Bring Bing Home

Bing Haubrich has made new friends in Japan, but they want to keep him there. In fact, they have threatened to hold him for ransom unless his American friends and family do two things:
1. Answer questions about Japan/Nippon culture and cuisine.
2. Donate money to help his mother pay the plane fare for his trip.

It’s tempting for a young man to stay in Japan, because so far he has found the food to be awesome and the shopping (even in vending machines) to be, let’s say, “unique.” In fact, the Japanese students think that if he stays long enough he could use his ninja powers to be Emperor someday. I don’t think that this would be a good thing for world peace, as Bing has not worked out his “Megalomania” issues and bad things could happen.

So, test your knowledge and help bring this young man home….

Today’s carnivals

Skeptics Circle #117 is up on Ionian Enchantment
The latest Four Stone Hearth is up on Greg Laden’s blog
Friday Ark #256 is up on Modulator

Making the Web Work for Science (video)

Making the Web Work for Science – Full from Jordan Mendelson on Vimeo.

From left to right: Tim O’Reilly, Jimmy Wales, Stephen Friend and John Wilbanks – via Jonathan (there is also a shorter summary version here)

The Open Laboratory 2009 – the submissions so far

OpenLab logo.jpg
Here are the submissions for OpenLab 2009 to date. As we have surpassed 280 entries, all of them, as well as the “submit” buttons and codes and the bookmarklet, are under the fold. You can buy the 2006, 2007 and 2008 editions at Lulu.com. Please use the submission form to add more of your and other people’s posts (remember that we are looking for original poems, art, cartoons and comics, as well as essays):

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

For me the creative process, first of all, requires a good nine hours of sleep at night. Second, it must not be pushed by the need to produce practical applications.
– William N. Lipscomb, Jr.

Kseniya Simonova – Sand Animation (video)


The winner of Ukraine’s Got Talent.

Clock Interview: John Hogenesch – genes, clocks, Web and ScienceOnline’09

The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline’09 back in January.
This is also the first in what I hope will be a long series of interviews with researchers in my field of Chronobiology.

Today, I asked John Hogenesch, my chronobiologist colleague who moderated the ‘Community intelligence applied to gene annotation’ session at ScienceOnline’09, to answer a few questions.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your (scientific) background?
I’m an Associate Professor at the University of Pennsylvania in the Department of Pharmacology. Our lab works on clocks, but also on functional genomics in mammals. I did my graduate work in neuroscience at Northwestern University at the Chicago campus with Chris Bradfield. In Chris’s lab, I worked on identifying and characterizing new members of the bHLH-PAS class of transcription factors — several of these orphan PAS domain proteins ended up being Bmal1, its paralog Bmal2, and Npas2, core components of the E-box machinery of the clock. For my postdoctoral training, I joined the lab of Steve Kay at the then developing Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation. Later , I started my own lab there focusing on functional genomics and became Director of Genomics. These research projects included circadian clock research, but also other areas of biology that were of interest to me or GNF.
How did it happen that you became a scientist? How did you end up in chronobiology?
I’m a second-generation scientist, my dad is professor of chemistry at the University of Southern California. My mom also teaches at USC, and my brother is a political science professor at Cal State Northridge. So, you could say that science/academia is in the family.
I ended up interested in chronobiology largely based on a lecture in the first year graduate school by Joe Takahashi. Joe gave this fabulous lecture covering the progress of the Drosophila clock field in the fall of 1992, and I was hooked.
What is your Real Life job? What do you want to do/be when (and if ever) you grow up?
My real life job is the complicated life of academic science. Teaching, mentoring, sitting on study section, running a research group, being involved in graduate groups, sitting on committees, writing grants, and, time permitting, writing papers. (Oh yeah, I have twin one-year-old boys and a five-year-old to occupy my remaining day and night.)
I’m not sure what I will be when I grow up. I view science as a career of continual development. I started my research career mining genome data for new bHLH-PAS proteins (informatics). Then I cloned and characterized them — molecular and cellular biology. Then I became a genomicist, and learned a lot more about bioinformatics. I’m not really sure what will come next, but I hope to continue to learn how to do new things and apply them to subjects I’m interested in such as the clock.
Can you explain to my lay audience, what your research is all about?
Our research involves learning how the clock works. In humans, the clock is actually your whole body, as clocks are everywhere, not just in your brain. There are really three facets of circadian clock function — synchronizing with your environment, keeping time, and regulating physiology and behavior. We are working on all three of these issues to various extents.
What aspect of science communication and/or particular use of the Web in science interests you the most?
John Hogenesh pic.jpgI call myself a first generation Atari American — I’ve spent most of my life around computers. Because of that, I probably see more opportunities than most people to exploit information technology, bioinformatics, and the Web. I use it to manage my own personal communications — I’m big into Gmail and Google voice. I use tools such as Basecamp, project management software, to keep track of how things are going in the lab and collaborate with other laboratories. We dabble in computational approaches in the lab, occasionally more than dabble.
About 10 years or so ago, I listened to David Botstein when he began advocating for open science and the release of large data sets. It was obvious — if you collect information on 10,000 genes, but only follow up one or a few, it’s really a shame to let the remaining data lie fallow. It occurred to me that a good way to avoid this would be to publish data and make it available. Again pretty obvious. However, depositing data in a database is not enough to ensure that it is used. In 1998, Rusty Thomas, a colleague in the Bradfield lab, and I put together a gene expression database to enable end-users, not card-carrying computational biologists, to explore large toxicology data sets. When I got to GNF and had the resources to do something like this at scale, I jumped at the chance. With an extremely talented graduate student, Andy Su (now director of computational biology at GNF), we built the Gene Atlas/Symatlas, a repository of multiple tissue expression data for human and mouse genes. This resource has been highly used by the research community. I thought, if this works for tissue specific gene expression, which was a peripheral interest of mine, it should work just as well for circadian data. So we built the first circadian expression databases. Now, we’re putting up other large-scale data sets such as siRNA screens. When tens, dozens, or hundreds of labs are using your resources, good things will come of it.
The Web and technology to exploit it have changed, but the basic principle of open science has not. Papers associated with these databases are read more, the data sets are used more, the papers are cited more, it’s win-win.
You are involved in a number of initiatives involving Wikipedia and gene annotation online – can you tell us more about these?
My foray into gene annotation efforts really began with the Gene Atlas. The Web isn’t static, though, and other opportunities emerged. One of these was Wikipedia. We noticed that the canonical gene annotation efforts at NCBI were understaffed — one person ran Locus Link. Andy thought , why not apply community intelligence, which generated a resource to rival Encyclopaedia Britannica, to gene annotation efforts? I agreed. Again, if something like this is going to happen on a genome scale, I’ll do my best to make sure that the circadian clock community benefits first. Now, if you go to Google and search a clock gene such as Bmal1, the first link that comes up is the Arntl entry in Wikipedia. When a clock rookie looks at the circadian gene, they go to its Wikipedia page, an archive and evolving review paper, to learn about it. That’s a fact.
The second recent development is BioGPS, a descendent of the Gene Atlas and SymAtlas. It handles gene synonyms, but more importantly, it allows one to use lightweight methods, URL-based, to aggregate and visualize gene-based data sets. This is the technology we use to build the siRNA screening database. We put our data in there, but also linked this cell based screening data to gene expression data sets (circadian and multiple tissue expression), annotation efforts at NCBI and Wikipedia, and the UCSC genome browser. The really cool aspect of it, though, is that it’s customizable. If you want to add a new data set, you can, or you can link to one of the 100+ plug-in data sets with a couple of mouse clicks. A customized gene portal with your favorite data in a couple of minutes for free.
How does (if it does) blogging figure in your work? How about social networks, e.g., Twitter, FriendFeed and Facebook?
I don’t currently blog. It’s not that I’m opposed to it, it’s just that I have my hands full. I do use Facebook, but mostly to keep up with friends and family.
When and how did you discover science blogs? What are some of your favourites? Have you discovered any new cool science blogs while at the Conference?
Is this a trick question? Yours of course. When I can, I also tune into Mike Eisen, a fellow baseball and genomics enthusiast, and Andy Su.
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
Andy and I had a long discussion with Deepak Singh from Amazon on their Web Services platform (AWS). It’s two things, storage and compute power — you buy what you need when you need it. I came back to Penn and began advocating for testing these platforms out on our own data. Even big institutions such as ours have problems with access to compute clusters. We are already exploiting AWS for proteomics work, and beginning to do the same now for genomic data — Steven Salzberg at the University of Maryland has pioneered some of these ideas.
My summary: at this point, if you use north of 70% of your CPU cycles, you’re probably better off buying your own. If you use less than 50%, AWS already makes sense, and much below that, I would argue it’s a no-brainer. There are some problems — you have to code in a particular way, data transfer costs can add up, but these things can be mitigated and Amazon is working hard to do so. Why buy expensive hardware, maintain and service it, and compete for high-priced IT talent, when Amazon already does that better than academia ever will?
For the molecular biologists in the audience, it’s sort of like buying a polyacrylamide gel rather than pouring one. Until I told people in the lab about eight years ago, no more pouring page gels. It’s time-consuming, which is money consuming, and I would rather have them do something else.
It was so nice to see see you again and thank you for the interview. I hope to see you again next January.
==========================
See the 2008 interview series and 2009 series for more.

