrate later this year as well.
Mark Patterson explains in detail what this will mean for you: authors and readers of these three journals – the process will be easier, faster and will help these journals attain financial self-sufficiency. The five journals and one hub hosted on TOPAZ will be better integrated with each other as well. And the interactivity features will enable readers and authors to communicate with each other on the papers and to continue the discussion and review of the work after its publication. For bloggers: you will be now able to send trackbacks to articles in these journals whenever you post about them.
Richard Cave, head of our Web team provides a detailed summary of changes in the TOPAZ platform, made in preparation for the migration of the three journals. After this time, if you open any article in the five journals and one Hub hosted on TOPAZ you will see some differences. For instance, what used to be called a ‘discussion’ will then be called a ‘comment’ – a much more common term that everyone is familiar with. What used to be called an ‘annotation’ will then becalled ‘note’, a shorter, sweeter term (and it reminds you of a Post-It Note, I hope). Furthermore, there will then be more than one types of Note. You will still be able to make a regular note, displayed as a blue mark on the text of the article. But there will be two additional options: a minor correction, displayed as a red mark on the text, or a formal correction displayed on the top of the article. Both will require a review by the editors and will make corrections faster to implement and also make sure that the corrections and the articles are literally on the same page.
Richard describes several more improvements to TOPAZ in his post, but one many people will probably like the most is the vastly improved Search. Go check it out.

Darwin Quotes

Charles_Darwin.jpg…it is always advisable to perceive clearly our ignorance.
– Charles R. Darwin
Support The Beagle Project
Read the Beagle Project Blog
Buy the Beagle Project swag
Prepare ahead for the Darwin Bicentennial
Read Darwin for yourself.

Peter Agre on ScienceDebate2008

Check all the video clips here.

Congratulations to Karen James!

Excitement on science blogs! Karen James of the Beagle Project Blog has just today published a paper in PLoS ONE:
Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) for Pan-Genomic Evolutionary Studies of Non-Model Organisms:

Background
High-throughput tools for pan-genomic study, especially the DNA microarray platform, have sparked a remarkable increase in data production and enabled a shift in the scale at which biological investigation is possible. The use of microarrays to examine evolutionary relationships and processes, however, is predominantly restricted to model or near-model organisms.
Methodology/Principal Findings
This study explores the utility of Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) in evolutionary studies of non-model organisms. DArT is a hybridization-based genotyping method that uses microarray technology to identify and type DNA polymorphism. Theoretically applicable to any organism (even one for which no prior genetic data are available), DArT has not yet been explored in exclusively wild sample sets, nor extensively examined in a phylogenetic framework. DArT recovered 1349 markers of largely low copy-number loci in two lineages of seed-free land plants: the diploid fern Asplenium viride and the haploid moss Garovaglia elegans. Direct sequencing of 148 of these DArT markers identified 30 putative loci including four routinely sequenced for evolutionary studies in plants. Phylogenetic analyses of DArT genotypes reveal phylogeographic and substrate specificity patterns in A. viride, a lack of phylogeographic pattern in Australian G. elegans, and additive variation in hybrid or mixed samples.
Conclusions/Significance
These results enable methodological recommendations including procedures for detecting and analysing DArT markers tailored specifically to evolutionary investigations and practical factors informing the decision to use DArT, and raise evolutionary hypotheses concerning substrate specificity and biogeographic patterns. Thus DArT is a demonstrably valuable addition to the set of existing molecular approaches used to infer biological phenomena such as adaptive radiations, population dynamics, hybridization, introgression, ecological differentiation and phylogeography.

Have no idea what it all means? Be patient. Karen will explain it all on the Beagle Project Blog in a day or two….

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 48 new articles published this week in PLoS ONE. It’s hard to choose just a couple to highlight, so look around for what interests you (avian flu, the Plague?). How about these titles that piqued my interest:
Neural Substrates of Spontaneous Musical Performance: An fMRI Study of Jazz Improvisation:

To investigate the neural substrates that underlie spontaneous musical performance, we examined improvisation in professional jazz pianists using functional MRI. By employing two paradigms that differed widely in musical complexity, we found that improvisation (compared to production of over-learned musical sequences) was consistently characterized by a dissociated pattern of activity in the prefrontal cortex: extensive deactivation of dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral orbital regions with focal activation of the medial prefrontal (frontal polar) cortex. Such a pattern may reflect a combination of psychological processes required for spontaneous improvisation, in which internally motivated, stimulus-independent behaviors unfold in the absence of central processes that typically mediate self-monitoring and conscious volitional control of ongoing performance. Changes in prefrontal activity during improvisation were accompanied by widespread activation of neocortical sensorimotor areas (that mediate the organization and execution of musical performance) as well as deactivation of limbic structures (that regulate motivation and emotional tone). This distributed neural pattern may provide a cognitive context that enables the emergence of spontaneous creative activity.

