Category Archives: PLoS

Extreme Dinosaur: Nigersaurus, the Mesozoic Cow!

Blogging on Peer-Reviewed Research

Today is a super-exciting day for me and I hope you will find it exciting as well. Why?
Because today PLoS ONE published a paper I am very hyped about – Structural Extremes in a Cretaceous Dinosaur by Sereno PC, Wilson JA, Witmer LM, Whitlock JA, Maga A, et al.
Simultaneously with the publication of the paper at 10:30am EST today (and such perfect synchrony took a LOT of work, sweat and nail-biting!), the fossil itself will be unveiled at the National Geographic in Washington D.C. (and you’ll see some snippets from there on TV tonight – more information on channels and times later).
First, why is this dinosaur exciting and then, below, why is the publication of this paper so exciting to me personally.
A French paleontologist, Dr. Philippe Taquet, who led the first fossil expeditions to Niger in the 1960s., brought home some bone fragments that he never named. It took three decades until more of this dinosaur was found. In 1997., a member of Paul Sereno’s team discovered the skull of a bizzare-looking dinosaurus which they named Nigersaurus taqueti in honor of their French predecessor. In 1999., Sereno brought in a crew that dug out an almost complete skeleton of this animal, a younger, smaller cousin of the Diplodocus, one of my favourite dinos since I was a little kid.
Nigersaurus%20fleshed%20out.jpg
[image copyright Todd Marshall, courtesy Project Exploration – click for high-res image]
It usually takes some time for a big dinosaur skeleton to get cleaned and prepared, but in this case it also took some time to do serious head-scratching! The animal was so strange and difficult to interpret!
Although this is a large dinosaur, about elephant-sized, the bones, especially the vertebrae, are extremely hollow – mostly air. Obviously the animal existed and did fine (I believe they found remains of more than one, including babies) although it is hard to fathom that such a large animal could have such a hollow vertebral column without collapsing under the slightest outside pressure. This calls into question the understanding of what the minimal requirements for bone mass are for the skeleton to be useful.
Nigersaurus%20skeleton%20.jpg[image copyright P. Sereno and C. Abraczinskas, courtesy Project Exploration]
The same goes for the skull which is so hollow and minimalistic in its structure that the bones are transparent (see pictures below)! Yet this extremely light-weight skull fed this large animal – again, questioning the current understanding of what the minimal requirements are for a skull to be functional.
The jaw was extremely wide, with about 500 teeth set in a ruler-straight line, being regularly replaced as they wore out. Moreover, the head is positioned in such a way that it strongly suggests that animal was feeding very close to the ground. Apparently, since Marsh uncovered the first Diplodocus in the 1800s, there has been a debate about the mode of feeding in diplodocids, some taking a “long neck = giraffe” view of high tree browsing, while others argued for low-browsing or even grazing close to the ground. The inability of Marsh and later Holland in 1924 to mount the skull of Diplodocus in straight line with the neck (the way usually portrayed in the books of your youth) suggests that the heads of animals in this group tended to point downward, indicating close-to-grouond feeding. Nigersaurus, with the most extreme example of such angle between the head and neck reinforces this notion further. A CT scan of the endocast shows the positioning of the inner ear that also supports this notion.
You can find a LOT of information about the find, pictures and movies, on a beautifully designed Nigersaurus homepage put together by Project Exploration, the science education organization led by Paul Sereno and his wife Gabrielle Lyons.
I got to know Paul Sereno some years ago through his wife who went to grad school at U of Chicago together with my brother. I met Paul in person at SICB meeting in 2000 and then again this summer at Scifoo. Remember this picture:
Nigersaurus%20in%20a%20case%20at%20SciFoo.jpg
Yes, that is the Nigersaurus skull in a case I carried from the hotel to the Google campus in August. Here are the pictures I took there that I had to sit on for months now:
Nigersaurus%201.jpg
Nigersaurus%202.jpg
Nigersaurus%203.jpg
During Scifoo, Paul became a strong proponent of Open Access and the publication of this paper in PLoS ONE is a big victory for PLoS, for Open Access and for me personally. In one of roughly 5 billion e-mails I exchanged with Paul over the past couple of months, when he first actually went to PLoS ONE and looked around at papers and author instructions, etc. he wrote back to me [a strong, exclamatory word omitted in order to retain the G-rating of this blog]:

“I have been looking over the PLoS ONE site, what can be attached, how it prints, how it reads online, how it cites, how it allow flexible organization and headings plus it’s commenting and rating tools, it’s so very nice, I don’t think I will ever leave!”.

So, if Sereno likes it, you should, too! Go and read the paper. Rate it. Annotate and comment. Blog about it (I will make a linkfest of all the blogospheric responses) and send trackbacks.

Other blog and media coverage:

Pixelshot: Dinosaur build
University of Chicago News Office: Dinosaur from Sahara ate like a ‘Mesozoic cow’
Web is Gold: DINOSAURS: THE EXTREME AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN
Latest from the Ann Arbor News: Eureka! New dinosaur discovered
Africasia: Anatomically odd African dinosaur sucked up the greenery
The Associated Press: Dinosaur Found With Vacuum-Cleaner Mouth
MLive.com: U-M researchers had role in Nigersaurus puzzle
Kalamazoo Gazette: Dinosaur hunter has deep roots in Kalamazoo
Newswise: Dinosaur from Sahara Ate Like a ‘Mesozoic Cow’ (press release)
EurekAlert: Dinosaur from Sahara ate like a ‘mesozoic cow’
New York Times: A Dinosaur That Grazed Like a Cow
Science Blog: Dinosaur from Sahara ate like a ‘mesozoic cow’
Raw Story: Anatomically odd African dinosaur sucked up the greenery
National Geographic: Dino With “Vacuum Mouth” Revealed
National Geographic: Bizarre Dinosaur Grazed Like a Cow, Study Says
Pharyngula: Nigersaurus, a Cretaceous hedge-trimmer
Scientific Frontline: Dinosaur From Sahara Ate Like A ‘Mesozoic Cow’
Tetrapod Zoology: The world’s most amazing sauropod
Health, Science, & Libraries: Very Interesting …
ScienceDaily: Dinosaur From Sahara Ate Like A ‘Mesozoic Cow’
Raeilgh News & Observer: Dinosaur had mouth like a vacuum cleaner
New Scientist: Odd-jawed dinosaur reveals bovine lifestyle
Pondering Pikaia: Nigersaurus: just when you thought you’d seen everything…
The Esoteric Science Resource Center: ‘…while Nursie is a sad, insane old woman with a dinosaur fixation.’
PLoS Blog: The Nigersaurus has landed
Reuters: Weird dinosaur was ‘cow of the Mesozoic’: report
Panda’s Thumb: Nigersaurus, a Cretaceous hedge-trimmer
Not I, Spake the Soothsayer: Meet A New Dinosaur
derStandard.at: Dinosaurus bizarrus
Nonoscience: Nigersaurus, the Open Access Dinosaur
Laelaps: Nigersaurus taqueti!
eFluxMedia: CT Imaging Sheds Light on Saharan Nigersaurus taqueti
Chicago Tribune: U. of C. scientist unveils skeleton of plant-eating dinosaur
Hairy Museum of Natural History: A Great Day for Goofy Sauropods
Clioaudio: The Open Access Dinosaur
Effect Measure: Lightweight dinosaur, heavyweight publishing event
Billy the Blogging Poet: The Mesozoic Nigersaurus Dinosaur
Integrated Sciences: The Open Access Dinosaur
Pixelshot: Nigersaurus – raising the bones!
Science After School: Youth Involved in New Dinosaur Discovery
Transcription Factor: Thanks, Bora!
The Esoteric Science Resource Center: More on Nigersaurus
The Beagle Project Blog: Open access science publishing lands a big one
The Tree of Life: Open Access dinosaurs and way to go Paul Sereno
The Great Beyond (Nature): Dinosaur of the Day: a ‘Flintstones lawnmower’
Wired Science: This Week in Dinosaurs: A Mesozoic Vacuum Cleaner, An Accidental Find
Popular Science Blog: Dinosaur That Munched Like a Cow
NPR Morning Edition: ‘Mesozoic Cow’ Rises from the Sahara Desert
Business|bytes|genes|molecules: Dinosaurs come with Creative Commons licenses too
When Pigs Fly Returns: Lawnmowers of the Early Cretaceous
Microecos: Pod People
DailyKos: Open Science Thread
Greg Laden’s blog: Hey, Sb Readers, Get With It!
Crooks And Liars: Mike’s Blog Round Up
Be openly accessible or be obscure: Nigersaurus, the OA dino
Braving the Elements: Strange New Dinosaur
Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week: Xenoposeidon week, day 5: the quest for glory
Curious Cat: Nigersaurus
Gypsy’s Blog: Dinosaur – Living Mower?
Hairy Museum of Natural History: Extreme, Bizarre, Goofy, and Strange
Self-designed Student: Nigersaurus…and a question…
Ocmpoma: I heart PLoS
Everything Dinosaur: Nigersaurus – An unusual long-necked Dinosaur that grazed like a cow
Project Exploration

Would You Like to Work at PLoS?

I just noticed there are six ads on the PLoS Jobs page. I thought that my vast blog readership (sic!) may include people suited for and interested in such jobs. Perhaps you would like to work as a Web Producer, or Javascript Developer, or Senior Java Programmer, for instance?
You get to live in the Bay Area where everyone is on Facebook (is that good or bad?) and never have to wear a tie to work (or whatever is the formal equivalent for female employees). And everyone there, regardless of the actual job, is a big proponent of Open Access and loves working for a forward-looking, cutting-edge organization. Every day brings new excitement – I know, I work there and it is great fun.

“The Truth and Truthiness, together at last!”

