Yearly Archives: 2007

New and Exciting in PLoS Biology

Basic Math in Monkeys and College Students:

Adult humans possess mathematical abilities that are unmatched by any other member of the animal kingdom. Yet, there is increasing evidence that the ability to enumerate sets of objects nonverbally is a capacity that humans share with other animal species. That is, like humans, nonhuman animals possess the ability to estimate and compare numerical values nonverbally. We asked whether humans and nonhuman animals also share a capacity for nonverbal arithmetic. We tested monkeys and college students on a nonverbal arithmetic task in which they had to add the numerical values of two sets of dots together and choose a stimulus from two options that reflected the arithmetic sum of the two sets. Our results indicate that monkeys perform approximate mental addition in a manner that is remarkably similar to the performance of the college students. These findings support the argument that humans and nonhuman primates share a cognitive system for nonverbal arithmetic, which likely reflects an evolutionary link in their cognitive abilities.

My picks from ScienceDaily

New Hope For Sleep Disorders: Genetic Switch For Circadian Rhythms Discovered:

University of California, Irvine researchers have identified the chemical switch that triggers the genetic mechanism regulating our internal body clock. The finding, which uncovers the most specific information about the body’s circadian rhythms to date, identifies a precise target for new pharmaceuticals that can treat sleep disorders and a host of related ailments. Paolo Sassone-Corsi, Distinguished Professor and Chair of Pharmacology, found that a single amino acid activates the genes that regulate circadian rhythms. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins, and Sassone-Corsi was surprised to find that only a single amino acid activates the body-clock mechanism because of the complex genes involved.

Skin Color Evolution In Fish And Humans Determined By Same Genetic Machinery:

When humans began to migrate out of Africa about 100,000 years ago, their skin color gradually changed to adapt to their new environments. And when the last Ice Age ended about 10,000 years ago, marine ancestors of ocean-dwelling stickleback fish experienced dramatic changes in skin coloring as they colonized newly formed lakes and streams. New research shows that despite the vast evolutionary gulf between humans and the three-spined stickleback fish, the two species have adopted a common genetic strategy to acquire the skin pigmentation that would help each species thrive in their new environments.

Ape To Human: Walking Upright May Have Protected Heavy Human Babies:

The transition from apes to humans may have been partially triggered by the need to stand on two legs, in order to safely carry heavier babies. This theory of species evolution presented by Lia Amaral from the University of São Paulo in Brazil has just been published online in Springer’s journal, Naturwissenschaften.

Two New Mammal Species Discovered In Indonesia’s Wilderness:

A tiny possum and a giant rat were recorded by scientists as probable new species on a recent expedition to Indonesia’s remote and virtually unknown “Lost World” in the pristine wilderness of western New Guinea’s Foja Mountains. The Foja Wilderness is part of the great Mamberamo Basin, the largest unroaded tropical forest in the Asia Pacific region.

Emerging Field Of Neuroecology Bridges Neural Basis Of Behavior And Ecological Consequences:

Neuroecology bridges a critical gap between studying the neural basis of behavior (neuroethology) and evaluating the consequences of that behavior at the ecological levels of populations and communities. A plant laces its leaves with a noxious chemical, forcing a hungry herbivore to choose between starving, eating a potentially toxic item, or moving on. A newt secretes a potent neurotoxin to defend against predators, unwittingly setting off a cascade of effects in its freshwater pond, where other inhabitants co-opt the toxin for different uses. A squid escapes a predator by clouding the water with ink — but is this a visual defense, or are there chemical implications for the ecosystem as well?

Predicting Growth Hormone Treatment Success:

Growth hormone treatments work better on some children than on others, but judging which candidates will gain those vital inches in height is no simple task. Now researchers have developed a new mathematical model which predicts the optimal dose of growth hormone to treat children who are abnormally short for a wide range of reasons. A new study describes a model that can be more widely applied than previous versions, with greater predictive accuracy.

Today’s carnivals

Encephalon #38 is up on Not Exactly Rocket Science
Carnival of the Green – 108th Edition – is up on Great Green Gadgets

Super-calloused-fragile-mystic-vexed-by-halitosis

I’ve never before seen a picture that better fits the description used in the title of this post:
callus.jpg
You may have to read the story here to see how well the title fits.
Hat-tip: Mark

RIP: George Folkerts (November 26, 1938 – December 14, 2007)

George Folkerts was one of those naturalists of the ‘old school’, interested in everything and excited about learning and sharing the knowledge throughout his life. He died on Friday, suddenly and unexpectedly, at the end of a typically busy day at Auburn University.
Anne-Marie was his student, one of thousands who had the privilege to learn from and with Folkerts, and one of those who now has to carry on his work. She wrote about him in two very touching posts: Huge loss on many levels and Classifying grief.

Science Debate 2008 – my Question #4: Who has Scientific Authority?

To keep the conversation about the Science Debate 2008 going, I decided to post, one per day, my ideas for potential questions to be asked at such a debate. The questions are far too long, though, consisting more of my musings than real questions that can be asked on TV (or radio or online, wherever this may end up happening). I want you to:
– correct my factual errors
– call me on my BS
– tell me why the particular question is counterproductive or just a bad idea to ask
– if you think the question is good, help me reduce the question from ~500 to ~20 words or so.
Here is the fourth one, so comment away!

Emboldened by the generally anti-science positions of this Administration, both politically motivated and religiously motivated assaults on science have reached unprecedented levels of intensity over the past seven years, quite openly stating their goals of rolling back the Enlightenment. There have been increased attempts, often looked kindly by some people in Congress as well as the White House, to introduce Intelligent Design Creationism into public schools, to ban abortion and even contraception, to reduce sex education to the ineffectual “abstinence-only” classes, to ban nuclear transfer techniques (‘therapeutic cloning’), to ban stem cell research, to deny global warming is caused by human activity, etc.
For the first time in history the websites of Federal agencies (e.g., FDA, CDC, NASA) cannot be 100% trusted to present complete, up-to-date, correct and uncensored scientific information on such “hot” issues.
Various cranks, quacks, pseudoscientists and paid PR people are trotted out as “authority” on scientific matters for which they are not qualified in order to provide an illusion of ‘controversy’ where no such controversy exists. The media gullibly accepts the perception of controversy and strives to provide a false “balance” by giving both “sides” equal time and perceived authority.
If elected President, what can you do, and what you intend to do to reverse the anti-science trend seen in the USA over the past several years? How will you determine what is the voice of the true authority on a scientific question? What is your role as President to enhance public understanding of science and what can you do to ensure quality science education in all public schools in the country at all levels?
Previously:
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #1: Scientific Advice to the President
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #2: Science Funding
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #3: Global Warming

Science Blogging Conference – who is coming? (North Carolina State University)

2008NCSBClogo200.pngThere are 33 days until the Science Blogging Conference. We have 199 registered participants. The Sigma Xi space accommodates 200 and we have ordered food for 200 and swag bags for 200. Apart from the public list, we also have a list with a couple of anonymous bloggers as well as about a dozen of students who will be coming with their teachers. So, the registration is now officially closed and all future registrants will be placed on a waiting list.
The anthology should be published in time for the event. Between now and the conference, I am highlighting some of the people who will be there, for you to meet in person if you register in time.
Patrick Hamlett is associate professor of multidisciplinary studies focusing on technology and society at North Carolina State University
Francesca Reale-Levis is a mathematics graduate assistant at North Carolina State University
If you are registered, you will get to meet them in person very soon.
Now is the good time to:
Find and exchange information about hotels, rides, etc. Do you want to share a room? Will you have a car with you then and there? Please offer to give others a ride by editing that wiki page.
Sign up for one of the remaining slots for the Friday afternoon (1pm – 4pm) Lab Tours by editing the wiki page.
Sign up for one of the remaining slots for the Friday morning Blogging Skills Sessions, either the beggining blogging or advanced blogging session.
Sign up for the Friday dinner by editing that wiki page.
Sign up to help in some other way by editing the Volunteer page.
Visit our Sponsors page to see who is making this all possible.
Write a blog post about it and see what others have already written so far.
Go to the Program page and start adding your questions, ideas and comments to the individual session pages.
Get updates and get in touch with other participants via our Facebook Event group (I see that some who originally responded “Maybe attending” are now registered).
Please use ‘scienceblogging.com’ as your tag when writing blog posts about it or uploading pictures. You can also download and print out the flyers (PDF1 and PDF2) and post them on bulletin boards at your office, lab or school.