Clock Quotes

Walk groundly, talk profoundly, drink roundly, sleep soundly.
– William Hazlitt

And I’ll Huff, And I’ll Puff…

…and I’ll blow the straw house down. And the sticks house down. And, wow, the brick house down as well! Yummy little pigs!

Today’s carnivals

Grand Rounds Vol. 5 No. 47 is up on The Covert Rationing Blog

Clock Quotes

Sleep is when all the unsorted stuff comes flying out as from a dustbin upset in a high wind.
– William Golding

I Am A Scientist (video)


via Arikia

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 29 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
The Apollo Number: Space Suits, Self-Support, and the Walk-Run Transition:

How space suits affect the preferred walk-run transition is an open question with relevance to human biomechanics and planetary extravehicular activity. Walking and running energetics differ; in reduced gravity (<0.5 g), running, unlike on Earth, uses less energy per distance than walking. The walk-run transition (denoted *) correlates with the Froude Number (Fr = v2/gL, velocity v, gravitational acceleration g, leg length L). Human unsuited Fr* is relatively constant (~0.5) with gravity but increases substantially with decreasing gravity below ~0.4 g, rising to 0.9 in 1/6 g; space suits appear to lower Fr*. Because of pressure forces, space suits partially (1 g) or completely (lunar-g) support their own weight. We define the Apollo Number (Ap = Fr/M) as an expected invariant of locomotion under manipulations of M, the ratio of human-supported to total transported mass. We hypothesize that for lunar suited conditions Ap* but not Fr* will be near 0.9, because the Apollo Number captures the effect of space suit self-support. We used the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal and other sources to identify 38 gait events during lunar exploration for which we could determine gait type (walk/lope/run) and calculate Ap. We estimated the binary transition between walk/lope (0) and run (1), yielding Fr* (0.36±0.11, mean±95% CI) and Ap* (0.68±0.20). The Apollo Number explains 60% of the difference between suited and unsuited Fr*, appears to capture in large part the effects of space suits on the walk-run transition, and provides several testable predictions for space suit locomotion and, of increasing relevance here on Earth, exoskeleton locomotion. The knowledge of how space suits affect gait transitions can be used to optimize space suits for use on the Moon and Mars.

Ants, Cataglyphis cursor, Use Precisely Directed Rescue Behavior to Free Entrapped Relatives:

Although helping behavior is ubiquitous throughout the animal kingdom, actual rescue activity is particularly rare. Nonetheless, here we report the first experimental evidence that ants, Cataglyphis cursor, use precisely directed rescue behavior to free entrapped victims; equally important, they carefully discriminate between individuals in distress, offering aid only to nestmates. Our experiments simulate a natural situation, which we often observed in the field when collecting Catagyphis ants, causing sand to collapse in the process. Using a novel experimental technique that binds victims experimentally, we observed the behavior of separate, randomly chosen groups of 5 C. cursor nestmates under one of six conditions. In five of these conditions, a test stimulus (the “victim”) was ensnared with nylon thread and held partially beneath the sand. The test stimulus was either (1) an individual from the same colony; (2) an individual from a different colony of C cursor; (3) an ant from a different ant species; (4) a common prey item; or, (5) a motionless (chilled) nestmate. In the final condition, the test stimulus (6) consisted of the empty snare apparatus. Our results demonstrate that ants are able to recognize what, exactly, holds their relative in place and direct their behavior to that object, the snare, in particular. They begin by excavating sand, which exposes the nylon snare, transporting sand away from it, and then biting at the snare itself. Snare biting, a behavior never before reported in the literature, demonstrates that rescue behavior is far more sophisticated, exact and complexly organized than the simple forms of helping behavior already known, namely limb pulling and sand digging. That is, limb pulling and sand digging could be released directly by a chemical call for help and thus result from a very simple mechanism. However, it’s difficult to see how this same releasing mechanism could guide rescuers to the precise location of the nylon thread, and enable them to target their bites to the thread itself.

Illusionary Self-Motion Perception in Zebrafish:

Zebrafish mutant belladonna (bel) carries a mutation in the lhx2 gene (encoding a Lim domain homeobox transcription factor) that results in a defect in retinotectal axon pathfinding, which can lead to uncrossed optic nerves failing to form an optic chiasm. Here, we report on a novel swimming behavior of the bel mutants, best described as looping. Together with two previously reported oculomotor instabilities that have been related to achiasmatic bel mutants, reversed optokinetic response (OKR) and congenital nystagmus (CN, involuntary conjugate oscillations of both eyes), looping opens a door to study the influence of visual input and eye movements on postural balance. Our result shows that looping correlates perfectly with reversed OKR and CN and is vision-dependent and contrast sensitive. CN precedes looping and the direction of the CN slow phase is predictive of the looping direction, but is absent during looping. Therefore, looping may be triggered by CN in bel. Moreover, looping in wild-type fish can also be evoked by whole-field motion, suggesting that looping in a bel mutant larvae is a result of self-motion perception. In contrary to previous hypotheses, our findings indicate that postural control in vertebrates relies on both direct visual input (afference signal) and eye-movement-related signals (efference copy or reafference signal).