If you look over to you right (you may have to refresh your page or click on internal links and thus raise my pageviews to see it) you will see an ad on the right side-bar that takes you to PLoS ONE. The first 50 readers of scienceblogs who click on that ad and complete registration will receive a Free PLoS ONE T-shirt. And then, once registered, use that registration to rate, annotate and comment on articles there.
If you looked around Scienceblogs.com over the last couple of days (I think it is gone now), you could also see the ad for Colbert Report on the top of the page. So, with some luck, or a few refreshes of the page, you can get both the Colbert ad and the PLoS ad on the same page, like this:
PLoS%20ONE%20ad%20on%20Sb.JPG
When Dave saw this combination, he exclaimed:

Check it out — ads for the Colbert Report and PLoS, all on one page! The Truth and Truthiness, together at last!

Now, if you go from Scienceblogs.com to PLoS ONE and keep clicking around the front page and the individual articles, you will see a number of rotating ads and banners there as well and you may be able to see a banner that looks like this:
seed%20banner%20on%20plos2.JPG
When you click on it, you will end up at this post on Gene Expression. Or, if you keep clicking, you may see something like this on top of a page:
seed%20banner%20on%20plos.JPG
When you click on it, you will be transported to this post on Zooillogix. More such banners will be found there in the future. Isn’t it great that the two organizations – one I work for and one I blog for – love each other so much?

A Week in PLoS

What with all the traveling, I am behind with all the PLoS-related news. So, let me put it all together in one post here.
In the Media
There is a very nice article in New York Times about the launch of PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases and a nice article about Open Access in The Journal Times (hat-tip: Jonathan).
Also see commentary from the blogosphere: Introduction at The Modest Proposal blog and The End of Advertising as we know it on Elearnspace.
PLoS ONE
Last week, when I made my picks, I forgot to point out a very interesting paper from the Ross lab: Molecular Variation at a Candidate Gene Implicated in the Regulation of Fire Ant Social Behavior
The latest Journal Club is ongoing – please chime in with your questions, ratings and comments. And let me know if you want to do one of these on one of the ONE papers in the nearest future.
Drosophila genomes
Many years ago, when the Human Genome race was still ongoing, I was saying that the genomics revolution will really start only once we are capable of sequencing and comparing many genomes of closely related species. Now, I am happy to announce that 12 additional species of Drosophila (melanogaster and pseudoobscura were done before) have been sequenced and published in Nature. Jonathan, RPM and RPM again comment on it. In addition to the genomes themselves, about 40 papers are in the process of being published that take the new genomics data and do additional analyses. PLoS published a few of those papers in PLoS Biology, PLoS Genetics and PLoS ONE:
Population Genomics: Whole-Genome Analysis of Polymorphism and Divergence in Drosophila simulans
A sex-ratio Meiotic Drive System in Drosophila simulans. I: An Autosomal Suppressor
A sex-ratio Meiotic Drive System in Drosophila simulans. I: An Autosomal Suppressor
Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
Fine-Tuning Enhancer Models to Predict Transcriptional Targets across Multiple Genomes
Rampant Adaptive Evolution in Regions of Proteins with Unknown Function in Drosophila simulans
PLoS Blog
There are several new posts on the PLoS Blog that are awaiting your comments…
More exciting stuff next week…

Breaking News: PLoS ONE Managing Editor visits the Chapel Hill office!

Yup, Chris Surridge, Managing Editor of PLoS ONE (and the author of the legendary comment) swung by the Chapel Hill office last night. Since my initial stint was in the San Francisco office, and Chris is working in the Cambridge UK office, this was the first time we met in person. Much fun was had by all. The pictorial story under the fold:

Continue reading

Announcing the new PLoS Journal: Neglected Tropical Diseases!

NTDs%20image.jpgThese last couple of days were very exciting here at PLoS. After months of preparation and hard work, PLoS presents the latest addition to its collection of top-notch scientific journals. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases went live yesterday at 6:42pm EDT. This journal will be

…the first open-access journal devoted to the world’s most neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), such as elephantiasis, river blindness, leprosy, hookworm, schistosomiasis, and African sleeping sickness. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research on all scientific, medical, and public-health aspects of these forgotten diseases affecting the world’s forgotten people.

As Daniel Sarna notes, the Journal is truly international in nature – about half of the authors in the first issue are researchers living and working on the ground in developing countries, and the first papers have been authored by scientists from such countries as:

Mexico, Ghana, Cameroon, Thailand, Spain, the Netherlands, Bolivia, Nigeria, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Mali, the United States, the Philippines, Tanzania, Egypt, Burkina Faso, the Dominican Republic, Canada, Australia, Belgium, Kenya, and China.

The potential for Open Access to make science more global and to help scientists all over the world communicate with each other on equal footing is something that is, both to me personally and to PLoS as an organization, one of the key motivators for doing our work every day. This sentiment is echoed by the inspiring Guest Commentary by WHO Director-General Margaret Chan:

Equity is a fundamental principle of health development. Access to life-saving and health-promoting interventions should not be denied for unjust reasons, including an inability to pay. The free availability of leading research articles will benefit decision-makers and diseases control managers worldwide. It will also motivate scientists, both in developing and developed countries.

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases will be very broad in scope, both in terms of diseases and their causes, and in terms of disciplinary approaches:

Although these diseases have been overshadowed by better-known conditions, especially the “big three”–HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis–evidence collected in the past few years has revealed some astonishing facts about the NTDs. They are among the most common infections of the poor–an estimated 1.1 billion of the world’s 2.7 billion people living on less than US$2 per day are infected with one or more NTDs. When we combine the global disease burden of the most prevalent NTDs, the disability they cause rivals that of any of the big three. Moreover, the NTDs exert an equally important adverse impact on child development and education, worker productivity, and ultimately economic development. Chronic hookworm infection in childhood dramatically reduces future wage-earning capacity, and lymphatic filariasis erodes a significant component of India’s gross national product. The NTDs may also exacerbate and promote susceptibility to HIV/AIDS and malaria.

Bacterial, viral and fungal diseases will be highlighted, of course, but many of the most devastating and yet least understood tropical diseases are parasitic, caused by Protists or Invertebrate animals. Those organisms often have amazingly complex (and to a person with scientific curiousity absolutely fascinating) life cycles. They may have to go through several life-stages in several different hosts/vectors. The hosts and vectors themselves may have quite unusual natural histories as well. Regular readers of my blog know that I am fascinated by the way such diseases have to be addressed in a fully interdisciplinary manner: epidemiology, ecology, animal behavior, systematics, neuroscience, human and animal physiology, genetic/genomics, pharmacology and clinical trials. Only putting together all the pieces will let us understand some of these complex diseases and how to conquer them. And this new Journal will allow scientists from all these disciplines from around the world to place all of that research in one place for everyone – and I mean EVERYONE – to see for free.
Furthermore, the new journal is run on the TOPAZ software which allows the readers to use all the nifty tools of post-publication peer-review and discussion. All the articles in PLoS NTDs will allow you to post comments and annotations. You can give ratings. If you write a blog post about an article, you can send trackbacks (just like you can do on PLoS ONE and PLoS Hub for Clinical Trials).
Congratulations to all the members of the PLoS team who put in many months of hard work in putting this exciting new journal in place. So, go and take a look at the inaugural issue, subscribe to e-mail alerts and/or RSS feed and blog about the articles you find interesting in the future.

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

Another Tuesday night, another embarrassment of riches on PLoS ONE (yeah, yeah, I work there, OK). There are 35 new articles published today and it is hard for me to pick and choose as so many are interesting to me, including a couple I may have to write separate posts about (and test the new BPR3 icon). If any of these, or any of older ONE articles (or any of yet-to-be-published articles – ask me by e-mail) are in your area of interest/expertise and you would like to volunteer your group (research lab group, graduate seminar, honors class, whatever counts as a “group” of scientists) for a future Journal Club, let me know. In the meantime, you know what you need to do: read the papers, rate them, annotate them, post comments, blog about them and send trackbacks. Here are my picks for this week:
The LARK RNA-Binding Protein Selectively Regulates the Circadian Eclosion Rhythm by Controlling E74 Protein Expression:

Despite substantial progress in defining central components of the circadian pacemaker, the output pathways coupling the clock to rhythmic physiological events remain elusive. We previously showed that LARK is a Drosophila RNA-binding protein which functions downstream of the clock to mediate behavioral outputs. To better understand the roles of LARK in the circadian system, we sought to identify RNA molecules associated with it, in vivo, using a three-part strategy to (1) capture RNA ligands by immunoprecipitation, (2) visualize the captured RNAs using whole-genome microarrays, and (3) identify functionally relevant targets through genetic screens. We found that LARK is associated with a large number of RNAs, in vivo, consistent with its broad expression pattern. Overexpression of LARK increases protein abundance for certain targets without affecting RNA level, suggesting a translational regulatory role for the RNA-binding protein. Phenotypic screens of target-gene mutants have identified several with rhythm-specific circadian defects, indicative of effects on clock output pathways. In particular, a hypomorphic mutation in the E74 gene, E74BG01805, was found to confer an early-eclosion phenotype reminiscent of that displayed by a mutant with decreased LARK gene dosage. Molecular analyses demonstrate that E74A protein shows diurnal changes in abundance, similar to LARK. In addition, the E74BG01805 allele enhances the lethal phenotype associated with a lark null mutation, whereas overexpression of LARK suppresses the early eclosion phenotype of E74BG01805, consistent with the idea that E74 is a target, in vivo. Our results suggest a model wherein LARK mediates the transfer of temporal information from the molecular oscillator to different output pathways by interacting with distinct RNA targets.

Chemical Magnetoreception: Bird Cryptochrome 1a Is Excited by Blue Light and Forms Long-Lived Radical-Pairs:

Cryptochromes (Cry) have been suggested to form the basis of light-dependent magnetic compass orientation in birds. However, to function as magnetic compass sensors, the cryptochromes of migratory birds must possess a number of key biophysical characteristics. Most importantly, absorption of blue light must produce radical pairs with lifetimes longer than about a microsecond. Cryptochrome 1a (gwCry1a) and the photolyase-homology-region of Cry1 (gwCry1-PHR) from the migratory garden warbler were recombinantly expressed and purified from a baculovirus/Sf9 cell expression system. Transient absorption measurements show that these flavoproteins are indeed excited by light in the blue spectral range leading to the formation of radicals with millisecond lifetimes. These biophysical characteristics suggest that gwCry1a is ideally suited as a primary light-mediated, radical-pair-based magnetic compass receptor.