A Specific and Rapid Neural Signature for Parental Instinct:

Darwin originally pointed out that there is something about infants which prompts adults to respond to and care for them, in order to increase individual fitness, i.e. reproductive success, via increased survivorship of one’s own offspring. Lorenz proposed that it is the specific structure of the infant face that serves to elicit these parental responses, but the biological basis for this remains elusive. Here, we investigated whether adults show specific brain responses to unfamiliar infant faces compared to adult faces, where the infant and adult faces had been carefully matched across the two groups for emotional valence and arousal, as well as size and luminosity. The faces also matched closely in terms of attractiveness. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in adults, we found that highly specific brain activity occurred within a seventh of a second in response to unfamiliar infant faces but not to adult faces. This activity occurred in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), an area implicated in reward behaviour, suggesting for the first time a neural basis for this vital evolutionary process. We found a peak in activity first in mOFC and then in the right fusiform face area (FFA). In mOFC the first significant peak (p<0.001) in differences in power between infant and adult faces was found at around 130 ms in the 10-15 Hz band. These early differences were not found in the FFA. In contrast, differences in power were found later, at around 165 ms, in a different band (20-25 Hz) in the right FFA, suggesting a feedback effect from mOFC. These findings provide evidence in humans of a potential brain basis for the "innate releasing mechanisms" described by Lorenz for affection and nurturing of young infants. This has potentially important clinical applications in relation to postnatal depression, and could provide opportunities for early identification of families at risk.

Time Pressure Modulates Electrophysiological Correlates of Early Visual Processing:

Reactions to sensory events sometimes require quick responses whereas at other times they require a high degree of accuracy-usually resulting in slower responses. It is important to understand whether visual processing under different response speed requirements employs different neural mechanisms. We asked participants to classify visual patterns with different levels of detail as real-world or non-sense objects. In one condition, participants were to respond immediately, whereas in the other they responded after a delay of 1 second. As expected, participants performed more accurately in delayed response trials. This effect was pronounced for stimuli with a high level of detail. These behavioral effects were accompanied by modulations of stimulus related EEG gamma oscillations which are an electrophysiological correlate of early visual processing. In trials requiring speeded responses, early stimulus-locked oscillations discriminated real-world and non-sense objects irrespective of the level of detail. For stimuli with a higher level of detail, oscillatory power in a later time window discriminated real-world and non-sense objects irrespective of response speed requirements. Thus, it seems plausible to assume that different response speed requirements trigger different dynamics of processing.

Generalization Mediates Sensitivity to Complex Odor Features in the Honeybee:

Animals use odors as signals for mate, kin, and food recognition, a strategy which appears ubiquitous and successful despite the high intrinsic variability of naturally-occurring odor quantities. Stimulus generalization, or the ability to decide that two objects, though readily distinguishable, are similar enough to afford the same consequence [1], could help animals adjust to variation in odor signals without losing sensitivity to key inter-stimulus differences. The present study was designed to investigate whether an animal’s ability to generalize learned associations to novel odors can be influenced by the nature of the associated outcome. We use a classical conditioning paradigm for studying olfactory learning in honeybees [2] to show that honeybees conditioned on either a fixed- or variable-proportion binary odor mixture generalize learned responses to novel proportions of the same mixture even when inter-odor differences are substantial. We also show that the resulting olfactory generalization gradients depend critically on both the nature of the stimulus-reward paradigm and the intrinsic variability of the conditioned stimulus. The reward dependency we observe must be cognitive rather than perceptual in nature, and we argue that outcome-dependent generalization is necessary for maintaining sensitivity to inter-odor differences in complex olfactory scenes.

Memory in Microbes: Quantifying History-Dependent Behavior in a Bacterium:

Memory is usually associated with higher organisms rather than bacteria. However, evidence is mounting that many regulatory networks within bacteria are capable of complex dynamics and multi-stable behaviors that have been linked to memory in other systems. Moreover, it is recognized that bacteria that have experienced different environmental histories may respond differently to current conditions. These “memory” effects may be more than incidental to the regulatory mechanisms controlling acclimation or to the status of the metabolic stores. Rather, they may be regulated by the cell and confer fitness to the organism in the evolutionary game it participates in. Here, we propose that history-dependent behavior is a potentially important manifestation of memory, worth classifying and quantifying. To this end, we develop an information-theory based conceptual framework for measuring both the persistence of memory in microbes and the amount of information about the past encoded in history-dependent dynamics. This method produces a phenomenological measure of cellular memory without regard to the specific cellular mechanisms encoding it. We then apply this framework to a strain of Bacillus subtilis engineered to report on commitment to sporulation and degradative enzyme (AprE) synthesis and estimate the capacity of these systems and growth dynamics to ‘remember’ 10 distinct cell histories prior to application of a common stressor. The analysis suggests that B. subtilis remembers, both in short and long term, aspects of its cell history, and that this memory is distributed differently among the observables. While this study does not examine the mechanistic bases for memory, it presents a framework for quantifying memory in cellular behaviors and is thus a starting point for studying new questions about cellular regulation and evolutionary strategy.

Crayfish Recognize the Faces of Fight Opponents:

The capacity to associate stimuli underlies many cognitive abilities, including recognition, in humans and other animals. Vertebrates process different categories of information separately and then reassemble the distilled information for unique identification, storage and recall. Invertebrates have fewer neural networks and fewer neural processing options so study of their behavior may reveal underlying mechanisms still not fully understood for any animal. Some invertebrates form complex social colonies and are capable of visual memory-bees and wasps, for example. This ability would not be predicted in species that interact in random pairs without strong social cohesion; for example, crayfish. They have chemical memory but the extent to which they remember visual features is unknown. Here we demonstrate that the crayfish Cherax destructor is capable of visual recognition of individuals. The simplicity of their interactions allowed us to examine the behavior and some characteristics of the visual features involved. We showed that facial features are learned during face-to-face fights, that highly variable cues are used, that the type of variability is important, and that the learning is context-dependent. We also tested whether it is possible to engineer false identifications and for animals to distinguish between twin opponents.

