Bloggers at the Zoo – movies #4

Another five clips:

Continue reading

Nature Network bloggers at ScienceOnline’09

scienceonline09.jpg
Nature Network will be much better represented this year than last year, I am happy to report. This early in the game, we already have four registrants, coming from four different countries and making our meeting very international!
Anna Kushnir came last year. This year, it is Dr.Anna Kushnir who is coming back.
Martin Fenner is coming from Germany.
Bob O’Hara will travel from Finland.
And Richard Grant is coming all the way from Australia.
See who else is registered so far. Then register yourself.

Clock Quotes

Our ignorance of history causes us to slander our own times.
– Gustave Flaubert

New and Exciting in PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine

Under the fold:

Continue reading

Bloggers at the Zoo – movies #3

Here are another five clips (out of a total of 47) from the Millionth Comment party at the NC Zoo:

Continue reading

The advantages of thin layer chromatography in Middle Ages

Viral video marketing of science instruments seems to be flurishing: Monty Python and the Holy Instrument:

The hook-up culture

Amanda is in the middle of reading Michael Kimmel’s Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men and has posted the first, preliminary review, with some very interesting explorations by the commenters as well (I guess the MRAs did not get there yet to ruin the discussion). The review is focusing on the societal gender roles as the cause of the hook-up culture as well as the perception of it as being negative.
Much younger, sarahmeyers looks at the setting for the hook-up culture and identifies her own – highly urban, career-oriented, highly-connected (online and offline).
Possibly related:
Hooked on Hooking Up, Or What’s Wrong With Conservative View Of Marriage
Teen Sex, ‘Hooking Up’, Gay Marriage, Femiphobia and Bush Victory Are All Interconnected
Stephanie Coontz On Marriage
What is the Future of the Institution of Marriage?
Books: ‘The Sex Lives Of Teenagers’ by Lynn Ponton
Teen Parenthood for the X-box generation

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Today’s carnivals

The Accretionary Wedge #13: Geology in Space – is up on goodSchist
Encephalon #55 is up on Neuroscientifically Challenged
Berry Go Round #9 is up on Gravity’s Rainbow
Friday Ark #210 is up on Modulator
Carnival of the Green #147 is up on Confessions of a Closet Environmentalist

Aerosteon riocoloradensis – the new dinosaur with hollow bones

I always get excited when Paul Sereno publishes a paper in PLoS ONE and today is one such day – his third paper in this journal within a span of less than a year (the first was the paper with detailed description of Nigersaurus and the second was the article on Green Sahara cemeteries). Today’s paper is also the second time PLoS ONE publishes a taxonomy paper, i.e., a monograph that describes a new species:
Evidence for Avian Intrathoracic Air Sacs in a New Predatory Dinosaur from Argentina:

Background
Living birds possess a unique heterogeneous pulmonary system composed of a rigid, dorsally-anchored lung and several compliant air sacs that operate as bellows, driving inspired air through the lung. Evidence from the fossil record for the origin and evolution of this system is extremely limited, because lungs do not fossilize and because the bellow-like air sacs in living birds only rarely penetrate (pneumatize) skeletal bone and thus leave a record of their presence.
Methodology/Principal Findings
We describe a new predatory dinosaur from Upper Cretaceous rocks in Argentina, Aerosteon riocoloradensis gen. et sp. nov., that exhibits extreme pneumatization of skeletal bone, including pneumatic hollowing of the furcula and ilium. In living birds, these two bones are pneumatized by diverticulae of air sacs (clavicular, abdominal) that are involved in pulmonary ventilation. We also describe several pneumatized gastralia (“stomach ribs”), which suggest that diverticulae of the air sac system were present in surface tissues of the thorax.
Conclusions/Significance
We present a four-phase model for the evolution of avian air sacs and costosternal-driven lung ventilation based on the known fossil record of theropod dinosaurs and osteological correlates in extant birds:
(1) Phase I–Elaboration of paraxial cervical air sacs in basal theropods no later than the earliest Late Triassic.
(2) Phase II–Differentiation of avian ventilatory air sacs, including both cranial (clavicular air sac) and caudal (abdominal air sac) divisions, in basal tetanurans during the Jurassic. A heterogeneous respiratory tract with compliant air sacs, in turn, suggests the presence of rigid, dorsally attached lungs with flow-through ventilation.
(3) Phase III–Evolution of a primitive costosternal pump in maniraptoriform theropods before the close of the Jurassic.
(4) Phase IV–Evolution of an advanced costosternal pump in maniraptoran theropods before the close of the Jurassic.
In addition, we conclude:
(5) The advent of avian unidirectional lung ventilation is not possible to pinpoint, as osteological correlates have yet to be identified for uni- or bidirectional lung ventilation.
(6) The origin and evolution of avian air sacs may have been driven by one or more of the following three factors: flow-through lung ventilation, locomotory balance, and/or thermal regulation.

