“Newsworthy-ness”

It appears that the clash of generations in regards to journalism is also happening in journalism schools: Screw AP style! Why I don’t want to be a journalist anymore.

5 of my friends began their college careers as eager journalists. 5 of my friends are now either in a different field or no longer eager about being a journalist but eager to graduate. My choice is to go back and get another degree in Graphic Design – something that results in product that highlights as opposed to false light.

And this comes from one of the most promising students in that class!

My question: is it the industry or the classroom that has soured these students on the profession? And are we going to lose an entire generation of reporters in a massive media-fatigue driven brain drain?

The wide-eyed youngsters eager to become journalists are leaving in disgust. Why? Yes, money and jobs are a concern. But also:

As I sat through most of my classes this semester, I realized the overrated-ness (if you will) of journalism. Journalist can be very ruthless, not caring about where their next story comes from – as long as it comes. I spent four years of my life studying to become a journalist, which means I sat in classes learning about the history of journalism, the technology boom, and how the news is shifting from newspapers to the Internet. I also spent a lot of time learning about the importance of “newsworthy-ness” only to realize that the only time I ever sit down and watch the news is when I’m bored, then EVERYTHING becomes newsworthy.

Ha! That is a gem right there! When you need to find stuff, you look for it online. But when you sit in front of the TV, you become, like most people, a passive consumer. Everything on the screen becomes interesting. If a pollster calls you and asks you what topics you are interested in, you will probably note the exact same topic you were just watching a show about. If it was a show about celebrity, you will say that you find celebrity news interesting. The pollster tells the TV that you are interested in Britney Spears, so the TV puts up more shows about Britney Spears, so you are more likely to see it and find it interesting and say to the next pollster that this is what you are interested in…. you see: a vicious cycle. People watch Britney because they find it interesting and they find it interesting because it is on TV.
But if there was something else on TV, like a nature show with David Attenborough, they would find that interesting instead. And they did – for years. Nature and science shows used to be very popular. Why are they not any more? Because people don’t see them any more, so they don’t know (and don’t tell the pollsters) they would be interested. People who already know they are interested in science and nature, seek that information on their own, perhaps by reading science blogs. But many others WOULD be interested if they had an exposure to such material on a regular basis.
Cameron just had an amazing and eye-opening encounter on his train commute:

What do I take from this? That there is a a demand for this kind of information and data from an educated and knowledgable public. One of the questions he asked was whether as a scientist I ever see much in the way of demand from the public. My response was that, aside from pushing the taxpayer access to taxpayer funded research myself, I hadn’t seen much evidence of real demand. His argument was that there is a huge nascent demand there from people who haven’t thought about their need to get into the detail of news stories that effect them. People want the detail, they just have no idea of how to go about getting it.

In the related FF thread, Jill notes: “No one believes that anyone outside of academe has a serious interest in the content.”
I think there is such an interest, both for science/nature content in general media for the general viewer, and for access to data and more thorough science reporting by the educated, sophisticated audience. And there is a hunger for a more modern, more serious, and more engaged journalism. The student cited above, conludes in a new post:

I have been thinking alot about being apart of such a Journalism Renaissance that would completly revolutionize journalism as we know it today. I have been getting encouragement and several discouragements from people about the feild in general but I WANT to be a part of it. I WANT to be a part of change. To re-create the art of storytelling and essentially change journalism from mere reportage to a tool used to make a change. To use my “creative energy to plan awesome marketing campaigns/web sites” as well as to keep people in the know. Awareness vs. just information. It may sound corny but, I want to spark a nerve to make people want to come from behind the television, come from behind the newspapers and the computer screens and begin to “change the world.”
Can I do it? YES. Will I have opposition and adversity? Of course…the best can’t live without haters.

Related:
Are we Press? Part Deux
Science vs. Britney Spears
Scientists are Excellent Communicators (‘Sizzle’ follow-up)

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Turkish March – Mozart on Balalaika by Moscow Nights Ensemble

Clock Quotes

One reason I don’t drink is because I wish to know when I’m having a good time.
– Nancy Astor

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 10 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
Glaucoma Alters the Circadian Timing System:

Glaucoma is a widespread ocular disease and major cause of blindness characterized by progressive, irreversible damage of the optic nerve. Although the degenerative loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and visual deficits associated with glaucoma have been extensively studied, we hypothesize that glaucoma will also lead to alteration of the circadian timing system. Circadian and non-visual responses to light are mediated by a specialized subset of melanopsin expressing RGCs that provide photic input to mammalian endogenous clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). In order to explore the molecular, anatomical and functional consequences of glaucoma we used a rodent model of chronic ocular hypertension, a primary causal factor of the pathology. Quantitative analysis of retinal projections using sensitive anterograde tracing demonstrates a significant reduction (~50-70%) of RGC axon terminals in all visual and non-visual structures and notably in the SCN. The capacity of glaucomatous rats to entrain to light was challenged by exposure to successive shifts of the light dark (LD) cycle associated with step-wise decreases in light intensity. Although glaucomatous rats are able to entrain their locomotor activity to the LD cycle at all light levels, they require more time to re-adjust to a shifted LD cycle and show significantly greater variability in activity onsets in comparison with normal rats. Quantitative PCR reveals the novel finding that melanopsin as well as rod and cone opsin mRNAs are significantly reduced in glaucomatous retinas. Our findings demonstrate that glaucoma impacts on all these aspects of the circadian timing system. In light of these results, the classical view of glaucoma as pathology unique to the visual system should be extended to include anatomical and functional alterations of the circadian timing system.

