Category Archives: Politics

On their way to 40 years in the desert….

The Economist:

But the odds in favour of an imminent renaissance look long. Many conservatives continue to think they lost because they were not conservative or populist enough–Mr McCain, after all, was an amnesty-loving green who refused to make an issue out of Mr Obama’s associations with Jeremiah Wright. Richard Weaver, one of the founders of modern conservatism, once wrote a book entitled “Ideas have Consequences”; unfortunately, too many Republicans are still refusing to acknowledge that idiocy has consequences, too.

Politico:

That there is no simple solution for what ails the party is clear from the number of solutions offered to fix it. Ask a room of Senate Republicans what’s next for their diminished and deflated minority, and you’ll get a different answer from each of them.

Kathleen Parker:

As Republicans sort out the reasons for their defeat, they likely will overlook or dismiss the gorilla in the pulpit.
Three little letters, great big problem: G-O-D.
——————-
Religious conservatives become defensive at any suggestion that they’ve had something to do with the GOP’s erosion. And, though the recent Democratic sweep can be attributed in large part to a referendum on Bush and the failing economy, three long-term trends identified by Emory University’s Alan Abramowitz have been devastating to the Republican Party: increasing racial diversity, declining marriage rates and changes in religious beliefs.
——————-
The young will get older, of course. Most eventually will marry, and some will become their parents. But nonwhites won’t get whiter. And the nonreligious won’t get religion through external conversion. It doesn’t work that way.
Given those facts, the future of the GOP looks dim and dimmer if it stays the present course. Either the Republican Party needs a new base — or the nation may need a new party.

I still think I was right

Toward a Reality-Based GOP

…and the journalism that can help. Jay Rosen and Conor Friedersdorf on Blogginheads.tv:

Perhaps they should ask Ted Stevens about a series of tubes…

The geriatric leaders of the government of Italy are making fools of themselves by trying to regulate bloggers, i.e., get them to register with the government, pay taxes, be liable for what they write, etc.:

The law’s impact would turn all bloggers in Italy into potential outlaws. This could be great for their traffic, I realise, but hell on the business aspirations of an Italian web start-up, not to mention any tech company that wants to sell its blog-publishing software in Italy, or open a social network here. In addition to driving out potential tech jobs, the stifling of free speech also can have a dramatic chilling effect on all forms of free expression, the arts and scholarship.

Or, to keep it simple:

Only someone who is utterly clueless on how the internet works, or even what it is, could come up with such an idea.

Will there be new communication channels in the Obama administration?

There is quite a lot of chatter around the intertubes about changes in the communication environment that happened between the last and this election and how those changes may be affecting the way the new White House communicates to people as well as how the new White House will receive communications from the people.
A lot of people are impatient – they want to see everything in place right this moment. Easy, guys! The inauguration is on January 20th. Until that time, Bush is the President and the Obama communications folks have time to think through, design and implement communication channels that we will definitely NOT see until the inauguration or a little bit later. So, you can pore over Change.org all you want in search for hints of the future, but it is unlikely you will see anything truly informative until January 20th at the earliest.
But in the meantime, speculation abounds.
This NYTimes article lays down the arguments pro and con (and check out the FriendFeed discussion as well – quite telling to see how some techie folks do not understand this is not a technological problem at all).
The problem is this: if a President says or writes something that is recordable – and technology is irrelevant, it could be handwriting, a magnetophone or an 8-track – it can be subpoenad by Congress. The article explores the tensions between the need for a President to have confidentiality about important matters of the state, and the need to open up new mode of communications fit for the 21st century mindset of the Facebook generation (Note: “facebook generation” has nothing to do with the actual Facebook site, or with a particular age – it is a frequently-used shorthand term for a mindset of continuity and openness in communication).
This is why Bush stopped using e-mail the day he became the President. Everything that the President says or writes becomes official record. New technology allows one to communicate too much and too informally. Chatting with friends over e-mail becomes a potential liability for the officials of such high ranking.
What is new is that Obama is the first President with that “facebook generation” mindset of constant, open communication, as opposed to a bubble-boy, smoke-filled back-rooms, secretive types that the previous 43 Presidents were. The laws, customs and trappings of his new job are going to be conflicting with his modern instincts towards openness. And people are starting to talk about a potential need to alter these out-dated laws in order to allow Obama to lead a more transparent government.
We shall see what actually happens, but we can expect, at least until/unless there are legal changes, that all the e-mailing will be done by staffers and not Obama himself. He is also going to be the first President in history to keep a laptop on the Oval Office desk (doesn’t this sound quaint?)! He will likely use the computer not to broadcast or communicate anything himself, but only to get informed (perhaps via an RSS Feed).
Another confusion in online chatter about potentially new communication is that people do not make a distinction between centrifugal (broadcasting, outwards) communication and centripetal (listening, inwards) communication.
The best example is probably this Slate article. I think Disckerson is confused. The new Prez will experiment with a number of new ways to communicate. Some of it is inside out, some is outside in. Posting the radio address on YouTube is the part of inside out. It is not the only tool and should not be looked at in isolation. Yes, it is part of his PR, but it is targeted to a set of people who past Presidents did not and could not reach: exactly the same people who are the most likely to use OTHER channels of communication to talk back to him. What Dickerson did in this text was sorta like focusing on a Food Chain and not seeing the Food Web (or forest for the trees, choose your own metaphor) – a lack of ecological thinking by a member of an old media class that thinks too linearly.
Brian Solis has collected probably some of the best ideas on the entire issue, and you should also read the various links and ideas in Josh Bernoff’s post and Lidija Davis’ post.
Obama’s first radio address was also filmed. The movie was posted on Change.org, and also on YouTube:

People like Dan Farber and Allen Stern are worried about favouritism – why YouTube and not other video services? Answer: if the only place they place a video is Change.org, then someone else will put it on YouTube, perhaps edited, with open comments, who knows what else. By posting it on YouTube themselves, the Obama comms folks are putting a degree of control over the message. In the next few months, they may decide to do the same on several other video-hosting services. This was just the first address, and YouTube, being such an 6000lbs gorilla (or is it an elephant in the room?), is the obvious place to go and test the waters first before embarking on a more ambitious program.
Also, a more ambitious program requires building the communications team. Which requires hiring people, including a Chief Conversation Officer, perhaps this guy (or me – I can do it, that’s my job right now anyway). That process has just started. People like Secretary of State are much more important positions to fill first. So, have some patience….

