The Scientific Paper: past, present and probable future

From the ArchivesA post from December 5, 2007:

Continue reading

ClockCast #1

A couple of months ago, my SciBling David Dobbs and I recorded about an hour of discussion for Bloggingheads.tv. We talked mainly about science journalism, but also about journalism in general, about the future of the book, etc.
Unfortunately, Dave’s half of the file got broken beyond repair, so the show never aired. I kept my half of the file and did not really know what to do with it. So, recently I downloaded Audacity and tried my hand at editing the audio part of the file, trying to cut out the silences (during which Dave was talking) and dialogues that would be intelligible without Dave’s part of the file.
Here is the very first part, just a brief (1 minute and 38 seconds) introduction to myself and my job. Thus, my very first podcast, which (after popular vote on FriendFeed decided) will be called ClockCast. I will try to find some time (as I am learning to tackle Audacity!) to edit and post the rest of the file in the near future (I am not, for now, promising any kind of regularity for posting these, until I feel comfortable with the medium and the technology):

ClockCast1.wav –

Testing, testing, 1-2-3-

Trying to see if uploading audio works – feel free to ignore:

VN520001.WMA –

Jason?

In any case, try over here.

Clock Quotes

There are many intelligent species in the universe. They are all owned by cats.
– Anonymous

Programing note: next two weeks will be exciting!

As you may already be aware I am about to embark on a trip to Europe again. I will be traveling on Sunday and arriving at Lindau, Germany on Monday for the 59th Meeting of Nobel Laureates. The list of Nobel Laureates (23 of them) and the list of about 600 young researchers from 66 countries are very impressive. Of course, not being a chemist, I’ll have to do some homework before I go (I printed out the complete list of descriptions of all of them to read on the airplane), learning what these people did to get their prizes and what the younger ones are doing hoping to get a Nobel in the future.
My SciBling PZ Myers will also be there, so we will both blog about the sessions and panels and people and, well, beer. Of course, beer, it is Bavaria! Apart from the two of us, there will be a lot of blogging about the meeting on the Scienceblogs Germany site, as well as some on Page 3.14.
But I will also do some work – I will be on an Open Access panel on Tuesday.
What I hope to do is conduct brief (1-2 minutes) interviews with people using a Flash camera, and later upload the files on YouTube and embed them here on the blog. Then I would follow up with a little longer (5-10 minutes) interviews with the same people using a digital audio recorder, upload the files somewhere (probably Odeo.com but I’ll test a few sites to see which one works the best) and embed the podcasts here on the blog. I will also be taking pictures and posting some on Flickr and Facebook and others via Twittpic to Twitter (which then goes to FriendFeed and Facebook as well). So you will be able to see them wherever you follow me online. Note the FriendFeed widget on the bottom of the left side-bar on this blog.
The Lindau meeting is from June 28th to July 3rd, after which I’ll fly to Belgrade for a few days, to visit my Mom and meet some friends (especially those I missed last year). Ana, Vedran and some others are already trying to organize the bust program for me.
I will give a talk at the University Library on Tuesday, July 7th at noon, and then at the Oncology Center at the Medical School at the University of Belgrade at noon on Wednesday, July 8th. I’ll be meeting my high-school friends on the 5th, and two different sets of elementary/middle school friends on the 9th and 11th of July (a bunch of expats are coming from abroad to the July 11th reunion as well). The horse-y friends will be at the Mediterranean games, so I will miss them this time around.
I am in contact with some people there who may be able to tell me more about the newly discovered mammoth fossil (I am not sure I will be able to actually go and see it, but I’ll try) as well as the people who put together the new exhibit of Argentinian dinosaurs (a traveling exhibit that just moved from Germany to Belgrade last week). I am also hoping to give some interviews at local radio and/or TV. More information about the Belgrade leg of the trip will be available on Facebook.
I am likely to be online a lot nonetheless. Apart from blogging the trip and uploading interviews, I will probably also schedule (for automatic posting) ClockQuotes and some reposts of old stuff from the Archives. And I will be in touch with the PLoS HQ and will convey all the exciting news coming from there. And on the 1st of July I will announce the Blog Pick of the Month.

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 15 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures:

The impact of scientific publications has traditionally been expressed in terms of citation counts. However, scientific activity has moved online over the past decade. To better capture scientific impact in the digital era, a variety of new impact measures has been proposed on the basis of social network analysis and usage log data. Here we investigate how these new measures relate to each other, and how accurately and completely they express scientific impact. We performed a principal component analysis of the rankings produced by 39 existing and proposed measures of scholarly impact that were calculated on the basis of both citation and usage log data. Our results indicate that the notion of scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator, although some measures are more suitable than others. The commonly used citation Impact Factor is not positioned at the core of this construct, but at its periphery, and should thus be used with caution.

Cool Sex? Hibernation and Reproduction Overlap in the Echidna:

During hibernation there is a slowing of all metabolic processes, and thus it is normally considered to be incompatible with reproduction. In Tasmania the egg-laying mammal, the echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) hibernates for several months before mating in mid-winter, and in previous studies we observed males with females that were still hibernating. We monitored the reproductive activity of radio-tracked echidnas by swabbing the reproductive tract for sperm while external temperature loggers provided information on the timing of hibernation. Additional information was provided by camera traps and ultrasound imaging. More than a third of the females found in mating groups were torpid, and the majority of these had mated. Some females re-entered deep torpor for extended periods after mating. Ultrasound examination showed a developing egg in the uterus of a female that had repeatedly re-entered torpor. The presence of fresh sperm in cloacal swabs taken from this female on three occasions after her presumed date of fertilization indicated she mated several times after being fertilized. The mating of males with torpid females is the result of extreme competition between promiscuous males, while re-entry into hibernation by pregnant females could improve the possibility of mating with a better quality male.

More than 9,000,000 Unique Genes in Human Gut Bacterial Community: Estimating Gene Numbers Inside a Human Body:

Estimating the number of genes in human genome has been long an important problem in computational biology. With the new conception of considering human as a super-organism, it is also interesting to estimate the number of genes in this human super-organism. We presented our estimation of gene numbers in the human gut bacterial community, the largest microbial community inside the human super-organism. We got 552,700 unique genes from 202 complete human gut bacteria genomes. Then, a novel gene counting model was built to check the total number of genes by combining culture-independent sequence data and those complete genomes. 16S rRNAs were used to construct a three-level tree and different counting methods were introduced for the three levels: strain-to-species, species-to-genus, and genus-and-up. The model estimates that the total number of genes is about 9,000,000 after those with identity percentage of 97% or up were merged. By combining completed genomes currently available and culture-independent sequencing data, we built a model to estimate the number of genes in human gut bacterial community. The total number of genes is estimated to be about 9 million. Although this number is huge, we believe it is underestimated. This is an initial step to tackle this gene counting problem for the human super-organism. It will still be an open problem in the near future.