Neural Correlates of Appetite and Hunger-Related Evaluative Judgments:

How much we desire a meal depends on both the constituent foods and how hungry we are, though not every meal becomes more desirable with increasing hunger. The brain therefore needs to be able to integrate hunger and meal properties to compute the correct incentive value of a meal. The present study investigated the functional role of the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex in mediating hunger and dish attractiveness. Furthermore, it explored neural responses to dish descriptions particularly susceptible to value-increase following fasting. We instructed participants to rate how much they wanted food menu items while they were either hungry or sated, and compared the rating differences in these states. Our results point to the representation of food value in the amygdala, and to an integration of attractiveness with hunger level in the orbitofrontal cortex. Dishes particularly desirable during hunger activated the thalamus and the insula. Our results specify the functions of evaluative structures in the context of food attractiveness, and point to a complex neural representation of dish qualities which contribute to state-dependent value.

Do Genetic Diversity Effects Drive the Benefits Associated with Multiple Mating? A Test in a Marine Invertebrate:

Mothers that mate with multiple males often produce higher quality offspring than mothers that mate with a single male. By engaging in polyandry, mothers may increase their chances of mating with a compatible male or promote sperm competition – both of which act to increase maternal fitness via the biasing of the paternity of offspring. Surprisingly, mating with multiple males, can carry benefits without biasing paternity and may be due simply to differences in genetic diversity between monandrous and polyandrous clutches but role of genetic diversity effects in driving the benefits of polyandry remains poorly tested. Disentangling indirect, genetic benefits from genetic diversity effects is challenging but crucial if we are to understand the selection pressures acting to promote polyandry. Here, we examine the post-fertilisation benefits of accessing the sperm of multiple males in an externally fertilising polychaete worm. Accessing the sperm of multiple males increases offspring performance but this benefit was driven entirely by genetic diversity effects and not by the biasing of paternity at fertilisation. Previous studies on polyandry should be interpreted cautiously as genetic diversity effects alone can explain the benefits of polyandry yet these diversity effects may be difficult to disentangle from other mechanisms. We suggest that future studies use a modified experimental design in order to discriminate between genetic diversity effects and indirect, genetic benefits.

Brain Potentials of Conflict and Error-Likelihood Following Errorful and Errorless Learning in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder:

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is thought to be overacting in patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) reflecting an enhanced action monitoring system. However, influences of conflict and error-likelihood have not been explored. Here, the error-related negativity (ERN) originating in ACC served as a measure of conflict and error-likelihood during memory recognition following different learning modes. Errorless learning prevents the generation of false memory candidates and has been shown to be superior to trial-and-error-learning. The latter, errorful learning, introduces false memory candidates which interfere with correct information in later recognition leading to enhanced conflict processing. Sixteen OCD patients according to DSM-IV criteria and 16 closely matched healthy controls participated voluntarily in the event-related potential study. Both, OCD- and control group showed enhanced memory performance following errorless compared to errorful learning. Nevertheless, response-locked data showed clear modulations of the ERN amplitude. OCD patients compared to controls showed an increased error-likelihood effect after errorless learning. However, with increased conflict after errorful learning, OCD patients showed a reduced error-likelihood effect in contrast to controls who showed an increase. The increase of the errorlikelihood effect for OCD patients within low conflict situations (recognition after errorless learning) might be conceptualized as a hyperactive monitoring system. However, within high conflict situations (recognition after EF-learning) the opposite effect was observed: whereas the control group showed an increased error-likelihood effect, the OCD group showed a reduction of the error-likelihood effect based on altered ACC learning rates in response to errors. These findings support theoretical frameworks explaining differences in ACC activity on the basis of conflict and perceived error-likelihood as influenced by individual error learning rate.

The Genome Response to Artificial Selection: A Case Study in Dairy Cattle:

Dairy cattle breeds have been subjected over the last fifty years to intense artificial selection towards improvement of milk production traits. In this study, we performed a whole genome scan for differentiation using 42,486 SNPs in the three major French dairy cattle breeds (Holstein, Normande and Montbéliarde) to identify the main physiological pathways and regions which were affected by this selection. After analyzing the population structure, we estimated FST within and across the three breeds for each SNP under a pure drift model. We further considered two different strategies to evaluate the effect of selection at the genome level. First, smoothing FST values over each chromosome with a local variable bandwidth kernel estimator allowed identifying 13 highly significant regions subjected to strong and/or recent positive selection. Some of them contained genes within which causal variants with strong effect on milk production traits (GHR) or coloration (MC1R) have already been reported. To go further in the interpretation of the observed signatures of selection we subsequently concentrated on the annotation of differentiated genes defined according to the FST value of SNPs localized close or within them. To that end we performed a comprehensive network analysis which suggested a central role of somatotropic and gonadotropic axes in the response to selection. Altogether, these observations shed light on the antagonism, at the genome level, between milk production and reproduction traits in highly producing dairy cows.

N00b boyfriend meets l33t family

The Open Laboratory 2009 – the submissions so far

OpenLab logo.jpg
Here are the submissions for OpenLab 2009 to date. As we have surpassed 260 entries, all of them, as well as the “submit” buttons and codes and the bookmarklet, are under the fold. You can buy the 2006, 2007 and 2008 editions at Lulu.com. Please use the submission form to add more of your and other people’s posts (remember that we are looking for original poems, art, cartoons and comics, as well as essays):

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

And the sea shall grant all men new hope, as sleep brings dreams of home.
– Christopher Columbus

If I…. (video)

Intriguing, thought-provoking:

If i… from Tim Brown on Vimeo.

Who are you calling fat, eh?