Wow! Read the whole thing!
For more, read Greg Laden’s thoughts.

‘Normal’ body temperature? Not really.

Once a year, I go back to my alma mater and do a guest lecture about biological clocks in an Anatomy & Physiology class. Knowing how many pre-meds are among the 200 students in the room, I try to start with some examples of rhythms in human physiology (and disease), and the first one is body temperature, busting the myth that 98.6F (37C) is the “normal” temperature:
thermometer.gif
Now Orac links to an excellent post that explains it all – the entire history of the idea that 37C is normal and what the real difference, means and fluctuations there are. Read the whole thing.
thermometer2.gif

SciBlings at ScienceOnline’09

scienceonline09.jpg
You may remember how last two years I introduced all registrants for the blogging conferences, 2-3 people per day. I decided this year to do it less often, but to introduce more people in each post. Let me start with an easy group to gather – my Sciblings:
Brian will be there.
Grrrrl will be there.
Both SciCurious and Evil Monkey as well.
And Greg Laden.
And Janet, of course.
And Zuska and Tara.
James for sure.
And yes, Abel and Sheril and Dr.Pal.
Both Sciencewoman and Alice said they’re coming.
Mo will do his best to come across the pond.
And there are probably going to be more – they just need to check their calendars and finances and register – so watch the growing registration list. And register yourself.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Bloggers at the Zoo – movies #2

Another 5 (out of 47) short clips from the Millionth Party at the NC Zoo:

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

It is rare that the public sentiment decides immorally or unwisely, and the individual who differs from it ought to distrust and examine well his own opinion.
– Thomas Jefferson

Bloggers at the Zoo – movies #1

When we met at the Zoo we took 47 short movie clips. Here are the first five and I will post the rest over the next few days:

Continue reading

Five stages of a blogger’s life

From here. Which stage are you in?

Continue reading

Open Laboratory 2008 – submissions so far

We are busy preparing for The Open Laboratory 2008. The submissions have been trickling in all year, and a little bit more frequently recently, but it is time now to dig through your Archives for your best posts since December 20th 2007 and submit them. Submit one, or two, or several – no problem. Or ask your readers to submit for you.
Then take a look at your favourite bloggers and pick some of their best posts – don’t worry, we can deal with duplicate entries. Do not forget new and up-coming blogs – they may not know about the anthology – and submit their stuff as well.
As we did last year, we encourage you to also send in original poems and cartoons.
Keep in mind that the posts will be printed in a book! A post that relies heavily on links, long quotes, copyrighted pictures, movies, etc., will not translate well into print.
The deadline is December 1st, 2008.
Below are submissions so far. Check them out and get inspired. If you see that one of your posts is at an old URL and you have since moved, re-submit with the new URL (perhaps re-post it if necessary):

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

Children will watch anything, and when a broadcaster uses crime and violence and other shoddy devices to monopolize a child’s attention, it’s worse than taking candy from a baby. It is taking precious time from the process of growing up.
– Newton N. Minow

New and Exciting in PLoS this week

So, let’s see what was new in PLoS Genetics, PLoS Computational Biology, PLoS Pathogens, PLoS ONE and PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases last week. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:

Continue reading

Juno and Biscuit playing


Q: why does my daughter gets inspired to shoot movies exactly on those days when the house is a total mess?

Shimmering Bees

The PLoS ONE paper about the way shimmering wave behavior in honeybees repels hornets, as discussed by high-school students here, has an aaccompanying video of the behavior on YouTube:

Today in Greensboro, NC

I should have gone. Greensboro is barely an hour from here. If I did, I would have heard this:

Hadron Collider – how does it work?