PLoS ONE is Two – Second Birthday Synchroblogging Competition

Paper number 0000001 was published in PLoS ONE on December 20th 2006 – exactly two years ago. So, we will have various types of celebrations, of course. One of those, the one you can and should participate in, is the Second Birthday Synchroblogging Competition.
So, how does it go? How can you participate?
First, spread the word about it to your own contacts and readers.
Second, if you are not already registered with ResearchBlogging.org, do so ASAP, or on December 17th at the latest (to give them enough time to approve you and to give yourself enough time to look around and familiarize yourself with the way it works).
Third, go to PLoS ONE and browse the articles – there are almost 4000 there so there are plenty to choose from. Pick one that is in your area of interest or expertise, a paper that you find exciting and you can fully understand.
Write a blog post about that paper, using the guidelines of ResearchBlogging.org – once you are registered, look around the forums and the blog there for discussions on exactly what the criteria are.
Now wait – hold on. Don’t post it yet! Make sure that you publish your post on December 18th.
Make sure that your post contains the BPR3 icon and the Reference (both provided by a ResearchBlogging.org automated tool). This will ensure that your post shows up on the ResearchBlogging.org front page aggregator.
If your post does not show up there within a few hours, or if you already know that there is a technical incompatibility between ResearchBlogging.org and your blog, please e-mail me (Bora@plos.org) the permalink of your post. Also, try to make sure that the words “PLoS ONE @ Two” appear in your post or in your tags. I will look at the ResearchBlogging.org aggregator, in my e-mail, at Google Blogsearch and Technorati – that way I will be sure to catch all the entries.
If you are blogging on an “upper-level” platform, e.g., Drupal, Expression Engine, WordPress, MoveableType, Typepad, etc., please send a trackback from your post to the paper itself. You have to make sure that the body of your post contains the link to the paper in this exact form (there are several alternative URLs that will not work):
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000000
Then, in the “outgoing trackbacks” field of your blog, paste the URL of the paper in exactly this form:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000000/trackback
If you are using Blogspot, LiveJournal, etc. you cannot send trackbacks. But there is no reason why you cannot drop the permalink of your post in a comment on the paper itself.
You should login/register at PLoS ONE and consider posting your brief comments, notes or ratings there as well – after all, you are one of the few people who actually read the paper in great detail and with deep focus – you know more about it than most other people on the planet.
Once everyone’s posted their posts on the 18th, all the entries will be judged by a panel of four judges: Liz Allen of PLoS, Dave Munger of ResearchBlogging.org (and blogger on Cognitive Daily), Jason Stajich from the Department of Plant and Microbial Biology at UC-Berkeley, and myself.
The winner will be announced on December 20th. The winning post will be (with permission) cross-posted on the PLoS ONE Blog and here on A Blog Around the Clock. The author of the post will also receive a bag of swag that includes the new PLoS Water bottle (H2go brand) and a couple of cool PLoS t-shirts.
So, let’a start writing….

SciAm Podcast

Scott Derrickson, director of the new version of The Day the Earth Stood Still, talks about his take on the iconic sci-fi movie. And Nobel laureate, Richard Roberts, discusses the importance of open-access science publishing. Plus, we’ll test your knowledge about some recent science in the news.

Listen here.

Interview with Michael Nielsen

Sam Dupuis (yes, the son of John) contacted Michael Nielsen and posted a nice, smart, long blog interview. Check it out.

KRISTOF: Obama’s ‘Secretary of Food’?

In today’s NYTimes:

As Barack Obama ponders whom to pick as agriculture secretary, he should reframe the question. What he needs is actually a bold reformer in a position renamed “secretary of food.”
A Department of Agriculture made sense 100 years ago when 35 percent of Americans engaged in farming. But today, fewer than 2 percent are farmers. In contrast, 100 percent of Americans eat.
Renaming the department would signal that Mr. Obama seeks to move away from a bankrupt structure of factory farming that squanders energy, exacerbates climate change and makes Americans unhealthy — all while costing taxpayers billions of dollars….

How to organize a Smart Mob

For instance, to protest Creationist bills in state and local legislatures:

Science Change.gov

Under Bush, Science Learned It Must Speak Up:

Barack Obama received a relatively quiet endorsement on Aug. 23 from 61 of the country’s Nobel laureates in physics, medicine and chemistry — scientific heavyweights who used the occasion to both call for a scientific renewal in America and critique the state of American science at the end of the Bush era.
“During the administration of George W. Bush,” their open letter charged, “vital parts of our country’s scientific enterprise have been damaged by stagnant or declining federal support. The government’s scientific advisory process has been distorted by political considerations. As a result, our once dominant position in the scientific world has been shaken and our prosperity has been placed at risk.”
The United States lost critical time, the letter went on, in innovating alternative energy sources, treating disease, reversing climate change, strengthening security and improving the economy. In the process, the country has lost ground as the world’s scientific leader and leading attraction to the world’s current and would-be scientists — many of whom could not have come here even if they wanted to after Sept. 11.
The underlying concern — that the Bush administration has been either ambivalent toward or downright hostile to their work — elicited an outcry this election season from the normally staid scientific community….