Exceptionally Preserved Jellyfishes from the Middle Cambrian:

Cnidarians are a group of animals including corals, jellyfish and sea anemones. Due to the early emergence of this group, it may provide important clues for understanding animal evolution. The authors of this paper describe cnidarian fossils from Utah believed to be approximately 505 million years old. These fossils have very well preserved soft tissue, which the authors interpret as evidence that representatives of modern jellyfish existed by the middle Cambrian period.

Underestimation of Species Richness in Neotropical Frogs Revealed by mtDNA Analyses:

Previously unknown amphibian species are being discovered every year as a result of increased exploration in poorly surveyed tropical areas. However, this group is also experiencing high rates of extinction. The authors of this paper analyze rDNA sequences from 60 frog species in South America to estimate the number of undescribed species in this region. The results indicate that more than half the frog species in the Amazonian part of the Guianas are as yet undiscovered, suggesting that the global decline of amphibians may be more serious than previously thought.

Selection at the Y Chromosome of the African Buffalo Driven by Rainfall:

Selection coefficients at the mammalian Y chromosome typically do not deviate strongly from neutrality. Here we show that strong balancing selection, maintaining intermediate frequencies of DNA sequence variants, acts on the Y chromosome in two populations of African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). Significant correlations exist between sequence variant frequencies and annual rainfall in the years before conception, with five- to eightfold frequency changes over short time periods. Annual rainfall variation drives the balancing of sequence variant frequencies, probably by affecting parental condition. We conclude that sequence variants confer improved male reproductive success after either dry or wet years, making the population composition and dynamics very sensitive to climate change. The mammalian Y chromosome, interacting with ecological processes, may affect male reproductive success much more strongly than previously thought.

How Emotion Strengthens the Recollective Experience: A Time-Dependent Hippocampal Process:

Emotion significantly strengthens the subjective recollective experience even when objective accuracy of the memory is not improved. Here, we examine if this modulation is related to the effect of emotion on hippocampal-dependent memory consolidation. Two critical predictions follow from this hypothesis. First, since consolidation is assumed to take time, the enhancement in the recollective experience for emotional compared to neutral memories should become more apparent following a delay. Second, if the emotion advantage is critically dependent on the hippocampus, then the effects should be reduced in amnesic patients with hippocampal damage. To test these predictions we examined the recollective experience for emotional and neutral photos at two retention intervals (Experiment 1), and in amnesics and controls (Experiment 2). Emotional memories were associated with an enhancement in the recollective experience that was greatest after a delay, whereas familiarity was not influenced by emotion. In amnesics with hippocampal damage the emotion effect on recollective experience was reduced. Surprisingly, however, these patients still showed a general memory advantage for emotional compared to neutral items, but this effect was manifest primarily as a facilitation of familiarity. The results support the consolidation hypothesis of recollective experience, but suggest that the effects of emotion on episodic memory are not exclusively hippocampally mediated. Rather, emotion may enhance recognition by facilitating familiarity when recollection is impaired due to hippocampal damage.

A Step Towards Seascape Scale Conservation: Using Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) to Map Fishing Activity:

Conservation of marine ecosystems will require a holistic understanding of fisheries with concurrent spatial patterns of biodiversity. Using data from the UK Government Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) deployed on UK-registered large fishing vessels we investigate patterns of fisheries activity on annual and seasonal scales. Analysis of VMS data shows that regions of the UK European continental shelf (i.e. Western Channel and Celtic Sea, Northern North Sea and the Goban Spur) receive consistently greater fisheries pressure than the rest of the UK continental shelf fishing zone. VMS provides a unique and independent method from which to derive patterns of spatially and temporally explicit fisheries activity. Such information may feed into ecosystem management plans seeking to achieve sustainable fisheries while minimising putative risk to non-target species (e.g. cetaceans, seabirds and elasmobranchs) and habitats of conservation concern. With multilateral collaboration VMS technologies may offer an important solution to quantifying and managing ecosystem disturbance, particularly on the high-seas.

More under the fold:

Continue reading

Where does a fruitfly go when it goes out for a walk?

Last week’s PLoS ONE paper, Analysis of the Trajectory of Drosophila melanogaster in a Circular Open Field Arena, is the subject of the newest Journal Club. It is an interesting methods paper, showing the way a camera and some math can be used for a much more sophisticated analysis of animal behavior than it has traditionally been done.
The Journal Club this week is being led by Bjoern Brembs from the Institute of Biology – Neurobiology, Freie Universitat Berlin. You may be familiar with his name because Bjoern also writes a science blog.
The group has now posted some initial commentary, in particular a list of questions. It is now up to YOU to go and add your voice to the Journal Club – answer the questions if you can, or ask new questions, or just post a brief comment.
Here is the abstract, and you go read the entire paper, rate, comment, annotate, blog about and send trackbacks:

Background
Obtaining a complete phenotypic characterization of a freely moving organism is a difficult task, yet such a description is desired in many neuroethological studies. Many metrics currently used in the literature to describe locomotor and exploratory behavior are typically based on average quantities or subjectively chosen spatial and temporal thresholds. All of these measures are relatively coarse-grained in the time domain. It is advantageous, however, to employ metrics based on the entire trajectory that an organism takes while exploring its environment.
Methodology/Principal Findings
To characterize the locomotor behavior of Drosophila melanogaster, we used a video tracking system to record the trajectory of a single fly walking in a circular open field arena. The fly was tracked for two hours. Here, we present techniques with which to analyze the motion of the fly in this paradigm, and we discuss the methods of calculation. The measures we introduce are based on spatial and temporal probability distributions and utilize the entire time-series trajectory of the fly, thus emphasizing the dynamic nature of locomotor behavior. Marginal and joint probability distributions of speed, position, segment duration, path curvature, and reorientation angle are examined and related to the observed behavior.
Conclusions/Significance
The measures discussed in this paper provide a detailed profile of the behavior of a single fly and highlight the interaction of the fly with the environment. Such measures may serve as useful tools in any behavioral study in which the movement of a fly is an important variable and can be incorporated easily into many setups, facilitating high-throughput phenotypic characterization.

Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development

Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development (which I mentioned a few days ago here) was a great success. You can see all the articles associated with it here.
PLoS has collected all the poverty-related articles from its Journals on this nifty collections page.
A PLoS Medicine article – Food Insufficiency Is Associated with High-Risk Sexual Behavior among Women in Botswana and Swaziland – was one of the few that were highlighted at the event at NIH. Gavin has the details. Nick Anthis gives his angle.

Links and files from ConvergeSouth and ASIS&T

My brain is fried. My flight home was horrifying – the pilot warned us before we even left the gate that the weather is nasty and that he ordered the stewardess to remain seated at least the first 30 minutes of the flight. Did the warning make the experience more or less frightening? I think it made it more so. Yes, the wind played with our airplane as if it was a toy, but knowing that the pilot thought it was nasty made it less comforting that he is confident himself in his abilities to keep us afloat. The scariest was the landing – we were kicked around throughout the descent until the moment of touch-down. The pilot had to fight it by going on with more power than he would normally use, so the touch-down was followed by very sharp breaking. Yuck. I was hoping to take a nap on the flight – yeah, right!
Anyway, while I am recovering (and trying to catch up with work), here are some files and links from the two conferences I presented at over the last week:
Let me just put everything in one place:
ConvergeSouth
The audio is here (missing the interesting Q&A unfortunately (you may have to crank up the volume on your computer to the max to hear it).
I used these links as a basis for the talk, though focusing primarily on PLoS, SciVee.com and Open Access.
CIT blog summary: Scientific publications, now with interactivity
And here is my summary.
ASIS&T:
You can watch a streaming Flash of the session (sans the last part of the Q&A) here.
My PPT can be downloaded here. Note in the recording how quickly I went through the slideshow about blogs and left the PLoS ONE slide up forever talking about the way OA publications will get integrated into other ways of doing, teaching and communicating science (including blogs) online – I certainly earned my pay for PLoS on Tuesday 😉
The Rashomon of blog summaries:
me
me
Janet
Jean-Claude
Christina Pikas
Ken Varnum
Stephanie Willen Brown

Birthday wishes all around!

Everyone at PLoS has been so busy lately, that we all forgot to check our calendars and note some important anniversaries!
PLoS is turning 5 in December.
PLoS Biology turned 4 last Saturday.
PLoS Medicine is turning 3 this Friday.
PLoS ONE passed the 1000-article mark last week.
PLoS ONE will be one year old in December.
We found this out from a blogger – thanks John for the reminder (I told you those “this day in history” posts were useful!).
birthday_cake_candle_out_1.jpg
[image source]

Parts, Wholes, and Context in Reading – add your thoughts!

As last week’s Journal Club on PLoS ONE has been a success (and no, that does not mean it’s over – feel free to add your commentary there), we are introducing a new one this week!
Members of the Potsdam Eye-Movement Group have now posted their comments and annotations on the article Parts, Wholes, and Context in Reading: A Triple Dissociation.
You know your duty: go there, read the paper, read what the group has already posted in their commentary, register, and add your own comments and questions. Rate the article. If you blog about it, send your readers to do the same. If your blogging platform allows it, send trackbacks.
The Postdam group has already done one Journal Club earlier – feel free to add more commentary on their first one as well.
If you are a member of a research group, or a graduate seminar, or an honors section of a college class, or you teach an AP Biology high-school class, and would like to do a Journal Club on one of the PLoS ONE papers, please sign up.
And if you want to know why you should do it, read this first.

Journal Clubs – think of the future!