Watch this informative video (sorry, could not find a way to embed it here).
Oh, should have known it existed also on YouTube (thanks Greg):

My picks from ScienceDaily

Earth’s Magnetic Field Reversals Illuminated By Lava Flows Study:

Earth’s north magnetic pole is shifting and weakening. Ancient lava flows are guiding a better understanding of what generates and controls the Earth’s magnetic field – and what may drive it to occasionally reverse direction.
—————–
Current evidence suggests we are now approaching one of these transitional states because the main magnetic field is relatively weak and rapidly decreasing, he says. While the last polarity reversal occurred several hundred thousand years ago, the next might come within only a few thousand years.

Mother Of A Goose! Giant Ocean-going Geese With Bony-teeth Once Roamed Across SE England:

A 50 million year old skull reveals that huge birds with a 5 metre wingspan once skimmed across the waters that covered what is now London, Essex and Kent. These giant ocean-going relatives of ducks and geese also had a rather bizarre attribute for a bird: their beaks were lined with bony-teeth.

From One Laying To Another, The Female Collembolan Adapts Its Eggs To Environmental Constraints:

Reproductive plasticity – the ability of individuals to modify their reproduction and the characteristics of their progeny according to environmental or social conditions – is a crucial factor in the demographics of animal populations, including man.

Weak Bladders Deter Many Young Women From Sports Participation:

A weak bladder is putting many young women off participating in sport, or prompting them to give it up altogether, suggests new research.

Captive Breeding Introduced Infectious Disease To Mallorcan Amphibians:

A potentially deadly fungus that can kill frogs and toads was inadvertently introduced into Mallorca by a captive breeding programme that was reintroducing a rare species of toad into the wild, according to a new study in the journal Current Biology.

Australian Frog Species Chooses Not To Put Eggs In One Basket:

A groundbreaking new study into the mating and nesting practices of a common Australian frog has found they partner up to eight males sequentially – the highest recorded of any vertebrate.

Animals Farmed For Meat Are The No. 1 Source Of Food Poisoning Bug, Study Shows:

A study by researchers from Lancashire, England, and Chicago, IL, found that 97 percent of campylobacteriosis cases sampled in Lancashire were caused by bacteria typically found in chicken and livestock. The work is based on DNA-sequence comparison of thousands of bacteria collected from human patients and animal carriers.

Bees Can Mediate Escape Of Genetically Engineered Material Over Several Kilometers:

A study by scientists from the Nairobi-headquartered international research centre icipe, in collaboration with the French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) has established that bees have the potential to mediate the escape of transgenes (genetically engineered material) from crops to their wild relatives over several kilometres.

Clock Quotes

If you really want to do something, you’ll find a way; if you don’t, you’ll find an excuse.In times when the passions are beginning to take charge of the conduct of human affairs, one should pay less attention to what men of experience and common sense are thinking than to what is preoccupying the imagination of dreamers.
– Alexis de Tocqueville

A fable about the Frog and the Salamander

Where to watch the debate tonight

C-Span’s Debate Hub is better than twitter, or so they say.
I’ll watch it on TV at a neighbor’s house, then come back and see what the folks on FriendFeed and around the blogs say as well.

Do we need a bloggers ethics panel?

Remember this?
Well, apparently that blog post (not mine, but the source) raised quite a lot of hackles, so much that the PBS Obmudsman had to step in and try to explain:

But, I have serious problems with the episode that unfolded recently in which a journalism student at New York University, Alana Taylor, authored a Sept. 5 posting as an “embedded” blogger on MediaShift, writing critically about her class content and professor at NYU without informing either the teacher or her classmates about what she was doing. The headline read: “Old Thinking Permeates Major Journalism School.” This column attracted a lot of online attention and controversy, not to mention attention by the professor, Mary Quigley, who was not happy. Glaser then wrote a follow-up column on Sept. 17 about the controversy, headlined “NYU Professor Stifles Blogging, Twittering by Journalism Student.”
The controversy was brought to my attention by Adam Penenberg, an assistant professor at NYU and chairman of the journalism department’s ethics committee, who raised numerous journalistic challenges to Taylor’s “embedded” role and reporting techniques and also questioned whether this was not a violation of PBS’ own editorial standards. That’s where I came in.
This is a complicated issue involving all sorts of free speech and privacy issues, respect for other students’ rights, private versus public institutions, and also whether the classroom should be a place where every word can be recorded, personal opinions introduced, and put on the Web without anyone but a blogger knowing about it beforehand.
I think that teachers and professors need to be accountable for what they say in class, and certainly student blogging (after class would be my preference) can be a useful tool in helping to improve struggling courses, reinforcing those that are really good, or simply expanding ideas and discussion.
But the issue here for me is that Taylor was not just an undergrad posting her observations on her own blog about her journalism class, called “Reporting Gen Y.” Rather she was hired — although not for money, according to Glaser — by Glaser as an “embed” to write for MediaShift. So Taylor’s post did not simply join millions of other postings in the blogosphere by individuals that may or may not have many readers. This one was sponsored by PBS’s MediaShift and had immediate access to the huge PBS.org audience.
Furthermore, this was a journalism student in a journalism department who did this without either telling the teacher what she was doing or who she was doing it for, without asking permission of the teacher or other classmates (one classmate is quoted anonymously, also not a great journalistic habit to get in to), without checking content or asking for the teacher’s views of the author’s critical assessments, and without, of course, identifying her national connection to PBS. Glaser, wrote Penenberg, assigned this NYU junior “to go undercover in one of her classes to blog about her impressions for PBS.” That is more straightforward language in this case than “embedded,” but it sounds right to me.

What do you think?

‘If Blogging Had No Ethics, Blogging Would Have Failed’

Jay Rosen. Makes you think. Watch the video here (no idea why there is no embed code#$%%^&*) and read the accompanying blog post here.

The number one reason why journalists should blog is that it tutors you in how the Web works. You learn about open systems, and getting picked up; you become more interactive and have to master the horizontal part– or your blog fails. Fails to stick.

As I like to say often – “blog is software”. But there is more – watch the video.

The funny graph of the day

From here:
hadron.gif

100!

This morning, the 100th person registered for ScienceOnline’09. That is about half the capacity of Sigma Xi. We got there fast! Don’t waver and wait too long – this may fill up sooner than expected!

Bat and moth

Clock Quotes

Bankers sometimes look on politicians as people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, order more tunnel.
– John Quinton

Somebody had to do this….

It was inevitable – took just a few hours (you need to listen, not just watch):

Oooops! McCain lost the most rabid voters.

Rabies themselves!

We are a proud group of rabies. We are not a rabid group. And we
rarely engage in rabid rabble rousing. As a commonly misunderstood
virus which supports the Barack Obama candidacy, we’ve formed an
alliance of rabies to pledge our support for Senator Obama. Our group
is comprised of all different kinds of rabies, including rabies from a
raccoon, bat and non-domesticated canines.

Wow! If this won’t get wingnuts frothing at their mouths, I don’t know what will!

My picks from ScienceDaily

Bats Pick Up Rustling Sounds Against Highway Background Noise:

When bats go hunting by listening for faint rustling sounds made by their quarry on a quiet night they don’t have any problems. But what happens when a bat goes foraging next to a noisy highway? Can they still hear the faint sounds?

America’s Smallest Dinosaur Uncovered:

An unusual breed of dinosaur that was the size of a chicken, ran on two legs and scoured the ancient forest floor for termites is the smallest dinosaur species found in North America, according to a University of Calgary researcher who analyzed bones found during the excavation of an ancient bone bed near Red Deer, Alberta.

Growing Up Too Fast May Mean Dying Young In Honey Bees:

New study shows that transitions to aerobically-expensive behaviors in organisms living free in nature can have important consequences affecting the pace of aging.

Continue reading

Sarah Silverman rocks (NSWF)

The Great Schlep from The Great Schlep on Vimeo.

Oooops!