Cautious Optimism for Obama’s Policy on Science:

Whoever advises Barack Obama in the next administration will have to differentiate between science for policy and policy for science.
It’s not just wordplay: The former captures how the resources of science can affect issues like energy, health care and the environment. The latter refers to making policy in support of science by providing, for example, funding for research and development.
“One thing a science adviser has got to be very, very careful about is putting the emphasis on science for policy,” said Bill Blanpied, a retired government scientist and expert on presidential science history. President Richard Nixon, he pointed out, eliminated the Office of Science and Technology Policy because it came to be viewed as a special lobby for science within the White House (and, well, farmers don’t get their own special lobby either).
“You don’t want the science adviser perceived as someone who is simply saying, ‘We need more money.’ On the other hand, the expectation of a lot of scientists is that’s exactly what the science adviser should be doing. It’s tricky.”…..

And Obama has a good start – Steven Chu appears to have been tapped for Secretary of Energy.

Triangle Blogger Meetup

Last night was the first time we had a Triangle blogger meetup at the new Carrboro Creative Coworking place. Wayne Sutton, John Rees, Rob G, Jeff Cohen, Jim Buie, Brian Russell and I got together and talked about Twitter and FriendFeed, about engaging the commenters and moderating comments, and many other things. That was fun.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Gypsies’ camp goes to sky, 1976

Clock Quotes

For us who live in cities Nature is not natural. Nature is supernatural. Just as monks watched and strove to get a glimpse of heaven, so we watch and strive to get a glimpse of earth. It is as if men had cake and wine every day but were sometimes allowed common bread.
– Gilbert Keith Chesterton

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 11 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
Settling Decisions and Heterospecific Social Information Use in Shrikes:

Animals often settle near competitors, a behavior known as social attraction, which belies standard habitat selection theory. Two hypotheses account for these observations: individuals obtain Allee benefits mediated by the physical presence of a competitor, or they use successfully settled individual as a source of information indicating the location of high quality habitat. We evaluated these hypotheses experimentally in two species of shrikes. These passerine birds with a raptor-like mode of life impale prey to create larders that serve as an indicator of male/habitat quality. Thus, two forms of indirect information are available in our system: a successfully settled shrike and its larder. Typically these two cues are associated with each other, however, our experimental treatment created an unnatural situation by disassociating them. We manipulated the presence of larders of great grey shrikes and examined the settling decisions of red-backed shrikes within and outside the great grey shrike territories. Male red-backed shrikes did not settle sooner on plots with great grey shrikes compared to plots that only contained artificial larders indicating that red-backed shrikes do not use the physical presence of a great grey shrike when making settling decisions which is inconsistent with the Allee effect hypothesis. In contrast, for all plots without great grey shrikes, red-backed shrikes settled, paired and laid clutches sooner on plots with larders compared to plots without larders. We conclude that red-backed shrikes use larders of great grey shrikes as a cue to rapidly assess habitat quality.

Ah, finally some useful stuff done with math modeling…. ;-)

YouTube Usage Decoded:

Why are certain videos on YouTube watched millions of times while 90 percent of the contributions find only the odd viewer? A new study reveals that increased attention in social systems like the YouTube community follows particular, recurrent patterns that can be represented using mathematical models.
The Internet platform YouTube is a stomping ground for scientists looking to investigate the fine mechanism of the attention spiral in social systems. How is it possible, for example, that one YouTube video of a previously unknown comedian from Ohio can be viewed over ten million times in the space of two weeks and 103 million times during its total two-year running time? The video was aired on the most popular television networks in America and the comedian Judson Laipply has meanwhile become a YouTube star. Social scientists, economists, mathematicians and even physicists are fascinated by this “herding”, as the herdlike behavior in social networks is often termed, on YouTube.

Read the rest, it’s very interesting (and applicable to other media, not just YouTube).

Today’s carnivals

Linnaeus’ Legacy No. 14: A Carnival of Diversity, is up on Agricultural Biodiversity Weblog
Carnival of Education, #201 is up on Scheiss Weekly
Carnival of Homeschooling #154: Anniversary Gifts, is up on The Daily Planet

Two rare white lion cubs were born in Belgrade Zoo on Tuesday

The (apparently un-embeddable) video of the cuties is here (I wouldn’t do that with my hand, though, what you see at one point….).
Hat-tip: Viktor

Press-release Title FAIL

So, which gender is the researcher?
press%20release%20title%20FAIL.JPG

Impact Factor

Yesterday’s PhD comic strip:
phd120808s.gif
We still have ways to go until we get it right….

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

Each time we re-read a book we get more out of it because we put more into it; a different person is reading it, and therefore it is a different book.
– Muriel Clark

Setting up the teaching lab….