Wow, the weight-loss topic is still going strong in the blogosphere (see that post for links for several initial posts).
Pal MD has more and some more.
Dr.Isis is on a roll.
Janet is now in the discussion.
Bikemonkey joins in.
Larry’s had something related recently.
It is interesting to see how experts differ on the topic…and the comment threads are enlightening as well. Take-home message: don’t trust a “TV dietitian”…or diet advice in your local newspaper or Cosmo….
As you know, my problem has always been the opposite. How to gain weight?!
The only time I managed to put on a few pounds was when I was working at a horse farm back in 1991/92. I was outdoors for about 13 hours a day. I walked many miles each day catching horses on distant pastures to bring them in, then walking them back to let them out again. I helped feed and muck stalls. I caught, groomed, tacked-up and rode a few young, strong, unruly horses every morning. I taught a couple of riding lessons every afternoon (never standing still – always walking or running along, sometimes hopping on a pony to demonstrate, etc.) and more on Saturdays. So, it was a time when I exercised a lot.
It was also a time when my diet abruptly changed. I just moved to the USA. I had no idea what was what, food-wise. I was also, for the first time in my life, free to make my own food choices. This is also the only time when I ate breakfast regularly – don’t cringe: a big bowl of Coco Puffs, Cocoa Pebbles and Coco Crispies with chocolate milk – I needed all that raw energy to operate! Lunch break was short, so it was either some greasy Stouffers microwaveable crap, or a quick run to Burger King. Dinner consisted of enormous quantities of home-made spaghetti or pizza or steak/potatoes (all very yummy) with a big bowl of salad with lots of cheese and dressing, followed by a beer or two. And in-between those meals I constantly grazed from my hidden stash at the barn: chocolate, bananas and Coke.
What those few extra pounds were – muscle, fat? – I have no idea. They disappeared as soon as I stopped working there and started grad school.
So, some people look at my skinny body and think I am weak or unhealthy – oh, how wrong they are! On the other hand, I wonder how many people who look huge are also strong and healthy. Here are some pictures of top athletes, Olympic gold medalists and World Champions, super-fit, super-strong, super-healthy, yet if you saw them in the street you’d think they were obese – am I mistaken?
Big boxer.jpg
Big wrestlers.jpg
Big Sumo wrestler.jpg
Big dressage horse.jpg

New and Exciting in PLoS this week

Let’s see what’s new in PLoS ONE, PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine and PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
Long-Term Functional Side-Effects of Stimulants and Sedatives in Drosophila melanogaster:

Small invertebrate animals, such as nematodes and fruit flies, are increasingly being used to test candidate drugs both for specific therapeutic purposes and for long-term health effects. Some of the protocols used in these experiments feature such experimental design features as lifelong virginity and very low densities. By contrast, the ability of both fruit flies and nematodes to resist stress is frequently correlated with their longevity and other functional measures, suggesting that low-stress assays are not necessarily the only useful protocol for testing the long-term effects of drugs. Here we report an alternative protocol for fruit fly drug-testing that maximizes reproductive opportunities and other types of interaction, with moderately high population densities. We validate this protocol using two types of experimental tests: 1. We show that this protocol detects previously well-established genetic differences between outbred fruit fly populations. 2. We show that this protocol is able to distinguish among the long-term effects of similar types of drugs within two broad categories, stimulants and tranquilizers. Large-scale fly drug testing can be conducted using mixed-sex high-density cage assays. We find that the commonly-used stimulants caffeine and theobromine differ dramatically in their chronic functional effects, theobromine being more benign. Likewise, we find that two generic pharmaceutical tranquilizers, lithium carbonate and valproic acid, differ dramatically in their chronic effects, lithium being more benign. However, these findings do not necessarily apply to human subjects, and we thus do not recommend the use of any one substance over any other.

Distinct Parietal and Temporal Pathways to the Homologues of Broca’s Area in the Monkey:

Two distinct cortical areas in the frontal lobe of the human brain, known as Broca’s region, are involved with language production. This region has also been shown to exist in nonhuman primates. In this study, we explored the precise neural connectivity of Broca’s region in macaque monkeys using the autoradiographic method to achieve a level of detail impossible in the human brain. We identified two major streams of connections feeding into Broca’s area: a ventral stream from the temporal region, which includes areas processing auditory, multisensory, and visual information and a dorsal stream originating from the inferior parietal lobule and the adjacent superior temporal sulcus. Our detailed connectivity analysis illuminates the pathways via which posterior cortical areas can interact functionally with Broca’s region, in addition to contributing to an understanding of the evolution of language. We suggest that a fundamental function of Broca’s region is to retrieve information in a controlled strategic way from posterior cortical regions and to translate this information into action. This fundamental function was adapted during evolution of the left hemisphere of the human brain to serve language.

Motor Properties of Peripersonal Space in Humans:

A stimulus approaching the body requires fast processing and appropriate motor reactions. In monkeys, fronto-parietal networks are involved both in integrating multisensory information within a limited space surrounding the body (i.e. peripersonal space, PPS) and in action planning and execution, suggesting an overlap between sensory representations of space and motor representations of action. In the present study we investigate whether these overlapping representations also exist in the human brain. We recorded from hand muscles motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) after presenting an auditory stimulus either near the hand or in far space. MEPs recorded 50 ms after the near-sound onset were enhanced compared to MEPs evoked after far sounds. This near-far modulation faded at longer inter-stimulus intervals, and reversed completely for MEPs recorded 300 ms after the sound onset. At that time point, higher motor excitability was associated with far sounds. Such auditory modulation of hand motor representation was specific to a hand-centred, and not a body-centred reference frame. This pattern of corticospinal modulation highlights the relation between space and time in the PPS representation: an early facilitation for near stimuli may reflect immediate motor preparation, whereas, at later time intervals, motor preparation relates to distant stimuli potentially approaching the body.

Adaptive Lévy Walks in Foraging Fallow Deer:

Lévy flights are random walks, the step lengths of which come from probability distributions with heavy power-law tails, such that clusters of short steps are connected by rare long steps. Lévy walks maximise search efficiency of mobile foragers. Recently, several studies raised some concerns about the reliability of the statistical analysis used in previous analyses. Further, it is unclear whether Lévy walks represent adaptive strategies or emergent properties determined by the interaction between foragers and resource distribution. Thus two fundamental questions still need to be addressed: the presence of Lévy walks in the wild and whether or not they represent a form of adaptive behaviour. We studied 235 paths of solitary and clustered (i.e. foraging in group) fallow deer (Dama dama), exploiting the same pasture. We used maximum likelihood estimation for discriminating between a power-tailed distribution and the exponential alternative and rank/frequency plots to discriminate between Lévy walks and composite Brownian walks. We showed that solitary deer perform Lévy searches, while clustered animals did not adopt that strategy. Our demonstration of the presence of Lévy walks is, at our knowledge, the first available which adopts up-to-date statistical methodologies in a terrestrial mammal. Comparing solitary and clustered deer, we concluded that the Lévy walks of solitary deer represent an adaptation maximising encounter rates with forage resources and not an epiphenomenon induced by a peculiar food distribution.

Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions?:

The UK Medical Research Council defines complex interventions as those comprising “a number of separate elements which seem essential to the proper functioning of the interventions although the ‘active ingredient’ of the intervention that is effective is difficult to specify.” A typical example is specialist care on a stroke unit, which involves a wide range of health professionals delivering a variety of treatments. Michelle Campbell and colleagues have argued that there are “specific difficulties in defining, developing, documenting, and reproducing complex interventions that are subject to more variation than a drug” [10]. These difficulties are one of the reasons why it is challenging for researchers to systematically review complex interventions and synthesize data from separate studies. This PLoS Medicine Debate considers the challenges facing systematic reviewers and suggests several ways of addressing them.

