Why should we still be a ‘stub’?

Yup, there is a Wikipedia page about Scienceblogs.com, but it has practically nothing on it. If you go to the Discussions page, you will see some more. Be a Wikipedian – edit, add, remove and write stuff there. It is ‘bad etiquette’ for us to edit a page about ourselves, so our readers need to do it for us. Go forth and make the page grow and become comprehensive and useful.

2 responses to “Why should we still be a ‘stub’?

  1. The problem is that Wikipedia articles need source – all that material that Katerine added lacks good sourcing. What it really needs is material confirmed by independent sources – newspaper or magazine articles, things like that.

  2. But, there is no reason you can’t edit sub-stubs on other writers.
    πŸ˜‰