The Cooking Hypothesis of Human Evolution

The Food hypothesis of human evolution was developed by Richard Wrangham, author of “Catching Fire”. It was covered recently by my sciblings, including Erin, Razib and Ethan. It was also the topic on last week’s Bloggingheads.tv.
But now, you can hear the interview with Wrangham on the World Science podcast, then go over to the forum and ask him questions. He’ll be checking in the forums and responding for the next week or so.
Then let me know what you thought about it – the topic, the podcast, the forum.
[Reminder that I serve as an outside advisor to World Science]
Update: Wow! I did not know that one of my SciBlings, Greg Laden is one of the co-authors of the Food Hypothesis – see the paper here – see also Greg’s posts about it, e.g., here.

ScienceOnline’09: Interview with Peter Lipson

The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline’09 back in January.
Today, I asked one of my SciBlings and friends, Peter Lipson, aka Pal MD of the White Coat Underground, to answer a few questions.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your (scientific/medical) background?
I’m a husband, dad, and internist. An internist is a medical doctor who specializes in adult health and disease. I’ve always loved science, but medicine isn’t a science as much as the practical application of science.
PalMD pic.JPGWhat do you want to do/be when (and if ever) you grow up?
Well, I’m pretty much stuck with the three roles I mentioned, being in the middle of life and all. I’d love to do more writing and more teaching, if the economics of medicine were to allow it. In addition to writing on medicine, I’ve recently started writing on fatherhood as well. Interestingly, this turned out to be both popular and controversial. Part of blogging, for me at least, is showing how real live professionals balance the personal and professional. The folks who don’t like it, well, they can get their own blog.
Oh, i also have a podcast (called “The PalCast“) that goes out a couple of times a month where I discuss many of the same issues as I do on my blog, but in a different way.
I love writing (and strangely, I include the PalCast in that) and wish being a grownup let me do more of it.
What is your Real Life job?
I have my own private practice, and I teach medical residents and medical students at a teaching hospital. I work about 60 hours a week and squeeze blogging into the gaps.
What aspect of science communication and/or particular use of the Web in science interests you the most?
The opportunity to reach a wide audience is fascinating. Seriously, the people I’ve “met” online are interesting, smart, knowledgeable, even outside their own fields, and they’ve taught me a lot. I expected my blogging to be 1) ignored, and when i failed at that, 2) expository. It turns out that my readers know a lot and are willing to share their knowledge.
How does (if it does) blogging figure in your work? How about social networks, e.g., Twitter, FriendFeed and Facebook?
I’ve had patients discover my writing, but it’s not an integrated part of my work or home life. I do have friends who read my stuff, but not that many. I do use twitterfeed to tweet all of my blog posts. I accept my readers as friends on facebook, but I don’t use it that much. I don’t really check my friendfeed much anymore.
When and how did you discover science/medical blogs? What are some of your favourites? Have you discovered any new cool science/medical blogs while at the Conference?
I didn’t know that much at the blogosphere when I started out. I believe my first post was sometime around March of 07 on wordpress (the original blog is inactive and in storage so no links). As I started to follow links, I ran into Orac’s blog (scienceblogs.com/insolence) and followed links around the medical blogosphere from there. I’ve met some terrific people, and over the last several months I’ve been posting occasionally at sciencebasedmedicine.com, a terrific blog run by David Gorski and Steve Novella about, well, science-based medicine.
I met some great people at SciOnline but I think I may have been the only med blogger around.
Many medical bloggers write under pseudonyms. You don’t (at least not any more). What made you decide to blog under your own name?
You co-moderated a session about pseudonymity on the blogs. There is still a lot of misunderstanding, including in the mainstream media, about the role of pseudonyms and the ways of building reputation online unconnected to one’s real life persona. For example, a pseudonymous blogger was recently outed by media in the UK, right after he received the George Orwell prize for journalism (forgetting that ‘George Orwell’ was also a pseudonym). Where do you see the future regarding this issue – will it resolve itself over time? What can be done to persuade people that pseudonymus bloggers are not automatically less trustworthy, or that pseudonymous does not equal anonymous? Did you learn something about it from your own session?

Nothing can be done to persuade people that pseudonymous bloggers are as trustworthy as named bloggers, but that’s life. Hopefully, the writing speaks for itself. Critics of pseudonymous blogging often have a bone to pick with the content of the blog and use the author’s identity as a straw man argument. I pretty much feel that trustworthiness is a non-issue in this regard. There are many other reasons to use a pseudonym, however. I “came out” because I realized that some day I would be outed anyway and I didn’t want to allow myself to rely on anonymity. I do still blog under a pseudonym because it’s part of my online identity—it’s associated with my writing and ideas more closely than my real name.
People who out anonymous bloggers are assholes. Still, if you’re anonymous, you’ve got to remember that there’s a lot of assholes out there.
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
Just meeting people from so many different fields widened the scope of my reading (one of the first things I did when I got home was change my google reader subscriptions). I also got lots of ideas from sources that to me were unlikely, such as Henry Gee, gg, Salman Hameed, and many others outside of my field.
It was so nice to meet you in person and thank you for the interview. I hope to see you again next January.
Me too. Let’s hope the economy perks up a little!
==========================
See the 2008 interview series and 2009 series for more.

ScienceOnline’10 – mark your calendars

On Wednesday night, Anton Zuiker and I met over dinner at Town Hall Grill (and an amazing vocalist of local “Caribou Barbie Unboxed” band) and made some plans.
We confirmed the date – ScienceOnline’10 will be on 15-17th January 2010 in Triangle, NC.
We will have science and food related tours on Friday, ending with something special in the evening, followed by regular programming on Saturday (whole day) and Sunday (until noon). So, mark your calendars.
I’ll post more information as it becomes available, but briefly: we are having it, economic crisis or not. Sigma Xi is the likely venue (but not 100% sure yet – it’s just so hard to find a place as nice that could accommodate perhaps 50 extra people).
We’ll have a small registration fee (as sponsors are unlikely to shower us with riches in this economic situation), so we can be sure to have enough funds to run the conference, even if we have to cut down somewhat on the luxuries we used to shower you all with. Registration fee also ensures that people who register are committed to show up and are not just holding a place, “just in case”, while 50 others are waiting on the waiting list.
Of course, if your company is doing fine financially and you are willing to become a sponsor, then there will be no need to cut back on anything. Sponsor a meal, or an event, or travel costs for some poor students, or technical support (power, wifi, recording, livestreaming), though every organizer also loves to have some discretionary funds that can be used for whatever need arises in the last moment.
We’ll expand our organizing committee (there is a large pool of people interested) at a party/cookout in late July or early August, when we’ll make a division of labor. More information about that later. We are also going to ask the community for ideas soon (not yet about sessions, but about ways to make the conference work better, go smoothly, become more attractive, etc.) using a Woofoo form or a wiki.
Does anyone want to design the logo and banner for the conference? The old one says “’09” and we need one that doesn’t.
So stay tuned – there will be regular updates here, on our Twitter/FriendFeed/Facebook streams, and on the scienceblogging.com page.