Schizophrenia and Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis:

Schizophrenia is a lifelong, severe psychotic condition. One in 100 people will have at least one episode of schizophrenia during their lifetime. Symptoms include delusions (for example, patients believe that someone is plotting against them) and hallucinations (hearing or seeing things that are not there). In men, schizophrenia usually starts in the late teens or early 20s; women tend to develop schizophrenia a little later. The causes of schizophrenia include genetic predisposition, obstetric complications, illegal drug use (substance abuse), and experiencing traumatic life events. The condition can be treated with a combination of antipsychotic drugs and supportive therapy; hospitalization may be necessary in very serious cases to prevent self harm. Many people with schizophrenia improve sufficiently after treatment to lead satisfying lives although some patients need lifelong support and supervision.

Cross-National Analysis of the Associations among Mental Disorders and Suicidal Behavior: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys:

Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. Every 40 seconds, someone somewhere commits suicide. Over a year, this adds up to about 1 million self-inflicted deaths. In the USA, for example, where suicide is the 11th leading cause of death, more than 30,000 people commit suicide every year. The figures for nonfatal suicidal behavior (suicidal thoughts or ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts) are even more shocking. Globally, suicide attempts, for example, are estimated to be 20 times as frequent as completed suicides. Risk factors for nonfatal suicidal behaviors and for suicide include depression and other mental disorders, alcohol or drug abuse, stressful life events, a family history of suicide, and having a friend or relative commit suicide. Importantly, nonfatal suicidal behaviors are powerful predictors of subsequent suicide deaths so individuals who talk about killing themselves must always be taken seriously and given as much help as possible by friends, relatives, and mental-health professionals.

The Big Tech News of the Hour: Facebook just bought FriendFeed!

Read about it on TechCrunch, FriendFeed, FriendFeed blog and Facebook.

ScienceOnline’09 – interview with Danica Radovanovic

The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline’09 back in January.
Today, I asked Danica Radovanovic from the Digital Serendipities blog (you can also find her on her Serbian blog and Global Voices Online) to answer a few questions:
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your (scientific) background?
danica pic.jpgI’m a web activist, practitioner, social media researcher and observer, information management professional, project manager, PhD scholar, global nomad. It is hard to define or label myself, synthesize what I do as I’m pretty much interdisciplinary. One of my friends, prof. from Berkeley would say (joking or not) that I’m a spiritual scientist, seeing me in academia. Others would label me as super dragon woman in her practical work attacking the tasks. But the fact is my work in the last twelve years would be the closest to information science, web of science, communication studies, social media, humanities, web publishing, open access intertwined with web activism and web pioneering. My background is in humanities, philology sciences, LIS, publishing, information science, communications, cybernetics later, but I’ve been always curious about social implications of Web and online media. I’ve been pioneering many web projects in Serbia starting from the first academic mailing list in 90’s, electronic magazine in the beginning of ’00 (funny there is still a trace about this on this URL), comparative research on e-publishing in academia, open access using data from my US research studies, founder of the first science blog in Serbia (KOBSON), faught for the existence of this science blog, attended many local and international conferences, held sessions, talks, wrote and published many columns, was editor of open access database for Serbia, was a lecturer at School of Web journalism, and many other things that cannot fit this page. At this moment my life and work are pretty much dynamic, have to update all pages and services with new info ::smile::. More about my digital identity and beginnings on here.
In the last decade I found myself global nomading since I created my life to be a great adventure with unknown next destination. I’ve been living, travelling, working, studying both in Europe and United States. I’ve been blessed to interact, collaborate, work with fantastic people that supported me to put my ideas into action. My current work is based in Rome, Italy where I work for United Nations on the interesting projects dealing with the future web, semantic metadata systems, projects within EU and other international science and tech bodies. Beside my practical work – I want to keep up with my research, and I’ve been lucky to get into the Oxford Internet Institute where I’m a PhD scholar for 2009/2010, and in Fall I am moving on with my research right to OII.
What do you want to do/be when (and if ever) you grow up?
An astronaut ::giggle:: But realistically I would go now for a pilot flying licence for smaller planes, that’s more down to earth. Also, when I was a kid I wanted to be cybernaut [greek word cybernao – to govern] and when I saw the first Commodore 64, I dropped the idea of having a bike, but rather a computer, so I wanted to be computer cybernaut and to do something futuristic, wether it is travelling to cosmos or creating super interesting things on a computer.
What is your Real Life job?
My real life job is creating super interesting things on the computer and the Web ::smile::
I have been so lucky to be invited by United Nations to join the Department that deals with Knowledge and capacity building, semantic web, science and technology. My colleagues are very supportive and we are creating new projects with other scientific and tech institutions and universities world wide. I am currently working on one that is based in Europe and covers science, education, technology, web of science, bioethics, etc. Working in brilliant surrounding I am learning every day from super smart people but also I have a freedom and flexibility to do whatever I want within my area.
People ask me every day how did the heck I get to UN, and I usually say that has to do with serendipities and my belief that the knowledge is the power. It is a story about being in the right place at the right time. After ScienceOnline conference in January 2009, I got back to Belgrade and gave a few lectures on social networks for the School of Web Journalism, when my current colleague/supervisor asked me for an interview offering me a job. After fifteen minutes of teleconference talk we’ve clicked and I’ve been asked to move to Rome within two weeks. The rest is all written on Digital serendipties. I can say from this point of view, ScienceOnline09 helped me to reinvent new curiosities for science and tech and I carried around positive, good spirits from the event. So things just happened. I am very thankful for this fantastic opportunity I was given.
What aspect of science communication and/or particular use of the Web in science interests you the most?
I’m pretty much interdisciplinary in my approach to research and practice, since my work is oriented towards: social web, social media, social networks, open access, metadata, semantic web, web of science, web anthropology, linked data, information science, communications, virtual communities, web publishing, eLearning practices, metadata, semantic web. All these are occupying my mind and projects in the last few years, as they are intertwining at certain points.
How does (if it does) blogging figure in your work? How about social networks, e.g., Twitter, FriendFeed and Facebook?
I have been a blogger since 2003. I started to blog during my time at UNC-Chapel Hill and I’ve been blogging ever since. I blog in English since majority of my friends and colleagues are English speakers and Serbian is my native language. It’s one of the ways to express myself, practice my written word, interact with the people who are reading my words and giving me the constant feedback in digital or analogue world. My blog is the hugest social network for my friends, allies as on one place there is info that one needs to know: on my current projects, plans, adventures, rants, reflections, links to the social software I use, and other musings. I do blog about social media, technology, information and life. Some of the material I blog I use as well for the articles, papers I publish or as initial idea for my presentations and lectures, and vice versa.
Regarding social networks: Twitter and Friendfeed I use every day, most of the time. Friendfeed and Twitter helps out in my work as there is a group of people with whom I exchange information and share it with others, comment on some issues, interact. I have to admit that I’m somewhat a Twitter addict, actually texting, and from its early beginnings I did silly things twittering from wherever I was, airplanes, unreachable places, broadcasting conferences, being in dangerous or funny situations.
Facebook and I have an interesting history. Before massive madness I actually got my job in 2006 thanks to Facebook. Back then I had only academic folks and close friends as contacts. Now everyone wants to be Facebook “friend” with me, and I refuse to “friend” anyone who doesn’t write in a note if we’ve met before somewhere at some conference, any other affiliation space or situation. If someone writes that is my blog fan and what I write helps her/him out at the studies, or makes a comment on something I wrote – I cannot say “no”. This refers to others social networks as well.
Other than that, I’m just trying to reduce the information noise. The same refers to Twitter: my attention span on Twitter is short so there are friends I know for years I don’t follow and they are OK with that as we can meet whenever and chat. I may not follow thousands of people but I always reply/react to an interesting tweet. That’s why I have a separate Twitter protected account for friends and family.
When and how did you discover science blogs? What are some of your favourites? Have you discovered any new cool science blogs while at the Conference?
Thanks to you I discovered science blogs three years ago, and ever since I’m following your blog regularly. From the people who attended the conference – I like to read Bjoern Brembs blog, Greg Laden’s, John Dupuis’s blog, and many others within ScienceBlogs network. I’ve discovered few new interesting science blogs of Miriam Goldstein, Kevin Zelnio and Andrew Thaler’s as marine and ocean blogging is like watching discovery oceanographic adventures but in words.
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
I enjoyed the entire conference, especially interacting with people in between the sessions. Two sessions I found very interesting for my work and research was extensive conversation on open access moderated by Bjoern and Bill and presentation by John Wilbanks from Science Commons on semantic web in science. I think in the future conferences these two sections that are discussing the current issues should not be omitted as they are curating and shaping the science 3.0.
What are you currently working on?
I am finalizing a part of the major project I’m on since March this year. At the moment it is work on application profiles that involves social networking aspect (people + connections) using FOAF as a base (geeks know whats FOAF – machine readable ontology). I have full freedom in creating it, and beside people in-house, I do collaboration and consultations with the ingenious people and the creators of this project. I keep up with my UN job as it is very challenging for me in every aspect.
Then, I should be writing and finishing before departing for Oxford, a book (in co-authorship) for web journalists in Serbia. This will be my contribution to Serbian media regarding social web. My chapters in the book are covering topics such as: Web 2.0, social media software and tools for web journos, the special chapters on Social networks (Facebook and Linkedin), blogs, and Micro-blogging (Twitter), social marketing, etc. All this I have to finish before Oxford, and beside that I have zillion other tasks so this summer for me is working summer. I hope to catch up a few days of so needed vacation and to get the energy for Oxford.
What’s your PhD research about?
My PhD research is focused on exploring communication practices in the social networks, virtual communities, particularly on Facebook and young adults in Serbia, in specific media and conversation practices. I want to examine how young adults move between online and offline worlds.
No one so far examined how new digital media performances are embedded in a broader sociocultural and education frameset in Serbia, I want it to explore, so in the Fall I am finally returning back to my PhD research that I’ve put aside because of work. I am blessed and lucky to get the Oxford Internet Institute fellowship, which is giving me the great opportunity to collaborate with fantastic people in social media and interwebs.
It was so nice to meet you and thank you for the interview. I hope to see you again next January.
Thank you. You and Anton organized a superb conference. I hope to see you and other people next year.
==========================
See the 2008 interview series and 2009 series for more.