The Blind Watchmaker Network: Scale-Freeness and Evolution:

It is suggested that the degree distribution for networks of the cell-metabolism for simple organisms reflects a ubiquitous randomness. This implies that natural selection has exerted no or very little pressure on the network degree distribution during evolution. The corresponding random network, here termed the blind watchmaker network has a power-law degree distribution with an exponent γ≥2. It is random with respect to a complete set of network states characterized by a description of which links are attached to a node as well as a time-ordering of these links. No a priory assumption of any growth mechanism or evolution process is made. It is found that the degree distribution of the blind watchmaker network agrees very precisely with that of the metabolic networks. This implies that the evolutionary pathway of the cell-metabolism, when projected onto a metabolic network representation, has remained statistically random with respect to a complete set of network states. This suggests that even a biological system, which due to natural selection has developed an enormous specificity like the cellular metabolism, nevertheless can, at the same time, display well defined characteristics emanating from the ubiquitous inherent random element of Darwinian evolution. The fact that also completely random networks may have scale-free node distributions gives a new perspective on the origin of scale-free networks in general.

Quantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?:

Increased variability in sexually selected ornaments, a key assumption of evolutionary theory, is thought to be maintained through condition-dependence. Condition-dependent handicap models of sexual selection predict that (a) sexually selected traits show amplified variability compared to equivalent non-sexually selected traits, and since males are usually the sexually selected sex, that (b) males are more variable than females, and (c) sexually dimorphic traits more variable than monomorphic ones. So far these predictions have only been tested for metric traits. Surprisingly, they have not been examined for bright coloration, one of the most prominent sexual traits. This omission stems from computational difficulties: different types of colours are quantified on different scales precluding the use of coefficients of variation. Based on physiological models of avian colour vision we develop an index to quantify the degree of discriminable colour variation as it can be perceived by conspecifics. A comparison of variability in ornamental and non-ornamental colours in six bird species confirmed (a) that those coloured patches that are sexually selected or act as indicators of quality show increased chromatic variability. However, we found no support for (b) that males generally show higher levels of variability than females, or (c) that sexual dichromatism per se is associated with increased variability. We show that it is currently possible to realistically estimate variability of animal colours as perceived by them, something difficult to achieve with other traits. Increased variability of known sexually-selected/quality-indicating colours in the studied species, provides support to the predictions borne from sexual selection theory but the lack of increased overall variability in males or dimorphic colours in general indicates that sexual differences might not always be shaped by similar selective forces.

Frequency and Density-Dependent Selection on Life-History Strategies – A Field Experiment:

Negative frequency-dependence, which favors rare genotypes, promotes the maintenance of genetic variability and is of interest as a potential explanation for genetic differentiation. Density-dependent selection may also promote cyclic changes in frequencies of genotypes. Here we show evidence for both density-dependent and negative frequency-dependent selection on opposite life-history tactics (low or high reproductive effort, RE) in the bank vole (Myodes glareolus). Density-dependent selection was evident among the females with low RE, which were especially favored in low densities. Instead, both negative frequency-dependent and density-dependent selection were shown in females with high RE, which were most successful when they were rare in high densities. Furthermore, selection at the individual level affected the frequencies of tactics at the population level, so that the frequency of the rare high RE tactic increased significantly at high densities. We hypothesize that these two selection mechanisms (density- and negative frequency-dependent selection) may promote genetic variability in cyclic mammal populations. Nevertheless, it remains to be determined whether the origin of genetic variance in life-history traits is causally related to density variation (e.g. population cycles).

Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information:

The rise of electronic publishing [1], preprint archives, blogs, and wikis is raising concerns among publishers, editors, and scientists about the present day relevance of academic journals and traditional peer review [2]. These concerns are especially fuelled by the ability of search engines to automatically identify and sort information [1]. It appears that academic journals can only remain relevant if acceptance of research for publication within a journal allows readers to infer immediate, reliable information on the value of that research. Here, we systematically evaluate the effectiveness of journals, through the work of editors and reviewers, at evaluating unpublished research. We find that the distribution of the number of citations to a paper published in a given journal in a specific year converges to a steady state after a journal-specific transient time, and demonstrate that in the steady state the logarithm of the number of citations has a journal-specific typical value. We then develop a model for the asymptotic number of citations accrued by papers published in a journal that closely matches the data. Our model enables us to quantify both the typical impact and the range of impacts of papers published in a journal. Finally, we propose a journal-ranking scheme that maximizes the efficiency of locating high impact research.

Post comments, notes and ratings, blog about them and send trackbacks.

Open Education

There are three interesting, thought-provoking articles on Open Education today:
The Digital Commons – Left Unregulated, Are We Destined for Tragedy?
An Interview with Ahrash Bissell of the Creative Commons
The Open Digital Commons – A Truly Endless Array of Success Stories
Worth your time and effort.