Today’s carnivals

Friday Ark #249 is up on Modulator

Clock Quotes

Nine times out of ten, the first thing a man’s companion knows of his shortcomings is from his apology.
– Oliver Wendell Holmes

Today’s carnivals

Change of Shift, Volume 3 Number 26 is up on RehabRN
I and the Bird #103 is up on Birdfreak.com

PLoS ONE: Background, Future Development, and Article-Level Metrics

If you are in any way following the developments in the world of science publishing, you have probably heard about the new effort by PLoS to establish article-level metrics for scientific papers (instead of the dreadful and erronoeus Impact Factor).
Today, Peter Binfield, the Managing Editor of PLoS ONE, published a paper entitled “PLoS ONE: Background, Future Development, and Article-Level Metrics” that covers all of that in great detail. The paper is, of course, Open Access, so you can download the PDF for free here and the related PowerPoint slideshow here.
Peter says:

The paper goes into a lot of detail on the history and inner workings of PLoS ONE, and so if you are at all interested in where our journal came from; how it operates; and where it is going in the future, then it is required reading.

I second that! A Must Read!
Also, as this is a peer-reviewed article, if you blog about it, and if you use the BPR3 icon, the link to your blog post will show up on the ResearchBlogging.org aggregator and will thus be eligible for the Blog Pick Of The Month for June.
You can also discuss this article on FriendFeed.

New and Exciting in PLoS this week

Let’s take a look at all seven PLoS journals today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:

Continue reading

ScienceOnline’09: Interview with SciCurious

The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline’09 back in January.
Today, I asked one of my SciBlings and friends, Scicurious of the Neurotopia, to answer a few questions.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your (scientific) background?
SciCurious pic.jpgMy name is Scicurious (please, call my Sci), and I’m a grad student studying Pharmacology at a Southeastern University of Good Reputation. Every once in a while, I think I see the end of the tunnel, but it turns out I was fooling myself.
What do you want to do/be when (and if ever) you grow up?
A Mad Scientist. MWAH-HA-HA-HA. Honestly, it’s amazing how many of us didn’t know what to do with ourselves after college, and now it’s amazing how many of us don’t know what to do with ourselves after grad school. I guess I better begin thinking of that right about now, huh…it will definitely involve world domination.
What is your Real Life job?
Grad student. It’s a lot less glamorous than it sounds. I don’t suffer at all from paparazzi.
What aspect of science communication and/or particular use of the Web in science interests you the most?
I really love learning in a wide variety, and sharing ideas with a large number of people. I love that, since beginning to read science blogs, I’ve found out so much more about my field, and expanded my knowledge base in other fields. I think it’s the spread of knowledge to both other scientists and lay people that interests me the most.
How does (if it does) blogging figure in your work? How about social networks, e.g., Twitter, FriendFeed and Facebook?
In my real work? It doesn’t. I blog on my own time, and never on my Real Work. However, you can find me on Twitter, and I hear there’s a Facebook group as well. I love blogging and sharing information and educating, but work and blogging need to stay separate for now.
But indirectly, there’s been a massive effect of blogging on my work. My knowledge of other areas has increased exponentially, and now it seems that the instant something big comes out in my field, I know. So it’s been a positive influence, over all. And I’ve made some awesome friends and contacts.
When and how did you discover science blogs? What are some of your favourites?
Funny, that. See, I went to this coffee shop one day and met this guy Coturnix. I hear you know him… Someone had told me that he could help me break into the world of science writing. And he told me to start a science blog. So I spent the next day or so checking out blogs, and thinking “hey! This is pretty sweet!” And thus, Scicurious was born.
Favorites? I hate playing favorites. I have to say I LOVE “What the hell is wrong with you, I’m mean, damn” because the title kills me. I go there when I’m feeling down just to read the title and laugh. Otherwise, I’ve got a LOT of blogs I read every day. Everyone has their good and bad days.
You led a session about History of Science at the conference – how did that go and what did you learn from it?
Well, I’ve never led a session on ANYTHING before, so I guess it went well for my first time! It was great to have gg and Laelaps there with me, I love those guys. Gg in particular knows SO much about the history of science, and has so much to share.
I think we started some good discussions. One question that really interested me was “why does this MATTER?!” I was kind of shocked, because I personally love history, and so it never really occurred to me that people wouldn’t think it mattered. But it did make me think about why people should blog about the history of science. After all, a lot of times it’s not easy to do, looking up and explaining old techniques. But I think we were able to show a little of WHY the history of science is important. I personally think that the history of science is necessary to explain a great deal of what goes on the modern biosciences, a lot of which can be really complicated if you don’t have some idea of the background.
It seems that blog posts on three topics – Historical Science, Weird Science, and Science of Sex – draw a lot of interest from your readers. But as you know, most of currently done science is not that sexy – how do you balance this for your audience?
ALL well-done, elegant science is sexy science! I also like to explain a lot of the more complicated topics, and try to make science understandable to a non-scientist audience. I try to convey how excited I was when I first learned about the topics, and I hope that gets other people excited about some of the “less-sexy” science as well, when it is conveyed by people who are passionate and who can explain how the heavy stuff relates to every day life. Sure, some science is funny and weird, and some of it’s not, but all of it is important and helps us to understand our bodies and the world that we live in. New knowledge is always pretty exciting.
You are the guest editor of the Open Laboratory 2009 anthology – any thoughts about it yet?
I agreed to do what now? Aiieeeeeeee!!!!

Well, I just hope I can do as well as the previous years have done. We’ve already got boatloads of submissions coming in, many of which look like good contenders. I’m just hoping I turn out something awesome and that I don’t go insane doing it!
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
Well, I will say that I think there’s a lot to be said for meeting bloggers in person. When they are a disembodied series of words, it is very easy to misinterpret. There is no tone of voice on the internet And also, you can build up pictures in your head of these blogging gods, and in reality, we’re all just people. So it was very cool to meet some of the people I’ve been communicating with for ages, and see what they’re really like. Now sometimes I can even hear them talking when I read them!
I was also really impressed with the sessions on anonymity and women and minorities in science. Even though I AM a woman in science, it was something that I had never really thought about before. I have since become a lot more aware of these issues, and I’ve been reading up a lot on them as well. I hope that conversations about women and minority issues at conferences continue, I think there’s a lot left to be discussed, and there are ALWAYS more people to educate.
It was so nice to see you again and thank you for the interview. I hope to see you again next January.
==========================
See the 2008 interview series and 2009 series for more.

Clock Quotes

The riders in a race do not stop when they reach the goal. There is a little finishing canter before coming to a standstill. There is time to hear the kind voices of friends and say to oneself, The work is done.
– Oliver Wendel Holmes Jr.

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 14 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:

Continue reading

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

Thanks to television, for the first time the young are seeing history made before it is censored by their elders.
– Margaret Mead

Leave journalism to professionals!

Or better not. Is this the way Washington Post is trying to hasten its complete loss of respect and relevance? In the week they fired their only journalist worthy of that title?