ClockQuotes

To live is so startling it leaves time for little else.
– Emily Dickinson

Today’s carnivals

Gene Genie #22 is up on Sandwalk

Two very, very important deadlines coming very, very soon!

First, we have 199 people registered for the Science Blogging Conference. The Sigma Xi space accommodates 200 and we have ordered food for 200 (coffee for more, to make up for the coffee flop last year) and swag bags for 200. Apart from the public list, we also have a list with a couple of anonymous bloggers as well as about a dozen of students who will be coming with their teachers. Thus, we will be closing the registration most likely tonight or tomorrow, so hurry up and grab that last 200th spot! After that, we will probably have a waiting list, but that is no guarantee (and makes it hard to plan your travel and stay that way).
If you are registered, now is the good time to:
1) find and exchange information about hotels, rides, etc. Will you have a car with you then and there? Please offer to give others a ride by editing that wiki page.
2) sign up for one of the remaining slots for the Friday afternoon (1pm – 4pm) Lab Tours by editing the wiki page.
3) sign up for one of the remaining slots for the Friday morning Blogging Skills Sessions, either the beggining blogging or advanced blogging session.
4) sign up for the Friday dinner by editing that wiki page.
5) sign up to help in some other way by editing the Volunteer page.
6) visit our Sponsors page to see who is making this all possible.
7) write a blog post about it and see what others have already written so far.
8) Go to the Program page and start adding your questions, ideas and comments to the individual session pages.
Second, the deadline for submitting blog posts for the 2nd Science Blogging Anthology is December 20th at midnight. Yup, just four more days. So, submit your best of the year here. There are more than 410 posts there already, and the 30+ judges are already reading them and rating them. Make sure your best post is there. Original poems and cartoons/comics are still in short supply.

It’s In Your DNA!

That is one of the phrases that has been getting on my nerves for years now. So, I chuckled when I saw Keith Robison explain why that is not such a good corporate slogan.
I’ll add another one to his funny list:
– Most of our organization sits there inert and dead while all of the work is performed by janitors, cooks, chauffeurs and outside contractors.

Hypnic Jerk

No, that is not a really nasty guy who hypnotizes people. It is a technical term used to describe the feeling of falling one sometimes experiences at the moment one drifts into sleep. It often makes the person wake up again. I have not experienced it as kid, and even now it happens to me only rarely, when I am extremely exhausted at the time I finally get to go to bed.
But if you want to know more about this phenomenon and little that is known about its causes, head on to Pure Pedantry where Jake Young explains it.

My picks from ScienceDaily

New Research Alters Concept Of How Circadian Clock Functions:

Scientists from the University of Cambridge have identified a molecule that may govern how the circadian clock in plants responds to environmental changes. The researchers have discovered that a signalling molecule, known to be important for environmental stress signalling in plants, also regulates their circadian clock. They believe that the molecule may therefore incorporate information about environmental changes into the biological clock that regulates the physiology of plants. The research dramatically changes our current understanding of the circadian clock and may have important implications for the agricultural community.

Penguins In Peril As Climate Warms:

The penguin population of Antarctica is under pressure from global warming, according to a WWF report. The report, Antarctic Penguins and Climate Change, shows that the four populations of penguins that breed on the Antarctic continent — Adélie, Emperor, Chinstrap and Gentoo — are under escalating pressure. For some, global warming is taking away precious ground on which penguins raise their young. For others, food has become increasingly scarce because of warming in conjunction with overfishing.

To Catch A Panda:

Michigan State University’s panda habitat research team has spent years collecting mountains of data aimed at understanding and saving giant pandas. Now a graduate student is working to catch crucial data that’s black, white and furry. Vanessa Hull, 25, a Ph.D. candidate, is in the snowy, remote mountains of the Sichuan Province of China — which also is the heart of panda habitat. She’s hoping to capture, collar and track up to four wild pandas using advanced global positioning systems.

New, Rare And Threatened Species Discovered In Ghana:

Scientists exploring one of the largest remaining blocks of tropical forest in Western Africa discovered significant populations of new, rare and threatened species underscoring the area’s high biological diversity and value.

Genetic Differences Influence Aging Rates In The Wild:

Long-lived, wild animals harbor genetic differences that influence how quickly they begin to show their age, according to the results of a long-term study. Evidence for the existence of such genetic variation for aging rates–a central tenet in the evolutionary theory that explains why animals would show physiological declines as they grow older–had largely been lacking in natural populations until now, the researchers said.

Today’s carnivals

The Accretionary Wedge #4: Deskcrops is up on goodSchist
Carnival of the Liberals #53: Best Of 2007 is up on Neural Gourmet

Science Debate 2008 – my Question #3: Global Warming

To keep the conversation about the Science Debate 2008 going, I decided to post, one per day, my ideas for potential questions to be asked at such a debate. The questions are far too long, though, consisting more of my musings than real questions that can be asked on TV (or radio or online, wherever this may end up happening). I want you to:
– correct my factual errors
– call me on my BS
– tell me why the particular question is counterproductive or just a bad idea to ask
– if you think the question is good, help me reduce the question from ~500 to ~20 words or so.
Here is the third one, so comment away!

Back in 2004, global warming was not a prominent campaign issue for any of the candidates. This time around, most of the candidates have highlighted this issue to some extent. Unlike many other problems we are facing, the threat of global warming is neither just an internal U.S. problem, nor a problem that we can afford to wait a couple of more electoral cycles before we address it seriously.
The USA is not a signatory of the Kyoto agreement and countries all over the world are failing to meet Kyoto requirements. Reduction of CO2 intensity per GDP, or slowing down of the increase of CO2 production are not sufficient goals. The production of CO2 actually has to be reduced from current levels in order to avoid temperature increase. Many of the factors that lead to global warming (especially transportation) have additional environmental impacts, e.g., noise, light and space pollution. Reducing all the factors is not a matter of a single, simple policy – so much is deeply interconnected: the energy production and consumption, dependence on (foreign) oil, environmental protection, agriculture, transportation, infrastructure, design of cities, among else. Even the U.S. foreign policy, the way we do business and our way of life need to change.
Big systemic changes are necessary, and such changes are always strongly opposed by actors who fear a short-term financial loss from such changes. How do you propose to tackle the complex issue of climate change and, if elected in 2008, what can you do to persuade the Congress, the private sector and the American people, as well as all the other nations in the World, to accept your plan although it will require substantial changes in the way we think: choosing quality of life over raw wealth! Is America ready for this?
Previously: Science Debate 2008 – my Question #1: Scientific Advice to the President
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #2: Science Funding

Science Blogging Conference – who is coming? (More students at Duke University)

2008NCSBClogo200.pngThere are 34 days until the Science Blogging Conference. The wiki is looking good, the Program is shaping up nicely, and there is more and more blog and media coverage already. The anthology should be published in time for the event. There are already 197 registered participants and if you do not register soon, it may be too late once you decide to do so (the maxium capacity of the venue is about 200 and we are about to close the registration). Between now and the conference, I am highlighting some of the people who will be there, for you to meet in person if you register in time.
Phoebe Lee is a graduate student in Molecular Genetics & Microbiology and the WiSE Program Coordinator at Duke University
Julia Chen is also a graduate student in Molecular Genetics and Microbiology at Duke University
Jason Reeves is a graduate student in Genetics and Genomics at Duke University
Daniel Wilson is an undergraduate student at Duke University
In order to meet them, you know what you have to do: register! Registration is free. Check the map for nearby hotels. And sign up for the Friday dinner.
If you are coming, find hotel information, exchange information about where you are staying, if you are offering a ride, need a ride, or want to carpool on the Ride Board – just edit the wiki page and add the query or information.
Our Friday lab tours are now in place, so you can start signing up to join one of them.
Get updates and get in touch with other participants via our Facebook Event group (I see that some who originally responded “Maybe attending” are now registered).
Please use ‘scienceblogging.com’ as your tag when writing blog posts about it or uploading pictures. You can also download and print out the flyers (PDF1 and PDF2) and post them on bulletin boards at your office, lab or school.

ClockQuotes

Life itself is a bubble and a skepticism, and a sleep within sleep.
– Ralph Waldo Emerson

Congratulations!

Michael Barton has graduated! He got his degree in History of Science and will try to pursue a graduate degree in the same field. Hey, check out NC State as an option…

The Meme Of Memes!