JoVE hits Big Time

Journal of Visualized Experiments signed a deal with Wiley-Blackwell to provide videos for Current Protocols:
Wiley-Blackwell and JoVE Unveil Groundbreaking Online Video Publications
Online methods videos go mainstream
Visual journal partners with Wiley
Related

Today’s carnivals

Grand Rounds 4.22: The Future of Medicine – are up on ScienceRoll.
The 113th Carnival of Homeschooling is up on The Daily Planet

My picks from ScienceDaily

Religion Colors Americans’ Views Of Nanotechnology:

Is nanotechnology morally acceptable? For a significant percentage of Americans, the answer is no, according to a recent survey of Americans’ attitudes about the science of the very small.

Male Fertility May Be Harmed By Mix Of Endocrine Disrupters:

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which are harmless individually in small doses, can together be a dangerous cocktail. Concurrent exposure to several endocrine-disrupting substances may, among other things, result in malformed sexual organs. Risk assessments of chemical substances should therefore take potential cocktail effects into account.

Two Oxygenation Events In Ancient Oceans Sparked Spread Of Complex Life:

The rise of oxygen and the oxidation of deep oceans between 635 and 551 million years ago may have had an impact on the increase and spread of the earliest complex life, including animals, according to a new study.

Krill Discovered Living In The Antarctic Abyss:

Scientists have discovered Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) living and feeding down to depths of 3000 metres in the waters around the Antarctic Peninsula. Until now this shrimp-like crustacean was thought to live only in the upper ocean. The discovery completely changes scientists’ understanding of the major food source for fish, squid, penguins, seals and whales.

Empty Nest Syndrome May Not Be Bad After All, Study Finds:

One day they are crawling, the next day they are driving and then suddenly they aren’t kids anymore. As children reach adulthood, the parent-child relationship changes as parents learn to adapt to newly independent children. A new study by a University of Missouri professor explored the differences in how mothers and fathers interacted with their young adult children. She found there were few differences in the way mothers and fathers felt and that many of the changes were positive, despite the perception that mothers in particular fall apart and experience the so-called empty nest syndrome.

Zoologists Challenge Longstanding Theory That ‘Eyespots’ Mimic The Eyes Of Predators’ Enemies:

Circular markings on creatures such as butterflies are effective against predators because they are conspicuous features, not because they mimic the eyes of the predators’ own enemies, according to research in the journal, Behavioral Ecology*. Zoologists based at the University of Cambridge challenge the 150-year-old theory about why these markings are effective against predators.

Busy Beavers Can Help Ease Drought:

They may be considered pests, but beaver can help mitigate the effects of drought, and because of that, their removal from wetlands to accommodate industrial, urban and agricultural demands should be avoided, according to a new University of Alberta study.