The cover graphics designer at Nature is not going to sleep very well tonight (and will, in the future, always open up the mag to see both the front and back covers at the same time), after making this gaffe:
ObamaMccainNature.jpg

ScienceOnline’09 – The Program

scienceonline09.jpg
With almost a hundred people already signed up for ScienceOnline’09, we are busily working on the Program.
But we do not want to force a program on you – we want you to help design the program that you will enjoy and find useful. We need you to look at the Program page and tell us what you think and what you offer to do. You can e-mail me or you can edit the Program page and add your name next to one of the suggested topics or add a new topic on the bottom.
Keep in mind that this is the Third conference. While it needs to cover some of the basics (e.g., “Why blog?” or “What is Open Access?”) for the people who are coming for the first time, most of the program should go beyond the basics and not be just a repeat of the sessions we had the past two years.
Analyzing your feedback after the last two conferences provided us with incentives to do things that many people asked for:
First, doubling the duration of the meeting – which does not mean we’ll get double the funding (unless you helps us with sponsorship) so we have to be frugal and carefully allocate the funds.
Second, having more sessions devoted to the educational aspects.
Third, trying to have all sessions live-streamed or recorded.
Fourth, do the “Blogging 101” session on site, during the conference, as it is difficult to go all the way to UNC for it the day before. Sigma Xi, the hotel and the airport are very close to each other, but venturing outside that small area requires us to take care of transportation, which can be costly (unless we get enough locals to volunteer to drive).
So, on Thursday, January 15th, some locals and any visitors already in town are invited to join us for the Early Bird Dinner (Place and time TBD.).
On Friday, January 16th, we will have, as we did last year, Science lab and museum tours in the morning. We’ll arrange for groups of 5-10 conference attendees to visit local science labs to get an introduction to the research and resources at that particular lab, or to one of the local science/nature museums. We’ll have a sign-up sheet up soon, as soon as we finalize the deals with all the local participating labs and museums.
In addition, for those who prefer food to science (or prefer to combine the two), and knowing that the Triangle is quite a ‘foodie’ place, we will have some tours of the local eateries, coffee shops and wine shops and agricultural science places. As soon as we finalize those deals, you will be able to sign up for them as well.
In the afternoon and evening, we will gather at Sigma Xi. The Friday will be sponsored and organized by Duke WiSE. It will start with the Women in Science & Engineering networking dinner, followed by the Keynote Address by a prominent woman science communicator.
Saturday, January 17th is the Big Day! We will have break-out sessions all day (with breaks for lunch and then a dinner at the end). Sessions will be 70 minutes long and there will be four sessions going on simultaneously.
We would prefer most of the sessions to be in an “unconference” format, predicated on the assumption that all the people in the room (people ‘formerly known as audience’) will collectively have more knowledge about the subject than the ‘expert’ at the head of the room. The role of the session leader is to introduce the subject, set the limits and goals, engage the audience in discussion, prevent any single individual from ‘hogging’ the conversation, and preventing the discussion from veering too far and too long off on tangents. So, if the session leader ends up talking for an hour, you are doing it wrong 😉
We will have four tracks:
1. science/health/nature blogging
2. science communication and education
3. doing and publishing science
4. show-and-tell quick sessions (these will be 15 minutes long and in a presentation/demo format).
Each track will have sessions targeting different audiences (e.g., beginner bloggers, experienced bloggers, scientists, students, teachers, journalists, etc.).
The program, in the same format, will continue on Sunday, January 18th, until 2pm (we may plan some interesting kind of lunch for the end).
We have already been in touch with a number of potential leaders who contacted us. Go to the Program page (which does not reflect everything we are negotiating right now, but will soon) check out the proposed topics and add your name to one you would like to lead, or add a new idea at the bottom. Discuss the topics and descriptions there. Topics that appear to garner the most interest are more likely to be picked (there is just not enough time and space to have them all!).
As some of the sessions get “fixed in stone” I will edit the Program page to reflect this. In the meantime, we are all ears – we want to hear what you want. And we’ll work with you to make it happen.