Matt and Mrs.Whatsit tagged me with the 7-meme and 8-meme and I have been struggling with the ideas as to how to respond. I am usually a sucker for memes. I always do them. But there is nothing – weird or not – about myself that I have not already mentioned on this blog at one point or another (except things that I will never say, as I do not want to endanger my job, my marriage, or my good relationships with the family, in-laws, neighbors, friends and colleagues). So, instead, I will challenge you: have you done more memes than I did in your blogging career? List them all. Here are mine:
Learn more basic stuff about me from the 4 meme
Learn even more about me from The Eight Random Facts Meme
Learn even, even more about me from the Eight Random Facts Meme, Take 2
Learn even, even, even more about me in the Meme of Four (again)
Learn more silly factoids about me in The Dirty Thirty Meme
Learn even more silly factoids about me in Seven Times Seven Meme
Learn more about what I think as to who might qualify as a scientist rock-star in the Scientist Rock Star meme
Learn more about my incredible library from the My Oldest Book(s) Meme
Learn more about my taste in books from the Book meme
Learn even more about my taste in books from The Book Meme
Learn even, even more about my taste in books from Another Book Meme!
Oh, and also Science Books from my Childhood meme.
I’ve been traveling a lot lately, so I need to update the States Meme
Learn more about my work history in the Four Jobs Meme
Learn more about the quotes I like from the Random Quotes Meme
Learn more about my thoughts on blogging at the Blogging Blog Meme
Learn even more about my thoughts on blogging from the Why Do You Blog Meme
I did the Year In Review meme twice, in 2006 and in 2007.
This year I missed it, but last year I did the Hanukah meme
The Thinking Blogger is kind of a meme as well.
Learn more about my favorite animals from the Cool Animal Meme
Learn more about my favourite birds in the Beauty: Not Just Feather-Deep meme.
Learn more about my tastes in movies/music/books from the Pharyngula mutating genre meme
And there are even more movies in the Obscure-but-Good Movies meme.
Learn more about my blog-fu from the I rank number one on Google meme!!
Learn more about my taste in monster movies from the Happy HalloMeme!
I participated in the Memetree experiment.
This is an old one – the 23-5 meme
And this one is silly: Zero meme
And so is this one – Browser Meme
While the Academic Blog Survey is dead serious.
I think that’s all. At least all I could find. Have fun. See if you can beat my record (well, just do them all plus one).

Today’s carnivals

Oekologie #12 is up on Behavioral Ecology Blog

Year In Review Meme

Janet, John and I did this last year. Now John is reminding us again and I hope more people pick it up as it is quite fun to do. The idea is to link back to your first post of each month of the year and to copy and paste the first sentence of each of those posts. Let’s see if it is all ClockQuotes for me this year, as I tend to schedule them at 4am, so they are likely to be first posts of the day, thus also of the month – I tend to post substantive stuff around noon. Just check all the months’ archives and browse the titles that are interesting to you (2555 posts so far this year!):
January
If we take care of the moments, the years will take care of themselves.
February
Four Stone Hearth #8 is up on Northstate Science.
March
Time is the image of eternity.
April
I love sleep.
May
In a large proportion of the surface of our planet, people are not supposed to go to work today.
June
The season of failure is the best time for sowing the seeds of success.
July
OK, I have scheduled to repost automatically some of the best clock-related posts.
August
Flip Of Genetic Switch Causes Cancers In Mice To Self-destruct: Killing cancerous tumors isn’t easy, as anyone who has suffered through chemotherapy can attest.
September
Late last night we opened the registration for the 2nd Science Blogging Conference, to be held on January 19th, 2008 on the Sigma Xi campus (publishers of ‘American Scientist’) in the Research Triangle Park which is officially on the territory of Durham, NC.
October
In a time of drastic change it is the learners who inherit the future.
November
To do nothing is sometimes a good remedy.
December
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect.
Now you do it.

Update:
Janet did it again. And Anne-Marie and Afarensis did it as well.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Losses Of Long-established Genes Contribute To Human Evolution

While it is well understood that the evolution of new genes leads to adaptations that help species survive, gene loss may also afford a selective advantage. A group of scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz led by biomolecular engineering professor David Haussler has investigated this less-studied idea, carrying out the first systematic computational analysis to identify long-established genes that have been lost across millions of years of evolution leading to the human species.

The actual paper is here
Cholesterol Fine Tunes Hearing:

Levels of cholesterol in the membranes of hair cells in the inner ear can affect your hearing, said a consortium of researchers from Baylor College of Medicine, Rice University and Purdue University in a new report in the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Anti-drinking Campaign Ads May Be ‘Catastrophically Misconceived’:

Some anti-drinking advertising campaigns may be “catastrophically misconceived” because they play on the entertaining ‘drinking stories’ that young people use to mark their social identity, say researchers who have just completed a three year study of the subject.

Intensive Care Quality Of Sleep Improved By New Drug, Reports Study:

A new sedative drug has been shown to improve the sleep quality and comfort levels of intensive care patients, compared to the most commonly-used medication, according to research published in the journal JAMA.

Science Debate 2008 – my Question #2: Science Funding

To keep the conversation about the Science Debate 2008 going, I decided to post, one per day, my ideas for potential questions to be asked at such a debate. The questions are far too long, though, consisting more of my musings than real questions that can be asked on TV (or radio or online, wherever this may end up happening). I want you to:
– correct my factual errors
– call me on my BS
– tell me why the particular question is counterproductive or just a bad idea to ask
– if you think the question is good, help me reduce the question from ~500 to ~20 words or so.
Here is the second one, so comment away!

There is always a balance – and tension – between basic science and applied science. Some Presidents favor a greater emphasis on goal-directed research, e.g., earmarks for cancer-research at the expense of basic science ( e.g., cell biology) although both can ultimately result in findings needed for better treatments for cancer, while other Presidents are reverse, favoring basic science. There is also an ideological dimension present in funding decisions. For instance, conservatives are in favor of diminishing funding for behavioral research – both basic and applied – although it is potentially important research for the fight against terrorism: studying psychology of terrorists, religion, other cultures, i.e., this is not a post-modern promotion of “immoral sexual behavior” or being “anti-American”.
What are your thoughts on the ideal balance between basic and applied research? Is there a place, for instance, for a next-generation high-energy particle accelerator in the USA? On the other hand, do we really need so much funding of the research on defensive biological warfare, (something that potentially, and in the wrong hands, can be used offensively)?
What is the role of the opinion of the American public in guiding the research priorities?
Non-military research funding has historically been around 11% of GDP, yet it has been decreasing lately. Even worse than a steady decline is the “roller-coaster” pattern of science funding: big increases in funding resulting in an increase of the numbers of young researchers (freshly minted PhDs, postdocs and recently hired junior faculty) are followed by sharp decreases of funding leaving all those young scientists stranded mid-career (or “pre-career”) with no money for research and no possibilities for professional advancement. How do you propose to stabilize long-term steady growth in funding for science and what are the priorities when asking Congress to appropriate the funding?
There is also a tension – and a need for balance – between our wish for the USA to remain the scientific superpower and the intrinsic need of science to disregard borders – knowledge is universal and should be free for all of humanity (including for the American public, something that the Bayh-Dole bill has inadvertently restricted).
In recent years, there has been a lagging interest among young Americans in pursuing careers in science. In the past, there have always been scientists from other countries eager to come here to study and do research, thus filling the gap left by the lack of interest by Americans. However, due to the new immigration policies, it is increasingly difficult for scientists from many other countries to obtain visas to come here. They are also uncertain about the quality of research they can do in a country that is increasingly perceived as being ‘anti-science’ and lacking funding security.
At the same time, a number of other countries have recently developed strong research infrastructure of their own and are now capable of attracting and retaining their students and researchers. Furthermore, in some areas of research, most notably stem-cell research, we see the first signs of brain-drain – American researchers leaving the country in order to do research elsewhere.
How would you address the current problems of scientific research in the USA – stopping the brain-drain, attracting foreign students, energizing young Americans to consider careers in science, and encouraging development of science in other countries (with free flow of information between nations as well as between scientists and the public in the USA) while still retaining the US dominance?
Previously: Science Debate 2008 – my Question #1: Scientific Advice to the President

Science Blogging Conference – who is coming? (Museum of Life and Science)

2008NCSBClogo200.pngThere are 35 days until the Science Blogging Conference. The wiki is looking good, the Program is shaping up nicely, and there is more and more blog and media coverage already. The anthology should be published in time for the event. There are already 196 registered participants and if you do not register soon, it may be too late once you decide to do so (the maxium capacity of the venue is about 200 and we are about to close the registration). Between now and the conference, I am highlighting some of the people who will be there, for you to meet in person if you register in time.
Brad Herring and Kristen Wolfe work at the Museum of Life and Science in Durham NC
In order to meet them, you know what you have to do: register! Registration is free. Check the map for nearby hotels. And sign up for the Friday dinner.
If you are coming, find hotel information, exchange information about where you are staying, if you are offering a ride, need a ride, or want to carpool on the Ride Board – just edit the wiki page and add the query or information.
Our Friday lab tours are now in place, so you can start signing up to join one of them.
Get updates and get in touch with other participants via our Facebook Event group (I see that some who originally responded “Maybe attending” are now registered).
Please use ‘scienceblogging.com’ as your tag when writing blog posts about it or uploading pictures. You can also download and print out the flyers (PDF1 and PDF2) and post them on bulletin boards at your office, lab or school.