The recent return of Journal Clubs on PLoS ONE has been quite a success so far. People are watching from outside and they like what they see.
The first Journal Club article, on microbial metagenomics, has already, in just one week, gathered 3 ratings, each accompanied with a short comment, one trackback (this will be the second) and 7 annotations and 4 discussions eliciting further 14 responses in the comment threads. The 12-comment-and-growing thread on the usefulness of the term ‘Prokaryote’ is quite exciting, showing that it is not so hard to comment on PLoS ONE after all, once you get over the initial reluctance. You should join in the conversation there right now!
If you encounter a technical problem, please contact the Webmaster so the glitch can be fixed promptly. For a brand-new software built in-house, TOPAZ is performing remarkably well, but glitches do sometimes happen. It is essential to report those to the Webmaster so the IT/Web team can fix them quickly and make the site better and better for all users as time goes on. Just like anything else in development, it needs feedback in order to improve over time. For the time being, I guess, compose in Notepad, WordPad or something similar before copying and pasting there. And thank you for your participation.
One thing to keep in mind is that a PLoS ONE article is not a blog post – the discussion is not over once the post goes off the front page. There is no such thing as going off the front page! The article is always there and the discussion can go on and on for years, reflecting the changes in understanding of the topic over longer periods of time.
Imagine if half a century ago there was Internet and there were Open Access journals with commenting capability like PLoS ONE. Now imagine if Watson and Crick published their paper on the DNA structure in such a journal. Now imagine logging in today and reading five decades of comments, ratings and annotations accumulated on the paper!!!! What a treasure-trove of information! You hire a new graduate student in molecular biology – or in history of science! – and the first assignment is to read all the commentary to that paper. There it is: all laid out – the complete history of molecular biology all in one spot, all the big names voicing their opinions, changing opinions over time, new papers getting published trackbacking back to the Watson-Crick paper and adding new information, debates flaring up and getting resolved, gossip now lost forever to history due to it being spoken at meetings, behind closed door or in hallways preserved forever for future students, historians and sociologists of science. What a fantastic resource to have!
Now imagine that every paper in history was like that (the first Darwin and Wallace letters to the Royal Society?!). Now realize that this is what you are doing by annotating PLoS ONE papers. It is not the matter so much of here-and-now as it is a contribution to a long-term assessment of the article, providing information to the future readers that you so wished someone left for you when you were reading other people’s papers in grad school and beyond. Which paper is good and which erroneous (and thus not to be, embarrassingly, cited approvingly) will not be a secret lab lore any more transmitted from advisor to student in the privacy of the office or lab, but out there for everyone to know. Every time you check out a paper that is new to you, you also get all the information on what others think about it. Isn’t that helpful, especially for students?
So, go forth and comment on papers in areas you are interested in. And if you are a member of a lab group, a graduate seminar, an honors class, or an AP Biology class, let me know if you would be interested in doing a Journal Club on one of the PLoS ONE papers in the future – a great exercise for you, nice exposure to your group, and a service to the scientific community of today and tomorrow.

Web

Some good, thought-provoking reads about the Web, social networking, publishing and blogging:
Aggregating scientific activity
Social Networks at Work Promise Bottom-Line Results
Would limiting career publication number revamp scientific publishing?
The Public Library of Science group
The Seven Principles of Community Building

Participate in Journal Clubs on PLoS ONE!

Journal Clubs are a popular feature on PLoS ONE papers. There were several of them in the spring. Now, after a brief summer break, the Journal Clubs are going live again and they will happen on a regular basis, perhaps as frequently as one per week.
What does it mean – a Journal Club? In short, a lab group volunteers to discuss one of the more recent (or even upcoming, not yet published) PLoS ONE papers and to post their discussion as a series of comments, annotations and ratings on the paper itself, triggering a discussion within a broader scientific community.
The first group that will start our Fall series is the Bacterial Metagenomics group led by Dr.Jonathan Eisen at UC-Davis. They chose to discuss last week’s ONE article Metagenomics of the Deep Mediterranean, a Warm Bathypelagic Habitat. It is a good and interesting paper and they have posted their discussion on it already.
If the name Jonathan Eisen rings a bell, it is probably because you are reading his blog. Perhaps you will recognize that one of his students participating in the Journal Club is also familiar to you through her blog as well.
So, what would l really like you to do is to go and read the paper and what the Eisen group wrote about it, then join in the conversation – add your own commentary, including annotations and ratings to the article. If you decide to blog about it at your own site, try to trigger a trackback.
And if you and your group would like to do a Journal Club in the future, let us know – e-mail me at: Bora@plos.org
[cross-posted]

New on PLoS today!

Lots of new stuff on PLoS today. So, let’s go over it one by one.
First, today is the inaugural day of the Clinical Trials Hub, central place for all the papers reporting on clinical trials and discussions of them, hosted on TOPAZ platform (just like PLoS ONE) so users can comment, rate and annotate all the papers (and links from blog posts will show up as trackbacks). Emma Veitch has all the details.
Second, the Trackbacks are now working for some, but not all blogging platforms, as long as the correct URL of the article is used. Links from Drupal blogs form automatically. For MoveableType (at least more recent versions) and WordPress blogs, it is necessary to input the correct trackback URL into the appropriate field. We are assuming that other high-end platforms (e.g., Text Pattern, Scoop, Expression Engine, Typepad, etc.) will work the same way and I would like to know if that is true or if there are glitches with any of them. The lower-end platforms (e.g., Blogspot, LiveJournal, etc.) apparently are incapable of sending trackbacks at this point in time.
The PLoS Medicine team has taken to blogging like fish to water – already three posts this week:
Setting better standards in reporting – and doing – animal research by Virginia Barbour;
Should patients tell researchers what to do? by Paul Chinnock; and
Nominate classic trials in child health by Gavin Yamey.
Encourage them in this endeavor by posting comments (they will not immediately show up on the site, but don’t despair, they will eventually).
Finally, there are new papers published today in the Community Journals: PLoS Genetics, PLoS Computational Biology and PLoS Pathogens. My picks:
What Are Lightness Illusions and Why Do We See Them?, Developing Computational Biology, The Impact of PLoS Pathogens and Genetics of Aging in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Oh, and someone really, really likes the design of PLoS ONE pages. 😉

Great news from PLoS for Bloggers

Yesterday, PLoS ONE moved to the newest version of the TOPAZ platform. Rich Cave explains all the improvements that this move entails, including the citation download for articles, but one new feature that should really be exciting to bloggers are Trackbacks.
From now on, if you link to a PLoS ONE article in your post, that article will display a link back to your blog post (go to an article and look at the right side-bar, nested between the Discussions and Ratings). Thus, in addition to the conversation already going on in the commentary attached to the article itself, the readers will be able to access the responses from the blogosphere as well. And that should also bring additional traffic to the bloggers.
I have been testing the feature over the past 24 hours or so, but I need your input in order to refine and improve the Trackbacks feature.
First, for the time being, the link you use in your post has to be in the format of the full URL of the full text (i.e., not the shorter, DOI-only compression), so this is how it should look like (replace 0000000 with the actual number of the article):
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2f10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000000
Unfortunately, for the time being (and we are working on it), this shorter form of the URL will not work:
http://www.plosone.org/doi/pone.0000000
Likewise, links to other parts of the site, e.g., to the PDF of the article, will not generate trackbacks.
So far, it appears that Trackbacks are working automatically on Drupal and MoveableType, i.e., there is no need for manual trackbacks.
In WordPress.com, it is necessary to type the trackback URL into the appropriate field in your posting form. The trackback URL is in this form:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0000000/trackback
At this moment, it appears that links from Blogger/Blogspot blogs do not generate Trackbacks, but we are working on it. Test it anyway and let me know if there is a “trick” I missed so far.
Also, please let me know how it works on other platforms (e.g., Typepad, Radio Userland, Blogsome, LiveJournal, etc.)
I am not 100% sure (so tell me if I am wrong), but links posted “under the fold” will also not generate a trackback.
Also, and this may differ between platforms, I am not sure that republishing a blog (or an individual post) will trigger trackbacks from links made before yesterday. Give it a test run and let me know, please.
You can give me feedback in the comments here, or by e-mail, or by contacting the Webmaster on the PLoS ONE site itself.

New and Exciting in PLoS Community Journals

As always on Fridays, there are new papers published in PLoS Genetics, PLoS Pathogens and PLoS Computational Biology. I like to take my own picks, and today I pick this pre-publication (there is a provisional PDF online) in my own field:
Meta-analysis of Drosophila Circadian Microarray Studies Identifies a Novel Set of Rhythmically Expressed Genes:

Five independent groups have reported microarray studies that identify dozens of rhythmically expressed genes in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Limited overlap among the lists of discovered genes makes it difficult to determine which, if any, exhibit truly rhythmic patterns of expression. We reanalyzed data from all five reports and found two sources for the observed discrepancies, the use of different expression pattern detection algorithms and underlying variation among the data sets. To improve upon the methods originally employed, we developed a new analysis that involves compilation of all existing data, application of identical transformation and standardization procedures followed by ANOVA based statistical pre-screening, and three separate classes of post-hoc analysis: cross-correlation to various cycling waveforms, autocorrelation, and a previously described Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) based technique [1-3]. Permutation based statistical tests were used to derive significance measures for all post-hoc tests. We find application of our method, most significantly the ANOVA prescreening procedure, to significantly reduce the false discovery rate (FDR) relative to that observed among the results of the original five reports while maintaining desirable statistical power. We identify a set of 81 cycling transcripts previously found in one or more of the original reports as well as a novel set of 133 not found in any of the original studies. We introduce a novel analysis method that compensates for variability observed among the original five Drosophila circadian array reports. We identify a set of previously found cycling transcripts as well as a set of novel ones. Based on the statistical fidelity of our meta-analysis results, and the results of our initial validation experiments (quantitative RT-PCR), we predict many of our newly found genes to be bona fide cyclers, and suggest that they may lead to new insights into the pathways through which clock mechanisms regulate behavioral rhythms.