Today’s carnivals

Carnival of Space #115 is up at New Frontier News

The exciting history of history of science. And mammoths!

Scientific facts are fun. But probably to a limited number of people.
It’s more fun to know how scientists got those facts – their thoughts, motivations and methods. How they did it. Why they did it. Where did they get the idea to do it in the first place.
It’s even more fun, for a broader number of people, if that finding is placed in a historical context – how work of previous generations of scientists, meandering around various age-specific ideas, led to the work of this particular group.
But it is even more fun watching the historians of science at work. Most recent science is pretty easy to figure out. But going into the past, it gets harder and harder. The unit of information today is the peer-reviewed scientific paper in a journal that is for the most part easily obtainable online. But in the past, books were more important. The standards of evidence were not as stringent. The various pseudoscientific and borderline scientific ideas were mainstream. Many scientific findings were made by adventurous explorers, not people with long and sophisticated scientific training. The line between science and fiction was not very clear. While today English is the language of science, in the past many languages were used, and not everyone could read all of them. Transport of books around the world was slow and difficult. Plagiarism was harder to detect, thus rampant. History of science, and even more the work of science historians, reads like a detective thriller! Now that’s exciting!
Which is why I regularly read John McKay at Archy, who is a professional historian, slowly working on his book. And occasionally putting some of the essays on his blog for the commenters to help with corrections, ideas and additional information. See his latest output – all riveting reads:
Fragments of my research – VIII
A mammoth literary mystery
A very brief history of plagiarism
The intellectual dishonesty of Allan Quist
Quist, Antarctica, and all that
Mammoth on ice
Mammoth illustrations

Clock Quotes

Recipe for success: Study while others are sleeping; work while others are loafing; prepare while others are playing; and dream while others are wishing.
– William A. Ward

Clock Quotes

Three things give us hardy strength: sleeping on hairy mattresses, breathing cold air, and eating dry food.
– Welsh proverb

Shine A Light (video)

Clifford Johnson of the Asymptotia blog is working on some cool movies explaining science! Here is the trailer

And this is the first clip – Shine A Light:

The Open Laboratory 2009 – the submissions so far

OpenLab logo.jpg
Here are the submissions for OpenLab 2009 to date. As we have surpassed 260 entries, all of them, as well as the “submit” buttons and codes and the bookmarklet, are under the fold. You can buy the 2006, 2007 and 2008 editions at Lulu.com. Please use the submission form to add more of your and other people’s posts (remember that we are looking for original poems, art, cartoons and comics, as well as essays):

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

I’ll sleep when I’m dead.
– Warren Zevon

Today’s carnivals

Carnival of the Arid #6 is up on Coyote Crossing
Carnival of Evolution #14 is up on Quintessence of Dust
Friday Ark #255 is up on Modulator

Weight Loss – what works, really?

You may remember Dr.Charles whose blog was here on Scienceblogs.com for a while two years ago. He took a hiatus from blogging, but is now back at it with a vengeance at his new site which I warmly recommend you visit.
Today’s post is interesting – and not just because it is partially about a PLoS ONE paper – Why Exercise is Not the Best Prescription for Weight Loss which fits perfectly within the ongoing discussion about weight-loss and dieting going on a couple of my SciBlings’ blogs right now.
PalMD is going on a diet and monitoring his progress publicly, on his blog.
Dr.Isis tells him he is doing it wrong.
And don’t forget that a couple of years ago Chad went on a successful – and also highly public – diet: see his updates (each with some additional thoughts about dieting) here, here, here, here, here and here.
So, who’s right? What are your experiences? And what can I do with my 6’1″ and 126lbs – weight I’ve had since I was a teenager? Nothing seems to work to help me gain – I eat a lot, actually….

The World Science podcast/forum: May Berenbaum – DDT vs. Malaria: The Lesser of Two Evils?