ClockQuotes

Time is too slow for those who wait, too swift for those who fear, too long for those who grieve, too short for those who rejoice, but for those who love, time is eternity.
– Henry Van Dyke

She has a bright future ahead of her!

Science Debate 2008 – my Question #1: Scientific Advice to the President

To keep the conversation about the Science Debate 2008 going, I decided to post, one per day, my ideas for potential questions to be asked at such a debate. The questions are far too long, though, consisting more of my musings than real questions that can be asked on TV (or radio or online, wherever this may end up happening). I want you to:
– correct my factual errors
– call me on my BS
– tell me why the particular question is counterproductive or just a bad idea to ask
– if you think the question is good, help me reduce the question from ~500 to ~20 words or so.
Here is the first one, so comment away!

Advancements in science and society have brought in new technologies over the past decades and centuries, so today we have to deal with the consequences of uses of such technologies that previous generations did not have to deal with, ranging from reproductive technologies to global warming, from ecosystem protection to bioterrorism. More and more policy decisions are heavily dependent on good understanding of the underlying science. Thus, there is an increased need for good science advice to the President and the Congress, as well as good implementation of science policies devised and enacted by the President and the Congress.
Unfortunately, empirical knowledge of the way the world works stands in the way of ideologically motivated policies, thus some politicians and some of their allies in the business community and/or religious community have systematically suppressed science and ignored scientific advice. First, in 1994, one of the first acts of the Gingrich Congress was to eliminate the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. President G.W.Bush demoted the office of the Presidential Science Advisor who in previous administrations was a member of the Cabinet present at daily meetings and who had the ear of the President instantly whenever needed. The President’s Council on Bioethics has been systematically filled with far-Rightwing ideologues. The Federal scientific, health and environmental agencies are now headed by party loyalists with no scientific background who act as censors of the research produced by the agency scientists. Finally, the reports of the National Academy of Science were ignored or even openly dismissed by the current President.
If elected President, what do you intend to do to make sure that you receive trustworthy scientific information and that your policies are based on the best available empirical knowledge about the world? What do you see as the primary role of the Presidential Science Advisor? In what way, if any, would you change the current federal framework of implementing science-related policy?

Today’s carnivals

Friday Ark #169 is up on Modulator

New and Exciting in PLoS Community Journals

On Fridays I look at the new stuff published on PLoS community journals, i.e., PLoS Pathogens, Neglected Tropical Diseases, Genetics and Computational Biology. Here are my picks for this week:
The Per2 Negative Feedback Loop Sets the Period in the Mammalian Circadian Clock Mechanism:

Network models of biological systems are appearing at an increasing rate. By encapsulating mechanistic detail of chemical and physical processes, mathematical models can successfully simulate and predict emergent network properties. However, methods are needed for analyzing the role played by individual biochemical steps in producing context-dependent system behavior, thereby linking individual molecular knowledge with network properties. Here, we apply sensitivity analysis to analyze mammalian circadian rhythms and find that a contiguous series of reactions in one of the four negative feedback loops carries primary responsibility for determining the intrinsic length of day. The key reactions, all involving the gene per2 and its products, include Per2 mRNA export and degradation, and PER2 phosphorylation, transcription, and translation. Interestingly, mutations affecting PER2 phosphorylation have previously been linked to circadian disorders. The method may be generally applicable to probe structure-function relationships in biological networks.

Sustained Post-Mating Response in Drosophila melanogaster Requires Multiple Seminal Fluid Proteins:

In sexually reproducing organisms, sperm enter the female in combination with seminal proteins that are critical for fertility. These proteins can activate sperm or enhance sperm storage within the female, and can improve the chance that sperm will fertilize eggs. Understanding the action of seminal proteins has potential utility in insect pest control and in the diagnosis of certain human infertilities. However, the precise function of very few seminal proteins is known. To address this, we knocked down the levels of 25 seminal proteins individually in male fruit flies, and tested the males’ abilities to modulate egg production, sperm storage/release, or behavior of their mates. We found five seminal proteins that are necessary to elevate offspring production in mated females. Four of these proteins are needed for efficient release of sperm from storage to fertilize eggs, a function that had not been previously assigned to any seminal protein. All four are in biochemical classes that are conserved in seminal fluid from insects to humans, suggesting they may play similar sperm-related roles in other animals. In addition to assigning functions to particular seminal proteins, our results suggest that fruit flies can serve as a model with which to dissect the functions of conserved protein classes in seminal fluid.

A Bacterial Kind of Aging:

Bacteria are sometimes honored with a few lines in books and reviews on aging as an example of organisms that do not age. This is because binary fission of bacteria has been assumed to proceed with a nonconservative dispersion of both undamaged and damaged constituents, such that there are no adult forms of bacterial cells and the bacterial population is not age structured. However, some authors have expressed different views; for example, Partridge and Barton [1] consider asymmetry in simple unicellular systems and how this might develop into aging, and Tom Kirkwood [2] argues, on theoretical grounds, that damage segregation could be selected for in simple unicellular systems dividing by binary fission, and that sibling-specific deterioration may confer a selective advantage. Indeed, recent reports lend experimental support to this notion and point to mandatory aging also being a part of the life history of bacteria.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Blind Humans Lacking Rods And Cones Retain Normal Responses To Non-visual Effects Of Light:

In addition to allowing us to see, the mammalian eye also detects light for a number of “non-visual” phenomena. A prime example of this is the timing of the sleep/wake cycle, which is synchronized by the effects of light on the circadian pacemaker in the hypothalamus. Researchers have identified two totally blind humans whose non-visual responses to light remain intact, suggesting that visual and non-visual responses to light are functionally distinct. Indeed, this separation was suggested by earlier studies in mice that demonstrated that circadian rhythms and other non-visual responses remain sensitive to light in the absence of rods and cones, the two photoreceptor types that are responsible for vision.

Related: Compared to your pet iguana, you are practically blind
Melanopsin
Semen Ingredient ‘Drastically’ Enhances HIV Infection:

A plentiful ingredient found in human semen drastically enhances the ability of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to cause infection, according to a report in the December 14, 2007, issue of the journal Cell. The findings help to understand the sexual transmission of HIV and suggest a potential new target for preventing the spread of AIDS, the researchers said.

Mom’s Personality Means Survival For Her Squirrel Pups:

A recent study indicates that mother squirrels have personalities, and they are essential for the growth rate and survival of her pups. Researchers at the Kluane Red Squirrel Project found that red squirrels have a range of personalities, from exploratory and aggressive to careful and passive. Both kinds of squirrels persist in the population because neither personality type offers an exclusive advantage for survival.

Andean Highlands In Chile Yield Ancient South American Armored Mammal Fossil:

A paleontological dig in Chile at an altitude of more than 14,000 feet in the Andes has yielded fossils of an 18-million-year-old armored mammal. It appears to be one of the most primitive members of a family of extinct mammals known as “glyptodonts,” a group closely related to the modern-day armadillo.

Present-day Species Of Piranha Resulted From Marine Incursion Into Amazon Basin:

Piranhas inhabit exclusively the fresh waters of South America. Their geographical distribution extends from the Orinoco River basin (Venezuela) to the North, down to that of the Paraná (Argentina) to the South. Over this whole area, which also embraces the entire Amazon Basin, biologists have recorded 28 carnivorous species of these fish (2). In spite of the evolutionary success of this subfamily of fish, the mechanisms that generated the species richness of this group are still insufficiently known.