Public Forum – The Historic 2008 Election: Analysis and Reflections…

An e-mail from the Orange County (NC) Democratic Party:

The exciting and historic 2008 election stirred our souls and mobilized millions, but how did it happen? And what does it mean for electoral politics going forward? Bring your questions and your friends to a public forum presented by the Orange County Democratic Party and the Orange County Democratic Women:
The Historic 2008 Election: Analysis and Reflections
Hodding Carter III, University Professor of Leadership and Public Policy, UNC-CH
Rob Christensen, Reporter and columnist, The News and Observer
Ferrel Guillory, Director, Program on Public Life, UNC-CH School of Journalism
7:30 PM, November 20, 2008
Carrboro Century Center
100 N. Greensboro Street, Carrboro
Open to the community – no charge

Government: open and transparent

The paranoid secrecy is one of the hallmarks of the Bush Administration. The signs are there that Obama will have the opposite approach. But how exactly?
Here, the staff of the Sunlight Foundation has posted a set of recommendations to Obama and his administration: Open Letter to the Obama Administration on How to Shine Sunlight:

Dear Mr. President-Elect,
In your acceptance speech, you rightfully called on Americans to get ready to work to address the challenges that tomorrow will bring. All of us at Sunlight affirm to pitch in and work harder, and agree that we all have to look after each other. In that spirit, we offer advice for your administration on how to undo the culture of secrecy and transform the presidential administration into a transparent operation.
Your campaign embraced the Internet and engaged millions of Americans in unprecedented ways. Keep that momentum going. Your administration can make our government more open, more responsive, more accountable and thus more trusted by the people. But, how?
I asked several Sunlighters to sound-off about how they think the next administration should act to create greater government transparency. They represent a healthy cross-section of who comprises Sunlight: technology geeks, policy wonks, bloggers, journalists, optimists and pragmatists. Here’s their advice:
————snip—————
Over the coming weeks and months, Sunlight staff will share reviews of various transition recommendations for the new administration. Readers, what do you think? How do you think the 44th POTUS should help promote a more open, accountable government? Share your thoughts by commenting below.

Republicans? Who’s that?

For the past several weeks before the election when it was already clear that Obama was going to win, I was looking for it and could not find it. During the election night coverage and the days immediately after, on TV, radio, newspapers and blogs I was looking for it and could not find it. Only in the last two days I found two isolated examples of people who “get it” – here and here. What?
The failure of imagination coupled with failure of doing basic math has been missing all along. Everyone is wondering how will the GOP make a come-back, what they need to do to come back, never questioning the notion that such a thing is inevitable. Why do people think that a two-party system in which the two parties are Democrats and Republicans alternating in power, is some God-given situation? It’s not written in the Constitution. Nobody remembers the Whigs, the Know-Nothings and other parties that used to be powerful in the history of USA and vanished once they exhausted all the possible ideas they could have? Nobody remembers the Ross Perot era Reformists, much more recently, and how many votes they got in 1992?
I think the GOP is at the point when it has exhausted itself. Here’s why:

Continue reading

Post-election thoughts

Scattered thoughts, that is.
—————————-
On Tuesday night I was teaching. Yup, my BIO101 class for adults. Scheduled for 6-10pm. But it was the mid-term exam day. I made an exam that can be done in two hours. I knew that my students were itchy to get it done and go home to watch the election returns. Many of them are African American as well. I sat there, with the computer on, browser open on TalkingPointsMemo, FiveThirtyEight, CNN.com, FriendFeed…watching as they announced Kantucky and Vermont, refreshing every couple of seconds. At 8pm I kicked the last couple of stragglers out, got in the car and went home (they announced a few more states on NPR during my drive).
—————————–
Before the class started, though, I was in the faculty room making copies when another professor came in. He was determined to keep his class until 10pm exactly. He was saying some silly things about Obama not to be trusted because he was raised by his grandmother as if that was bad or relevant, and continued with several other stupid and hidden-racist comments. I let it be – no need talking back to this guy. Too old and set in his ways to be fixable.
—————————–
At home, we watched mostly CNN (occasionally switching to MSNBC). And every now and then I would go back online to see what is going on (as cable news are certainly not going to be as fast, nor could the talking-heads be trusted to report relevant stuff or frame it correctly). After it became obvious that Obama was going to win, my wife and son fell asleep. My daughter and I moved to her room and watched the rest of the coverage there. At 11pm, when it was officially announced, we went out on the porch and listened to the fireworks from the direction of the UNC campus.
—————————–
We watched the speeches by McCain and Obama. I am not a kind of person who gets emotional about this kind of stuff, but I choked up a little during Obama’s speech. But I was surprised at my other emotion – anger. Eight years of frustration just erupted at that moment. The fact that those years were possible made me angry. The fact that millions of people, after it became obvious that no legitimate reason beyond racism still remained to support Republicans, still voted for McCain, made me angry.
——————————
My daughter did not understand why everyone in Chicago was crying and why everyone was saying this was a ‘historical election’. For her and for her generation, it is hard to understand why it would be unusual to have a Black President – that’s a normal kind of thing in their world. When my kids invite friends over, it looks like a Unesco event.
I told her: “You were only four when Bush became President. You do not remember the time before it. You grew up during the Bush years so you have no idea how it feels to live in a normal country with a normal government and a normal President. Now you will see how that looks like.”
——————————
I myself had a similar difficulty. I understand the American history of race relations only from reading about it. Growing up, every week on TV News there would be some Head of State from a non-aligned country visiting Tito and most of them were Black or Arabic or Muslim, so I grew up with that image of a variety of people leading countries. Being white was not the norm in that world.
But on NPR they had a long daily series of interviews with ordinary people. And almost every African American interviewed said something along the lines of “now I can tell my kids they can grow up to be whatever they want and not lie to them as I say that”. I understood that.
——————————
Back in April when I spent a month in Europe, everyone was very interested in the US election and my take on it. There, especially in Serbia, they were adamant that America will never elect a Black President and that the Dems only have a chance if Hillary Clinton is the nominee. While myself undecided at the time (I did vote for Obama in the NC caucuses in May, though, mainly because of the people the two candidates surrounded themselves with – I did not want to see any of the old Clintonites anywhere near the White House and liked some of the Obama advisors much more), I replied: “Just you watch – we will have a Black President in November.”
When asked to explain, I said that while racism in the USA is alive and well, due to the history of Civil Rights struggle, racism is very non-PC. Thus, advertising against Obama and reporting by the media on him would have to veil the racism behind some very tricky dog-whistles and still be in danger of backfiring. Most could not be done in the open, but behind the scenes. The kids and younger folks, after decades of learning about the US history in schools and hearing how racism is bad, are much less racist than their elders.
On the other hand, sexism never had that kind of historical event that can be used as a teaching moment. Thus, sexism is rampant and openly so. Ads against Hillary could be openly sexist and still not backfire. TV pundits could say outrageously misogynist stuff and not get fired. In many ways, USA has gone much farther along in race relations than gender. And remember that even historically, Black males got a right to vote before women (of any color) did. It just seems that (opposite from the situation in Europe) race always advances first, and gender follows (then sexual orientation next, and atheists still did not crack the first egg open). The femiphobic males that comprise such a large proportion of the electorate will more easily vote for a Black man than for a woman of any color at the top of the ticket (Palin was safely under “control” of McCain who was perceived as a top dog for bagging such a chick – or so the wingnut mind works anyway).
———————————–
Somebody did a poll of the world and most countries, if permitted, would have voted for Obama, with a few notable exceptions. One of the countries that would have gone blue is Serbia. But not gung-ho for him. After all, people around the world are not directly affected by jobs and healthcare in the USA. They are affected by the foreign policy. From the Serbian perspective, there is no real difference between the foreign policies of the two parties, both seen as equally aggressive and imperialistic. It was Clinton, after all, who screwed with the Balkans for eight years and ended up bombing Belgrade so there is no love for the Democrats there. If anything, Republicans are more predictable – they have a hard-on for Middle East while Democrats seem to bomb random countries around the world.
But with Bush years, perceptions changed. Vicious aggression against some darkies somewhere, bombing them without even knowing who they are, is not foreign policy – it’s batshit craziness. The main difference people there saw between the two candidates is that Obama is pragmatic, rational and thoughtful, while Bush (and later they also saw that McCain is cut from the same cloth and even crazier) is just nuts. And the way Republican economics is based on outdated vodoo ideas, has repercussions around the world. The way Republicans ignore the environment – something that is very important to Europeans including Serbs – has global consequences. So, reluctantly, Serbs in general were hoping that McCain loses, more than they got excited about Obama winning. They say: good, you got lesser of two evils.
——————————–

Transition and the new Cabinet

There are rumors aplenty, but take them with caution, about potential members of the Obama Administration.
Despite understanding, on a cerebral level, what Obama is trying to do, on a visceral level my instinct is to use the majority to implement progressive policies fast and forcefully, to have enough time for those policies to take hold and demonstrate to the people that they are good – two years of gradual economic recovery, new jobs, affordable health-care, serious environmental programs and such can lead to further increase in Dem numbers in Congress instead of decline, and would ensure Obama’s re-election another two years after.
I understand that, as a Progressive, I will not like all of his cabinet picks or agree with all of his policy proposals.
I guess I can live with Rahm Emanuel.
But there are people I cannot live with.
Robert Kennedy Jr. is one of those. He is the typical paranoid, conspiracy-theorist, hyperbolic quack. A kind of person shunned, ignored and marginalized by the Democratic Party for decades now for two good reasons: such people’s judgment cannot be trusted, and such people give the party a bad name. We are supposed to be Reality-Based Community and RFK Jr. does not belong.
For more information, this is your Obligatory Reading of the Day. RFK Jr as a head of a Federal Agency (either Interior or Environment) would be equivalent to Michael Crichton advising Bush on climate change, or McCain choosing Sarah Palin for VP. Embarrassing.
The other one is Larry Summers. Others are also vocing doubts, for various reasons. But if you search Scienceblogs you will see that Summers would be a very, very bad choice.
Now, how can Obama be notified that most scientists, academics and otherwise educated folks would be very unhappy about these two choices? Does anyone have a personal touch with a member of his Transition Team? Good connections in the Mainstream Media? Or could we, by screaming to the tops of our voices on many blogs catch the attention of the Media sufficiently for Obama himself to be made aware of it? What is the best way to do this?
But there are also positive suggestions. We have already discussed several potential Science Advisors. We know that Obama is very pro-science and he mentions science in every speech. I have pushed for my choice, but there are several other good choices as well.
How about Lawrence Lessig? Obama’s campaign has used the technology in a truly winning way so he should understand how important freedom of information is.
And how do we push these ideas loudly enough to get picked up by the media and the Transition Team?