Yuck!
[via @jayrosen_nyu]

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 20 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
A Fish Eye Out of Water: Ten Visual Opsins in the Four-Eyed Fish, Anableps anableps:

The “four-eyed” fish Anableps anableps has numerous morphological adaptations that enable above and below-water vision. Here, as the first step in our efforts to identify molecular adaptations for aerial and aquatic vision in this species, we describe the A. anableps visual opsin repertoire. We used PCR, cloning, and sequencing to survey cDNA using unique primers designed to amplify eight sequences from five visual opsin gene subfamilies, SWS1, SWS2, RH1, RH2, and LWS. We also used Southern blotting to count opsin loci in genomic DNA digested with EcoR1 and BamH1. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed the identity of all opsin sequences and allowed us to map gene duplication and divergence events onto a tree of teleost fish. Each of the gene-specific primer sets produced an amplicon from cDNA, indicating that A. anableps possessed and expressed at least eight opsin genes. A second PCR-based survey of genomic and cDNA uncovered two additional LWS genes. Thus, A. anableps has at least ten visual opsins and all but one were expressed in the eyes of the single adult surveyed. Among these ten visual opsins, two have key site haplotypes not found in other fish. Of particular interest is the A. anableps-specific opsin in the LWS subfamily, S180γ, with a SHYAA five key site haplotype. Although A. anableps has a visual opsin gene repertoire similar to that found in other fishes in the suborder Cyprinodontoidei, the LWS opsin subfamily has two loci not found in close relatives, including one with a key site haplotype not found in any other fish species. A. anableps opsin sequence data will be used to design in situ probes allowing us to test the hypothesis that opsin gene expression differs in the distinct ventral and dorsal retinas found in this species.

Melanopsin Bistability: A Fly’s Eye Technology in the Human Retina:

In addition to rods and cones, the human retina contains light-sensitive ganglion cells that express melanopsin, a photopigment with signal transduction mechanisms similar to that of invertebrate rhabdomeric photopigments (IRP). Like fly rhodopsins, melanopsin acts as a dual-state photosensitive flip-flop in which light drives both phototransduction responses and chromophore photoregeneration that bestows independence from the retinoid cycle required by rods and cones to regenerate photoresponsiveness following bleaching by light. To explore the hypothesis that melanopsin in humans expresses the properties of a bistable photopigment in vivo we used the pupillary light reflex (PLR) as a tool but with methods designed to study invertebrate photoreceptors. We show that the pupil only attains a fully stabilized state of constriction after several minutes of light exposure, a feature that is consistent with typical IRP photoequilibrium spectra. We further demonstrate that previous exposure to long wavelength light increases, while short wavelength light decreases the amplitude of pupil constriction, a fundamental property of IRP difference spectra. Modelling these responses to invertebrate photopigment templates yields two putative spectra for the underlying R and M photopigment states with peaks at 481 nm and 587 nm respectively. Furthermore, this bistable mechanism may confer a novel form of “photic memory” since information of prior light conditions is retained and shapes subsequent responses to light. These results suggest that the human retina exploits fly-like photoreceptive mechanisms that are potentially important for the modulation of non-visual responses to light and highlights the ubiquitous nature of photoswitchable photosensors across living organisms.

Stimulus Familiarity Affects Perceptual Restoration in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris):

Humans can easily restore a speech signal that is temporally masked by an interfering sound (e.g., a cough masking parts of a word in a conversation), and listeners have the illusion that the speech continues through the interfering sound. This perceptual restoration for human speech is affected by prior experience. Here we provide evidence for perceptual restoration in complex vocalizations of a songbird that are acquired by vocal learning in a similar way as humans learn their language. European starlings were trained in a same/different paradigm to report salient differences between successive sounds. The birds’ response latency for discriminating between a stimulus pair is an indicator for the salience of the difference, and these latencies can be used to evaluate perceptual distances using multi-dimensional scaling. For familiar motifs the birds showed a large perceptual distance if discriminating between song motifs that were muted for brief time periods and complete motifs. If the muted periods were filled with noise, the perceptual distance was reduced. For unfamiliar motifs no such difference was observed. The results suggest that starlings are able to perceptually restore partly masked sounds and, similarly to humans, rely on prior experience. They may be a suitable model to study the mechanism underlying experience-dependent perceptual restoration.

Induction of Empathy by the Smell of Anxiety:

The communication of stress/anxiety between conspecifics through chemosensory signals has been documented in many vertebrates and invertebrates. Here, we investigate how chemosensory anxiety signals conveyed by the sweat of humans (N = 49) awaiting an academic examination are processed by the human brain, as compared to chemosensory control signals obtained from the same sweat donors in a sport condition. The chemosensory stimuli were pooled according to the donation condition and administered to 28 participants (14 males) synchronously to breathing via an olfactometer. The stimuli were perceived with a low intensity and accordingly only about half of the odor presentations were detected by the participants. The fMRI results (event-related design) show that chemosensory anxiety signals activate brain areas involved in the processing of social emotional stimuli (fusiform gyrus), and in the regulation of empathic feelings (insula, precuneus, cingulate cortex). In addition, neuronal activity within attentional (thalamus, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) and emotional (cerebellum, vermis) control systems were observed. The chemosensory perception of human anxiety seems to automatically recruit empathy-related resources. Even though the participants could not attentively differentiate the chemosensory stimuli, emotional contagion seems to be effectively mediated by the olfactory system.

Large-Scale Assessment of the Effect of Popularity on the Reliability of Research:

Based on theoretical reasoning it has been suggested that the reliability of findings published in the scientific literature decreases with the popularity of a research field. Here we provide empirical support for this prediction. We evaluate published statements on protein interactions with data from high-throughput experiments. We find evidence for two distinctive effects. First, with increasing popularity of the interaction partners, individual statements in the literature become more erroneous. Second, the overall evidence on an interaction becomes increasingly distorted by multiple independent testing. We therefore argue that for increasing the reliability of research it is essential to assess the negative effects of popularity and develop approaches to diminish these effects.

No Need to Discriminate? Reproductive Diploid Males in a Parasitoid with Complementary Sex Determination:

Diploid males in hymenopterans are generally either inviable or sterile, thus imposing a severe genetic load on populations. In species with the widespread single locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD), sex depends on the genotype at one single locus with multiple alleles. Haploid (hemizygous) individuals are always males. Diploid individuals develop into females when heterozygous and into males when homozygous at the sex determining locus. Our comparison of the mating and reproductive success of haploid and diploid males revealed that diploid males of the braconid parasitoid Cotesia glomerata sire viable and fertile diploid daughters. Females mated to diploid males, however, produced fewer daughters than females mated to haploid males. Nevertheless, females did not discriminate against diploid males as mating partners. Diploid males initiated courtship display sooner than haploid males and were larger in body size. Although in most species so far examined diploid males were recognized as genetic dead ends, we present a second example of a species with sl-CSD and commonly occurring functionally reproductive diploid males. Our study suggests that functionally reproductive diploid males might not be as rare as hitherto assumed. We argue that the frequent occurrence of inbreeding in combination with imperfect behavioural adaptations towards its avoidance promote the evolution of diploid male fertility.