Science Blogging Conference – who is coming? (More local scientists)

2008NCSBClogo200.pngThere are 36 days until the Science Blogging Conference. The wiki is looking good, the Program is shaping up nicely, and there is more and more blog and media coverage already. The anthology should be published in time for the event. There are already 189 registered participants and if you do not register soon, it may be too late once you decide to do so (the maxium capacity of the venue is about 200). Between now and the conference, I am highlighting some of the people who will be there, for you to meet in person if you register in time.
Arwen Long Is a neuroscience graduate student at Duke University
Brian Westwood is working on Biochemistry of Hypertension and Organ Injury at Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
In order to meet them, you know what you have to do: register! Registration is free. Check the map for nearby hotels. And sign up for the Friday dinner.
If you are coming, find hotel information, exchange information about where you are staying, if you are offering a ride, need a ride, or want to carpool on the Ride Board – just edit the wiki page and add the query or information.
Our Friday lab tours are now in place, so you can start signing up to join one of them.
Get updates and get in touch with other participants via our Facebook Event group (I see that some who originally responded “Maybe attending” are now registered).
Please use ‘scienceblogging.com’ as your tag when writing blog posts about it or uploading pictures. You can also download and print out the flyers (PDF1 and PDF2) and post them on bulletin boards at your office, lab or school.

ClockQuotes

To those who sweat for their daily bread leisure is a longed-for sweet until they get it.
– John Maynard Keynes

Blogrolling for Today

Cogitamus


Wanderlustig


I A C O V I B U S


Overcoming Bias


Science Sense


McBlawg


Sweet Waters


Lisa Paitz Spindler

Today’s carnivals

I and the Bird #64 is up on Iowa Voice
Change of Shift, Vol. 2, Number 13 is up on Emergiblog

Science Blogging Conference – who is coming? (Hosts and Sponsors)

2008NCSBClogo200.pngThere are 37 days until the Science Blogging Conference. The wiki is looking good, the Program is shaping up nicely, and there is more and more blog and media coverage already. The anthology should be published in time for the event. There are already 184 registered participants and if you do not register soon, it may be too late once you decide to do so (the maxium capacity of the venue is about 200). Between now and the conference, I am highlighting some of the people who will be there, for you to meet in person if you register in time.
Katie Lord is the Director of of Marketing and Communications at Sigma Xi, where the Conference is held.
Brian Hayes is the Senior Writer for the American Scientist magazine, published by Sigma Xi. Brian is also a science blogger.
Russ Campbell, Communications Officer at Burroughs Wellcome Fund (our biggest sponsor this year) blogs at Another State of Mind.
In order to meet them, you know what you have to do: register! Registration is free. Check the map for nearby hotels. And sign up for the Friday dinner.
If you are coming, find hotel information, exchange information about where you are staying, if you are offering a ride, need a ride, or want to carpool on the Ride Board – just edit the wiki page and add the query or information.
Our Friday lab tours are now in place, so you can start signing up to join one of them.
Get updates and get in touch with other participants via our Facebook Event group (I see that some who originally responded “Maybe attending” are now registered).
Please use ‘scienceblogging.com’ as your tag when writing blog posts about it or uploading pictures. You can also download and print out the flyers (PDF1 and PDF2) and post them on bulletin boards at your office, lab or school.

ClockQuotes

Sleep that knits up the ravel’d sleeve of care,
The death of each day’s life, sore labor’s bath,
Balm of hurt minds, great nature’s second course,
Chief nourisher in life’s feast.

– William Shakespeare

Orange Julius

And here is the little orange prince:
OJ%20stalking.jpg
More pictures under the fold….

Continue reading

Biscuit

It’s been ages since I posted a picture of my oldest cat, the Queen of our household:
Biscuit-01.jpg

My picks from ScienceDaily

Massive Dinosaur Discovered In Antarctica Sheds Light On Life, Distribution Of Sauropodomorphs:

A new genus and species of dinosaur from the Early Jurassic has been discovered in Antarctica. The massive plant-eating primitive sauropodomorph is called Glacialisaurus hammeri and lived about 190 million years ago.

Aging In Salmon Depends On Choosy Bears:

According to George Bernard Shaw: “We don’t stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” But how fast does that aging occur once started? In the case of populations of salmon in Alaska studied by Stephanie Carlson and colleagues at the University of Washington and McGill University and reported on in this week’s PLoS ONE, it all depends on how choosy are the bears which feed on them.

When She’s Turned On, Some Of Her Genes Turn Off, Fish Study Shows:

When a female is attracted to a male, entire suites of genes in her brain turn on and off, show biologists from The University of Texas at Austin studying swordtail fish.

The Effect Of ‘In Your Face’ Political Television On Democracy:

Television can encourage awareness of political perspectives among Americans, but the incivility and close-up camera angles that characterize much of today’s “in your face” televised political debate also causes audiences to react more emotionally and think of opposing views as less legitimate.

Different Areas Of The Brain Respond To Belief, Disbelief And Uncertainty:

The human mind is a prolific generator of beliefs about the world. The capacity of our minds to believe or disbelieve linguistic propositions is a powerful force for controlling both behavior and emotion, but the basis of this process in the brain is not yet understood.

Today’s carnivals

Carnival of Space #32 is up on Robot guy
Grand Rounds 4.12 are up on Odysseys of George
The 149th edition of The Carnival of Education is up on The Colossus of Rhodey
102nd Carnival of Homeschooling is up on Seeking Rest in the Ancient Paths

Science Blogging Conference – who is coming? (Museum of Life and Science)

2008NCSBClogo200.pngThere are 38 days until the Science Blogging Conference. The wiki is looking good, the Program is shaping up nicely, and there is more and more blog and media coverage already. The anthology should be published in time for the event. There are already 182 registered participants and if you do not register soon, it may be too late once you decide to do so (the maxium capacity of the venue is about 200). Between now and the conference, I am highlighting some of the people who will be there, for you to meet in person if you register in time.
Jeff Stern is the Director of Membership Advancement at the Museum of Life and Science in Durham, NC.
Larry Boles is the Lead Keeper (Information Systems) at the Museum of Life and Science in Durham as well as a blogger.
In order to meet them, you know what you have to do: register! Registration is free. Check the map for nearby hotels. And sign up for the Friday dinner.
If you are coming, find hotel information, exchange information about where you are staying, if you are offering a ride, need a ride, or want to carpool on the Ride Board – just edit the wiki page and add the query or information.
Our Friday lab tours are now in place, so you can start signing up to join one of them.
Get updates and get in touch with other participants via our Facebook Event group (I see that some who originally responded “Maybe attending” are now registered).
Please use ‘scienceblogging.com’ as your tag when writing blog posts about it or uploading pictures. You can also download and print out the flyers (PDF1 and PDF2) and post them on bulletin boards at your office, lab or school.

ClockQuotes

I hate it when my foot falls asleep during the day cause that means it’s going to be up all night.
– Steven Wright

Scienceblogs.com in Klingon? What’s next?

Now that Seed scienceblogs are taking over the world, one language at a time, the overlords are asking: which language to conquer next? That’s a poll which you should go and take. But my thoughts first:
Some languages have few or no science blogs. Others have many but are a a closed community, only reading/linking/blogrolling each other. Others may have many, but they barely know each other and are not a community (yet). Others, though they share the language, stick to each other along national lines without much cross-over. Others crave international audience and write some or all of their content in (semi-broken) English. Should Seed go next to a market that is most ripe for the picking, or the one where they can make the greatest impact?
We are here in the USA where Spanish is the #1 foreign language, it is the mother tongue for many citizen’s, and if you look south, there is an entire neighboring continent full of Spanish-speaking people (and yes, a bunch of Portuguese language people as well, I know). From an American perspective, Spanish as the next language for scienceblogs is a no-brainer.
But, if you live in Europe, Spanish language is, let’s say, the top of the second tier of languages, behind English, German, French, Russian and Italian. If you live in Eastern Asia, in Russia, in the Middle East or in Africa, your perception of what language is the most important will be different as well.
If I think of foreign-language blogs that linked to me over the years, I barely remember any Spanish-language blogs that did so. But I remember quite a few in Portuguese and Russian (OK, also in Slovenian and Serbian, but that is my own ‘niche’ in a sense, not reflecting any kind of reality). I know one French blog, half of the posts of which are written in English. Recently, the most science blogging I see outside of English and German is in Italian – they are hot about it and keep linking to me and e-mailing me, etc – I will be going to Trieste in April to talk to them, etc. so it appears to me that theirs is the fastest-rising, most excited science blogosphere that wants to get international recognition – they may be the best organized and most receptive if Seed wants to offer a deal. Who knows what Russians or Chinese or Japanese are doing and what they think?
So, to summarize….
If the target is the language spoken by most people in the world, regardless of their Internet access – pick Chinese.
If the target is the language used by most blogs in the world, regardless of the way they are used and if they have science content – pick Korean.
If the target is the language understood, at least superficially, by most Americans – pick Spanish.
If the target is the language understood, behind English and German, by most Europeans – pick French (but beware that Science! on blogue already exists – do scienceblogs want to compete or open new markets?)
If the target is the language in a different, non-Western part of the world that is chock-full of scientists and science bloggers not known outside their region – pick Russian.
If the target is the language that already has a thriving science blogging community that is craving international recognition and will be receptive to Sb advances the most – pick Italian.
Now go and vote and voice your own opinion.