Update
– more from my SciBlings:
Revere
Mike the Mad Biologist
Mike Dunford
Josh Rosenau
Blake
Chad
Sciencewoman
Orac
Orac
Orac
PalMD
ERV
MarkH
DarkSyde
Brandon Keim

North Carolina newspapers – yesterday’s front pages

NC Press Asociation’s front pages from Wednesday.
Due to narrow margin – about 12,000 in Obama’s favor – the state has to count all the provisional ballots (which usually favor Dems) and all the mail-in ballots (mostly from the military personnel abroad – who knows who that favors any more!). There is little chance, though, officials and statisticians say, that the additional counting will reverse the order, but the official business has to be done in an orderly way. Unofficially, North Carolina went Blue this year. This will become official in a couple of days, I guess. How? Large influx of people from NY, OH, CA, MI and elswehere, coming to NC to work in technology and biotech industries. Large urban centers (Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Asheville, etc.) getting more and more democratic, but also good ground game in heavily Republican counties in the mountains that each have a small University campus brought many of the students to vote and turned those counties blue as well.
The state went for Obama. The state legislature remains Democratic. The Dem governor Mike Easley was replaced by the Dem governor Beverly Purdue. Congressman Hayes was kicked out by Larry Kissel. Elizabeth Dole was trounced by the new Senator Kay Hagan. It feels good to be a North Carolinian today.
There were celebrations around here – in Durham, Chapel Hill and Carrboro on Tuesday night. And there were fireworks coming from the direction of the UNC campus and/or Carolina stadium after the 11pm announcement.
Update: It is official now – AP reports that Obama won North Carolina! w00t!!!!

A History Lesson

Uploaded on authorSTREAM by jahanl1

The Speech

Get used to these faces…..

chicago-speech-megawide2.jpg
Welcome to the Obamaland!

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

obama2-megawide.jpg

I have voted. Have you?

This is an uber-liberal enclave in NC, so more than 80% excited voters already voted early. Still, it was hard to find parking this morning.
voting%20001.jpg
voting%20002.jpg
voting%20004.jpg

On Voting

Vote early and vote often.
– Al Capone, 1899 – 1947
Suffrage, n. Expression of opinion by means of a ballot. The right of suffrage (which is held to be both a privilege and a duty) means, as commonly interpreted, the right to vote for the man of another man’s choice, and is highly prized.
– Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary, 1881 – 1906
Ask a man which way he is going to vote, and he will probably tell you. Ask him, however, why, and vagueness is all.
– Bernard Levin
Truth is not determined by majority vote.
– Doug Gwyn
Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.
– John Quincy Adams, 1767 – 1848
My problem is that, with the two-party system, you only get to vote against one candidate in each race.
– G. Armour Van Horn

From Quotes of the Day

Outside the Obama rally in Raleigh (video)

Your weekend politics

Annals of McCain – Palin, XLI: how I palled around with terrorists:

No one who knows me would ever consider me a domestic terrorist. I am, in fact, a pacifist. You may think that’s naive, but it would be a real stretch to consider my pacifism to be the same as terrorism, even if you think it helps terrorism (in which case I strenuously disagree). I’m a doctor and take the responsibility to heal pretty seriously. Barack Obama is being accused of “palling around with terrorists” because he has had an association with people the McCain campaign decided they want to call domestic terrorists purely for the purpose of inferring guilt — guilt, literally, by association. So in the interests of full disclosure and for the purpose of making a clear statement, I declare that by their standard I’ve palled around with a few domestic terrorists in my time. Most of them weren’t terrorists at all. Not by any stretch of the imagination. I’ll concede some could plausibly be described as low level domestic terrorists. Like Bill Ayres. Although I don’t know Bill Ayres from a hole in the wall, I may indeed have “palled around with him” once. I have no idea. Here’s the story.

Continue reading

Sarah Palin pranked by a Canadian shock jock

At first I thought this was fake, but apparently the call was real. If true – what a moment!

Comrade Moore: Barack Obama is the furthest thing from a socialist candidate

Is Class Warfare Real?

Apart from the rhetoric, apparently not:

The election is right around the corner, and voters around the country have been subjected to politicians, pundits and commercials laden with allegations of class warfare and claims about which candidates cater to the rich and which candidates will best serve the interests of the poor and the middle class. But a new study, co-authored by North Carolina State University researcher Dr. Chris Ellis, shows that it would be impossible for Congress and the White House to cater solely to any socioeconomic group – because people’s preferences tend to be overwhelmingly similar when it comes to how the federal government should spend its money.
—————————
In the study, Ellis and his co-author Dr. Joseph Ura used data from the long-running General Social Survey to measure public opinion on government spending from 1973 to 2006 and found that political sentiment was very similar between the various socioeconomic groups. Basically, trends toward becoming more liberal or more conservative tended to take place at the same time among rich, poor and middle-class voters. Ellis explains that the trends happened at the same time because both rich and poor responded to changes in the nation’s economic health, or the actions of the federal government, in broadly similar ways. Ellis is an assistant professor of political science at NC State. Ura is an assistant professor of political science at Texas A&M University.

Atheists – the last U.S. minority that can be openly maligned without consequence

I am sure that you have already heard about the despicable TV ad that Elizabeth Dole aired against Kay Hagan. You probably heard about it online, perhaps on Twitter or FriendFeed or blogs. Here’s a quick selection:
My godless money. Take it or leave it.
The Worst Insult of All?
Thou shalt not bear false witness
NC: Hagan responds to ‘Godless’ ad; Dole’s immigrant bashing
Elizabeth Dole ad falsely suggests opponent Kay Hagan is ‘Godless.’
North Carolina Senate Race Degenerates Into Shouting Match About Atheists
GODLESS AMERICANS.
Sen. Liddy Dole (R-NC) attacks Sunday school teacher: ‘There is no God’
Sen. Dole vs. the atheists
With friends like these…
Also, we aren’t tax exempt, so: Vote Obama
You Know Your Senator Is Getting Desparate When…
North Carolina Watch
Don’t you call me an atheist, you
There is No God!
Is Elizabeth Dole Godless?
Elizabeth Dole accuses her opponent of atheism!
Will Elizabeth Dole Ad Have A Subliminal Effect On Young Viewers
Liddy Dole is an asshole
Calling someone an atheist is apparently slander
A pox on them all
Liddy Dole’s Desperate Bigotry
Godless isn’t immoral (a letter to Raleigh News & Observer)
….and many more….
But, if this happened four years ago, you would not have heard about it in the mainstream media. This year, you do:

What changed in four years?
Ari Melber thinks it’s the Web: blogs, social networks, YouTube:

Everyone can hear it now. This Internet-driven, hyperactive presidential race is forcing accountability on two of the oldest tricks in politics: dog whistles and secret smears.
————————-
Partisan and muckraking bloggers now fight political operatives’ efforts to keep unseemly attacks below the radar. Take automated “robo” phone calls, which often deploy the sharp attacks that campaigns don’t want exposed in the mass media. Previously, the calls were obscure, rarely drawing major media coverage, let alone sustained criticism. Now they can be recorded, uploaded and dissected in a single news cycle. Sites like TalkingPointsMemo and Daily Kos use crowd-sourcing by readers to track the attacks and pin them squarely on John McCain. Insider political sites, like Ben Smith’s Politico blog, also disseminate the audio recordings to media and political elites, converting a “targeted” message into a mass broadcast. And organized campaigns like the National Political Do Not Call Registry use the web, Twitter and e-mail to track and map every call.
————————–
Once exposed, McCain’s robocalls were unpalatable even to his allies in the party and the media, adding another “Hey, Rube” squabble to his already contentious campaign. Republican senators condemned the calls. Fox News’s Chris Wallace pressed McCain on the issue, reminding the senator that he once denounced such tactics. Even Sarah Palin felt compelled to respond to criticism of the campaign’s robocalls, telling reporters that while she did not renounce them, she would prefer to do personal and retail campaigning instead.
————————-
All this online activity has been amplified by the rapidly shifting landscape of political television. The increasingly opinionated cable news programs, always in search of conflict and fresh content, now treat debates over these tactics as a major campaign issue. This emphasis is bleeding into the broader campaign discourse, which includes minute dissection of attacks that were once considered unmentionable. A whole range of smears against Obama, for example, have been exposed under the glare of nationally televised debates. Sometimes that process has angered his supporters–as when the ABC News primary debate focused on smears regarding “patriotism” and Islam. In one of the general election debates, CBS moderator Bob Scheiffer was credited for playing a corrective role when he pressed both candidates to answer for attacks from their supporters. That is a stark contrast to the previous two presidential races, when even the most incendiary attacks drew scant calls for accountability at the candidate level.
————————
“Thanks to YouTube–and blogging and instant fact-checking and viral emails– it is getting harder and harder to get away with repeating brazen lies without paying a price, or to run under-the-radar smear campaigns without being exposed,” contends Arianna Huffington, whose website pulses with a constant, two-way debate of news and opinion. “The McCain campaign hasn’t gotten the message,” she added, “hence the blizzard of racist, alarmist, xenophobic, innuendo-laden accusations being splattered at Obama.”
———————————-
This new media environment undermines political attacks that turn on coded meanings and hidden messages, because now anything can be exposed and cheaply disseminated. Observers used to worry that the web would fragment our media consumption into private little silos–that famous “Daily Me.” Yet in presidential politics, an inverse dynamic is emerging. Small groups of people are using the web to expose the targeted appeals of the analog world, and then injecting them into the mass media for the whole nation to assess. And many voters do not like what they see.

Perhaps Liddy Dole, by airing this TV ad, provoked exactly the kind of storm that, amplified through both the New and Old Media, will lead to a public shift in perception of atheists. If everyone and their grandmother starts talking about it and seeing this ad as despicable – not for tainting Hagan but for denigrating atheists (sorta like what Colin Powell did to the idea that calling someone a Muslim is a smear) – then we as a society have just made another step in the right direction.

Some North Carolina politics….

On the Road: Charlotte, North Carolina:

An observation we’ve heard repeated in Obama offices across America, Crandall emphasized how beneficial the contested primary had been for building the foundation for record turnout. “We had real hints of it in the primary,” Crandall said. The first-time voters the campaign energized for the May 6 vote foreshadowed what North Carolina is seeing today. Crandall remembers thinking “these are NOT your typical primary voters.”

Pathetic yard sign captured in Raleigh – and Q of the Day:

By far I see more Obama stickers and signs in my town, including a hilarious “Tina Fey in 2008” sign next to an Obama sign on one yard in Durham. What have you seen in your area? Take a stab at the proportion of Obama to McCain signs and stickers.

On the Road: Raleigh, North Carolina:

With only a short time to go, the Obama campaign is tightening up with information and statistics, and most of our questions for numbers were met with referrals to already-published newspaper stories. Still, when asked what kinds of numbers the data-obsessed field teams were seeing in the early voting precinct-by-precinct statistics, Cox said “in terms of the early vote, we feel very comfortably that we’re in a good position.”
While there was no way to predict a win, Cox gave off the vibe of a man who was liking what he saw in the numbers. With more votes cast already at the halfway point than in all of 2004, and registered Democrats holding a huge double-digit lead in those ballots, the campaign here is already in full fledged GOTV mode.

Polls suggest electoral gains for Obama:

It’s a simliar story in North Carolina, which last voted for a Democratic presidential candidate in 1976, when Jimmy Carter was running. A new poll suggests Obama has a six-point lead over McCain, 52 percent to 46 percent. Obama was up by four points in our last poll, conducted last week. “Other polls are showing North Carolina is essentially tied, but our poll shows Obama picking up support among younger voters and the blue-collar segment. Those are two reasons the race in North Carolina has gone from a 49-49 tie in early October to a 52-46 edge for Obama, at least in our results,” Holland said.

On the Road: Wilmington, North Carolina:

Hillary Stookey wouldn’t tell us her age. “60 and holding” and a big smile was all we got. But on her birthday, Hillary Stookey canvassed Wilmington, North Carolina for Barack Obama from 1:30 until 8:00 pm. That’s three hours past the time the Republican office had closed.

Updated: More statistics that supports why North Carolina won’t might swing blue:

I’m told that electoral votes are based on popular votes. Well I’ll be damned. If that’s the case, then I really don’t see what the big whoopie is about people being against electoral votes. Unless the elector doesn’t vote with popular vote. I still don’t believe NC will swing, but the probability becomes a lot larger from a mathematical stand point. The place where it fails is the historical trend data pulls it to the red still from a predictability factor.