…with inevitable food coloring for photo-ops:
me%20at%20Wesleyan.JPG

This is Huge!!!!!!!

put_me_down.jpg
That’s what she said….

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 9 new articles in PLoS ONE today and they are, like, totally awesome!
As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
Why Do Dolphins Carry Sponges?:

Tool use is rare in wild animals, but of widespread interest because of its relationship to animal cognition, social learning and culture. Despite such attention, quantifying the costs and benefits of tool use has been difficult, largely because if tool use occurs, all population members typically exhibit the behavior. In Shark Bay, Australia, only a subset of the bottlenose dolphin population uses marine sponges as tools, providing an opportunity to assess both proximate and ultimate costs and benefits and document patterns of transmission. We compared sponge-carrying (sponger) females to non-sponge-carrying (non-sponger) females and show that spongers were more solitary, spent more time in deep water channel habitats, dived for longer durations, and devoted more time to foraging than non-spongers; and, even with these potential proximate costs, calving success of sponger females was not significantly different from non-spongers. We also show a clear female-bias in the ontogeny of sponging. With a solitary lifestyle, specialization, and high foraging demands, spongers used tools more than any non-human animal. We suggest that the ecological, social, and developmental mechanisms involved likely (1) help explain the high intrapopulation variation in female behaviour, (2) indicate tradeoffs (e.g., time allocation) between ecological and social factors and, (3) constrain the spread of this innovation to primarily vertical transmission.

Ecosystem Overfishing in the Ocean:

Fisheries catches represent a net export of mass and energy that can no longer be used by trophic levels higher than those fished. Thus, exploitation implies a depletion of secondary production of higher trophic levels (here the production of mass and energy by herbivores and carnivores in the ecosystem) due to the removal of prey. The depletion of secondary production due to the export of biomass and energy through catches was recently formulated as a proxy for evaluating the ecosystem impacts of fishing-i.e., the level of ecosystem overfishing. Here we evaluate the historical and current risk of ecosystem overfishing at a global scale by quantifying the depletion of secondary production using the best available fisheries and ecological data (i.e., catch and primary production). Our results highlight an increasing trend in the number of unsustainable fisheries (i.e., an increase in the risk of ecosystem overfishing) from the 1950s to the 2000s, and illustrate the worldwide geographic expansion of overfishing. These results enable to assess when and where fishing became unsustainable at the ecosystem level. At present, total catch per capita from Large Marine Ecosystems is at least twice the value estimated to ensure fishing at moderate sustainable levels.

Extinction Risk Escalates in the Tropics:

The latitudinal biodiversity gradient remains one of the most widely recognized yet puzzling patterns in nature [1]. Presently, the high level of extinction of tropical species, referred to as the “tropical biodiversity crisis”, has the potential to erode this pattern. While the connection between species richness, extinction, and speciation has long intrigued biologists [2], [3], these interactions have experienced increased poignancy due to their relevancy to where we should concentrate our conservation efforts. Natural extinction is a phenomenon thought to have its own latitudinal gradient, with lower extinction rates in the tropics being reported in beetles, birds, mammals, and bivalves [4]-[7]. Processes that have buffered ecosystems from high extinction rates in the past may also buffer ecosystems against disturbance of anthropogenic origin. While potential parallels between historical and present-day extinction patterns have been acknowledged, they remain only superficially explored and plant extinction patterns have been particularly neglected. Studies on the disappearances of animal species have reached conflicting conclusions, with the rate of extinction appearing either higher [8] or lower [9] in species richness hotspots. Our global study of extinction risk in vascular plants finds disproportionately higher extinction risk in tropical countries, even when indicators of human pressure (GDP, population density, forest cover change) are taken into account. Our results are at odds with the notion that the tropics represent a museum of plant biodiversity (places of historically lowered extinction) and we discuss mechanisms that may reconcile this apparent contradiction.

Anticipatory Cortical Activation Precedes Auditory Events in Sleeping Infants:

Behavioral studies have shown that infants can form associations between environmental events and produce anticipatory actions for the predictable event, but the neural mechanisms for the learning and anticipation of events in infants are not known. Recent neuroimaging studies revealed that the association cortices of infants show activation related to auditory-stimulus discrimination and novelty detection during sleep. In the present study, we expected that when an auditory cue (beeps) predicted an auditory event (a female voice), specific regions of the infant cortex would show anticipatory activation before the event onset even while sleeping. We examined the cortical activation of 3-month-old infants during delays between the cue and the event by using multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy. To investigate spatiotemporal changes in cortical activation over the experimental session, we divided the session into two phases (early and late phase) and analyzed each phase separately. In the early phase, the frontal regions showed activation in response to the cue that was followed by the event compared with another cue that was not followed by any event. In the late phase, the temporoparietal region, in addition to the frontal region, showed prominent activation in response to the cue followed by the event. In contrast, when the cue was followed by an event and no-event in equal proportions, cortical activation in response to the cue was not observed in any phase. Sleeping 3-month-old infants showed anticipatory cortical activation in the temporoparietal and frontal regions only in response to the cue predicting the event, suggesting that infants can implicitly form associations between temporally separated events and generate the anticipatory activation before the predictable event. Furthermore, the different time evolution of activation in the temporoparietal and frontal regions suggests that these regions may be involved in different aspects of learning and predicting future events.