The other one I chose is this one, as it is related to some stuff I published way back when I was still in the lab:
Food Deprivation Attenuates Seizures through CaMKII and EAG K+ Channels:

Accumulated research has demonstrated the beneficial effects of dietary restriction on extending lifespan and increasing cellular stress resistance. However, reducing nutrient intake has also been shown to direct animal behaviors toward food acquisition. Under food-limiting conditions, behavioral changes suggest that neuronal and muscle activities in circuits that are not involved in nutrient acquisition are down-regulated. These dietary-regulated mechanisms, if understood better, might provide an approach to compensate for defects in molecules that regulate cell excitability. We previously reported that a neuromuscular circuit used in Caenorhabditis elegans male mating behavior is attenuated under food-limiting conditions. During periods between matings, sex-specific muscles that control movements of the male’s copulatory spicules are kept inactive by UNC-103 ether-a-go-go-related gene (ERG)-like K+ channels. Deletion of unc-103 causes ∼30%-40% of virgin males to display sex-muscle seizures; however, when food is deprived from males, the incidence of spontaneous muscle contractions drops to 9%-11%. In this work, we used genetics and pharmacology to address the mechanisms that act parallel with UNC-103 to suppress muscle seizures in males that lack ERG-like K+ channel function. We identify calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II as a regulator that uses different mechanisms in food and nonfood conditions to compensate for reduced ERG-like K+ channel activity. We found that in food-deprived conditions, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II acts cell-autonomously with ether-a-go-go K+ channels to inhibit spontaneous muscle contractions. Our work suggests that upregulating mechanisms used by food deprivation can suppress muscle seizures.

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

Holy Cow! Every Tuesday night I like to link to 5-6 of the brand new papers on PLoS ONE that I find personally most intriguing. But today, it is so difficult to choose – I want to highlight something like 20 out of today’s 39. So, here are a few and you definitely go and see the whole list for yourself (and you know the drill, as I parrot it every week: read, rate, comment):
Impedance-Matching Hearing in Paleozoic Reptiles: Evidence of Advanced Sensory Perception at an Early Stage of Amniote Evolution

Insights into the onset of evolutionary novelties are key to the understanding of amniote origins and diversification. The possession of an impedance-matching tympanic middle ear is characteristic of all terrestrial vertebrates with a sophisticated hearing sense and an adaptively important feature of many modern terrestrial vertebrates. Whereas tympanic ears seem to have evolved multiple times within tetrapods, especially among crown-group members such as frogs, mammals, squamates, turtles, crocodiles, and birds, the presence of true tympanic ears has never been recorded in a Paleozoic amniote, suggesting they evolved fairly recently in amniote history.
In the present study, we performed a morphological examination and a phylogenetic analysis of poorly known parareptiles from the Middle Permian of the Mezen River Basin in Russia. We recovered a well-supported clade that is characterized by a unique cheek morphology indicative of a tympanum stretching across large parts of the temporal region to an extent not seen in other amniotes, fossil or extant, and a braincase specialized in showing modifications clearly related to an increase in auditory function, unlike the braincase of any other Paleozoic tetrapod. In addition, we estimated the ratio of the tympanum area relative to the stapedial footplate for the basalmost taxon of the clade, which, at 23:1, is in close correspondence to that of modern amniotes capable of efficient impedance-matching hearing.
Using modern amniotes as analogues, the possession of an impedance-matching middle ear in these parareptiles suggests unique ecological adaptations potentially related to living in dim-light environments. More importantly, our results demonstrate that already at an early stage of amniote diversification, and prior to the Permo-Triassic extinction event, the complexity of terrestrial vertebrate ecosystems had reached a level that proved advanced sensory perception to be of notable adaptive significance.

Chimpanzees Share Forbidden Fruit:

It is common for chimpanzee communities that engage in hunting to use meat as a “social tool” for nurturing alliances and social bonds; however the sharing of wild plant foods is rare. As part of a study directly observing adult chimpanzees in West Africa, Hockings and colleagues found that cultivated plant foods were shared more frequently than wild plant foods. The results suggest that the challenge of crop-raiding provides adult male chimpanzees with food that may be considered highly desirable to the opposite sex.

Sleep in the Human Hippocampus: A Stereo-EEG Study

Our data imply that cortical slow oscillation is attenuated in the hippocampal structures during NREM sleep. The most peculiar feature of hippocampal sleep is the increased synchronization of the EEG rhythms during REM periods. This state of resonance may have a supportive role for the processing/consolidation of memory.

Successful Biological Invasion despite a Severe Genetic Load

Through population genetic analysis of neutral microsatellite markers and a gene experiencing balancing selection, we demonstrate that the solitary bee Lasioglossum leucozonium experienced a single and severe bottleneck during its introduction from Europe. Paradoxically, the success of L. leucozonium in its introduced range occurred despite the severe genetic load caused by single-locus complementary sex-determination that still turns 30% of female-destined eggs into sterile diploid males, thereby substantially limiting the growth potential of the introduced population. Using stochastic modeling, we show that L. leucozonium invaded North America through the introduction of a very small number of propagules, most likely a singly-mated female. Our results suggest that chance events and ecological traits of invaders are more important than propagule pressure in determining invasion success, and that the vigilance required to prevent invasions may be considerably greater than has been previously considered.

Self-Referential Cognition and Empathy in Autism

Individuals with autism spectrum conditions (ASC) are known to have difficulties empathizing with others, but this study shows them to have lesser self awareness as well. Thirty individuals with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism were compared to matched controls in a number of standard tests. Individuals with ASC had broad impairments in both self-referential cognition and empathy, suggesting specific dysfunctions within brain areas such as the medial prefrontal cortex.

Ubx Regulates Differential Enlargement and Diversification of Insect Hind Legs

In many insect groups, such as in grasshoppers and crickets, there has been an evolutionary trend over time towards the development of larger hind legs. The actual processes responsible for this trend are still to be determined. This paper examines the molecular basis of hind leg enlargement in the house cricket and the milkweed bug. The results show that the gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) regulates the differential growth and enlargement of the hind leg, suggesting that the diversity of insect hind leg size can result from alterations in the timing and duration of expression of a single gene.

Crown Plasticity and Competition for Canopy Space: A New Spatially Implicit Model Parameterized for 250 North American Tree Species

We introduce a new, simple and rapidly-implemented model-the Ideal Tree Distribution, ITD-with tree form (height allometry and crown shape), growth plasticity, and space-filling, at its core. The ITD predicts the canopy status (in or out of canopy), crown depth, and total and exposed crown area of the trees in a stand, given their species, sizes and potential crown shapes. We use maximum likelihood methods, in conjunction with data from over 100,000 trees taken from forests across the coterminous US, to estimate ITD model parameters for 250 North American tree species. With only two free parameters per species-one aggregate parameter to describe crown shape, and one parameter to set the so-called depth bias-the model captures between-species patterns in average canopy status, crown radius, and crown depth, and within-species means of these metrics vs stem diameter. The model also predicts much of the variation in these metrics for a tree of a given species and size, resulting solely from deterministic responses to variation in stand structure.

Retinal Encoding of Ultrabrief Shape Recognition Cues

Shape encoding mechanisms can be probed by the sequential brief display of dots that mark the boundary of the shape, and delays of less that a millisecond between successive dots can impair recognition. It is not entirely clear whether this is accomplished by preserving stimulus timing in the signal being sent to the brain, or calls for a retinal binding mechanism. Two experiments manipulated the degree of simultaneity among and within dot pairs, requiring also that the pair members be in the same half of the visual field or on opposite halves, i.e., across the midline from one another. Recognition performance was impaired the same for these two conditions. The results make it likely that simultaneity of cues is being registered within the retina. A potential mechanism is suggested, calling for linkage of stimulated sites through activation of PA1 cells. A third experiment confirmed a prior finding that the overall level of recognition deficit is partly a function of display-set size, and affirmed submillisecond resolution in binding dot pairs into effective shape-recognition cues.

Nonassociative Learning Promotes Respiratory Entrainment to Mechanical Ventilation

Patient-ventilator synchrony is a major concern in critical care and is influenced by phasic lung-volume feedback control of the respiratory rhythm. Routine clinical application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) introduces a tonic input which, if unopposed, might disrupt respiratory-ventilator entrainment through sustained activation of the vagally-mediated Hering-Breuer reflex. We suggest that this potential adverse effect may be averted by two differentiator forms of nonassociative learning (habituation and desensitization) of the Hering-Breuer reflex via pontomedullary pathways.

Declining Rates in Male Circumcision amidst Increasing Evidence of its Public Health Benefit

Male circumcision was common among men seeking STD services in San Francisco but has declined substantially in recent decades. Male circumcision rates differed by race/ethnicity and sexual orientation. Given recent studies suggesting the public health benefits of male circumcision, a reconsideration of national male circumcision policy is needed to respond to current trends.

Degeneration of the Olfactory Guanylyl Cyclase D Gene during Primate Evolution

The mammalian olfactory system consists of several subsystems that detect specific sets of chemical cues and underlie a variety of behavioral responses. ———— These data suggest that signaling through GC-D-expressing cells was probably compromised more than 40 million years ago, prior to the divergence of New World monkeys from Old World monkeys and apes, and thus cannot be involved in chemosensation in most primates.

No Language-Specific Activation during Linguistic Processing of Observed Actions

These results show that linguistic tasks do not only share common neural representations but essentially activate a subset of the action observation network if identical stimuli are used. Our findings strongly support the evolutionary hypothesis that fronto-parietal systems matching action execution and observation were co-opted for language, a process known as exaptation.