Early balloting ends Saturday; Obama supporters flock to polls:

According to the State Board of Elections, more than 1.4 million votes had been cast in North Carolina through Oct. 27–23 percent of the 6.2 million registered voters. The figure eclipsed the total 984,000 early votes in the 2004 election–with five days to go.
In heavily Democratic Durham and Orange counties, the numbers were even higher: About one-third percent of voters in Durham and Orange had cast early ballots by Oct. 27.
That turnout jibed with the state elections board report that 58 percent of the early voters statewide are registered Democrats, while just 25 percent are registered Republicans. And the statewide turnout was heavily African-American, the board reported: Black voters accounted for 28 percent of early voters, though they make up 21 percent of the population; they accounted for just 18.5 percent of the turnout four years ago.
In 2008, it’s the Democrats who can’t wait to vote, especially black Democrats, since Obama is on course–the polls say–to become the first African-American president.
New African-American voter registrations comprise 31 percent of the total in the state since the start of the year–271,000 out of 875,000 total new registrants through last Thursday.

Maybe voting at the mall isn’t such a great idea:

Conspicuously absent from the mall voting experience were political candidates, their supporters and party volunteers, who normally greet voters and hand out campaign literature. Security officers have ousted politicians and their supporters attempting to campaign, including one who was warned that his car would be towed. Confusion surrounding mall voting rules has allegedly prompted at least one election worker to enforce policies that contradict election law. Outcry over the policy prompted picketing and a boycott effort by critics who say it violates the First Amendment.
This year marks North Carolina’s first experiment with mall voting. As officials ponder whether that experiment is successful, they should also consider whether the promise of higher turnout trumps the right of voters to receive information–and the right of candidates to provide it.
Last year, the state legislature voted to allow non-public buildings to serve as early voting sites–a move Wake County election officials clamored for. The goal was to make early voting more convenient and get more voters to the polls, especially in areas where there are few public buildings that can absorb thousands of voters over the course of two weeks.

The historic 2008 election–without John Edwards:

The irony, of course, is that it only matters in America. The day the bad news about Senator Johnny began to make the rounds, we were eating lunch with a Chilean businessman, husband of an old friend of my wife’s. “In Chile, anywhere in Europe or Latin America, no one would have known about this,” he said. “And if they knew, no one would care.”
“What’s the big deal?” asked the Chilean, in the presence of his wife. But Edwards was no Candide. He knew what we all know about America’s double standard. Our private morals might make rabbits blush, but the standards we impose on public servants have changed very little since the Mayflower dropped anchor. Nowhere else in the world is there such a hypocritical discrepancy between private and public morality. Edwards knew the risk and took it. That’s where hubris comes in, as a sense of entitlement and immunity that comes with uncommon success.
I admit to a certain sympathy for this ruined man, this outcast. I don’t make political contributions, but I wouldn’t be surprised if my wife, who knows Edwards’ wife and is not bound by my scruples, has sent a check or two in their direction. I liked many of the things Edwards was saying during the primaries; some of them have even more bite now that corporate avarice and irresponsibility have brought the American economy to its knees.
I met him a couple of times. He had the nerve, rare among North Carolina politicians with more than local ambitions, to show up at holiday parties for the staff of the notorious Independent Weekly, once denounced by a Republican as “Left-wing attack media from hell.” Last spring I sat next to him at a small fund-raising luncheon and confess that I was unnerved by his boyish appearance–he could pass for 35 in the right light–and surreptitiously inspected his profile for signs of the plastic surgeon’s hand, or the hair-restorer’s.

Kids, share your toys!

In the end, I could not make it to the Obama rally in Raleigh, but other bloggers did.
If I did, I would have been one of the 28000 people to be the first to hear the “peanut butter and jelly” thing:

I think this is great framing – getting your mind back to the time you were a child. Who do you want to play with: a kid who shares his toys, or the old man who shouts “Get off my lawn!”? Do you prefer a parent who beats you every day, or a parent who teaches you how to get along with others?

Schneier on Voting Machine Security

Ed Cone interviews the security guru Bruce Schneier about voting machines:

There are a couple of reasons that things like automatic teller machines and gas pumps are more secure. The first one is, there’s money involved. If someone hacks an ATM, the bank loses money. The bank has a financial interest in making those ATMs secure. If someone hacks a voting machine, nobody loses money. In fact, half the country is happy with the result. So it’s much harder to get the economic incentives aligned.
The other issue about voting machines is that ballots are secret. A lot of the security in computerized financial systems is based on audits, based on being able to unravel a transaction. If you go to an ATM and you push a bunch of buttons and you get out ten times the cash you were supposed to, that’s a mistake, but that mistake will be caught in audit, and likely, you will be figured out as the person who got the money by accident, and it will be taken out of your account. Because ballots are secret, a lot of the auditing tools that we in the community have developed for financial systems don’t apply.

How Did NC Become an Electoral Battleground?

This is interesting:

But voter behavior is only part of the change drawing political attention to North Carolina. Presidential contenders are increasing their focus here because the state has more clout on the national stage than it did as recently as the 1980s. The same population boom that has helped alter the political landscape in North Carolina has also led to an increase in the number of electoral votes the state is allotted in the presidential election. While some states (such as Illinois and Pennsylvania) have been given fewer and fewer electoral votes since 1980, North Carolina has been on the rise. North Carolina now has 15 electoral votes, up from 13 in 1988. While that is fewer than Ohio’s 20, it is more than some of the other traditional swing states such as Missouri, which has 11.
In fact, only eight states have more electoral votes than North Carolina (New Jersey and Georgia are tied with North Carolina at 15 votes). In an election where only 270 electoral votes are needed to win, the Tarheel State matters.