Gender Differences in the Motivational Processing of Babies Are Determined by Their Facial Attractiveness:

This study sought to determine how esthetic appearance of babies may affect their motivational processing by the adults. Healthy men and women were administered two laboratory-based tasks: a) key pressing to change the viewing time of normal-looking babies and of those with abnormal facial features (e.g., cleft palate, strabismus, skin disorders, Down’s syndrome and fetal alcohol syndrome) and b) attractiveness ratings of these images. Exposure to the babies’ images produced two different response patterns: for normal babies, there was a similar effort by the two groups to extend the visual processing with lower attractiveness ratings by men; for abnormal babies, women exerted greater effort to shorten the viewing time despite attractiveness ratings comparable to the men. These results indicate that gender differences in the motivational processing of babies include excessive (relative to the esthetic valuation) motivation to extend the viewing time of normal babies by men vs. shortening the exposure to the abnormal babies by women. Such gender-specific incentive sensitization phenomenon may reflect an evolutionary-derived need for diversion of limited resources to the nurturance of healthy offspring.

ScienceOnline’09 – Interview with Greg Laden

The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline’09 back in January. Today, I asked one of my SciBlings, Greg Laden of the eponymous blog, to answer a few questions.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your (scientific) background?
When I was young, I intended to become a priest. Since I was being raised among Jesuits and Franciscans, that would mean that I would likely be trained as an Inquisitor, and Inquisitors were learned. So I searched for books to read, and in my household there was one bible written in Ancient German, an Encyclopedia, and a collection of Biology Textbooks. I read all of them except the Bible because I could not read Ancient German.
I believe that there is a direct line from my youthful training as an Inquisitor to my present job as a Blogger.
What do you want to do/be when (and if ever) you grow up?
I plan on being a retired Inquisitor.
GregLaden.jpgWhat is your Real Life job?
I don’t talk about my real life job these days I like to think of myself as an independent scholar and a writer, and a part time blogger. I have a lot of jobs, a lot of stuff I have to do. But writing, at this moment, is the only thing I want to acknowledge. Everything else can bite me.
What aspect of science communication and/or particular use of the Web in science interests you the most?
Good question. There is absolutely nothing related to science or communication about the web that is interesting. There is only interesting content. But there is a lot of interest from a technology point of view related to how Web 2.0/the blogosphere/etc works.
My interest is mainly in that content. I assume we can do anything with the web, anything related to communication, eventually. Web 2.0 is baby web. This will all look so silly even in just a few years. But the need for excellent, accurate, challenging and engaging content is paramount.
The web allows for communication of the form that has not happened before, but I see the current technology as doing almost as much to interfere with technology as to enhance it. On the user side of things, people in academics tend to be Luddites, wearing their ludditosity as a badge. These two things — baby technology and cultural resistance to novelty — need to change over the short term.
The Luddites will be left in the dust and Open Source technology will save us all.
With respect to the latter, I am very interested in promoting Open Source approaches as the technology of science communication, and Open Access as the structural or editorial milieu for dissemination. The proprietary models have had their chance and they have stifled rather than enhanced communication. The party is over, proprietary models! Over!
This does not mean that there is no room for commercial enterprise and even profit making, but the model that links consumer dollars to production via marketing has got to go.
How does (if it does) blogging figure in your work? How about social
networks, e.g., Twitter, FriendFeed and Facebook?

OK, now we are getting to the serious questions, I see. Blogging does not relate to my work. It IS my work. Blogging is where my voice lives these days. I’ve got writing projects that the blogging supports, in terms of my thought process and production stream. I’m a blogger, not a person who blogs. Social networks such as, for me mainly, Twitter and Facebook support, point to, enhance, underscore the blogging I do, and provide me with streams of information for my blog. Facebook in particular is also a social network that serves as a social network (as opposed to something called a social network that serves as a tool for disseminating information).
By the way, Twitter explicitly denies that it is a social network. This is in writing somewhere.
When and how did you discover science blogs? What are some of your favourites? Have you discovered any new cool science blogs while at the Conference?
I was at a Minnesota Citizens for Science Education conference and someone mentioned PZ Myers’ blog, Pharyngula, as a good thing for life science teachers to read. I mostly ignored it for a while, because I was not really into reading blogs. Then I read through a few days worth and thought “Hey, this is a good way to write. Nice bite size bits, instant feedback, etc” (I don’t remember if I actually said “etc” but I might have.) So I started a blog, and it ran for about 10 months, when I was asked by Scienceblogs Dot Com to join them.
I don’t think I discovered any new science blogs at the conference because a) I knew about most of them already and b) before the conference I used the conference wiki to find out about more.
What I did discover is that these blogs are actually written by PEOPLE!!! Who would have thought!?!?!? One of the great pleasures, for me, which I expected to happen, was to meet some of the bloggers in person. I was especially looking forward to meeting Coturnix, and I was not disappointed. There were many others.
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
Many things. Enough that I have to say that this was a very important conference. Much of what I learned came from the inter-session and extra-session conversations, as well as the sessions themselves. It was also great to meet in person people with whom I’ve collaborated on line. The organizers and participants in the Transitions session, Gender in Science, Race in Science, and Anonymity sessions produced a sort of Big Giant Stream of Conversation about all of these issues, which are largely related. There is positive movement here, and a lot of good is happening. I happen to also think that much of the social theory and political method being used by many of my fellow bloggers is rather mid 20th century and not as effective as it could be, and I would like to see this part of the blogosphere … well, grow up a bit, to be honest. But that is not true of everyone involved in these important political movements. And everyone, to a person, is well meaning and is contributing one way or another to the progress that is being made.
I look forward to the day when I can put up 15 blog postings in a row that have to do with gender and race and have the following two things NOT happen: 1) One or more commenters say “I thought this was a science blog, I’m leaving forever!!!” and 2) One or more fellow bloggers make a side long nasty remark about how my voice is different from theirs, and therefore, wrong. When those two things happen, or more exactly, don’t happen, I’ll know we’ll have made some advancement in this area.
At the ScienceOnline09 conference, because people were meeting face to face, we all were moving more quickly in this direction than we have on the intertubes before or since. That is important. The web is wonderful but it is not real life in this very important way. We need significant cultural evolution to happen in this regard.
Related, the ScienceOnline09 conference also demonstrated the overlap between science (= fieldwork and test tubes and stuff), politics and society. That is important.
There were a lot of pragmatic aspects of communication covered by the conference, most of which I missed because of the stream of sessions I chose. They looked good and I heard good things about them.
I also very much appreciated the conversations I had with James Hrynyshyn, Karen James, Tom Levinson, Rick McPherson, Mark Powell, Rebecca Skloot, Blake Stacey and Karen Venti, and others at Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, Beer Hour and so on. I flew out with my Quiche Moraine Co-blogger, Stephanie Zvan and her husband Ben , and we were very happy to use this as an opportunity to let people know about Quiche. Also, I was thrilled that Lou FCD came up from the coast for big chunks of the conference, so I could meet my on line buddy in real life.
The one thing that surprised me the most, if I may say, is how many people at the conference had been reading the Congo Memoirs, and went out of their way to tell me that they liked them! That was nice.
It was so nice to meet you and thank you for the interview. I hope
to see you again next January.