Age- and Sex-Specific Mortality Patterns in an Emerging Wildlife Epidemic: The Phocine Distemper in European Harbour Seals

Analyses of the dynamics of diseases in wild populations typically assume all individuals to be identical. However, profound effects on the long-term impact on the host population can be expected if the disease has age and sex dependent dynamics. The Phocine Distemper Virus (PDV) caused two mass mortalities in European harbour seals in 1988 and in 2002. We show the mortality patterns were highly age specific on both occasions, where young of the year and adult (>4 yrs) animals suffered extremely high mortality, and sub-adult seals (1-3 yrs) of both sexes experienced low mortality. Consequently, genetic differences cannot have played a main role explaining why some seals survived and some did not in the study region, since parents had higher mortality levels than their progeny. Furthermore, there was a conspicuous absence of animals older than 14 years among the victims in 2002, which strongly indicates that the survivors from the previous disease outbreak in 1988 had acquired and maintained immunity to PDV. These specific mortality patterns imply that contact rates and susceptibility to the disease are strongly age and sex dependent variables, underlining the need for structured epidemic models for wildlife diseases. Detailed data can thus provide crucial information about a number of vital parameters such as functional herd immunity. One of many future challenges in understanding the epidemiology of the PDV and other wildlife diseases is to reveal how immune system responses differ among animals in different stages during their life cycle. The influence of such underlying mechanisms may also explain the limited evidence for abrupt disease thresholds in wild populations.

A Fully Automated Robotic System for Microinjection of Zebrafish Embryos

As an important embodiment of biomanipulation, injection of foreign materials (e.g., DNA, RNAi, sperm, protein, and drug compounds) into individual cells has significant implications in genetics, transgenics, assisted reproduction, and drug discovery. This paper presents a microrobotic system for fully automated zebrafish embryo injection, which overcomes the problems inherent in manual operation, such as human fatigue and large variations in success rates due to poor reproducibility. Based on computer vision and motion control, the microrobotic system performs injection at a speed of 15 zebrafish embryos (chorion unremoved) per minute, with a survival rate of 98% (n = 350 embryos), a success rate of 99% (n = 350 embryos), and a phenotypic rate of 98.5% (n = 210 embryos). The sample immobilization technique and microrobotic control method are applicable to other biological injection applications such as the injection of mouse oocytes/embryos and Drosophila embryos to enable high-throughput biological and pharmaceutical research.

Evidence for Paternal Leakage in Hybrid Periodical Cicadas (Hemiptera: Magicicada spp.)

Mitochondrial inheritance is generally assumed to be maternal. However, there is increasing evidence of exceptions to this rule, especially in hybrid crosses. In these cases, mitochondria are also inherited paternally, so “paternal leakage” of mitochondria occurs. It is important to understand these exceptions better, since they potentially complicate or invalidate studies that make use of mitochondrial markers. We surveyed F1 offspring of experimental hybrid crosses of the 17-year periodical cicadas Magicicada septendecim, M. septendecula, and M. cassini for the presence of paternal mitochondrial markers at various times during development (1-day eggs; 3-, 6-, 9-week eggs; 16-month old 1st and 2nd instar nymphs). We found evidence of paternal leakage in both reciprocal hybrid crosses in all of these samples. The relative difficulty of detecting paternal mtDNA in the youngest eggs and ease of detecting leakage in older eggs and in nymphs suggests that paternal mitochondria proliferate as the eggs develop. Our data support recent theoretical predictions that paternal leakage may be more common than previously estimated.

Cool Stuff on PLoS Today

In PLoS Biology:
High-Resolution Genome-Wide Dissection of the Two Rules of Speciation in Drosophila:

The evolution of reproductive isolation is a fundamental step in the origin of species. One kind of reproductive isolation, the sterility and inviability of species hybrids, is characterized by two of the strongest rules in evolutionary biology. The first is Haldane’s rule: for species crosses in which just one hybrid sex is sterile or inviable, it tends to be the sex defined by having a pair of dissimilar sex chromosomes (e.g., the “XY” of males in humans). The second rule is the large X effect: the X chromosome has a disproportionately large effect on hybrid fitness. We dissected the genetic causes of these two rules of speciation by replacing many small chromosomal segments of the fruit fly Drosophila sechellia with those of a closely related species, D. mauritiana. Together, these segments cover 70% of the genome. We found that virtually all segments causing hybrid sterility or inviability act recessively and that hybrid male sterility is by far the most common type of hybrid incompatibility, confirming two leading theories about the causes of Haldane’s rule. We also found that X-linked segments are more likely to cause hybrid male sterility than similarly sized autosomal segments. These results show that the large X effect is caused by a higher density of hybrid incompatibilities on the X chromosome.

In PLos Medicine – a series of policy papers from the Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative aimed towards solving health problems in the developing world:
Grand Challenges in Global Health: The Ethical, Social and Cultural Program:
Grand Challenges in Global Health: Ethical, Social, and Cultural Issues Based on Key Informant Perspectives:
Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries:
Grand Challenges in Global Health: Engaging Civil Society Organizations in Biomedical Research in Developing Countries:
In PLoS Computational Biology – a compilation of wildly popular “Ten Simple Rules” articles on the professional development for career scientists, now all on a single PDF:
Ten Simple Rules for a Good Poster Presentation
Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations
Ten Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration
Ten Simple Rules for Selecting a Postdoctoral Position
Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers
Ten Simple Rules for Getting Grants
Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published

The Grand Ad Campaign Has Started!

Check out this screenshot of the front page of PLoS ONE:
Promo%202.JPG
See the banner on the top right? Looks familiar?
There are several rotating ads, so you may have to click around several papers until you get to see it yourself (and while looking around, of course you are allowed to read papers, rate them., etc….)

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases – sneak preview

The next journal to be launched by the Public Library of Science is PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases.
To whet your appetite, two papers were published in advance, both on the cause of River Blindness and the evolution of resistance to the anti-parasitic ivermectin: a research paper Genetic Selection of Low Fertile Onchocerca volvulus by Ivermectin Treatment and a commentary Ivermectin Resistance in Onchocerca volvulus – Toward a Genetic Basis.
Shabnam Sigman gives more details about the launch on the PLoS Blog. You can get more information about the new journal here.

Commenting on PLoS ONE: Q&A

Intrigued, but unsure about the whole thing? Would like to add comments, but don’t really understand what is acceptable? Read this.

“Free Will” on display on SciVee

Do you remember all the buzz about the paper on the not random but not deterministic either behavior in fruitflies? By our blogfriend Bjoern Brembs?
Well, you can now watch the behavior of the insect in the movie associated with the paper. The video is up on SciVee of course – see it here.
And if there is a text box on top of it that bothers you, you can easily toggle it off – see the menu on the left, find Selection and click on the selection you are watching – textbox is gone. Click again, box is back. Also there on the left are Options, one of which includes “disable selection box”, so you should be OK.

SciVee.com

Video is taking over science communication. And why not? Now that paper is outdated, the limitations of that ancient technology should not apply to scientific publishing any more. Just because paper cannot support movies does not mean that modern scientific papers should shy away from using them.
Last week saw the launch of SciVee, essentially an aggregator of science movies. Now, you may ask – why do we need yet another one of those sites? There are several out there already. Journal of Visualized Experiments is a real journal – the videos are submitted and reviewed first and, if accepted, the authors are supposed to pay a fee to have the video published. All the videos accepted are grouped into Issues, they get DOI numbers and there is a way to refer to them as citations in future papers (or videos!). Lab Action is similar in style, but more like YouTube, i.e., people freely upload the videos which are subsequently rated and commented on by users. SciTalks is also YouTube-ish, but instead of experiments, it has lectures by scientists and science writers/journalists. So does VideoLectures. On the other hand, ScienceHack is a serach engine for science-related videos. Nature Preceedings allows the upload of a few different types of files, and will likely include videos in the future, I guess.
So, how is SciVee.com different?
First, SciVee was built in partnership with The Public Library of Science (PLoS), The National Science Foundation (NSF) and The San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC), so it has broad institutional support right from the start.
Second, SciVee allows only the upload of movies associated with papers published in Open Access Journals. Richard Cave explains. The format of the video will vary. The first one up is essentially the author’s summary narrated into the camera. The others will demonstrate experimental technique, or display animal behavior relevant to the paper, etc. So, if you publish a paper in an Open Access journal, you can upload it to SciVee and the two spaces where the video appears will automatically link to each other. If you find a video by searching SciVee, you will be able to click on a link and read the paper. If you read the paper which contains a video, a single click will get you to SciVee where you can find related videos, videos by the same authors, etc. This cute flow-chart explains the potential of this system far better than I can put into words.
Deepak Singh, Kambiz Kamrani and Attila Csordasz have already posted their first impressions. You can also see the first reviews on Slashdot, If:Book, Mashable, InformationWeek, NewTeeVee, The Q Function and many other blogs. Check it out.

PLoS Blog

As could have been expected, I am now officially the blogmeister of the PLoS blog. I have just posted my first introductory post there. It is a Drupal blog. The above and below the fold parts are separate (you see one or the other, not both at the same time) so this will take some getting used to. There will be, in the coming weeks and months, changes to the blog and I want your input. Post your suggestions in the comments over there. The comments are moderated for now due to excessive influx of spam, so be patient when you post comments there – I will approve them as fast as I can.

Final Scifoo Wrap-up

As I predicted, bloggers have waited a day or two before they wrote much of substance abour Scifoo. First, you don’t want to miss out on any cool conversations by blogging instead. Second, the experience is so intense, one needs to cool down, process and digest everything. Before I write my own thoughts, here are some links to places where you can see what others are doing:
The campers are joining the Science Foo Camp Facebook group (honor system – only campers are supposed to join, but it is open) and exchanging links, pictures and information.
There is an official aggregator where you can see the recent posts by bloggers who attended scifoo.
More and more people are loading their pictures on Flickr.
You can see blog posts and pictures on Technorati (watch out for the dates – the 06 and 07 pics are mixed up together).
There is a Nature aggregator as well (appears to be the cleanest of them all), or you may choose to use Connotea instead.
Or you can use Google Blogsearch to find the recent posts about the meeting. They are all worth reading (I’ll highlight a few posts below).
Patrick is collecting a list of books mentioned at Scifoo.
Finally, people are posting ideas about potential future projects on Scifoo Prototypes, set up by Nikita of JoVE.
My previous posts about it are here:
Taking over the Silicon Valley
Science Foo Camp – Friday
Science Foo Camp – Saturday morning
Science Foo Camp – Saturday afternoon
Science Foo Camp – Sunday
Home
A question for Scifoo campers
That out of the way, follow me under the fold if you want to hear my angle on the story….
—————————

Continue reading

Jobs: Managing Editor, PLoS Biology

I am not sure if blogging about it is enough – in this case a very strong Resume may be more important – but if you think you have sufficient experience and expertise to be a Managing Editor of a major biology journal, PLoS Biology (and are not too intimidated to be stepping into Hemai’s shoes), check the job ad and apply:

The Public Library of Science (PLoS) seeks an experienced editor and manager to lead its flagship life science journal – PLoS Biology. Since its launch in 2003, PLoS Biology has rapidly become established as both a high impact journal and a leader in the open-access publishing movement. This is a unique opportunity to develop a ground-breaking journal, and to shape a fundamental transition in scientific publishing. The managing editor could be based in either of our editorial offices in San Francisco, USA or Cambridge, UK.