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 30 new articles published in PLoS ONE today. My personal picks:
Genetic Impact of a Severe El Nino Event on Galápagos Marine Iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus):

El Nino is an ocean-atmosphere phenomenon occurring in the Pacific Basin which is responsible for extreme climate variation in the Southern hemisphere. In this study, the authors investigated whether a severe El Nino event affected the genetic make-up of Galapagos marine iguanas. No strong influence of El Nino on genetic diversity in the iguana populations was uncovered; however, the data suggest that future studies of this type also need to consider the potential effect of other biological and environmental changes on genetic diversity.

What Are You Feeling? Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess the Modulation of Sensory and Affective Responses during Empathy for Pain:

Previous research suggests that empathy for pain activates similar pathways in the brain as first-hand painful experiences. However, the extent of similarity between empathy for pain and experienced pain is thought to depend on social factors and personality traits. Here, Lamm and colleagues studied the brain activity of participants who were shown photographs depicting painful or non-painful procedures on the hand of another participant. The results demonstrate that through emotional and bodily awareness people are able to evaluate the sensory and affective states of others.

Predation by Bears Drives Senescence in Natural Populations of Salmon:

Pacific salmon do not feed during their breeding period; they physically deteriorate very quickly once they start breeding and then die several weeks later. In this population-based study, the authors studied salmon and brown bears in southwest Alaska to find out whether the rate of aging in salmon was driven primarily by the rate of predation by bears, or by the tendency of the bears to prey on salmon with less evidence of aging. The results show that the main factor affecting the rate of aging in salmon populations was the tendency of bears to choose salmon with less evidence of aging.

Cross-Attraction between an Exotic and a Native Pine Bark Beetle: A Novel Invasion Mechanism?:

Aside from the ecological impacts, invasive species fascinate ecologists because of the unique opportunities that invasives offer in the study of community ecology. Some hypotheses have been proposed to illustrate the mechanisms that allow exotics to become invasive. However, positive interactions between exotic and native insects are rarely utilized to explain invasiveness of pests. Here, we present information on a recently formed association between a native and an exotic bark beetle on their shared host, Pinus tabuliformis, in China. In field examinations, we found that 35-40% of P. tabuliformis attacked by an exotic bark beetle, Dendroctonus valens, were also attacked by a native pine bark beetle, Hylastes parallelus. In the laboratory, we found that the antennal and walking responses of H. parallelus to host- and beetle-produced compounds were similar to those of the exotic D. valens in China. In addition, D. valens was attracted to volatiles produced by the native H. parallelus. We report, for the first time, facilitation between an exotic and a native bark beetle seems to involve overlap in the use of host attractants and pheromones, which is cross-attraction. The concept of this interspecific facilitation could be explored as a novel invasive mechanism which helps explain invasiveness of not only exotic bark beetles but also other introduced pests in principle. The results reported here also have particularly important implications for risk assessments and management strategies for invasive species.

Increased Litterfall in Tropical Forests Boosts the Transfer of Soil CO2 to the Atmosphere:

Aboveground litter production in forests is likely to increase as a consequence of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, rising temperatures, and shifting rainfall patterns. As litterfall represents a major flux of carbon from vegetation to soil, changes in litter inputs are likely to have wide-reaching consequences for soil carbon dynamics. Such disturbances to the carbon balance may be particularly important in the tropics because tropical forests store almost 30% of the global soil carbon, making them a critical component of the global carbon cycle; nevertheless, the effects of increasing aboveground litter production on belowground carbon dynamics are poorly understood. We used long-term, large-scale monthly litter removal and addition treatments in a lowland tropical forest to assess the consequences of increased litterfall on belowground CO2 production. Over the second to the fifth year of treatments, litter addition increased soil respiration more than litter removal decreased it; soil respiration was on average 20% lower in the litter removal and 43% higher in the litter addition treatment compared to the controls but litter addition did not change microbial biomass. We predicted a 9% increase in soil respiration in the litter addition plots, based on the 20% decrease in the litter removal plots and an 11% reduction due to lower fine root biomass in the litter addition plots. The 43% measured increase in soil respiration was therefore 34% higher than predicted and it is possible that this ‘extra’ CO2 was a result of priming effects, i.e. stimulation of the decomposition of older soil organic matter by the addition of fresh organic matter. Our results show that increases in aboveground litter production as a result of global change have the potential to cause considerable losses of soil carbon to the atmosphere in tropical forests.

A Novel Interhemispheric Interaction: Modulation of Neuronal Cooperativity in the Visual Areas:

The cortical representation of the visual field is split along the vertical midline, with the left and the right hemi-fields projecting to separate hemispheres. Connections between the visual areas of the two hemispheres are abundant near the representation of the visual midline. It was suggested that they re-establish the functional continuity of the visual field by controlling the dynamics of the responses in the two hemispheres. To understand if and how the interactions between the two hemispheres participate in processing visual stimuli, the synchronization of responses to identical or different moving gratings in the two hemi-fields were studied in anesthetized ferrets. The responses were recorded by multiple electrodes in the primary visual areas and the synchronization of local field potentials across the electrodes were analyzed with a recent method derived from dynamical system theory. Inactivating the visual areas of one hemisphere modulated the synchronization of the stimulus-driven activity in the other hemisphere. The modulation was stimulus-specific and was consistent with the fine morphology of callosal axons in particular with the spatio-temporal pattern of activity that axonal geometry can generate. These findings describe a new kind of interaction between the cerebral hemispheres and highlight the role of axonal geometry in modulating aspects of cortical dynamics responsible for stimulus detection and/or categorization.

What Causes Partial F1 Hybrid Viability? Incomplete Penetrance versus Genetic Variation:

Interspecific hybrid crosses often produce offspring with reduced but non-zero survivorship. In this paper we ask why such partial inviability occurs. This partial inviability could arise from incomplete penetrance of lethal Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities (DMIs) shared by all members of a hybrid cross. Alternatively, siblings may differ with respect to the presence or number of DMIs, leading to genotype-dependent variation in viability and hence non-Mendelian segregation of parental alleles in surviving F1 hybrids. We used amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) to test for segregation distortion in one hybrid cross between green and longear sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus and L. megalotis). Hybrids showed partial viability, and twice as much segregation distortion (36.8%) of AFLPs as an intraspecific control cross (18.8%). Incomplete penetrance of DMIs, which should cause genotype-independent mortality, is insufficient to explain the observed segregation distortion. We conclude that F1 hybrid sunfish are polymorphic for DMIs, either due to sex-linked DMI loci (causing Haldane’s Rule), or polymorphic autosomal DMI loci. Because few AFLP markers were sex-linked (2%), the most parsimonious conclusion is that parents may have been heterozygous for loci causing hybrid inviability.

Does Time Really Slow Down during a Frightening Event?:

Observers commonly report that time seems to have moved in slow motion during a life-threatening event. It is unknown whether this is a function of increased time resolution during the event, or instead an illusion of remembering an emotionally salient event. Using a hand-held device to measure speed of visual perception, participants experienced free fall for 31 m before landing safely in a net. We found no evidence of increased temporal resolution, in apparent conflict with the fact that participants retrospectively estimated their own fall to last 36% longer than others’ falls. The duration dilation during a frightening event, and the lack of concomitant increase in temporal resolution, indicate that subjective time is not a single entity that speeds or slows, but instead is composed of separable subcomponents. Our findings suggest that time-slowing is a function of recollection, not perception: a richer encoding of memory may cause a salient event to appear, retrospectively, as though it lasted longer.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Researchers Can Read Thoughts To Decipher What A Person Is Actually Seeing:

Following ground-breaking research showing that neurons in the human brain respond in an abstract manner to particular individuals or objects, University of Leicester researchers have now discovered that, from the firing of this type of neuron, they can tell what a person is actually seeing.

