Yup, there is a Wikipedia page about Scienceblogs.com, but it has practically nothing on it. If you go to the Discussions page, you will see some more. Be a Wikipedian – edit, add, remove and write stuff there. It is ‘bad etiquette’ for us to edit a page about ourselves, so our readers need to do it for us. Go forth and make the page grow and become comprehensive and useful.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Submit your entries for the third Science Blogging Anthology
- Circadian clock without DNA–History and the power of metaphor
- Fighting for Open Access in Serbia
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- The Dangers of Blogging, or, the Quest for Male Contraception
- Kevin In China, part 11 - How to avoid getting married in China, or, women are more complex organisms than venomous snakes.
- Online publishing, new way of peer-reviewing, and blogs
- Basics: Biological Clock
- My Picks From ScienceDaily
- Links and files from ConvergeSouth and ASIS&T
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






The problem is that Wikipedia articles need source – all that material that Katerine added lacks good sourcing. What it really needs is material confirmed by independent sources – newspaper or magazine articles, things like that.
But, there is no reason you can’t edit sub-stubs on other writers.
😉