A Metasystem of Framework Model Organisms to Study Emergence of New Host-Microbe Adaptations:

An unintended consequence of global industrialization and associated societal rearrangements is new interactions of microbes and potential hosts (especially mammals and plants), providing an opportunity for the rapid emergence of host-microbe adaptation and eventual establishment of new microbe-related diseases. We describe a new model system comprising the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and several microbes, each representing different modes of interaction, to study such “maladaptations”. The model microbes include human and agricultural pathogens and microbes that are commonly considered innocuous. The system has a large knowledge base corresponding to each component organism and is amenable to high-throughput automation assisted perturbation screens for identifying components that modulate host-pathogen interactions. This would aid in the study of emergence and progression of host-microbe maladaptations in a controlled environment.

Delayed Postconditioning Protects against Focal Ischemic Brain Injury in Rats:

We and others have reported that rapid ischemic postconditioning, interrupting early reperfusion after stroke, reduces infarction in rats. However, its extremely short therapeutic time windows, from a few seconds to minutes after reperfusion, may hinder its clinical translation. Thus, in this study we explored if delayed postconditioning, which is conducted a few hours after reperfusion, offers protection against stroke. Focal ischemia was generated by 30 min occlusion of bilateral common carotid artery (CCA) combined with permanent occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCA); delayed postconditioning was performed by repetitive, brief occlusion and release of the bilateral CCAs, or of the ipsilateral CCA alone. As a result, delayed postconditioning performed at 3h and 6h after stroke robustly reduced infarct size, with the strongest protection achieved by delayed postconditioning with 6 cycles of 15 min occlusion/15 min release of the ipsilateral CCA executed from 6h. We found that this delayed postconditioning provided long-term protection for up to two months by reducing infarction and improving outcomes of the behavioral tests; it also attenuated reduction in 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-uptake therefore improving metabolism, and reduced edema and blood brain barrier leakage. Reperfusion in ischemic stroke patients is usually achieved by tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) application, however, t-PA’s side effect may worsen ischemic injury. Thus, we tested whether delayed postconditioning counteracts the exacerbating effect of t-PA. The results showed that delayed postconditioning mitigated the worsening effect of t-PA on infarction. Delayed postconditioning reduced ischemic injury after focal ischemia, which opens a new research avenue for stroke therapy and its underlying protective mechanisms.

And there is also a cool paper in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases published last night:
Patterns in Age-Seroprevalence Consistent with Acquired Immunity against Trypanosoma brucei in Serengeti Lions:

Trypanosomiasis is a major health threat in Africa, but vaccine development has long been hampered by the extraordinarily diverse surface proteins of these parasites. However, Serengeti lions show an asymptotic age prevalence of the non-pathogenic Trypanosoma congolense in contrast to a strong peak and decrease in age prevalence of the pathogenic T. brucei s.l.. This pattern suggests that lions may gain cross-immunity to T. brucei from repeated exposure to the more genetically diverse T. congolense. Although lions may gain more effective cross immunity than other host species owing to their frequent consumption of infected prey animals, these findings suggest possible strategies for designing effective vaccines against sleeping sickness in livestock and humans.

Today’s carnivals

Hourglass VI: A carnival of biogerontology is up on Ouroboros
Encephalon 60, A Neuroscience Blog Carnival, is up on Living the Scientific Life
Grand Rounds 5:12 – Healthcare Reform Q&A – is up on Sharp Brains

ScienceOnline’09 – Friday Morning Coffee

scienceonline09.jpg
The first 25 registered participants who sign up here will get to taste some delicious coffee and discuss the science of coffee at Counter Culture Coffee in Durham (map) on Friday, January 16th at 9:30am. Use the same wiki page also to organize carpooling (locals, please offer to give rides to the guests).

Bloggers vs. Journalists morphs into Twitterers vs. Journalists

Journalists are fantastically capable of forgetting the he-said-she-said False Equivalence mode of dishonesty if they are themselves one of the sides. In that case, they quote only the “skeptics” side, not the side that may have actually something intelligent to say about the matter.
Watch this incredible video clip.
It shows a horse dealer, a horse trainer, a farrier and a saddle-maker sitting around the table, with serious faces, discussing this new invention – the car! It is just a fad. Those engineers know nothing about transportation. This will remain just a toy for the idle and the rich. No way a car can do what a horse can (like rear, buck, kick and bite). And how do we know – because we are the transportation experts!
Translation: People who used Twitter (and FriendFeed and blogs, etc.) to report from the scenes in Mumbai during the attacks and standoff cannot possibly be journalists. Let’s give them another name – how about “newsgatherers”? Why are they not “journalists”? Because they are not us. They don’t do what we do – bloviate about things we know nothing about but can pretend so well.
This NYT article also introduces the same word for a journalist who is not “one of us”:

A decade ago, Blogger was one of the first services that allowed anyone on the Internet to immediately publish his or her own content. It forever changed the face of media (witness the blog you are currently reading) and the way people communicate. Twitter is an extension of that transformation, Mr. Williams said.
“I was surprised by blogging. It took me a while to realize the profundity of blogging,” he said.
He is not surprised, though, that Twitter is being used in newsgathering, as it was during the terror attacks in India last week. “I’ve actually been waiting for it to happen,” he said. The day Barack Obama was elected president was Twitter’s most-trafficked day ever.
Twitter will complement other forms of media, he said, the way that blogs and newspapers co-exist. “New media never kill old media,” he said. “It’s all part of an ecosystem.”