Are Humans Evolving Faster? Findings Suggest We Are Becoming More Different, Not Alike:

Researchers have discovered genetic evidence that human evolution is speeding up — and has not halted or proceeded at a constant rate, as had been thought — indicating that humans on different continents are becoming increasingly different.

Eating More Red And Processed Meats Linked To Greater Risk For Bowel And Lung Cancer, Findings Suggest:

New findings provide evidence that people who eat a lot of red and processed meats have greater risk of developing bowel and lung cancer than people who eat small quantities. The research by Amanda Cross and colleagues at the US National Cancer Institute is published in the latest issue of PLoS Medicine.

For The Fruit Fly, Everything Changes After Sex:

Barry Dickson, director of the Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP) in Austria, and his group are interested in the genetic basis of innate behaviour. They focus on the reproductive behaviour of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Two years ago, the team was able to identify the fruitless gene as a key regulator of mating behaviour.

Threatened Birds May Be Rarer Than Geographic Range Maps Suggest:

Geographic range maps that allow conservationists to estimate the distribution of birds may vastly overestimate the actual population size of threatened species and those with specific habitats, according to a study published online this week in the journal Conservation Biology.

Science Blogging Conference – who is coming? (NC educators)

2008NCSBClogo200.pngThere are 39 days until the Science Blogging Conference. The wiki is looking good, the Program is shaping up nicely, and there is more and more blog and media coverage already. The anthology should be published in time for the event. There are already 180 registered participants and if you do not register soon, it may be too late once you decide to do so (the maxium capacity of the venue is about 200). Between now and the conference, I am highlighting some of the people who will be there, for you to meet in person if you register in time.
Shirl Smith is the Career Development Coordinator at Asheboro High School in NC.
Maureen Bell works in Martin Middle School in the Wake County School System.
Michelle Ellis founded the Ellis Educational Management Solutions
In order to meet them, you know what you have to do: register! Registration is free. Check the map for nearby hotels. And sign up for the Friday dinner.
If you are coming, find hotel information, exchange information about where you are staying, if you are offering a ride, need a ride, or want to carpool on the Ride Board – just edit the wiki page and add the query or information.
Our Friday lab tours are now in place, so you can start signing up to join one of them.
Get updates and get in touch with other participants via our Facebook Event group (I see that some who originally responded “Maybe attending” are now registered).
Please use ‘scienceblogging.com’ as your tag when writing blog posts about it or uploading pictures. You can also download and print out the flyers (PDF1 and PDF2) and post them on bulletin boards at your office, lab or school.

ClockQuotes

Time is a storm in which we are all lost.
– William Carlos Williams

Let’s get the Presidential candidates to debate science topics

Sheril Kirshenbaum and Chris Mooney have been promising something for a week, teasing us with tantalizing hints about something big. We were told to read Chris’ article Dr.President, and then this morning another article, Science and the Candidates by Lawrence Krauss.
Finally, today a little before 2pm EST, we got the idea what it was going to be and at 2, they posted their Call for a Presidential Science Debate on their blog, as well as invited everyone to the brand new Facebook group of the same title.
They have started an initiative to organize a debate for the U.S Presidential candidates on the topics of science, medicine, environment and technology. They got the support of a large number of top scientists, as well as journalists, science writers and elected officials, not to mention the ever-growing list of bloggers from all parts of the political spectrum.
While many of the policy topics that have been covered in speeches and other debates touch on science here and there, I am only aware of my Exclusive Interview with Senator John Edwards on Science-Related Topics as the only science-focused dialogue with any of the current candidates of either party. Yet, that was early in the process, at the time when they were just starting to come out with specific policy proposals. We can ask for much more specifics at this time in the cycle.
Some of the most pressing issues of the day are strongly dependent on the understanding of the underlying scientific findings, most importantly Global Warming. One’s stand on other issues, e.g., stem cells or evolution, is a pretty good indication of the person’s understanding of the world and how science studies it.
Of course, many details still have to ironed out. When would the debate be? Iowa caucus is in three weeks and the candidates’ schedules are packed to the minute. Perhaps later in the primaries (although there is a danger that it can all be over by early February in one or both parties)? Or during the general election? Would all candidates be asked in two debates (one Dem one Rep), or just the two final nominees? Then there is the question of Where? Which venue, or perhaps entirely online? Who would choose the questions? Who would ask them?
Just the response by the candidates to this invitation is an indicator of their seriousness about the job they are vying for.
Then, there is the question of how do we make sure it does not turn into a science pop-quiz? After all, the candidates are not scientists and need not know the details of stem cell research or to explain the hockey stick, as much as it would be nice if they could.
What we primarily want is to gauge their relationship with reality – will they govern using the best available information about the way the world really works, or will they govern by gut-sense and spiritual inspiration, or will they govern by immediate economic considerations only?
So, I think the questions should revolve around three general themes, while the specific topics (global warming, evolution, energy, space program, etc.) could be used as test-cases and examples of their thinking, their ways of demonstrating that their policy-making procedure will include correct science in a correct way:
Funding – what are the priorities, how much money is dedicated to research, who pays, who receives, who decides? Basic vs. applied science; science vs. technology.
Information – freedom of information, copyright, open source, open access, who owns and controls the information? How do they define “sound science”? What is the role of universities? What is taught in public schools?
Authority – what is scientific authority, who has it, who decides? How does governing rely on scientific authority? What considerations can be allowed to dilute the policy based on empirical information about the way the world works? Role of the WH science advisor, congressional Office of Technology Assessment, National Academy of Science?
For other people’s thoughts on this proposal, check out the early-bird bloggers, those who posted immediately after the 2pm announcement – and later check your Google or Technorati for additional responses:
Science Debate 08
Questions for the presidential candidates: where do you stand on science?
Let’s have a debate on science policy
Science Debate 2008
Science Debate 2008
Presidential Debates: The Future of Science in America
Call for a Science Debate
A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology
Science Debate!
Rattling the Presidential Science Debate Cage
Lets hear the candidates debate their solutions for global warming
Let’s Have a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology
Presidential Science Debate
The Great Science Debate
A call for a debate
A Great Idea: A Science and Technology Policy Debate
A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology
Presidential debates with an extra helping of science
A presidential science debate?
Science Debate 2008 — Do We Need It?
Let’s make a date for a debate
We Want a Presidential Science Debate
A Call for a Science Debate
ScienceDebate2008
It Is Time For A Presidential Debate On Science
We Want a Presidential Debate on Science!
Wait a Minute… Why Isn’t There a Sci/Tech Specific Debate for the Presidential Candidates?
Science Debate 2008
Sciencedebate 2008
Shouldn’t the presidential candidates have a debate on science?!
Sciencedebate 2008
Presidential debate focused on science & technology
Should there be a Presidential Debate about Science?
Let’s have a presidential science debate!
A presidential debate about science
Science Debate 08
Sciencedebate 2008
Science Debate 2008 – Just Say ‘Yes!’
A Science-Only Debate For the 2008 Presidential Candidates?
ScienceDebate2008
Looking ahead in political science
In This Evening’s Debate We Will Be Focusing on Science
You Want the Presidency? Let’s Talk Some Science.
Science Debate
Do Politicians Understand Science at All?
Dispatches from the Emerging Technoprogressive Mainstream
Calling for a science debate
Presidential Candidate’s Science, Technology, and Energy Positions
Call for a Presidential Science Debate
Better Smart than Dumb
Group calls for presidential science debate
A matter of debate
Science Debate 2008
Call for a Presidential Science Debate
The Unforgiving Nature of Objective Reality
Since we don’t have a science blog…
Let’s Have Them Debate Science Before They End It
Join the Debate
Uncommon Ground
Science debate 2008
Political Science
Science Debate 2008
Science Debate 2008
SCIENCE DEBATE
A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology
Presidential Science Debate?
Science Debate 2008
Sciencedebate 2008
Si los políticos debatieran sobre ciencia
Citizen Scientists
Political Issues and the Science Lobby
Krauss joins top scientists in call for special presidential debate
Debates Worth Having
Presidential Science Debate One More Time
Bali, Global Warming in the Midwest, a Science Debate and More
A good idea whose time has come
We Need A Presidential Debate On Science!
Science Debate 2008, and Krauss on Science and the Presidential Campaign
Undecided…
Znanost v ameriški predvolilni tekmi
Science debate 2008
Sciencedebate2008
A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology
Sciencedebate 2008
Presidential Science Debate?
Science Debate?
Let’s get the politicians talking about science
A science debate, not a science exam
Support the push for a Sci/Tech Presidential Debate in ’08
A solution to the stem cell restrictions
Science and the Presidential candidates
Think outside Schrodinger’s box
Support the push for a Sci/Tech Presidential Debate in ’08
Let the candidates debate science!
Science Debate 2008
Time for a Presidential Science Debate
Science Debate 2008
Science Debate: It’s about time!
EnviroHealth in Blogs: Calling all candidates!
Science Debate 2008: Shockwave in the Blogosphere
Krauss and Mooney in LA Times
Would it be better to drop ‘Science’ and use the c-word instead?
A REAL Debate
Best Science Rant
Make science part of the debate
Science is Life
Call for Presidential Science Debate
A Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Policy
Chapman and Kirshenbaum on HuffingtonPost
Make science part of the 2008 Presidential debate
Science Debate 2008
Debating Science and Technology
Presidential debating points: How about science and technology?
The Huffington Post
It Is Time For A Presidential Debate On Science – Part II
More on the Call for a Presidential Debate on Science and Technology Policy
Republicans talk climate change (maybe) – and a call for real science debate
Presidential Science Debate
Science Debate 2008
Science Debate 2008
ScienceDebate2008: What Is It?
Should the Presidential Candidates Have A Debate on Science & Technology?
Nobel Laureates and Bill Nye, the Science Guy Ask for Presidential Debate on Science
Science Debate 2008
Edwards Interview On Science
More Bora – Science Debate 2008
The Third Leg of the Triangle
Science Debate
Science Debate 2008
Idiocy all around
Let’s have a presidential debate on science
Science Debate is a Great Concept
Do We Need a Presidential Debate on Science?
Wissenschaft und die Prasidentschaftswahl in den USA
No, I really do think we need a science debate
I’m on the Fence Regarding Sciencedebate 2008
ScienceDebate2008–The Latest
Science Debate 2008
Republicans talk climate change (maybe) – and a call for real science debate
More on Science Debate 2008
Given my love of science
Science Debate 2008
More on the science debate
A Presidential Debate On Science?
Lets Talk Science
Sciencedebate 2008
ScienceDebate2008 — It’s about time
A refreshing idea
Scientists Push Presidential Candidates for Positions on Science
Commentary: A science-literate president, please
Sciencedebate 2008
More on the Science Debate
Nobel Winners Call for ‘Science Debate’, Candidates Spar Over Jesus-Lucifer Link
Let the states decide!
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #1: Scientific Advice to the President
Is Science Debatable?
ScienceDebate2008
Sciencedebate 2008
Scientists Push Presidential Candidates for Positions on Science
Friday Blog Roundup
Science Debate 2008
Support presidential debates and discussions on science issues
Sciencedebate 2008
[PRESIDENTIAL] SCIENCE DEBATE 2008: CAN WE TALK ABOUT ISSUES NOW?
Presidential Science Debate
Science Debate!
Open Science Thread
This is a waste of time and effort
Please Support A Presidential Candidate Science Debate 2008
A Sound Debate on Science …
Science Debate 2008. A great idea, but is it plausible?
Sciencedebate2008 – It’s time!
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #2: Science Funding
Flip-Floppers
Science Intrudes on Baptist vs. Morman GOP Race
Sciencedebate 2008
Milano-Torino andata e ritorno
Science Debate 2008!
December 14 News Items
Letter to Ben (and Everyone Else)
Science Debate 2008
Exploration, Discovery—Solutions
Science Debate
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #3: Global Warming
Science Debate 2008
ScienceDebate2008: In Search of a Science-literate Leader
Science and the presidential debates
Science Debate 2008
Science Debate 2008
War on Science
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #4: Who has Scientific Authority?
A Canadian lesson for Science Debate ’08: Integrity trumps science literacy
Waxing Political
Culling them out!
Shawn Lawrence Otto on the Science Debate
Time for a Science Debate
ScienceDebate2008: Twelfth Nobel Laureate, Second University President, First GOP Governor, and Jamie Thompson
Science Debate 2008 – my Question #5: Food