Ebola, for your kids! Interview with Tara Smith

Dr.Tara C. Smith is one of the original Gang Of Four(teen) here at Scienceblogs.com. She blogs on her Aetiology as well as contributes to Panda’s Thumb and Correlations group blogs. At the 2nd Science Blogging Conference last month Tara moderated the session on Blogging public health and medicine.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your scientific background? What is your Real Life job?
Well, let’s see. Working backwards, I’m an assistant professor; my field is infectious disease epidemiology. Specifically, I research bacteria which cross species barriers and are transmitted between humans and other animals. I currently work in Iowa, following post-doctoral training in molecular epidemiology at the University of Michigan and a Ph.D. in microbiology at the Medical College of Ohio (which now has been swallowed by the University of Toledo). I’ve lived in the midwest almost all my life, aside from my undergrad at Yale.
Outside of work, I have a daughter and a son (ages 8 and 5, respectively) who keep me very busy. I’m also navigating the waters as a divorced single mom, so it’s been a crazy few years between events in my career and personal life.
What do you want to do/be when you grow up?
Besides out of student loan debt and well-funded? I’m doing exactly what I want right now; I just hope I continue to improve at everything. I love my job, I have great kids, I have a wonderful boyfriend. Life is good.
When and how did you discover science blogs? What are some of your favorites? Have you discovered any new cool science blogs while following the Conference?
I think Panda’s Thumb was the first science blog I stumbled across, linked from a message board I used to frequent. I became a regular reader there and then started to write for them in early 2005, but didn’t really branch out very much as far as reading other blogs until my friend Evil Monkey encouraged me to start a blog of my own late that year. I don’t have as much time anymore to read as I used to, but I regularly check the last 24 hours page here at Sb, and regularly check out Cosmic Variance, Bad Astronomy, ERV, Christine Gorman’s Global Health report, Cocktail Party Physics. And this has guilted me again because I so badly need to update my blogroll…
At the conference, I spent most of my time meeting people whose blogs I already was familiar with but had never met in “meat space,” but I did run across a few new ones as well, such as Tom Levenson’s Inverse Square blog.
Tara%20interview%20pic.JPG
You often write well-researched and well-documented blog-posts about HIV/AIDS, about evolution and about sexually transmitted diseases. Unfortunately, those topics are, for some, not settled yet and you get droves of HIV-denialist, creationist and sexist trolls filling your comment threads. Which ones are the worst is hard to say. Yet you persist. Why? How do you see your blog as a weapon against such quackery, pseudoscience and credulity? Can people’s minds be changed on these emotional topics?
I don’t know about a weapon, but I certainly think accurate, readable information is one way to counter to misinformation. I don’t expect to change the minds of any hard-core creationists or HIV deniers. There’s the old adage that you can’t reason someone out of something they didn’t reason themselves into, and much of their denial (from the folks I know, anyway) isn’t due to lack of information; it’s due to emotion or fear. Creationists fear “secular scientists” are going to turn their kids into god-hating materialists; many HIV deniers are themselves HIV+ and unable or unwilling to face the seriousness of what that means, or they have friends, family, or partners who are HIV+. No amount of science is going to change minds if someone’s worldview revolves around denial of evidence–but there are plenty of fence-sitters out there, or people who have only recently stumbled upon HIV denial or evolution denial (just to name 2) who are looking for information and haven’t made their minds up yet. Those are mostly the people I write for.
You have written several highly informative series of posts on topics rarely seen on blogs, for instance, a series on Zoonoses and more recently a series on The Plague. I tried, but could not find any better sources of information online on these topics. Are you aware if your posts are used in educational settings at high-school, college or even medical school level?
Thanks for the compliment. A few people have emailed me to say they’ve used these or other posts for recommended reading in undergraduate or grad school courses. In my referral logs, I occasionally stumble upon links to my blog from other course websites as well. I think it’s great that people are using them as a reference. Obviously microbiology/infectious disease is my passion, so the more people familiar with it, the better from my (clearly biased!) point of view.
Your blog is a huge repository of useful information. Have you ever considered putting some of that out in the form of a book?
I have. Actually, I find there’s a good amount of crossover between what I blog about, the topics I teach, and what I write about for non-blog sources. I’ve already written 3 books for high school-age kids on Ebola, group A strep, and group B strep. The first two are due to be updated in 2009 and 2010, so I’ve blogged about some papers that I’ll also add to the second editions of those books. I also am considering another book aimed more at the general public, but I’ve not put together a proposal (yet) for that one. If only I could squeeze a few more hours out of the day…
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
I’ve started to think more seriously about science communication in general over the past few years, so hanging out with so many other people who have a passion for this was a great motivator to simply get more done, especially at the local level. I already run our state’s Citizens for Science group but would like to do more with it; perhaps move more toward the SCONC group model. As far as sessions, I really enjoyed Hemai Parthasarathy’s session on open science; I thought I knew a decent amount about open-access publishing, but I learned a lot more. I also was equal parts enjoying myself and seething with frustration at the session on gender and race in science. It’s so hard to know if you’re doing the right thing as a junior scientist, and especially a junior scientist who’s female or a racial minority. It was interesting listening to ScienceWoman and others talk about the difficulties they had with blogging anonymously; they feel confined in what they write about because they don’t want to blow their cover, while as a junior female scientist blogging under my own name, I feel constrained because I feel I’m under a bit of a microscope. Is that just the way things have to be? Anyway, suffice it to say that I left with much to think about.
It was so nice to see you again and thank you for the interview.
============================
Check out all the interviews in this series.

Darwin Quotes

Charles_Darwin.jpgDoing what little one can to increase the general stock of knowledge is as respectable an object of life, as one can in any likelihood pursue.
– Charles R. Darwin
Support The Beagle Project
Read the Beagle Project Blog
Buy the Beagle Project swag
Prepare ahead for the Darwin Bicentennial
Read Darwin for yourself.

1-2-3, the Goosed/Book meme

Oh-oh, it seems it’s a meme season again! I’ll dutifully do them, one at a time. Today – the good old 123 book meme, which memeticized over time into being called “Goosed meme”. I was tagged by Lance Mannion who was hoping that the book closest to me is the OpenLab07. Sorry. It’s not. It was until earlier today. Tough luck, Lance, you’ll just have to buy it.
Anyway, the rules first:
• look up page 123 in the nearest book
• look for the fifth sentence
• then post the three sentences that follow that fifth sentence on page 123.
The nearest book is the one which arrived in the mail today, so I have not have had the pleasure of reading it yet, though I am chomping at the bit as it is supposed to be quite racy. It is It’s every monkey for themselves by Vanessa Woods, a book which, for various legal reasons, is not available in the USA or on amazon.com, but you can order it directly from Allen&Unwin.
So, let’s see what’s on page 123 and if it is considered cheating if I do not consider single-word shouts in a dialog as sentences:

“But it was impossible. People in the monkey house were obsessed with sexual relations. We couldn’t help it. We spent all day watching monkeys go up and down the hierarchy because of who they had sex with.”

Whetted your appetite yet?
Now I need to tag some other bloggers to do the same excercise:
I hope that Eric Roston’s manuscript is the closest book to where he is sitting right now.
I hope that Tom Levenson keeps his manuscript close to his computer.
I hope that Chad Orzel’s dog has not dragged the manuscript away from his computer.
I guess that Jennifer Ouellette is always writing a new book as well and has a draft nearby.
And what the heck, might as well tag Vanessa Woods herself – she is busy writing two books so one of them is bound to be the “closest”.

May you be Onion in interesting times….