The pleasure was all mine, and I’ll see you in January!
==========================
See the 2008 interview series and 2009 series for more.

Clock Quotes

Not losing time has been my permanent concern since I was three years old, when it dawned on me that time is the warp of life, its very fabric, something that you cannot buy, trade, steal, falsify, or obtain by begging.
– Nina Berberova

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Today’s carnivals

Carnival of Space #108: Solstice Edition! is up on Starts With A Bang
Carnival of the Green #185 is up on The Daily (Maybe)

Name this Bug!

I am pretty sure it’s a true bug (i.e., I am not being sloppy by calling just any ole’ insect a bug). I got as close as I could with my iPhone, but the lighting was bad. This is on my porch and the bug is really large – about 1 inch in length of the body.
bug1.jpg
bug2.jpg
bug3.jpg
bug4.jpg
bug5.jpg
So, what is it?

ScienceOnline’09: Interview with Sol Lederman

The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline’09 back in January.
We kick off the series with the interview with Sol Lederman who gave a demo session: US Dept of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Who are you? What is your (scientific) background?
SolLederman.jpgI’m not a scientist and I don’t play one on TV either. I’m a techie. My education is in Mathematics and Sociology. I’ve worn many hats in the computer industry throughout the years – programmer, tech support person, writer, trainer, and consultant are some of the roles I’ve had.
What do you want to do/be when (and if ever) you grow up?
I like to communicate about computers. I especially like the potential of Web 2.0. Lately I’ve been getting into building apps with Drupal, including layout and php code. So, maybe I’ll evolve into a social application builder or into a writer or consultant about these things. Or maybe I’ll do something completely different. Basically, I’m happy doing what I’m doing now and I’m in no hurry to grow up and be something else/different/more.
What is your Real Life job?
I wear a couple of hats: blogger and consultant. I do a variety of things for the US Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI). I blog for OSTI, I explore ways of getting OSTI resources more visibility, and I do some consulting and programming for them. I also blog about federated search for the Federated Search Blog, a blog sponsored by Deep Web Technologies. Federated search is the technology that aggregates scholarly information from the “Deep Web”; that’s the part of the Web that Google can’t crawl. OSTI has a number of federated search applications whose search is powered by Deep Web Technologies. My relationship with OSTI started with supporting some of their apps while I was working full time for Deep Web and has morphed into a consulting relationship with both parties.
What aspect of science communication, and in particular the use of the Web in science, interests you the most?
I’m very interested in how Web 2.0 technologies can bring scientists together. I’m a member of a Web 2.0 Innovation Team led by OSTI technologist Mike Jennings. I can’t speak in any detail about what we’re doing but we’re looking at ways of extending the scope of OSTI’s reach into the world of Web 2.0.
Some of your readers might not be aware that OSTI’s precursor was founded to manage information pursuant to the Manhattan Project. OSTI’s mission is “to advance science and sustain technological creativity by making R&D findings available and useful to Department of Energy (DOE) researchers and the public.” So, OSTI is all about science communication and OSTI has a strong Web presence through applications like Science.gov and WorldWideScience.org.
How does (if it does) blogging figure in your job? Do you have a blog and if so, will you tell us about it, your experience in science blogging? How about social networks, e.g., Twitter, FriendFeed and Facebook?
Blogging is a moderate part of my work for OSTI. It’s a much larger role at Deep Web. In a year and a half I built the Federated Search Blog from zero readers to over 800. I’m quite proud of that and I believe the blog has been a good marketing piece for Deep Web. Not related to any paid work, I write a Math blog, WildAboutMath.com. Mostly I challenge people with Math problems and give prizes.
Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?
I always get good ideas about how OSTI can further its outreach at conferences. That’s why I attend. I vividly remember a long conversation with Wired blogger Aaron Rowe. He instilled the importance of using multiple Web 2.0 channels to reach the public. YouTube is just one example of how OSTI is taking that insight to heart.
It was so nice to meet you and thank you for the interview. I hope to see you again next January.
Thank you.
==========================
See the 2008 interview series and 2009 series for more.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
– Unknown

Carnivals, etc.

Friday Ark #248 is up on Modulator
Carnival of Evolution #13 will be hosted by FYI: Science! on July 2nd or so and needs more entries.
Scientia Pro Publica needs your entries before July 6th – the host is Greg Laden.
And, get your posts aggregated on ResearchBlogging.org if you want them to be considered for the PLoS ONE Blog Pick of the Month.

The Open Laboratory 2009 – the submissions so far

OpenLab logo.jpg
Here are the submissions for OpenLab 2009 to date. As we have surpassed 170 entries, all of them, as well as the “submit” buttons and codes and the bookmarklet, are under the fold. You can buy the 2006, 2007 and 2008 editions at Lulu.com. Please use the submission form to add more of your and other people’s posts (remember that we are looking for original poems, art, cartoons and comics, as well as essays):

Continue reading

Jay Rosen on journalism

Interview by Ulrike Reinhard:

Also, if you have not done so yet, it is worth your time to listen to Rebooting The News podcasts in which Jay Rosen and Dave Winer discuss the current transformation of the news media. They are longish – almost an hour long each – but worth your while. Good idea is to listen to them in chronological order, though they are getting better and better (i.e., better organized, clearer, more succinct) every week.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