Scienceblogs.com in Germany

If you can read German language and you are interested in science, you will be happy to know that our sister-site, Scienceblogs.de is now live! It looks and feels similar to us, and they have lured in several of the best German-language bloggers. The collaboration between the two sites will continue (hey, wanna translate some of their best posts?) and Page 3.14 has all the details. Which language is next? We are taking over the world, once language at a time!

New and Exciting in PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine

On Monday nights, it is time to see what is new in PLoS Medicine and PLoS Biology:
Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk:

Meat consumption in relation to cancer risk has been reported in over a hundred epidemiological studies from many countries with diverse diets. The association between meat intake and cancer risk has been evaluated by looking both at broad groupings of total meat intake, and also at finer categorizations, particularly intakes of red meat, which includes beef, lamb, pork, and veal, and also more specifically processed meats, which includes meats preserved by salting, smoking, or curing.

A Prospective Study of Red and Processed Meat Intake in Relation to Cancer Risk:

Background.
Every year, there are more than 10 million new cases of cancer around the world. These cases are not spread evenly across the globe. The annual incidence of cancer (the number of new cases divided by the population size) and the type of cancer most commonly diagnosed varies widely among countries. Much of the global variation in cancer incidence and type is thought to be due to environmental influences. These include exposure to agents in the air or water that cause cancer, and lifestyle factors such as smoking and diet. Researchers identify environmental factors that affect cancer risk by measuring the exposure of a large number of individuals to a specific environmental factor and then monitoring these people for several years to see who develops cancer. The hope is that by identifying the environmental factors that cause or prevent cancer, the global burden of cancer can be reduced.
Why Was This Study Done?
Diet is thought to influence the incidence of several cancers but it is very difficult to unravel which aspects of diet are important. Being overweight, for example, is strongly associated with an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, but the evidence that the intake of red meat (beef, pork, and lamb) and of processed meat (for example, bacon, ham, and sausages) is linked to cancer risk is much weaker. Although several studies have linked a high intake of red meat and processed meat to an increased risk of colorectal cancer (the colon is the large bowel; the rectum is the final few inches of the large bowel before the anus), whether this aspect of diet affects the risk of other types of cancer is unclear. In this prospective study, the researchers have examined the association between meat intake and the incidence of a wide range of cancers.
What Did the Researchers Do and Find?
In 1995-1996, nearly half a million US men and women aged 50-71 y joined the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. The participants in this study–none of whom had had cancer previously–completed a questionnaire about their dietary habits over the previous year and provided other personal information such as their age, weight, and smoking history. The researchers used these data and information from state cancer registries to look for associations between the intake of red and processed meat and the incidence of various cancers. They found that people whose red meat intake was in the top fifth of the range of intakes recorded in the study (the highest quintile of consumption) had an increased risk of developing colorectal, liver, lung, and esophageal cancer when compared with people in the lowest quintile of consumption. People in the highest quintile of processed meat intake had an increased risk of developing colorectal and lung cancer. The incidences of other cancers were largely unaffected by meat intake.
What Do These Findings Mean?
These findings provide strong evidence that people who eat a lot of red and processed meats have greater risk of developing colorectal and lung cancer than do people who eat small quantities. They also indicate that a high red meat intake is associated with an increased risk of esophageal and liver cancer, and that one in ten colorectal and one in ten lung cancers could be avoided if people reduced their red and processed meat intake to the lowest quintile. However, although the researchers allowed for factors such as smoking history that might have affected cancer incidences, some of the effects they ascribe to meat intake might be caused by other lifestyle factors. Furthermore, because the study’s definitions of red meat and processed meat overlapped–bacon and ham, for example, were included in both categories–exactly which type of meat is related to cancer remains unclear. Finally, most of the study participants were non-Hispanic white, so these findings may not apply to people with different genetic backgrounds. Nevertheless, they add to the evidence that suggests that decreased consumption of red and processed meats could reduce the incidence of several types of cancer.

Improving Science Education for Sustainable Development:

In recent issues of noteworthy journals, natural scientists have argued for the improvement of science education. Such pleas reflect the growing awareness that high-quality science education is required not only for sustaining a lively scientific community that is able to address global problems like global warming and pandemics, but also to bring about and maintain a high level of scientific literacy in the general population. There is no doubt that effective education can serve as a vehicle for solving global problems. The problem centers on how to achieve more effective education.