Diebold Accidentally Leaks Results Of 2008 Election Early

My picks from ScienceDaily

Snakes Locate Prey Through Vibration Waves:

It is often believed that snakes cannot hear. This presumption is fed by the fact that snakes lack an outer ear and that scientific evidence of snakes responding to sound is scarce. Snakes do, however, possess an inner ear with a functional cochlea.

Masters Of Disguise: Secrets Of Nature’s ‘Great Pretenders’ Revealed:

A gene which helps a harmless African butterfly ward off predators by giving it wing patterns like those of toxic species, has been identified. The mocker swallowtail butterfly, Papilio dardanus, is unusual because it emerges from its chrysalis with one of a large number of different possible wing patterns and colours. This is different from most butterfly species which are identified by a common wing pattern and colour. Furthermore, some of the different patterns that the mocker swallowtail exhibits mimic those of poisonous species, which affords this harmless insect a valuable disguise which scares off predators.

Salamanders Are ‘Keystone’ Species: Headwater Streams Critical In Food Chain:

University of Missouri scientist Ray Semlitsch studies creatures most people don’t ever see. These creatures are active only at night and thrive in the shallow, cool, wet surroundings of headwater streams, an oft-overlooked biological environment.

Blogrolling for Today

Psique


Guadalupe Storm-Petrel


Ectoplasmosis


Gallicissa


Sorting Out Science

PLoS Biology 2.0 – Congratulations to Jonathan!

This is an exciting day at PLoS and, after having to keep my mouth shut for a couple of months about it, I am really happy to be free to announce to the world that my friend and excellent science blogger Jonathan Eisen is now officially the Academic Editor-in-Chief of PLoS Biology.
The editors have written an article that explains his role and how and why it was Jonathan who was chosen. In a separate article, Jonathan gives us a touching and thrilling story of his conversion to Open Access and his vision for the future of PLoS Biology.
You should go and congratulate him in the comments of this blog post.

New and Exciting in PLoS Medicine, PLoS Biology and PLoS ONE

There are a bunch of new papers in PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine and, somewhat out of usual schedule, in PLoS ONE. So, check out these and then look around for more:
Does Mutation Rate Depend on Itself:

Many a research paper, textbook chapter, and grant proposal has begun with the phrase “Mutation is the ultimate source of genetic variation.” Implicit in this phrase is the assumption that genetic variation is required for evolution. Without mutation, evolution would not be possible, and life itself could never have arisen in the first place. However, there is overwhelming evidence that the great majority of mutations with detectable effects are harmful [1-3]. Deleterious mutations are the price we living organisms pay for the ability to evolve.

Understanding the Web of Life: The Birds, the Bees, and Sex with Aliens:

When I was in school, I learned about a linear food chain in which, for example, flowers provide food for bees, which in turn are eaten by birds. The implications of this model are clear: if bees were to vanish, birds would starve and flowers would not be pollinated. Whether this concept was a hangover from the old idea of the great chain of being (scala naturæ) or a simplification deemed necessary for unsophisticated school children is unclear. Nevertheless, despite the appeal of this simple caricature, it couldn’t be further from the truth in most of the world’s ecosystems. Birds feed on a variety of plants and animals, and are themselves fed upon by mammals, other birds, a diverse array of parasites, and eventually carrion feeders. It takes little more than a passing glance at the natural world to notice that complexity is the rule, rather than the exception. Describing this complexity and understanding its importance, however, is anything but simple. Ecologists have for a long time struggled to find consistent patterns in the structure of complex webs of interacting species from disparate ecosystems. However, recent empirical and theoretical breakthroughs have begun to shed light on the structure of the web of life that connects living things, and the vulnerability of this web to perturbations such as the introduction of invasive alien species.

The Fall and Rise of US Inequities in Premature Mortality: 1960-2002:

Debates exist as to whether, as overall population health improves, the absolute and relative magnitude of income- and race/ethnicity-related health disparities necessarily increase–or derease. We accordingly decided to test the hypothesis that health inequities widen–or shrink–in a context of declining mortality rates, by examining annual US mortality data over a 42 year period. Using US county mortality data from 1960-2002 and county median family income data from the 1960-2000 decennial censuses, we analyzed the rates of premature mortality (deaths among persons under age 65) and infant death (deaths among persons under age 1) by quintiles of county median family income weighted by county population size. Between 1960 and 2002, as US premature mortality and infant death rates declined in all county income quintiles, socioeconomic and racial/ethnic inequities in premature mortality and infant death (both relative and absolute) shrank between 1966 and 1980, especially for US populations of color; thereafter, the relative health inequities widened and the absolute differences barely changed in magnitude. Had all persons experienced the same yearly age-specific premature mortality rates as the white population living in the highest income quintile, between 1960 and 2002, 14% of the white premature deaths and 30% of the premature deaths among populations of color would not have occurred. The observed trends refute arguments that health inequities inevitably widen–or shrink–as population health improves. Instead, the magnitude of health inequalities can fall or rise; it is our job to understand why.