Reading Recommendation for today

The Great Limbaugh Con by Charles M. Kelly, published in 1994, is even more current and up-to-date than it was then. And it is not really about Limbaugh himself – he serves only as a starting point. There are many Limbaughs out there now who parrot the same stuff and what he pioneered in the early 1990s is now a big industry for the Right.
Furthermore, some of the right-wing rhetoric that Rush invented is now not just a standard GOP advertising lingo, but also deeply ingrained in the nation’s psyche and will take a lot of effort to neutralize. The book describes, for instance, exactly how Limbaugh demonized Hillary Clinton as early as 1991., and how some of the same tropes about her survive till today and made her presidential bid just that much harder.
But what is most important about the book is that Kelly uses Limbaugh’s rhetoric to discuss some of our erroneous preconceptions about the world, especially economics and how it works. For instance, Chapter 6 analyzes the phrase “trickle-down economics”, and Chapter 12 explains how liberals and conservatives have a very different definition of the word “work”. If the two sides of the political spectrum use different definitions of the same word, then the target audience – the low-information independent voters – will be confused. Or, depending how it is framed, the audience will understand the message to use one definition, while it really uses the other – the basis for Orwellian spin of the Right.
As far as I know, this is the first book that seriously talks about the role of language and ‘frames’ (though the word never appears in the text – too early in history for that) in the modern American politics. And it does it well.
You can read the entire book online on Google Books or buy yourself a cheap used copy on amazon.com. Even if you disagree with Kelly on some details, it will make you think differently and it will make you think next time you hear a right-wing hack in the media use some of those phrases – they do not mean what you think they mean.

New RNC Ad suggests that only a previous President is qualified and ready to become a new President


“Would you get on a plane with a pilot who has never flown?” the announcer asks. Yes, if the only other option is the guy who has proven repeatedly that he cannot keep his plane in the air:
mccain%20pilot.jpg
(cartoon from The Star)

Seed endorses Obama

Barack Obama for President – An endorsement from the editors of Seed:

Far more important is this: Science is a way of governing, not just something to be governed. Science offers a methodology and philosophy rooted in evidence, kept in check by persistent inquiry, and bounded by the constraints of a self-critical and rigorous method. Science is a lens through which we can and should visualize and solve complex problems, organize government and multilateral bodies, establish international alliances, inspire national pride, restore positive feelings about America around the globe, embolden democracy, and ultimately, lead the world. More than anything, what this lens offers the next administration is a limitless capacity to handle all that comes its way, no matter how complex or unanticipated.
Sen. Obama’s embrace of transparency and evidence-based decision-making, his intelligence and curiosity echo this new way of looking at the world. And that is what we should be weighing in the voting booth. For his positions and, even more, for his way of coming to them, we endorse Barack Obama for President of the United States.

Obama in Raleigh

Just got this e-mail earlier today:

This Wednesday, October 29th, please join Barack Obama in Raleigh, where he will talk about his vision for creating the kind of change we need.
Early Vote for Change Rally
with Barack Obama
Halifax Mall
Government Complex
300 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
Wednesday, October 29th
Doors Open: 10:00 a.m.
Pre-program Begins: 11:15 a.m.
This event is free and open to the public. Tickets are not required; however, an RSVP is strongly encouraged.
For security reasons, do not bring bags or umbrellas. Please limit personal items. No signs or banners allowed.

He is finally coming close enough for me to consider going to see him live (ah, the beauty of living in a battleground state – who would have thunk NC would be one!). I am thinking about bringing the kids along (they want to go), but I am not sure that the venue is large enough for everyone who will probably want to be there. Four years ago, when Kerry picked Edwards as running mate they came to Raleigh and used a bigger venue on the NCSU campus – it was full (25,000-40,000 people, depending who counted). This year, the crowd should be at least twice as big – how about 100,000? I have no idea how that many people will fit downtown. And where should one park? Probably far away, then walk or take a bus.
Any folks from Chapel Hill, Carrboro or Durham interested in car-pooling?

Obama’s Closing Statement

GOODVOTE.ORG – what to do if you are challenged at the polls?

GOODVOTE.ORG gives advice and collects media coverage of potential voter suppression:

GOODVOTE.ORG is a group of volunteers from the technology community and blogosphere who simply want the will of the voters to be reflected in the result of the 2008 election. Our only purpose is to make sure that when legitimate voters are challenged they know who to turn to for help.

AVoteForScience: Kiki Sanford endorses Barack Obama

Your weekend politics

Continue reading

US attacks … Syria?

Obviously a careful anti-insurgent action, not likely an invasion of Syria.
People online think of it as a possible October Surprise. But I think that that at this point, no matter what the GOP tries to do will be only seen as a gimmick to help McCain. Any attempt at an October Surprise by them will be seen as such and will backfire. And I think they realize this.
Thus, I don’t think this has anything to do with the election, but the military identified with 100% certainty a post, just inside the Syria-Iraq border, from where insurgents organized their attacks, targeted them precisely, probably with immediate communication with the Syrian government.
This does not mean that the blood-thirsty Right will not try to spin it for their side, but it will not work on the electorate. Too little, too late and too obvious.

The currently most popular independent political websites

The latest press release from ComScore – Huffington Post and Politico Lead Wave of Explosive Growth at Independent Political Blogs and News Sites this Election Season – has all sorts of interesting statistics about relative traffic, etc., of the top independent (i.e., unaffiliated with MSM) websites and blogs. One tidbit I found particularly interesting:

Looking at the demographic profiles for the top three sites, HuffingtonPost.com, Politico.com and DrudgeReport.com, one can conclude that visitors to these sites tend to be older, wealthier, and more likely to be male than the average U.S. Internet user.
Of the three sites, Politico.com skewed the oldest with 23 percent of its visitors age 55 and older, while DrudgeReport.com skewed wealthiest, with 40 percent of its visitors earning at least $100,000 a year, and had the highest concentration of males at 57 percent. HuffingtonPost.com, the site with the largest audience, was the most similar of the three when compared to the overall U.S. Internet audience.

Politico.com has the most old-timey look, DrudgeReport.com is read by the DC circle-jerk including the MSM pundits who were duped into thinking that Drudge is trustworthy (and I am glad to see it slipping down), and Huffington Post is a mix of some of the best opinion with some of the worst that one can find on the Left – blatant sexism (especially towards Palin), anti-vaccination woo, animal rights crap, New Age medical quackery and such – not a place I visit often as it represents the worst of the Left (and exposes that not everyone who is liberal is actually a member of the Reality Community).
Glad to see that Talkingpointsmemo.com, Crooksandliars.com and Fivethirtyeight.com are high and rising – that is some of the best New Journalism out there.