Then Twitterers surprise them from the inside, reporting blow-by-blow from a behind-the-doors meeting:

CNN, a division of Time Warner, invited several dozen newspaper editors to Atlanta last week for a summit about its forthcoming news wire. Gatherings of journalists aren’t usually off-the-record affairs, but CNN probably didn’t expect each segment of the summit to be shared with the Web. Then again, the increasingly popular Twitter, which allows users to share short messages with others, sometimes acts as a wire service as well. (CNN declined to comment.)

Dan Conover puts it the best:

…Thing is, if you don’t think Twitter is useful or valuable, don’t use it. Please don’t care about it. It’s really no skin off my ass. Those of us who use these tools aren’t offended by your opinion. In truth, we just don’t find your opinions all that interesting.
The strengths and weaknesses of Twitter and other social media tools are far more apparent to the people who use them than the people who don’t, so you’re not breaking any news to me when you tell me about their “flaws.” Half the conversations on social media are various forms of bitching about social media tools.
And when we observe with wonder the mysterious things that occur because of these proliferating new tools, and probe their meanings and implications obsessively, by all means try to frame that as a discussion about editorial control and quality. The party didn’t start when you noticed it. It didn’t stop when you left. It doesn’t care that you don’t think it’s a good party and that you and your friends want to go somewhere else. Knock yourselves out…[read the rest for the excellent and biting analysis]

But with a lot of gentle hand-holding, the dinosaur journalists can start “getting it”….
Update: Another new term – iReporters, sounds better as it suggests the people are journalists. And some are better than the professional journalist who wrote this article using a single case he liked and hand-picked because it proves his point.

What’s Your Jewish Zodiac Food Sign?

The kind of astrology I can have and eat it, too.

Kinesthetic learning online?

Tina writes – Kinesthetic Learners: Why Old Media Should Never Die:

…..Many classrooms, however, don’t offer this type of kinesthetic learning. The hands-on learner is left to fend for themselves and more often than not the only physical interaction they get is with the learning material itself.
You’ve seen them before. Sometimes, it’s a student whose fingers trace the words as they read them. Or the highlighter: the student who makes a colored mosaic of their text as they try to physically interact with the material. Even note-taking is a kinesthetic activity. In a variety of subtle ways, the kinesthetic learner can physically interact with their learning material.
Now, imagine these same students trying to physically interact with ‘new’ media. The method of consuming learning material is physically no different than consuming entertainment material. Your fingers and eyes make the same motions, there is no easy way to physically differentiate material, much less to physically interact with it.
Obviously, there are ways that new media can be superior. Video offers the best chance to reach all learning types. For example, a step-by-step video of a science experiment caters to visual and auditory senses while leaving the hands free to actually perform the experiment.
But for straight information consumption, new media leaves the kinesthetic learner out in the cold.

Videos. Like JoVE and SciVee.tv?
What about joysticks and Wii?

Bob Dylan – Sara (video)

LOLNobel

Krugman goes to Stockholm to get a Nobel and give a speech, posts his slides on his blog and apologizes for “light blogging lately” using a LOLcat.
The future is bright….

If there was Facebook during the Civil War…

See the screen-capture here: If The USA Had A Facebook Page During The Civil War (then click on the image to enlarge).

What a (science) museum can be?

Why do you care about and/or work in museums? Nina has her own reasons:

I don’t work in museums because I love them. I didn’t grow up staring open-mouthed at natural history dioramas or wandering through art galleries. When I visit a new city, I don’t clamor to visit museums. I go on hikes. I go to farmer’s markets. I walk around and get a sense for people and place. And while I’ll visit museums out of professional (and occasionally personal) interest, I don’t do it because of a deep emotional connection. Yes, there are some extraordinary museum experiences that have changed my life, but they are the exception, not the norm.
I don’t work in museums because I love them. I love the promise of what they can be. I work in museums because I hate schools and see museums as a viable alternative. I’m a strong believer in free-choice learning, and I see museums as places to circumvent the hazards of compulsory education and support a democratic, engaged society of learners….