The following three articles, two PLoS ONE research papers and a review in PLoS Biology are part of the same “package”, which, I hear, may be controversial in some circles (and I hope the expert bloggers will enlighten us all about it):
Shifting Baselines, Local Impacts, and Global Change on Coral Reefs:

Imagine trying to understand the ecology of tropical rainforests by studying environmental changes and interactions among the surviving plants and animals on a vast cattle ranch in the center of a deforested Amazon, without any basic data on how the forest worked before it was cleared and burned. The soil would be baked dry or eroded away and the amount of rainfall would be greatly decreased. Most of the fantastic biodiversity would be gone. The trees would be replaced by grasses or soybeans, the major grazers would be leaf-cutter ants and cattle, and the major predators would be insects, rodents, and hawks. Ecologists could do experiments on the importance of cattle for the maintenance of plant species diversity, but the results would be meaningless for understanding the rainforest that used to be or how to restore it in the future.
Fortunately, ecologists began to carefully describe tropical forests more than a century ago, and vast areas of largely intact forests have persisted until today, so there are meaningful baselines for comparison. Networks of 50-hectare plots are monitored around the world [1], and decades of experiments have helped to elucidate ecological mechanisms in these relatively pristine forests [2]. But the situation is very different for the oceans, because degradation of entire ecosystems has been more pervasive than on land [3] and underwater observations began much more recently. Monitoring of benthic ecosystems is commonly limited to small intertidal quadrats, and there is nothing like the high-resolution global monitoring network for tropical forests for any ocean ecosystem.
This lack of a baseline for pristine marine ecosystems is particularly acute for coral reefs, the so-called rainforests of the sea, which are the most diverse marine ecosystems and among the most threatened [4-8].

Baselines and Degradation of Coral Reefs in the Northern Line Islands:

Effective conservation requires rigorous baselines of pristine conditions to assess the impacts of human activities and to evaluate the efficacy of management. Most coral reefs are moderately to severely degraded by local human activities such as fishing and pollution as well as global change, hence it is difficult to separate local from global effects. To this end, we surveyed coral reefs on uninhabited atolls in the northern Line Islands to provide a baseline of reef community structure, and on increasingly populated atolls to document changes associated with human activities. We found that top predators and reef-building organisms dominated unpopulated Kingman and Palmyra, while small planktivorous fishes and fleshy algae dominated the populated atolls of Tabuaeran and Kiritimati. Sharks and other top predators overwhelmed the fish assemblages on Kingman and Palmyra so that the biomass pyramid was inverted (top-heavy). In contrast, the biomass pyramid at Tabuaeran and Kiritimati exhibited the typical bottom-heavy pattern. Reefs without people exhibited less coral disease and greater coral recruitment relative to more inhabited reefs. Thus, protection from overfishing and pollution appears to increase the resilience of reef ecosystems to the effects of global warming.

Microbial Ecology of Four Coral Atolls in the Northern Line Islands:

Microbes are key players in both healthy and degraded coral reefs. A combination of metagenomics, microscopy, culturing, and water chemistry were used to characterize microbial communities on four coral atolls in the Northern Line Islands, central Pacific. Kingman, a small uninhabited atoll which lies most northerly in the chain, had microbial and water chemistry characteristic of an open ocean ecosystem. On this atoll the microbial community was equally divided between autotrophs (mostly Prochlorococcus spp.) and heterotrophs. In contrast, Kiritimati, a large and populated (~5500 people) atoll, which is most southerly in the chain, had microbial and water chemistry characteristic of a near-shore environment. On Kiritimati, there were 10 times more microbial cells and virus-like particles in the water column and these microbes were dominated by heterotrophs, including a large percentage of potential pathogens. Culturable Vibrios were common only on Kiritimati. The benthic community on Kiritimati had the highest prevalence of coral disease and lowest coral cover. The middle atolls, Palmyra and Tabuaeran, had intermediate densities of microbes and viruses and higher percentages of autotrophic microbes than either Kingman or Kiritimati. The differences in microbial communities across atolls could reflect variation in 1) oceaonographic and/or hydrographic conditions or 2) human impacts associated with land-use and fishing. The fact that historically Kingman and Kiritimati did not differ strongly in their fish or benthic communities (both had large numbers of sharks and high coral cover) suggest an anthropogenic component in the differences in the microbial communities. Kingman is one of the world’s most pristine coral reefs, and this dataset should serve as a baseline for future studies of coral reef microbes. Obtaining the microbial data set, from atolls is particularly important given the association of microbes in the ongoing degradation of coral reef ecosystems worldwide.

Sheril Kirshenbaum on ScienceDebate2008

Check all the video clips here.

Welcome the newest SciBling!