The surest way to make a monkey of a man is to quote him.
– Robert Benchley

The Ethics of The Quote

Yesterday, I had an interesting discussion on Twitter with @jason_pontin (and a couple of others chimed in, e.g., @TomLevenson and @scootsmoon) about the role of quotes in journalism. Specifically, about the importance of providing a brief quote from sources interviewed for a piece. The difference in mindsets of Old vs. New journalism appeared in sharp relief.
I did not really think hard about this question until now, so this post is just my first provisional stream-of-thought about this and I welcome discussion in the comments.
So, let me try a mental experiment here. You are a journalist. You picked, or are assigned, a topic to write an article about. You may know nothing, little or a lot about the topic. Regardless, you start with a clean slate. What do you do?
First, you conceptualize your article in your mind: decide what the limits are, i.e., what can and what cannot be included due to space restrictions you are given by the editor. Thus, in your mind, you already have a bare skeleton of the story.
Then, you hit the Rolodex and start calling people who may something interesting to say on the topic. You consciously or subconsciously pick people who can provide you with a broad spectrum of opinion on the topic. You ask them for interviews. Many say Yes.
You conduct the interviews for about 30 minutes to an hour with each person. You record or jot down notes or save their e-mail responses.
Then you start writing your article, putting your skeletal version into words. When done with that phase, you start fleshing it out. How?
You have learned, from interviews or before, what the spectrum of opinions is out there. You want to include some or most of them into your article. How do you go about that?
First, you decide that Opinion A is so out of whack it is not worth mentioning. Second, you decide that Opinion B is out of whack, but can be used for comic relief to make your story fun.
Then you are left with a few remaining opinions which are, in your view, “legitimate”. Now you need to find the best quotes that represent those opinions. How do you find them?
You go through all your transcripts/notes/recording and look for them. And you find them – one best wording for each of the opinions. You include them in your article and correctly attribute them to the authors. Your work is done – send to the editor and move on to the next story.
What is wrong with this picture? What is wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong with this picture?
There are several layers of wrong. Let me try to dissect them, one at a time.
First wrong: you had the concept of the article in your head before you did the research. This shapes your research, choices of interviewees, choices of “opinions”, choices of quotes.
Second wrong: you picked to interview people with colorful views on the topic instead of people who have the relevant expertise to say something on the topic. Hence the appearance of Creationists, anti-vaccinationists, Global Warming Denialists or Republicans – people who are wrong every time they open their mouths – in the media.
Third wrong: you made decisions, out of your own gut instead of from deep research, which opinions are too wacky to include. How do you know they are wacky? Are you an expert? Are you sure they are just not outside the Overton Window, or outside the “legitimate sphere” as defined by the media itself?
Fourth wrong: you cherry-picked the quotes, looking for specific statements that illustrate the opinions you have decided to include. You are not interested, really, who they come from or if that person stands by it. You are just looking for who put it into words the best, the “best quote”. Journalists love language, but have a very post-modern relationship to facts. They think of themselves more as writers, with a skillful turn of the phrase, than as reporters who are stubbornly looking for the truth.
Even when asked, journalists openly state that their role is not to find the truth, but to register the spectrum of opinions out there. That is stenography at best (not even that, as some opinions are never registered, including some very valid opinions), not journalism.
But that is absolutely NOT what the audience expects. Audience is already aware of the spectrum of opinions out there. They look for you to tell them exactly which one of those opinions is correct, and which ones are bunk. But you never deliver. Which is why people are mad, and the press has an extremely low ranking in popular opinion on trustworthiness.
If you disagree with the above paragraph, think why that is so? Did you hear it from your editors and colleagues? If so, they are dead wrong. If you learned it in J-school, your professors were dead wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong!!!
Now think again.
Is everything you ever learned in a professional setting about the role of journalism wrong? Could be. Time for deep introspection.
But let’s go back to the example and look at some other aspects of wrongness in it.
The method of quoting used is deeply unfair to the interviewees. They talked for an hour. You cherry-picked a quote that fits your own narrative, not theirs. They are misrepresented.
For example, I may start the interview by putting up the clearest possible wording of a statement that I deeply disagree with. I spend the rest of the hour explaining in great detail and nuance why that statement is wrong. But I worded it so well, it is just peachy for you to use it and put my name next to it as if I agreed with that statement. That is blatantly dishonest.
You got your pretty quote, but in the process you completely misrepresented my stand on the issue, perhaps 180 degrees from it (yes, this happened to me – not found in Google, in St.Peterburg Times, about Edwards’ concession to Kerry in 2004). In public. Forever associated with my name. I should be able to sue you for this!
Even when the quote is correct, e.g., I do agree with the statement, there is a reason why I talked for an hour: it takes an hour to explain it (this happened to me, too).
Perhaps that sentence was an aside, just a polite way to respond to one of the stupider of your questions, but the main thrust is elsewhere – but that never makes it into print (yes, this also happened to me).
That single sentence you chose is such an oversimplification of my view, that the commenters will rip me to shreds for being so dumb (yes, this also happened to me – the same St.Peterburg Times article). And you did it to me – I did my best trying to explain my position, but you were not listening to what I had to say, you were just hunting for pretty quotes that fit YOUR narrative.
And people know all this. Which is why so many people refuse to give interviews – they know for certain they will be misquoted (sure it’s verbatim, but plucked out of context it is meaningless).
Some people refuse interviews only when they are told they will not be able to check the quotes before publication. The journalists invoke some sacred rule about refusing to do this. I have no idea where the rule comes from, but it is stupid and wrong. It is preventing the person from avoiding slander.
It should be made a right, and written into law, and monitored by the Human Rights Watch, that an interviewee has to be able to see the article in advance, can change one’s own quote, and can remove one’s name and quote from the article if deemed necessary to protect one’s own reputation. I do not want my name associated with statements I do not 100% hold and support and I have a right to remove my name from them. If you interview me as an expert, that is your duty (this may differ if you are playing gotcha journalism with a politician, but that is a different kind of interview and a different kind of quote: extracting facts from an unwilling participant, not an expert who gave time to explain stuff to the public).
But refusing the interviewee this right is the way journalists wield power over the interviewees. And they relish that power. And will relinquish it only if it is taken out of their dead, cold hands. They reserve the right to misquote and thus slander everyone.
As there is no argument that can be correctly summarized with a single sentence to the satisfaction of the interviewed expert, does this mean that quoting someone should be never done?
No, there is a role for a quote – as a hook for the reader to click on the link and read (or listen to or watch) the entire transcript. It makes an interesting story that may pique the interest of a casual reader who will then follow the links to get more information, including, especially, the full treatment by the interviewed expert. Then the reader can see if the person was quoted correctly or not, and will understand that the quote is an oversimplification which the author does not really hold. No reputation is lost that way.
So, when you interview someone, pull out that audio recorder, or camera and record the whole thing. Then pay the transcribing services (or get an intern to do it, or, better still, don’t be lazy and do it yourself: unlike bloggers who have other jobs it is your full time job to do this, so do it). Or better still, conduct the interview by e-mail so all you have to do is copy and paste. Then make sure that every quote in your article links to the complete transcript/podcast/video of the entire interview. Everything less than that is deeply dishonest and no interviewee should ever agree to.
Finally, this way of collecting quotes is a disservice to the reader who is looking for facts and the truth, not the spectrum of well-known opinions. By wasting half the space on meaningless quotes, the journalist has no space left to make the Truth-statement for the readers: the very reason journalism exists. So, not just interviewees are screwed, but so is the audience.
The institution of the quote goes back to the era of printing on paper. There was very little (and expensive) real estate in the newspaper or magazine. The editor told you in advance how many inches you get for your story. Reducing 20 hour-long interviews into 20 single-sentence quotes is a way for you to prove to your editor and to readers that you did your job. To hell with substance or truth – you demonstrated that you put hours into the article and thus deserve your paycheck.
On the Web, real-estate is endless and cheap. Not linking out to complete documentation – including transcripts of all interviews – is deeply unethical in the 21st century journalism unhindered by the limitations of the dead-tree technology.
You can see the full transcript of our Twitter debate on this topic if you search Twitter for BoraZ + jason_pontin (you will have to scroll down and go to the second page to see it all) as well as a couple of side-discussions by searching BoraZ + scootsmoon and BoraZ + TomLevenson.
=================
Addendum.
Here are some articles for which I was interviewed and what I think of them (I skipped several because they are behind paywalls or not available any more), so we can see by example what works and what does not, and why:
This was the worst example. It does not even matter what I said and what was quoted – my name is in a piece that slanders everything I stand for, including my own book. But what does one expect from The New Scientist?
This one is the example where I talked for 65 minutes and all that was quoted was an unimportant aside. Was there really nothing else interesting in what I said? Including things I explained in detail, with passion, clearly indicating what is important? Or just not what the journo had in mind at the outset?
This was radio, so the quote is very brief, and I am OK with it.
This one (also carried by papers in Baltimore, Houston and Charleston SC) was really good – the journalist paid attention, learned, and used her own words to accurately portray what I said on top of a decent quote.
This one was also good, for the same reason.
Caroline McMillan did even better – published two articles side-by-side: one was a profile of me, the other about science blogging learned from interviewing me. Worked great together as a package.
John Dupuis, Klaus Taschwer, Simon Owens, Hsien Hsien Li, Brandon and Caryn Shechtman did the smart thing – posted entire interviews. If you are interested in me as a personality, or in my expertise, or in my opinion, just give me the mike. That’s the best solution for everyone.
Likewise on the radio – several times I was on for entire hour-long shows – see this, this and this for some recorded examples. My panels and lectures were sometimes recorded and posted online as well.
At this day and age, when this technology is easy and cheap – who needs quotes any more?
Update: This is an excellent example of an interview that includes several quotes PLUS provides the entire transcript.