Clock Quotes

There is no fence or hedge round time that has gone. You can go back and have what you like if you remember it well enough.
– Richard Llewellyn

Pulitzers for online reporting

Pulitzer Prizes Broadened to Include Online-Only Publications Primarily Devoted to Original News Reporting:

New York, Dec. 8, 2008 – The Pulitzer Prizes in journalism, which honor the work of American newspapers appearing in print, have been expanded to include many text-based newspapers and news organizations that publish only on the Internet, the Pulitzer Prize Board announced today. [Who defines “newspaper” and “news organization”? Can I claim “A Blog Around The Clock” as one of those if I call it that way? If not, why not? Who decides?]
The Board also has decided to allow entries made up entirely of online content to be submitted in all 14 Pulitzer journalism categories. [Including for Commentary?]
While broadening the competition, the Board stressed that all entered material — whether online or in print — should come from United States newspapers or news organizations that publish at least weekly,[Is 8.2 times a day enough?] that are “primarily dedicated to original news reporting [That’s tough, but many bloggers have done it, and some do it on a regular basis.] and coverage of ongoing stories,” [Every blogger in the world.] and that “adhere to the highest journalistic principles.[Oooops! So NYTimes and WaPo are not eligible?]”
Consistent with its historic focus on daily and weekly newspapers, the Board will continue to exclude entries from printed magazines and broadcast media and their respective Web sites.[What is the difference between a weekly newspaper and a magazine? Are the Atlantic bloggers, like Sullivan, excluded because Atlantic gets printed on paper?]
“This is an important step forward, reflecting our continued commitment to American newspapers as well as our willingness to adapt to the remarkable growth of online journalism,” said Sig Gissler, administrator of the Prizes. “The new rules enlarge the Pulitzer tent and recognize more fully the role of the Web, while underscoring the enduring value of words and of serious reporting.”
The Board will continue to monitor the impact of the Internet, Gissler said.[Better later than never, I guess….]
Beginning in 2006, online content from newspaper Web sites was permitted in all Pulitzer journalism categories, but online-only newspapers were not allowed to submit entries, and entirely-online entries were permitted in only two categories, breaking news coverage and breaking-news photography.
In addition to text stories, the competition will continue to allow a full range of online content, such as interactive graphics and video, in nearly all categories. [No photoblogs?] Two photography categories will continue to restrict entries to still images.
The Board adopted the changes at its November meeting at Columbia University after a lengthy study by a committee.[This sounds like something written by a committee….]
The Board also refined the definition for its prize on Local Reporting of Breaking News. To emphasize immediacy, the new definition states that “special emphasis” will be given to “the speed and accuracy of the initial coverage.”[Someone on Twitter will win every time!]
The Board, Gissler said, hopes that this will encourage the submission of more online material in the category. [OK, guys, we’ll nominate and we’ll be watching you!]

A little more detail here: At Last: Pulitzer Prizes Expand to Include Web-Only News Outlets
Update:They asked Dan Gillmor for advice, but did not listen to a word of what he told them. Read his entire response.

New and Exciting in PLoS this week

There are 14 new articles in PLoS ONE today, as well as new papers in PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine.
As always, for PLoS ONE articles, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click.
Here are my own picks for the week- awesome papers! – you go and look for your own favourites:
The Worldwide Variation in Avian Clutch Size across Species and Space:

Why do some bird species lay only one egg in their nest, and others ten? The clutch size of birds is one of the best-studied life-history traits of animals. Nevertheless, research has so far focused either on a comparative approach, relating clutch size to other biological traits of the species, such as body weight; or on a macroecological approach, testing how environmental factors, such as seasonality, influence clutch size. We used the most comprehensive dataset on clutch size ever compiled, including 5,290 species, and combined it with data on the biology and the environment of these species. This approach enabled us to merge comparative and macroecological methods and to test biological and environmental factors together in one analysis. With this approach, we are able to explain a major proportion of the global variation in clutch size and also to predict with high confidence the average clutch size of a bird assemblage on earth. For example, cavity nesters, such as woodpeckers, have larger clutches than open-nesting species; and species in seasonal environments, especially at northern latitudes, have larger clutches than tropical birds. The findings offer a bridge between macroecology and comparative biology, and provide a global and integrative understanding of a core life-history trait.

Elephant (Loxodonta africana) Home Ranges in Sabi Sand Reserve and Kruger National Park: A Five-Year Satellite Tracking Study:

During a five-year GPS satellite tracking study in Sabi Sand Reserve (SSR) and Kruger National Park (KNP) we monitored the daily movements of an elephant cow (Loxodonta africana) from September 2003 to August 2008. The study animal was confirmed to be part of a group of seven elephants therefore her position is representative of the matriarchal group. We found that the study animal did not use habitat randomly and confirmed strong seasonal fidelity to its summer and winter five-year home ranges. The cow’s summer home range was in KNP in an area more than four times that of her SSR winter home range. She exhibited clear park habitation with up to three visits per year travelling via a well-defined northern or southern corridor. There was a positive correlation between the daily distance the elephant walked and minimum daily temperature and the elephant was significantly closer to rivers and artificial waterholes than would be expected if it were moving randomly in KNP and SSR. Transect lines established through the home ranges were surveyed to further understand the fine scale of the landscape and vegetation representative of the home ranges.