The Divine Right of Capital

At the time of complicated economic and financial news, I am reminded that the economic system and the financial system are quite separate in this country. The proposed bailout of the financial system only tangentially affects the economy – banks are needed to give out loans, so banks need to have the ability to do so. But the core of the crisis is the housing mortgage problem – shouldn’t the Feds use those $700 billion to pay off all those foreclosures and iffy loans? That would give the banks and lending companies money AND at the same time ensure that people get to keep their houses and have more money to spend on the Main Street (as their monthly payments have already been paid). Naive? Sure, but an idea to mull over.
divine%20right%20of%20capital.jpgA couple of weeks ago, I do not remember where and when exactly, someone online asked a question ‘what book you would want the newly elected President to read first?’
I’d have to go with The Divine Right of Capital by Marjorie Kelly. Reading it was an eye-opener!
Here is the key excerpt from the Introduction of the book – now go buy the book and read it carefully!

In an era when stock market wealth has seemed to grow on trees–and trillions have vanished as quickly as falling leaves–it’s an apt time to ask ourselves, where does wealth come from? More precisely, where does the wealth of public corporations come from? Who creates it?
To judge by the current arrangement in corporate America, one might suppose capital creates wealth–which is strange, because a pile of capital sitting there creates nothing. Yet capital providers–stockholders–lay claim to most wealth that public corporations generate. Corporations are believed to exist to maximize returns to shareholders. This is the law of the land, much as the divine right of kings was once the law of the land. In the dominant paradigm of business, it is not in the least controversial. Though it should be. What do shareholders contribute, to justify the extraordinary allegiance they receive? They take risk, we’re told. They put their money on the line, so corporations might grow and prosper. Let’s test the truth of this with a little quiz: Stockholders fund major public corporations–True or false? False. Or, actually, a tiny bit true–but for the most part, massively false. In fact, “investing” dollars don’t go to AT&T but to other speculators. Equity investments reach a public corporation only when new common stock is sold–which for major corporations is a rare event. Among the Dow Jones industrials, many have sold no any new common stock in thirty or fifty years. The stock market works like a used car market, as accounting professor Ralph Estes observes in Tyranny of the Bottom Line. When you buy a 1999 Ford Explorer, the money goes not to Ford but to the previous owner of the car. Ford gets the buyer’s money only when it sells a new car. Similarly, companies get stockholders’ money only when they sell new common stock. According to figures from the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission, in any given year about one in one hundred dollars trading on public markets reaches a corporation. In other words, ninety-nine out of one hundred “invested” dollars are speculative. And the past wasn’t much different. One accounting study of the steel industry examined capital expenditures over the first half of the twentieth century and found that issues of common stock provided only 5 percent of capital.
So what do stockholders contribute, to justify the extraordinary allegiance they receive? Very little. Yet this tiny contribution allows them essentially to install a pipeline and dictate that the corporation’s sole purpose is to funnel wealth into it. The productive risk in building businesses is borne by entrepreneurs and their initial venture investors, who do contribute real investing dollars, to create real wealth. Those who buy stock at sixth or seventh hand, or one-thousandth hand, also take a risk–but it is a risk speculators take among themselves, trying to outwit one another, like gamblers. It has little to do with corporations, except this: public companies are required to provide new chips for the gaming table, into infinity. It’s odd. And it’s connected to a second oddity–that we believe stockholders are the corporation. When we say that a corporation did well, we mean that its shareholders did well. The company’s local community might be devastated by plant closings. Employees might be shouldering a crushing workload. Still we will say, “The corporation did well.” One does not see rising employee income as a measure of corporate success. Indeed, gains to employees are losses to the corporation. And this betrays an unconscious bias: that employees are not really part of the corporation. They have no claim on wealth they create, no say in governance, and no vote for the board of directors. They’re not citizens of corporate society, but subjects. We think of this as the natural law of the market. It’s more accurately the result of the corporate governance structure, which violates market principles. In real markets, everyone scrambles to get what they can, and they keep what they earn. In the construct of the corporation, one group gets what another earns. The oddity of it all is veiled by the incantation of a single, magical word: ownership. Because we say stockholders own corporations, they are permitted to contribute very little, and take quite a lot. What an extraordinary word. One is tempted to recall the comment that Lycophron, an ancient Greek philosopher, made during an early Athenian slave uprising against the aristocracy. “The splendour of noble birth is imaginary,” he said, “and its prerogatives are based upon a mere word.”

Yes, we have a systemic problem. And a philosophical problem. We need to question some of the most essential premises of the way our economic and financial systems are organized.