The World is a radio show co-produced by WGBH Boston, Public Radio International and BBC. You can probably hear it on your local NPR station – if not, you can find all the shows recorded on the website.
You may remember that I went to Boston a few months ago, as a part of a team of people helping the show do something special: use the NSF grant they recently received to expand their science coverage and, in collaboration with Sigma Xi and NOVA, tie their radio science coverage to their online offerings.
The result is The World: Science website, a series of weekly science podcasts with Elsa Youngsteadt and David Kohn (subscribe to the RSS feed) and, starting this week, something new.
First, the radio show will have a brief segment on a science topic that includes an interview with a science-related person. A longer version of that story/interview will be on the website as a podcast, with additional links to outside sources. And, most exciting, the person who was interviewed for the show will come by the online forum for a week after the show and answer readers/listeners’ questions. Like an online version of a Science Cafe.
Today, the guest will be entomologist May Berenbaum. In the podcast and in the forum she will address the DDT debate: Is it really as bad as the critics say? (Even Rachel Carson thought it had value.) Is it really as good as the proponents say? (Sure, it may help with malaria control for a while, but eventually the mosquitoes will develop resistance.) Here’s an op/ed May had in the Washington Post a few years ago: If Malaria’s the Problem, DDT’s Not the Only Answer.
So, listen to the podcast and join the conversation which has already started and will be ongoing until next Friday. We hope that, with all of you checking in and spreading the word, the discussion will grow.
You should also follow the news about this endeavor on Twitter, in the FriendFeed room and a Facebook page. Join, friend, follow, subscribe. And come back next week and next and next. And don’t feel shy to give feedback as this is just in the early stages of development and we are open to suggestions.

Jay Rosen on the Science Writers in New York Panel for Social Media (video)

Clock Quotes

Do you want to tear your life apart and get rid of everything you’ve known as a lifestyle? Like seeing your family? Being with your friends? A fishing trip? A hunting trip? A night’s sleep?
– Walter Frederick Mondale

Today’s carnivals

Change of Shift Volume 4 Number 3 is up at Man-Nurse Diaries
Four Year Anniversary I and the Bird #106 is up on 10,000 birds
Scientia Pro Publica #9 is up on Pleiotropy

The Open Laboratory 2009 – the submissions so far

OpenLab logo.jpg
Here are the submissions for OpenLab 2009 to date. As we have surpassed 250 entries, all of them, as well as the “submit” buttons and codes and the bookmarklet, are under the fold. You can buy the 2006, 2007 and 2008 editions at Lulu.com. Please use the submission form to add more of your and other people’s posts (remember that we are looking for original poems, art, cartoons and comics, as well as essays):

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

Now I see the secret of the making of the best persons. It is to grow in the open air and to eat and sleep with the earth.
– Walt Whitman

Science Café Raleigh – North Carolina Snakes: Facts and Fiction

North Carolina Snakes: Facts and Fiction
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
6:30-8:30 pm with discussion beginning at 7:00 followed by Q&A
Location: Tir Na Nog 218 South Blount Street, Raleigh, 833-7795
Did you know that North Carolina is home to almost 40 species of native snakes and all but six of them are non-venomous and considered harmless? Of the six venomous species found in our state, only one, the copperhead occurs statewide and is likely to be encountered in Wake County. Unfortunately, snakes are often feared and misunderstood, with many harmless species being misidentified and killed. In this café we will discuss topics including the natural history and identification of these animals, current NC legislation about snakes and other exotic reptiles, as well as the challenges involved with keeping snakes in a public Museum. This café will give you a new appreciation for this important group of reptiles.
About the Speakers:
Daniel S. Dombrowski, M.S., DVM is currently the Veterinarian and Coordinator of Living Collections at the NC Museum of Natural Sciences. In 2006, he earned a DVM from NCSU with a focus in zoo medicine and advanced courses in reptile, fish, invertebrate, avian, and wildlife medicine, and received the 2006 Wildlife Avian Aquatics and Zoo Medicine proficiency in zoological medicine award. Dan has authored and coauthored several publications in pharmacology, natural history, as well as two book chapters focusing on topics in invertebrate medicine. His interests include wildlife conservation, education and veterinary medicine.
Phil Bradley is the Assistant Coordinator / Living Collections Herpetologist at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences. He maintains all of the reptile, amphibian, and related flora components at the Museum and serves as an informational resource about reptiles and amphibians for the public. He is active in a variety of societies including the NC Herpetological Society (Stewardship committee chair) as well as the North Carolina Partners in Amphibian & Reptile Conservation (a voting member of the Policy, Regulation, and Trade committee). Phil has a special interest in state and federal law pertaining to reptiles.
RSVP to kateyDOTahmannATncdenrDOTgov.

Clock Quotes

A dream is a wish your heart makes, when you’re fast asleep.
– Walt Disney’s Cinderella

Today’s carnivals

Carnival of the Blue #27 is up on OH, FOR THE LOVE OF SCIENCE!
Grand Rounds Vol. 5 No. 46 is up on Emergiblog

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 19 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
What You See Is What You Get? Exclusion Performances in Ravens and Keas:

Among birds, corvids and parrots are prime candidates for advanced cognitive abilities. Still, hardly anything is known about cognitive similarities and dissimilarities between them. Recently, exclusion has gained increasing interest in comparative cognition. To select the correct option in an exclusion task, one option has to be rejected (or excluded) and the correct option may be inferred, which raises the possibility that causal understanding is involved. However, little is yet known about its evolutionary history, as only few species, and mainly mammals, have been studied. We tested ravens and keas in a choice task requiring the search for food in two differently shaped tubes. We provided the birds with partial information about the content of one of the two tubes and asked whether they could use this information to infer the location of the hidden food and adjust their searching behaviour accordingly. Additionally, this setup allowed us to investigate whether the birds would appreciate the impact of the shape of the tubes on the visibility of food. The keas chose the baited tube more often than the ravens. However, the ravens applied the more efficient strategy, choosing by exclusion more frequently than the keas. An additional experiment confirmed this, indicating that ravens and keas either differ in their cognitive skills or that they apply them differently. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that corvids and parrots may perform differently in cognitive tasks, highlighting the potential impact of different selection pressures on the cognitive evolution of these large-brained birds.