Sorry, the Chapel Hill office in my bedroom is too small for such a big position, but San Francisco is a gorgeous city and the folks at PLoS are great to work with.

Google Earth on PLoS ONE papers

As far as I know, there are two papers on PLoS ONE so far that, as Supporting Information, have KML files readable by Google Earth: Naturalised Vitis Rootstocks in Europe and Consequences to Native Wild Grapevine and this week’s Regional Decline of Coral Cover in the Indo-Pacific: Timing, Extent, and Subregional Comparisons. Just scroll down to the Supporting Information of those papers, click on “Map S1” and, if you have Google Earth you can explore the map of the area of study.
If you are publishing a paper in an online, open access journal, think outside the box – there are things you can do that cannot be printed on paper but work online. If such files (images, videos, Google Earth maps, sound files, etc.) substantially enhance your manuscript, seriously consider including them. PLoS is working on making it easier for such files to be posted (or even embedded) in our papers in the future.

New look for PLoS journals.

Home pages of PLoS Biology, Medicine, Computational Biology, Genetics and Pathogens have a new look today. Richard Cave explains the design changes. Go take a look.

Last day in San Francisco

A month has passed.
It was a steep learning curve, but I think I have climbed high enough on it to be confident that I’ll be fine on my own back in Chapel Hill. Being a part of the PLoS team is such an exhillarating experience – there is so much energy and optimism around the office, everybody from CEO to the newest intern living, breathing and dreaming Open Access 24/7.
Not to bore you about the job any more – you will be hearing about PLoS over and over again here – let me, for now, just show you some pictures (under the fold) from the farewell party last night at Jupiter in downtown Berkeley, where some of us spent about six hours drinking last night…
Who was there?
Four of us Sciencebloggers: Alex Palazzo and his lovely wife, Josh Rosenau (and his parents) who has just arrived, after driving all the way from Kansas, to take on his new job at NCSE, Chris Hoofnagle and myself.
There were several of my new PLoS colleagues: Russell Uman, Barbara Cohen, Hemai Parthasarathy, Liza Gross, Gavin Yamay and, briefly, Peter Jerram with whom I had a great lunch conversation earlier in the day.
Then, some other local bloggers, scientists, friends, fans and scifoo campers: Chris Patil who is very funny, especially after a few beers (and his command of the Croatian language is getting good!!), old blog friend of mine Alvaro Fernandez and his summer intern Andreas Engvig (an MD/ PhD in Cog Neuroscience from Norway), Josh Staiger who is an old blogging friend from his days in Chapel Hill (before Google stole him from IBM), Meg Stalcup, currently in her fourth graduate program (which makes her so interdisciplinary, one’s head hurts, so of course she is invited to Science Foo Camp), Attila Csordas who is editing his Dissertation on his blog, Curtis Pickering of JeffsBench, Bosco Ho, a postdoc in Dave Agard’s lab at UCSF, and…heck, after all the beer, I am not sure I got all the names so add yourself in the comments if you were there and I omitted you from the list.
It was so much fun to see all these people get to know each other and make friends…

Continue reading

Happy Birthday, PLoS ONE!

On this day one year ago, PLoS ONE opened its doors to manuscript submissions. Chris Surridge, the Managing Editor, wrote a blog post recounting the past year:

The initial success of PLoS ONE is something unprecedented in scientific publishing. It has been achieved because of the commitment and faith of hundreds of people: PLoS staff, editorial and advisory board members, reviewers, authors and particularly readers. And yet this is only a very small step towards an open, interactive and efficient literature that will accelerate scientific progress. Over the coming months, we will take further steps with additional functionality on the site, new publishing ventures launching and established ones taking more advantage of the opportunities afforded by the TOPAZ platform on which PLoS ONE is presented.

The inside scoop: everyone here is really excited.
The manuscripts keep coming in, despite this being the middle of the summer when scientists are supposed to be out sailing, not writing papers. ONE is getting about 60 manuscripts per week and publishing about 30 per week. There are 697 papers already published, and many are in the pipeline. The traffic to the site is rapidly growing, although the online traffic is supposed to go down during the summer (I know my blog is down to about 60% of normal traffic right now).
While initially almost all the papers were biomedical, there are more and more papers in other areas of science, from ecology and behavioral biology to psychology and archaeology. Are you a bold pioneer, willing to be the one to break the ice and show the rest of the colleagues in YOUR field how good it is to publish with PLoS ONE? If yes, we love you – please submit a manuscript and help ONE become even more broad in its scope.
I just did some quick stats and, although this has started only three weeks ago, by last Sunday there were already 109 ratings on 78 papers! Keep them coming!
And, thanks to other bloggers who have already noted the anniverary on their sites:
PLoS ONE turns 1
PLoS ONE is (the) One
PLoS ONE is 1
PLoS ONE is one
Finally, let’s go back to Chris for the birthday present wishes:

So, if it is a birthday, what about presents?
Well, PLoS ONE would like three things none of which are particularly expensive and which all of the readers of this blog can give us: three resolutions.
Whenever you write about a published paper, be it in a journal or on a blog, always provide a link to the freely available version of the paper if one exists.
Whenever you read a paper in PLoS ONE, always rate it before leaving.
And most importantly….
Whenever you write a scientific paper, always, always, always publish it Open Access.

Look at the sticker!

This picture, from this article, must have been taken some time last week, just a couple of days after Jimmy Wales came to talk to us here at PLoS. That is when he placed the PLoS sticker on his laptop:
Jimbo.JPG

New and Exciting on PLoS ONE

There are 21 new papers on PLoS ONE published this week. Here are some titles that got my personal attention:
Climate Change, Genetics or Human Choice: Why Were the Shells of Mankind’s Earliest Ornament Larger in the Pleistocene Than in the Holocene? by Peter R. Teske, Isabelle Papadopoulos, Christopher D. McQuaid, Brent K. Newman and Nigel P. Barker:

The southern African tick shell, Nassarius kraussianus, is the earliest ornament known to be used by humans, dating back ~75,000 years. This study investigates why beads made from these shells in more recent times are smaller. It is likely due to increased temperatures produced by climate change at the beginning of the present interglacial period, making N. kraussianus fossil shells a possible biomonitor of climatic conditions.

Cortical Modulations Increase in Early Sessions with Brain-Machine Interface by Miriam Zacksenhouse, Mikhail A. Lebedev, Jose M. Carmena, Joseph E. O’Doherty, Craig Henriquez and Miguel A.L. Nicolelis:

Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) use the activity of cortical motor neurons to control external actuators, such as robot limbs. This study investigates the effects of the BMI itself on neuronal activity. Monkeys showed characteristic changes when they first starting training on BMIs that decreased as they gained experience, alluding to the formation of an internal model of the external actuator.

Do You See What I Mean? Corticospinal Excitability During Observation of Culture-Specific Gestures by Istvan Molnar-Szakacs, Allan D. Wu, Francisco J. Robles and Marco Iacoboni:

People all over the world use their hands to communicate expressively. Autonomous gestures, also known as emblems, are highly social in nature, and convey conventionalized meaning without accompanying speech. To study the neural bases of cross-cultural social communication, we used single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure corticospinal excitability (CSE) during observation of culture-specific emblems. Foreign Nicaraguan and familiar American emblems as well as meaningless control gestures were performed by both a Euro-American and a Nicaraguan actor. Euro-American participants demonstrated higher CSE during observation of the American compared to the Nicaraguan actor. This motor resonance phenomenon may reflect ethnic and cultural ingroup familiarity effects. However, participants also demonstrated a nearly significant (p = 0.053) actor by emblem interaction whereby both Nicaraguan and American emblems performed by the American actor elicited similar CSE, whereas Nicaraguan emblems performed by the Nicaraguan actor yielded higher CSE than American emblems. The latter result cannot be interpreted simply as an effect of ethnic ingroup familiarity. Thus, a likely explanation of these findings is that motor resonance is modulated by interacting biological and cultural factors.

The Population Dynamical Implications of Male-Biased Parasitism in Different Mating Systems:

Although there is growing evidence that males tend to suffer higher levels of parasitism than females, the implications of this for the population dynamics of the host population are not yet understood. Here we build on an established ‘two-sex’ model and investigate how increased susceptibility to infection in males affects the dynamics, under different mating systems. We investigate the effect of pathogenic disease at different case mortalities, under both monogamous and polygynous mating systems. If the case mortality is low, then male-biased parasitism appears similar to unbiased parasitism in terms of its effect on the population dynamics. At higher case mortalities, we identified significant differences between male-biased and unbiased parasitism. A host population may therefore be differentially affected by male-biased and unbiased parasitism. The dynamical outcome is likely to depend on a complex interaction between the host’s mating system and demography, and the parasite virulence.

