Yup, there is a Wikipedia page about Scienceblogs.com, but it has practically nothing on it. If you go to the Discussions page, you will see some more. Be a Wikipedian – edit, add, remove and write stuff there. It is ‘bad etiquette’ for us to edit a page about ourselves, so our readers need to do it for us. Go forth and make the page grow and become comprehensive and useful.
My Homepage
My homepage is at http://coturnix.org. It is temporarily stripped to minimal information, but more will come soon.Grab my RSS feed:
-
Join 1,496 other subscribers
Search This Blog:
Archives
Categories
Recent Comments:
Bora Zivkovic on Morning at Triton Angie Lindsay Ma on Morning at Triton Linda chamblee on Morning at Triton Jekyll » Blog… on The Big Announcement, this tim… Mike H on The Big Announcement, this tim… -
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Friday Weird Sex Blogging - Corkscrewing
- Does tenure need to change?
- Good science on the blogs these days!
- Eliminate peer-review of baseline grants entirely?
- Diversity of insect circadian clocks - the story of the Monarch butterfly
- How the Giraffe Got Its Neck?
- ClockQuotes
- The 50 Most Important, Influential, and Promising People in Science
- The Open Laboratory 2009 - the submissions so far
- Push vs. Pull strategies in science communication
@BoraZ on Twitter:
Tweets by BoraZCC licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.PayPal

Sitemeter






The problem is that Wikipedia articles need source – all that material that Katerine added lacks good sourcing. What it really needs is material confirmed by independent sources – newspaper or magazine articles, things like that.
But, there is no reason you can’t edit sub-stubs on other writers.
π