Patterns of Reproductive Isolation in Toads:

Understanding the general features of speciation is an important goal in evolutionary biology, and despite significant progress, several unresolved questions remain. We analyzed an extensive comparative dataset consisting of more than 1900 crosses between 92 species of toads to infer patterns of reproductive isolation. This unique dataset provides an opportunity to examine the strength of reproductive isolation, the development and sex ratios of hybrid offspring, patterns of fertility and infertility, and polyploidization in hybrids all in the context of genetic divergence between parental species. We found that the strength of intrinsic postzygotic isolation increases with genetic divergence, but relatively high levels of divergence are necessary before reproductive isolation is complete in toads. Fertilization rates were not correlated to genetic divergence, but hatching success, the number of larvae produced, and the percentage of tadpoles reaching metamorphosis were all inversely related with genetic divergence. Hybrids between species with lower levels of divergence developed to metamorphosis, while hybrids with higher levels of divergence stopped developing in gastrula and larval stages. Sex ratios of hybrid offspring were biased towards males in 70% of crosses and biased towards females in 30% of crosses. Hybrid females from crosses between closely related species were completely fertile, while approximately half (53%) of hybrid males were sterile, with sterility predicted by genetic divergence. The degree of abnormal ploidy in hybrids was positively related to genetic divergence between parental species, but surprisingly, polyploidization had no effect on patterns of asymmetrical inviability. We discuss explanations for these patterns, including the role of Haldane’s rule in toads and anurans in general, and suggest mechanisms generating patterns of reproductive isolation in anurans.

Secretary of Agriculture petition

If you agree with this petition, sign it:

Dear President-Elect Obama,
We congratulate you on your historic victory and welcome the change that your election promises to usher in for our nation. As leaders in the sustainable agriculture and rural advocacy community we supported you in record numbers during the caucus, primary and general election because of the family farm-friendly policies that you advocated during your campaign.
As our nation’s future president, we hope that you will take our concerns under advisement when nominating our next Secretary of Agriculture because of the crucial role this Secretary will play in revitalizing our rural economies, protecting our nation’s food supply and our environment, improving human health and well-being, rescuing the independent family farmer, and creating a sustainable renewable energy future.
————snip————
With this in mind, we are offering a list of leaders who have demonstrated a commitment to the goals that you articulated during your campaign and we encourage you to consider them for the role of Secretary of Agriculture.

Interviews with PLoS ONE authors and academic editors

If you don’t follow the PLoS Blog (you don’t? really?), you may have missed a series of posts we recently started, interviewing some of our authors and academic editors, who reveal the behind-the-scenes thoughts about the process. Check out interviews with Jeremy Farrar, Dario Ringach, Ivan Baxter, Niyaz Ahmed and Tian Kegong.

Jesse Dylan video on Science Commons

News from Science Commons:

Today, we are proud to announce the release of Science Commons’ first informational video. The video was directed by renowned director Jesse Dylan, the director of the Emmy- award winning “Yes We Can” Barack Obama campaign video with musical artist will.i.am from the Black Eyed Peas. The video can also be seen on the front of sciencecommons.org.
“I believe Science Commons represents the true aspiration of the web, and I wanted to tell their story,” Dylan said. “They’ve changed the way we think about exploration and discovery; the important and innovative ideas need to be shared. I believe it’s vital to revolutionizing science in the future. I hope this is just the beginning of our collaboration.”
This video is launched in conjunction with a letter of support from Richard Bookman, the Vice Provost for Research and Executive Dean for Research and Research Training at the University of Miami. Bookman joins a group of esteemed Commons supporters featured in this year’s “Commoner Letter” series, including this year: Eben Moglen of the Software Freedom Law Center and Columbia University, Renata Avila – CC Guatemala Project Lead, and singer/songwriter Jonathan Coulton. More information and an archive of past letters can be found at http://support.creativecommons.org/letters.

ScienceOnline’09 – the WiSE Friday event

scienceonline09.jpg
As you know, a portion of the Friday program at ScienceOnline09 is organized by Duke WiSE. They have now put up a webpage with additional information.
In short, if you have signed up for the conference and checked the “I will attend the Friday evening event” box on the registration form you are fine – no need to do anything else, just show up.
But if you are local and want to attend ONLY the WiSE event (and you have not registered for SO’09), you need to register by using this online form.
The program?
6:30 pm Registration
7 – 8 pm Networking reception and informational booths with local women’s groups
8 – 9 pm Keynote talk by Rebecca Skloot

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Ivan, Boris & Moi

Clock Quotes

Some say no evil thing that walks by night,
In fog or fire, by lake or moorish fen,
Blue meagre hag, or stubborn unlaid ghost
That breaks his magic chains at curfew time,
No goblin, or swart fairy of the mine,
Hath hurtful power o’er true virginity.

– John Milton

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

A glowing mushroom

A wonderful example of Bioluminescence!
glowing%20mushroom.jpg

Blanches nuits de satin

Why Doesn’t Anyone Comment on Your Blog?

Nina Simon explains:

Getting a good comment is like getting a million puppies in the mail. I am so so so grateful whenever you write back and share your thoughts with all those faceless people and with me. But I’ve also learned not to rely on or have an unhealthy relationship with that gratitude. I’m ecstatic when you comment. I’m thrilled when someone links to me. I’m elated by reader numbers. But what keeps me going is an interest in writing, learning, and sharing

Read the whole thing – it is detailed and good.

If you are planning to travel to Belgrade…

…you need to find the useful information by following the links in this post.