Congratulations

To Irena Ilic (see here) for winning the Junior Division of the Show Jumping Balkans Championship a couple of weeks ago in Istanbul.
hipodrom%20010.jpg
hipodrom%20013.jpg

Zerhouni to step down

As you may have already heard, Alias Zerhouni will step down from his position of the NIH director in October, not waiting for the inauguration of a new Administration. He has been a strong and effective proponent of Open Access and I hope his successor will be as well. The blogospheric responses are all over the spectrum, from very positive to very negative, depending on what aspects of his tenure are the focus. Here are some examples:
Heather Morrison:

Dr. Zerhouni has led the NIH through the long process of the NIH Public Access mandate, first the voluntary policy, then the mandatory one, most recently speaking up forcefully for the NIH and against the absurd Conyers bill. The NIH is the world’s largest medical research funder, and from my viewpoint, this is one of the OA initiatives that has been the subject of the most intense lobbying efforts. Thank you, Dr. Zerhouni. Public access is a great gift to the world; it is appreciated, and you will be missed.

Charles W. Bailey, Jr.:

The National Institutes of Health has announced the resignation of its Director, Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., from that post effective at the end of October 2008. Zerhouni has been a strong open access advocate.

Nick Anthis:

Eliot Zerhouni has overseen the NIH at difficult time, when its budget has been stagnant, leading to a precipitous decline in grant success rates. Two decent accomplishments, however, that occurred during his tenure were ethics reform and the NIH’s new policy on open access to publications funded by its research dollars. The legacy of what’s more commonly touted (at least by Zerhouni) as his major achievement–the NIH Roadmap–remains more dubious, as it is often blamed for siphoning funding away from more basic and higher-risk research.

Revere (also here):

Zerhouni presided over tumultuous years at NIH. The doubling of the NIH budget in the five years prior to 2003 created a pig in a python effect when the budget flatlined and all the new post docs, graduate students, laboratories and research projects stimulated by the doubling were left high and dry. Now the budget is at about what it was in real dollars before the doubling but there are many more mouths to feed and lab benches to maintain. Basic health research is facing its own financial meltdown as existing grants aren’t being renewed and the hands that do the work — the post docs and graduate students — are leaving the field and the research programs they were a part of are withering. This is creating a crisis in leadership in academic science in the US, as the post docs leave for other work and the mid level academics coming up for tenure can’t get their grants renewed and have to leave their institutions to look for other positions and start over or leave research altogether.

DrugMonkey:

Unsurprising since this is a political appointment and all. You did know that, right? More importantly and probably more concerning will be the dance of the IC Directors.
The directors of the NIH Institutes and Centers are slightly less political in nature but there are still allegiances. And the highly activist Directors can have immediate impact on what research grants get funded, etc. So the scientists who are funded by an IC which has a Director resign may want to pay some attention. A long interval of an Acting Director can, conversely, maintain status quo on the funding side but may seriously side-line Congressional advocacy for the IC’s mission.

writedit:

Given that the Great Zerhouni, like all political appointees, would have been submitting his resignation come January 2009, this is a bit odd he would bail a few months shy, especially since Kessler as FDA director set the precedent of straddling administrations (& parties in power; h/t BB). If the GZ had wanted to stay, it wasn’t out of the question. And with the CTSA Consortium just about to fill up and the T-R01s pouring in next January, I’m a bit surprised. Plus, if he truly wanted as minimal disruption as possible, he would have waited for the next appointed director to be approved by the Senate before stepping down. Someone will have the thankless job of serving as interim director for 6-8 months.

Today’s carnivals

Skeptic’s Circle #96 is up on Endcycle
Also, it’s time for you to write and submit posts (or submit other people’s posts that you have noticed recently) for The Giant’s Shoulders (October 15th on Second Order Approximation) and Praxis (on October 15th on The Other 95%).

How Should We Call Them?

How Should We Call Them?A follow-up on last night’s repost (originally from April 06, 2005)…

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

The longer I live the more I see that I am never wrong about anything, and that all the pains I have so humbly taken to verify my notions have only wasted my time.
– George Bernard Shaw

Oh! He is one of those students?!