Cognitive Processes Associated with Sequential Tool Use in New Caledonian Crows:

Using tools to act on non-food objects–for example, to make other tools–is considered to be a hallmark of human intelligence, and may have been a crucial step in our evolution. One form of this behaviour, ‘sequential tool use’, has been observed in a number of non-human primates and even in one bird, the New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). While sequential tool use has often been interpreted as evidence for advanced cognitive abilities, such as planning and analogical reasoning, the behaviour itself can be underpinned by a range of different cognitive mechanisms, which have never been explicitly examined. Here, we present experiments that not only demonstrate new tool-using capabilities in New Caledonian crows, but allow examination of the extent to which crows understand the physical interactions involved. In two experiments, we tested seven captive New Caledonian crows in six tasks requiring the use of up to three different tools in a sequence to retrieve food. Our study incorporated several novel features: (i) we tested crows on a three-tool problem (subjects were required to use a tool to retrieve a second tool, then use the second tool to retrieve a third one, and finally use the third one to reach for food); (ii) we presented tasks of different complexity in random rather than progressive order; (iii) we included a number of control conditions to test whether tool retrieval was goal-directed; and (iv) we manipulated the subjects’ pre-testing experience. Five subjects successfully used tools in a sequence (four from their first trial), and four subjects repeatedly solved the three-tool condition. Sequential tool use did not require, but was enhanced by, pre-training on each element in the sequence (‘chaining’), an explanation that could not be ruled out in earlier studies. By analyzing tool choice, tool swapping and improvement over time, we show that successful subjects did not use a random probing strategy. However, we find no firm evidence to support previous claims that sequential tool use demonstrates analogical reasoning or human-like planning. While the ability of subjects to use three tools in sequence reveals a competence beyond that observed in any other species, our study also emphasises the importance of parsimony in comparative cognitive science: seemingly intelligent behaviour can be achieved without the involvement of high-level mental faculties, and detailed analyses are necessary before accepting claims for complex cognitive abilities.

Keeping in Touch with One’s Self: Multisensory Mechanisms of Self-Consciousness:

The spatial unity between self and body can be disrupted by employing conflicting visual-somatosensory bodily input, thereby bringing neurological observations on bodily self-consciousness under scientific scrutiny. Here we designed a novel paradigm linking the study of bodily self-consciousness to the spatial representation of visuo-tactile stimuli by measuring crossmodal congruency effects (CCEs) for the full body. We measured full body CCEs by attaching four vibrator-light pairs to the trunks (backs) of subjects who viewed their bodies from behind via a camera and a head mounted display (HMD). Subjects made speeded elevation (up/down) judgments of the tactile stimuli while ignoring light stimuli. To modulate self-identification for the seen body subjects were stroked on their backs with a stick and the felt stroking was either synchronous or asynchronous with the stroking that could be seen via the HMD. We found that (1) tactile stimuli were mislocalized towards the seen body (2) CCEs were modulated systematically during visual-somatosensory conflict when subjects viewed their body but not when they viewed a body-sized object, i.e. CCEs were larger during synchronous than during asynchronous stroking of the body and (3) these changes in the mapping of tactile stimuli were induced in the same experimental condition in which predictable changes in bodily self-consciousness occurred. These data reveal that systematic alterations in the mapping of tactile stimuli occur in a full body illusion and thus establish CCE magnitude as an online performance proxy for subjective changes in global bodily self-consciousness.

Open Access, Achievements and Looking Forward (video)

Ginny Barbour, Part 5: Open Access, Achievements and Looking Forward from PLoS on Vimeo.

Clock Quotes

The best cure for insomnia is to get a lot of sleep.
– W. C. Fields

The Open Laboratory 2009 – the submissions so far

OpenLab logo.jpg
Here are the submissions for OpenLab 2009 to date. As we have surpassed 240 entries, all of them, as well as the “submit” buttons and codes and the bookmarklet, are under the fold. You can buy the 2006, 2007 and 2008 editions at Lulu.com. Please use the submission form to add more of your and other people’s posts (remember that we are looking for original poems, art, cartoons and comics, as well as essays):

Continue reading

Blogrolling/Bookmarking – Wild Muse

There is a new science blog on the block, right here in the Triangle – the Wild Muse, written by DeLene Beeland who is a freelance science journalist and writer (and a twitterer).
The blog will mostly cover the 3 Es: ecology, evolution and environment. The first posts are Urban bird strikes, Monster of God, by David Quammen, Malaria in the modern world and Florida’s imperiled smalltooth sawfish. Take a look.

Today’s carnivals

Carnival of Space #114 is up at Cheap Astronomy
Carnival of the Green #191 is up on Humane Connection

New and Exciting in PLoS this week

Monday – time to check out PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine and PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, as well as, of course, PLoS ONE.
As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
Equity for Open-Access Journal Publishing by Stuart M. Shieber:

Scholars write articles to be read–the more access to their articles the better–so one might think that the open-access approach to publishing, in which articles are freely available online to all without interposition of an access fee, would be an attractive competitor to traditional subscription-based journal publishing.
But open-access journal publishing is currently at a systematic disadvantage relative to the traditional model.
I propose a simple, cost-effective remedy to this inequity that would put open-access publishing on a path to become a sustainable, efficient system, allowing the two journal publishing systems to compete on a more level playing field. The issue is important, first, because academic institutions shouldn’t perpetuate barriers to an open-access business model on principle and, second, because the subscription-fee business model has manifested systemic dysfunctionalities in practice. After describing the problem with the subscription-fee model, I turn to the proposal for providing equity for open-access journal publishing–the open-access compact.

Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Problem for the Past, the Present, and the Future:

In systematically, and to me at least, persuasively establishing prolonged grief disorder (PGD) as a uniquely identifiable illness that requires specific treatments, Holly Prigerson and colleagues have separated PGD from normal grief and from other forms of pathologic grief responses [2]. Is it useful to include it in the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)? I believe it is for several reasons. First, treatment for PGD is effective and substantially different from treatment for other forms of psychiatric illnesses that can be triggered by or arise with grief and loss.

The Validation and Assessment of Machine Learning: A Game of Prediction from High-Dimensional Data:

In applied statistics, tools from machine learning are popular for analyzing complex and high-dimensional data. However, few theoretical results are available that could guide to the appropriate machine learning tool in a new application. Initial development of an overall strategy thus often implies that multiple methods are tested and compared on the same set of data. This is particularly difficult in situations that are prone to over-fitting where the number of subjects is low compared to the number of potential predictors. The article presents a game which provides some grounds for conducting a fair model comparison. Each player selects a modeling strategy for predicting individual response from potential predictors. A strictly proper scoring rule, bootstrap cross-validation, and a set of rules are used to make the results obtained with different strategies comparable. To illustrate the ideas, the game is applied to data from the Nugenob Study where the aim is to predict the fat oxidation capacity based on conventional factors and high-dimensional metabolomics data. Three players have chosen to use support vector machines, LASSO, and random forests, respectively.

New blog(ger)s on Scienceblogs.com

Our photoblog, Photo Synthesis gets a new photoblogger every month or so. Today we have a change of the guard and welcome B. N. Sullivan of The Right Blue blog who specializes on underwater photography – go say Hello.
Seed Magazine’s series, Revolutionary Minds, which highlights people who work on bridging the gaps between science and art, architecture, design, communication, and other fields, now has its own blog – go check it out.

PLoS Medicine’s Fifth Anniversary and Future Plans (video)

Ginny Barbour, Part 4: PLoS Medicine’s Fifth Anniversary and Future Plans from PLoS on Vimeo.

Clock Quotes

A mother’s arms are made of tenderness and children sleep soundly in them.
– Victor Hugo

Jay Rosen: ‘The Web is People’ (video)