‘Sexual’ Population Structure and Genetics of the Malaria Agent P. falciparum:

The population genetics and structure of P. falciparum determine the rate at which malaria evolves in response to interventions such as drugs and vaccines. This has been the source of considerable recent controversy, but here we demonstrate the organism to be essentially sexual, in an area of moderately high transmission in the Lower Shire Valley, Malawi. Seven thousand mosquitoes were collected and dissected, and genetic data were obtained on 190 oocysts from 56 infected midguts. The oocysts were genotyped at three microsatellite loci and the MSP1 locus. Selfing rate was estimated as 50% and there was significant genotypic linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the pooled oocysts. A more appropriate analysis searching for genotypic LD in outcrossed oocysts and/or haplotypic LD in the selfed oocysts found no evidence for LD, indicating that the population was effectively sexual. Inbreeding estimates at MSP1 were higher than at the microsatellites, possibly indicative of immune action against MSP1, but the effect was confounded by the probable presence of null mutations. Mating appeared to occur at random in mosquitoes and evidence regarding whether malaria clones in the same host were related (presumably through simultaneous inoculation in the same mosquito bite) was ambiguous. This is the most detailed genetic analysis yet of P. falciparum sexual stages, and shows P. falciparum to be a sexual organism whose genomes are in linkage equilibrium, which acts to slow the emergence of drug resistance and vaccine insensitivity, extending the likely useful therapeutic lifespan of drugs and vaccines.

Online Science Discussion

Curtis, one of the founders of JeffsBench wrote a very interesting article comparing JeffsBench to PLoS ONE in their roles in fostering online scientific discussions. Register, look around and comment….

Nursing PLoS

Kim of Emergiblog explains nicely why you should support Open Access publishing:
The Public Library of Science:

You are writing a paper. You need to do some research, so you google your topic.
Ah ha! There it is! The perfect article for your paper. The abstract is right in front of you, but you must go to the actual journal for the full text.
Hmmm…you can access the full text of the article, but you must pay to do it! Anywhere from nine dollars to almost thirty dollars for twenty-four hour access.
“No way”, you say! “I have access to my university’s online library, I’ll just go there and look it up for free!”
Except the journal isn’t in the online database or it has to physically come from another library, and you happen to live two thousand miles away from your “campus”.
Reluctantly, you pay for access to the article. Or not….

San Francisco – a running commentary #2

Wow – this was (and still is) a very busy week. On most days, I just crashed early, without having the energy to blog very much (at least very much for me).
In the last dispatch, I forgot to mention I met Jimmy Wales who came to visit PLoS and we talked about Wikipedia and building online communities.
Under the fold are a bunch of new pictures…

Continue reading

Now You Can (and Should) rate papers on PLoS ONE!

I buried this information between numerous pretty pictures in a yesterday’s post, so let me now tell you a little bit more.
A couple of days ago, a new feature was introduced on all published papers on PLoS ONE. Along with commenting on and annotating each paper, you can now also rate it.
The rating system is familiar to all of you from other sites, I’m sure – it is a simple five-star system. You can rate papers on three criteria: Insight, Reliability and Style and let the software average your three ratings to produce a single number, as well as average your ratings with other readers’ ratings to produce a single number for each of the three criteria.
Read the Rating Guidelines first, then dig into the site and rate every paper that you read, while leaving a very brief explanation of why you rated the way you did – no need to get wordy, the Discussions comments and Annotations are designed for that.
For a more technical account, read what Richard Cave wrote about the new application, and then check Pedro’s post for a quick pictorial tutorial. If you have the Javascript turned off, you will need to turn it on in order to be able to rate the papers.
As Chris Surridge says (after explaining what this all really means): “Never read a paper on PLoS ONE without leaving a rating!” I strongly second Chris on this: go look around PLoS ONE, read the papers (or find those you have already read in the past) and rate them. Now.

San Francisco – a running commentary

OK, so I’ve been here for about a week now. It’s been so far an exciting and overwhelming experience – there is so much to learn! And I am impatient with myself and want to get in the groove right now. I need to learn to slow down a little…
Anyway, I did manage to drop in here at the blog a couple of times and report on meetups with some local bloggers, but here is a little bit more about the week so far…

Continue reading

First Day at PloS

I Support the Public Library of ScienceThis post has been written in advance and scheduled for automatic posting. At the time this post shows up, I’ll be sleeping my first night in San Francisco. A few hours later, I’ll be at PLoS offices and will hopefully have online access soon after so I can post my first impressions.
As most of you probably know, I got a job as an Online Community Coordinator at PLoS ONE. Today is my first day at the job! I got the job in an unusual way as well – by posting about it on my blog (and the managing editor posting a comment “Is this a formal application?”). The rest is, as they say, history. To make this post shorter, I have blogged about the job before, about the way I got the job, and some of my thoughts about what I want to do with it, so check out the relevant posts:
I Want This Job!
Update on ‘I Want This Job’
Off to SF
Back from SF
Updates
It’s Official
While my CV and the cover letter were fine, what really got me the job were my blog commenters! That is: YOU! You demonstrated my ability to build an online community better than any Resume can reveal. Although, to be fair, it took me three years to build this community and now I have three months to build one on PLoS! So, I need your help and I am unabashedly begging for it.
So, my #1 goal (and there are other coooool goals I’ll tell you about later) is to dramatically increase the number of comments and annotations on the PLoS ONE papers, without compromising their quality. I have many ideas how to go about it, and so do the other members of the PLoS team, but I am always interested in hearing others (comments section of this post is a perfect place for just such ideas you may have).
For the time being, I will start with raising quantity first, i.e., trying to grow some numbers, e.g., overall traffic, number of return visitors, time spent on site, pageview/visit ratio, etc., building a critical mass until it reaches a threshold at which I will have to also deal with quality (you know the rule on blogs – more comments there are, lower the level of discourse).
Scientists are generally shy about posting stuff online, but a growing number of science bloggers shows that it is possible for them to change their habits! Please help me in that difficult task 😉 After all, you are the ones who are comfortable commenting – so if you set the example and start posting comments, the more reluctant scientists will hopefully follow suit.
As you are aware of, commenting is a positive feedback loop. If you go to a blog post (or a PLoS ONE paper) and see “0 comments” you are unlikely to be the first one to comment (but you are still more likely to do so than a scientist with no experience on blogs whatsoever!). But if you see “3 comments” or “7 comments” or “35 comments” you will be curious and you will click to see what others are saying. By the time you are done reading through the comments, you are already deeply involved and thus much more likely to decide to post a comment of your own (especially if you disagree with some statement there).
While scientists are secretive and shy by training, they are still people. The non-blogging scientists may have very high thresholds, but they do have thresholds! If they see a number of comments there and see something erroneous posted there, they will post a rebuttal, I hope. I need you – the bloggers – to bring the commenting threads up to the threshold levels at which non-blogging scientists will start kicking in. Then, hopefully, there will be a snowball effect and over the long run the growth of commenting will become organic (i.e., I will not need to bug you about this any more).
Here are some broad ideas about Science 2.0 I have (and I will give you particulars on what PLoS-ONE will do in the near future in later posts):
PLoS 500
Science 2.0
Nature Precedings
I will keep using my own blog as part of my toolkit at the job (subscribe/blogroll/bookmark it if you want so you can see the updates here as soon as I post them) and updates will appear here on my blog (and on the PLoS Blog as well). No, this does not mean I will quit blogging about other topics!
What should you expect me to ask/tell you in future job-related posts?
Usually, I will ask you to go to a particular page on PLoS site and do one or more of the following:
– take a look at the visual/psychological effect of the changes we made to the site and give me feedback about it
– test a new application we introduced on the site and let me know how it works and how it can be improved
– post a comment or annotation yourself (on a specific paper, or a paper of your own choice)
– ask the readers of your blog/website/newsgroup/mailing-list to do some of the above.
It’s all voluntary, of course. Do it if you feel like it, and are comfortable doing it, and have time, and are in just the right mood at the time…
Although, heed Orli’s words: “…as we all know, saying no to Bora means courting bad karma…” 😉
In order for you to be able to do this, i.e., to be able to compare the ‘before’ and ‘after’, I’d like you (and your readers) to go over the next few days and familarize yourself with PLoS ONE, its look and feel.
Also, you may want to get more familiar with PLoS as a whole, with all of its journals and with the principle of Open Access.
It will also be helpful if you register for the site, subscribe to RSS feeds of journals, and to e-mail notifications of new articles.
You can also help me if you use some of these ready-made PR materials (cool banners for your sidebars!) and here are some other ideas of the ways you can help.
You can join the PLoS group and PLoS cause on Facebook and invite all your ‘friends’ to join. On another social network? Start a support group yourself there!
One of the first things I am going to do is try to breathe new life into the PLoS Blog and make it a pretty central (and more frequently updated) spot on the site. As Technorati annual reports found out, it is not the age or quality that determines which blogs are popular and highly ranked, but the frequency and regularity of posting. This may also require some re-design. So, it is not a bad idea for you to subscribe to its feed and to check in regularly and post comments. Linking to its posts or placing them on services like digg, delicious, stumbleupon and redditt will also be appreciated.
Finally, go to the Sandbox and try your hand at annotations and comments before you do it on a real paper. Once you are comfortable with the process, find papers in your area of expertise and post a comment – it does not need to be very detailed (or a criticism of the work!). Authors will appreciate it if you tell them that you like the paper in 1-2 nice short sentences as well.
Oh, almost forgot – think about publishing your papers in PLoS-ONE. The average time between submission and publication is 19 days! More than 500 papers have already been published and several are added every week. And you get feedback from colleagues and your paper is likely to be cited more than if it was behind a pay wall. As long as it is good science and well written, it is acceptable. It does not need to be Earth-shaking, revolutionary stuff that goes to Science or Nature (though that is certainly acceptable!). It does not need to be of ‘general interest’ either – a very specialized paper is fine. Also, while currently most of the papers are in the biology/genetics/medicine areas, the journal takes anything from math to archaeology so please help us become more diverse!
Oh, another thing – if you are in Bay Area (San Francisco, California, USA) during July and would like to meet me in person, let me know.
Oh, and tell your friends…