The The funniest response to today’s McCain gambit

Lawrence Lessig compares Sarah Palin to every vice president in U.S. history

‘Advancing Science Through Conversations’ article – summary of the blogospheric responses

The PLoS Biology article about science blogs and their (potential) relationship to the academic institutions has, as expected, received quite a lot of coverage in the blogosphere. Nick collects the responses and responds to the responses – join in the conversation in the comments there. Update: So does Tara.
Update: Jessica’s post is what I would have written. Now I don’t need to – go read hers.

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 6 new articles in PLoS ONE today – and one of them has nothing to do with biology or medicine (ONE is meant to be for all areas of science, after all). As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
In Situ Observation of Modulated Light Emission of Fiber Fuse Synchronized with Void Train over Hetero-Core Splice Point:

Fiber fuse is a process of optical fiber destruction under the action of laser radiation, found 20 years ago. Once initiated, opical discharge runs along the fiber core region to the light source and leaves periodic voids whose shape looks like a bullet pointing the direction of laser beam. The relation between damage pattern and propagation mode of optical discharge is still unclear even after the first in situ observation three years ago. Fiber fuse propagation over hetero-core splice point (Corning SMF-28e and HI 1060) was observed in situ. Sequential photographs obtained at intervals of 2.78 µs recorded a periodic emission at the tail of an optical discharge pumped by 1070 nm and 9 W light. The signal stopped when the discharge ran over the splice point. The corresponding damage pattern left in the fiber core region included a segment free of periodicity. The spatial modulation pattern of the light emission agreed with the void train formed over the hetero-core splice point. Some segments included a bullet-shaped void pointing in the opposite direction to the laser beam propagation although the sequential photographs did not reveal any directional change in the optical discharge propagation.

Single-Species Microarrays and Comparative Transcriptomics:

Prefabricated expression microarrays are currently available for only a few species but methods have been proposed to extend their application to comparisons between divergent genomes. Here we demonstrate that the hybridization intensity of genomic DNA is a poor basis on which to select unbiased probes on Affymetrix expression arrays for studies of comparative transcriptomics, and that doing so produces spurious results. We used the Affymetrix Xenopus laevis microarray to evaluate expression divergence between X. laevis, X. borealis, and their F1 hybrids. When data are analyzed with probes that interrogate only sequences with confirmed identity in both species, we recover results that differ substantially analyses that use genomic DNA hybridizations to select probes. Our findings have implications for the experimental design of comparative expression studies that use single-species microarrays, and for our understanding of divergent expression in hybrid clawed frogs. These findings also highlight important limitations of single-species microarrays for studies of comparative transcriptomics of polyploid species.

Species Specificity in Major Urinary Proteins by Parallel Evolution:

Species-specific chemosignals, pheromones, regulate social behaviors such as aggression, mating, pup-suckling, territory establishment, and dominance. The identity of these cues remains mostly undetermined and few mammalian pheromones have been identified. Genetically-encoded pheromones are expected to exhibit several different mechanisms for coding 1) diversity, to enable the signaling of multiple behaviors, 2) dynamic regulation, to indicate age and dominance, and 3) species-specificity. Recently, the major urinary proteins (Mups) have been shown to function themselves as genetically-encoded pheromones to regulate species-specific behavior. Mups are multiple highly related proteins expressed in combinatorial patterns that differ between individuals, gender, and age; which are sufficient to fulfill the first two criteria. We have now characterized and fully annotated the mouse Mup gene content in detail. This has enabled us to further analyze the extent of Mup coding diversity and determine their potential to encode species-specific cues.
Our results show that the mouse Mup gene cluster is composed of two subgroups: an older, more divergent class of genes and pseudogenes, and a second class with high sequence identity formed by recent sequential duplications of a single gene/pseudogene pair. Previous work suggests that truncated Mup pseudogenes may encode a family of functional hexapeptides with the potential for pheromone activity. Sequence comparison, however, reveals that they have limited coding potential. Similar analyses of nine other completed genomes find Mup gene expansions in divergent lineages, including those of rat, horse and grey mouse lemur, occurring independently from a single ancestral Mup present in other placental mammals. Our findings illustrate that increasing genomic complexity of the Mup gene family is not evolutionarily isolated, but is instead a recurring mechanism of generating coding diversity consistent with a species-specific function in mammals.