Go say Hello to Ed Yong at Not Exactly Rocket Science

One of a Mind: Interview with Shelley Batts

Shelley Batts and I are of the same “generation”, meaning that we became SciBlings on the same day. You need to hurry up and check out her blog Retrospectacle before she moves to a new blog in a few days. At the Science Blogging Conference last month Shelley moderated the Student blogging panel–from K to Ph D.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your background? What is your Real Life job?
I’m an end-stage Neuroscience graduate student at the University of Michigan, my thesis is related to developing therapies for deafness through cellular repair and regeneration. I also write at the neuroscience blog Retrospectacle, which will soon be merged with OmniBrain into a super-blog called ‘Of Two Minds, ‘ to launch March 1st. I went to undergrad at New College of Florida in Sarasota where I climbed trees and did biochemistry. I play tennis, do pilates, talk to parrots, and write angsty poetry in my spare time.
What do you want to do/be when you grow up?
Get an RO1 grant and a Wii, in no particular order. And I want to rebuild a 1965 Mustang someday. But foremost on the list is to get a postdoc position, as I graduate in December.
When and how did you discover science blogs? What are some of your favorites? Have you discovered any new cool science blogs while following the Conference?
ScienceBlogs plucked me out of obscurity when I was blogging away on neuroscience and hearing to an audience of about 30 people/day. I had decided to start a science blog as a way to condense and communicate interesting discoveries in science to a lay audience, and to point out fallacies in mainstream science reporting. And, to have a fun and educational hobby. I like being a jack of all trades, and merging my love of science and writing into a blog made sense.
Most science blogs out there have crossed my path at some point or another, but a few that were new to me were:
The Inverse Square Blog
Laelaps
NPR ScienceFriday Blog
Lab Life
My favorite blogs/bloggers are:
Drugmonkey
3 Quarks Daily
The Flying Trilobyte
Jon’s Travel Adventures
Acephalous
Digital Cuttlefish
Ectoplasmosis
Shelley%20interview%20pic.JPGRecently, you had a first-hand experience with the issue of Fair Use and copyright. Could you, please, explain to my readers what happened, how it all ended, how it changed your blogging and what can we all learn from the episode?
In the spring of 2007, the media was a-buzz with hype about a study which purportedly found that ‘alcohol made fruit healthier’, just published in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. I didn’t buy media spin, and decided to read the actual journal article for myself to blog what I thought. The paper was actually aimed at using various volatile chemicals to improve shelf life of berries by increasing antioxidants in the fruit. Ethanol was one such substance tested, but in fact the chemical methyl jasmonate performed the best (at extending berry shelf life) but this said nothing as to their healthful properties for human consumption. To make my point in the post, I included a snippet of a figure which I cut and pasted from the paper PDF. The morning I posted it, a representative of the journal emailed me, demanding I remove the figure and threatening legal action from their parent company John Wiley and Sons if I did not. I was completely surprised, it seemed like great (free)publicity for me to be discussing their paper, and an obvious case of fair-use in scholarly discussion of the figure. To make a long story short, I responded by recreating the figures in Excel, but letting the blogosphere know about the threats I was receiving as they initially refused to grant me permission. The blogosphere responded in full force, from BoingBoing to Slashdot to The Scientist, The Guardian and Newsweek and within a couple of days the journal issued an apology stating that it was a misunderstanding. Fortunately it came to an amiable resolution and hopefully both traditional and ‘new’ media learned something valuable from the discussion that ensued.
You have recently decided to pool your resources with Steve Higgins and fuse your two blogs (your Retrospectacle and Steve’s OmniBrain) into a brand-new blog. What considerations went into that decision? What are the pros and cons of running one’s own blog versus belonging to a group blog?
As it is my last year in grad school, I realized I need some blogging help to reduce the demands blogging made on my time. Steve at Omnibrain seemed like a natural choice, as we had become friends since he joined ScienceBlogs and he likes to blog about the humorous side of science. That will probably provide a good foil to my blogging style. Readers can expect still a lot of serious sciencey-type discussion with a bit of Steve’s same old raucous personality. 🙂 The pros of running a joint blog are the cooperation and discussion it can engender (plus splitting the time demands), and as for the cons, well, ask me in six months.
How’s Pepper doing these days? When is he going to write his next guest-post?
Pepper is rocking the casbah as usual, although lately he’s recently taken to remembering and repeating whole phone conversations early on Saturday mornings. I’m sure Pepper will find time out of his busy day (of destroying over-priced bird toys) to make another guest post, hopefully in the form of a review of Irene’s upcoming memoir on Alex.
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
The ideas I really took away from the conference were ones about how traditional and non-traditional media can learn to live and work together. A real strength of the meeting was having “real” reporters there, as well as self-styled e-reporters such as myself, thrown into the same topics of discussion. It was fascinating to see both sides readily admit the failings as well as strengths of their own craft– if those conversations could be extended into the future, perhaps blogs won’t be treated as the ugly half-brother of science reporting.
It was so nice to see you again and thank you for the interview.
============================
Check out all the interviews in this series.

Fiona turns green and ogre-ish at night

‘Fiona’ Gene Controls Flower’s Physiologic Clock:

Scientists have found a new gene that regulates the daily and yearly physiological cycles of flowering and seeding.
POSTECH researchers, led by Nam Hong-gil and Kim Jeong-sik, said that they named the gene FIONA1 after the heroine in the popular animation “Shrek.” In the animation, princess Fiona is human by day but becomes an ogress at sunset. Fiona also sounds similar to the term “flowering” in Korean.
The research is a foundation for further discoveries of the plants’ clock systems, the team said. To study the gene, the POSTECH team used mutated cress, a species of weed widely used in such experiments because of its short seeding cycle and small genome size.
“We have identified the novel clock component, FIONA1 (FIO1), which is closely associated with the central oscillator and is critical to maintaining the correct period length, but it is not necessary for maintaining the amplitude of circadian rhythm,” the researchers said in the paper published on Plant Cell magazine last week.

I am assuming that, when they find the next gene whose protein interacts closely with the Fiona protein, they will name it Shrek. Who said that scientists have no sense of humor?