UNC scientists comment in support of fruit fly research for understanding autism

As a follow-up to the yesterday’s press release, Dr. Manzoor Bhat and Joseph Piven, M.D., researchers at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill who use the Drosophila model system to study neurexin and its implications in the development of autism, have now released the video response – well worth watching:

Small Town Fear Itself – the Zombie Attack!

Zombies pose no threat at Palin event:

ASHEVILLE – Supporters of vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin will have plenty to see outside the Civic Center if they are unable to get inside for her Sunday appearance.
As many as 700 zombies are expected to amble up Flint Street past the Civic Center about 5 p.m., just after doors open for the Palin event.

But a Republican who is afraid of Obama even more than of zombies already made this advertisement:

Lawrence Lessig for Copyright Czar!

Peter Suber, James Love and Glyn Moody have already blogged about this, but we need to make sure this spreads far and wide:

The AAP and Copyright Alliance want to prod the next President of the US to tilt the unbalanced US copyright law further toward publishers. According to a letter the AAP sent to its members (thanks to James Love and Glyn Moody), the two organizations are trying to identify the positions “that will influence intellectual property policy”, and will then “offer suggestions regarding appropriate candidates for these positions to both presidential campaigns.”
But first they want to blackball one potential nominee:
…AAP is concerned, for example, that based on their past academic relationship, Senator Obama might choose among his appointments a divisive figure such as Larry Lessig – a law professor and leading proponent of diminished copyright rights….

Yup, those are the PRISM arguments – black is white, up is down, and Lessig is anti-copyright!@#$%^&*
So, how can we help push Lessig to get appointed Copyright Czar in the Obama administration? After all, nobody in the world knows more about it than him and he would be a perfect person for the job.

Palin, autism and fruitflies – it does not add up

You have probably heard that Governor Palin, in a recent speech contradicted herself within a span of a couple of sentences. So, she said that “Early identification of a cognitive or other disorder, especially autism, can make a life-changing difference.”, then in the next breath dissed that same research: “You’ve heard about some of these pet projects they really don’t make a whole lot of sense and sometimes these dollars go to projects that have little or nothing to do with the public good. Things like fruit fly research in Paris, France. I kid you not.” You can see that part here:

This is obviously not making Drosophila researchers happy, especially those who actually use this model animal to study the underlying causes of diseases such as autism. And they are firing back – see this response by UNC researchers: In defense of fruit flies and basic medical research:

Vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin made reference to fruit fly research in a broad statement about wasteful earmark funding that has “little or nothing to do with the public good.” She specifically mentioned work in Paris, France. (Just Google it.)
MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann reported this, and mentioned, specifically, (Drosophila) fruit fly research at the University of North Carolina (“which is not in Paris,” Olbermann noted) that has led to advanced understanding in autism research. (We think you’ll be able to find this easily, too.)
That work, led by neuroscientist Manzoor Bhat, Ph.D., and autism researcher and clinician Joseph Piven, M.D., director of UNC’s Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center.
Their work was published in Neuron in September 2007.
Dr. Bhat and Dr. Piven will have more to say tomorrow (Sunday, Oct. 26, 2008).
For now, here’s a passage from a UNC press release:
“Neurons, or nerve cells, communicate with each other through contact points called synapses. When these connections are damaged, communication breaks down, causing the messages that would normally help our feet push our bike pedals or our mind locate our car keys to fall short.
Now scientists at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine have shown that a protein called neurexin is required for these nerve cell connections to form and function correctly.
The discovery, made in Drosophila fruit flies may lead to advances in understanding autism spectrum disorders, as recently, human neurexins have been identified as a genetic risk factor for autism.
“This finding now gives us the opportunity to see what job neurexin performs within the cell, so that we can gain a better insight into what can go wrong in the nervous system when neurexin function is lost,” said Dr. Manzoor Bhat, associate professor of cell and molecular physiology in the UNC School of Medicine and senior author of the study.
The study, published online Sept. 6, 2007, in the journal Neuron, is the first to successfully demonstrate in a Drosophila model the consequences that mutating this important protein may have on synapses.
The research was supported in part by grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute of Mental Health and funds from the state of North Carolina.”

This study has been highlighted on Keith Olbermann’s show the other day:

More at UNC, a response by a fruitfly researcher, and a criticism of the way Olbermann handled it….

Update:
Dr. Manzoor Bhat and Joseph Piven, M.D. have now released the video response – well worth watching:

Update 2: More responses:
Mike the Mad Biologist
Evolgen
Napa Valley Register
Island Of Doubt
Pharyngula
Pandagon
The Tree of Life
Washington Post
Myrmecos Blog
KSJ Tracker
Hyllaballoo
Radula
Uncontrolled Experiment
Greta Christina’s Blog
Bjoern Brembs
Salon.com
Life v. 3.0
Flags and Lollipops – Network Edition

Wassup 2008

Yet another political roundup

Under the fold, as it is a LOT of links….

Continue reading

Natalie Portman for Early Vote (video)


…and Natalie Portman Wants You to Have “The Talk”:

Continue reading

Married With Children (video)

Al Bundy is back! And after figuring out how much he earns selling shoes, and how much tax-break he would get with each candidate, he made a choice:

Smoke Signals, Blogs, and the Future of Politics

Smoke Signals, Blogs, and the Future of PoliticsThis I first posted on June 24, 2004 on http://www.jregrassroots.org, then republished on August 23, 2004 on Science And Politics. I love re-posting this one every now and then, just to check how much the world has changed. What do you think? Was I too rosy-eyed? Prophetic?

Continue reading

McCain supporters defend Islam at rally (video)

Michael Pollan – Serious Sustainability

I’m Voting For O’Bama ‘Cause He’s Irish

Mark Westneat explains why a scientist should support Obama

Your weekend politics

Continue reading