A quick introduction to Twitter

On Twitter, things can be fast and unpredictable. Like yesterday. I was having an interesting discussion with @jason_pontin about the changing role of quoting sourses in Old vs. New journalism, when he suddenly said he had to go and then asked me if I would be interested in joining him. He was going to talk to a group of business-folks at the MIT Enterprise Forum about Web 2.0 and asked me to come in for a few minutes and explain, on Twitter, what Twitter is about. An hour later, it happened. Here is the stream (you can find it yourself by searching Twitter for #MITEO):
@jason_pontin Follow @BoraZ and me with the hashtag #MITEO in a discussion about Twitter and business with the MIT Entrepreneur’s Forum at 4.40 PM EST.
@jason_pontin @BoraZ #miteo Hi, we’re here at the MIT/EO Entrepreneurial Class. What is twitter for?
@BoraZ #MITEO First, thanks to @jason_pontin for inviting me here. It was short notice, but I hope we can answer some of your questions.
@BoraZ #MITEO First, let’s get some of the oft-heard myths about Twitter out of the way, so we can focus on the positives and good uses.
@BoraZ #MITEO Twitter Myth #1 “Twitter is bad because the word ‘Twitter’ is funny”. Just like the word “blog” 5 years ago.
@BoraZ #MITEO This is an unprofessional way to laugh at Twitter without using, studying and understanding it.
@BoraZ #MITEO Twitter Myth #2 “I don’t care what you had for lunch” This is called Lifecasting.
@BoraZ #MITEO A little bit of this is useful – makes human connection. If that’s all you see, you follow wrong people.
@BoraZ #MITEO Twitter Myth #3 “140 characters is not enough” You can write a novel using many, many tweets.
@BoraZ #MITEO It’s a flow, not disjointed individual short messages.
@BoraZ #MITEO Those myths out of the way, let’s focus now on good uses of Twitter.
@jason_pontin: @BoraZ #miteo any more myths to get off your chest?
@jason_pontin @BoraZ #miteo is twitter good for things other than marketing?
@BoraZ Yes, @jason_pontin, Twitter is good for many things besides marketing #MITEO
@BoraZ #MITEO Ways to use Twitter: #1 eavesdropping: follow informative people, get information, learn, use elsewhere, relay to people off-Twitter
@BoraZ #MITEO Ways to use Twitter: #2: dialogue: exhange information with friends, discuss, debate.
@BoraZ #MITEO Like @Jason_Pontin and I are known to do often. Both the participants and onlookers learn.
@BoraZ #MITEO Ways to use Twitter: #3: broadcast: used by news organizations, businesses to inform audience about news or products/services.
@BoraZ #MITEO Ways to use Twitter: #3a: Careful with broadcasting – many are blocked as they look like spam!
@BoraZ #MITEO Ways to use Twitter: #4: data collection: for example http://tinyurl.com/dfqwwg using Tweeting fishermen to monitor fish populations.
@BoraZ #MITEO Ways to use Twitter: #5: accidental journalism: examples: landing on Hudson river, Mumbai attacks, Iran post-election protests
@BoraZ #MITEO Ways to use Twitter: #6: Mindcasting (like @jayrosen_nyu) following a story, with links, for a period of time
@BoraZ #MITEO cont’d. – collect and refine on FriendFeed and blog: http://tinyurl.com/d8bcpg
@BoraZ #MITEO The best thing is to mix a little bit of everything: http://tinyurl.com/cnbs7d
@BoraZ #MITEO One-to-many broadcasting alone is bad for business. Making one-to-one connections with customers is the key.
@BoraZ #MITEO Listening, responding fast, showing humanity – essential.
@BoraZ #MITEO People today want to deal with a real person, not a faceless organization. And they expect to talk back and get responses. Fast.
@jason_pontin @BoraZ #miteo what is the best business aspect for using twitter for heads of companies?
@BoraZ #MITEO @jason_pontin surprisingly, it is listening. I spend more time observing what Twitter says about us, then telling about us.
@BoraZ #MITEO this allows for really speedy response, which customers appreciate. Also personal response.
@BoraZ #MITEO the reaction time for businesses is much shorter. Waiting 3 days of committee meetings is not enough for customers today.
@BoraZ @jason_pontin I just think that not watching Twitter is a risk for being blindsided by what people say about your biz #MITEO
@jason_pontin: @BoraZ Thanks for all your help!
@BoraZ: @jason_pontin Thank you. I am glad I had an hour to prepare. Some tweets take a lot of time to craft!
@sachinduggal @BoraZ #MITEO thank you!
@jason_pontin: @BoraZ We just finished! You were so good. Genuinely useful – and interesting and quite funny, too. The MIT Enterprise Forum thanks you.
@jason_pontin It was hard for us to respond #MITEO to @BoraZ on TweetDeck, but his comments were right on.
@jason_pontin: @Boraz I think there was some continuing confusion about the utility of this thing for biz
@BoraZ: @jason_pontin We can try to cont’ the convo, or include some business-twitterers.
@jason_pontin: Again, a *huge* shoutout to @BoraZ for educating the MIT Enterprise Forum today about Twitter.
@BoraZ: #MITEO @jason_pontin Thank you for inviting me. I hope I was useful 😉
@BoraZ Thanks @OldCola for putting the entire #MITEO stream on his blog: http://tinyurl.com/nq7uhj

Clock Quotes

Quoting: the act of repeating erroneously the words of another.
– Ambrose Bierce

Twitter and Science presentation from the 140 Characters Conference

A bunch of interesting Twitterers aggregated in NYC a couple of days ago at the 140 characters conference, discussing various aspects of and uses of Twitter. One of the sessions was about Twitter and Science, led by @thesciencebabe and @jayhawkbabe. I am very jealous I could not be there, but we can all watch the video of their session:

Happy to see the last slide, with @PLoS as one of the recommended Twitter streams to follow for those interested in science.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

If you have a great ambition, take as big a step as possible in the direction of fulfilling it. The step may only be a tiny one, but trust that it may be the largest one possible for now.
– Mildred McAfee (1900-1994); academic, served as first director of the WAVES (Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service) in the United States Navy.
[thanks to Joey]

New and Exciting in PLoS this week

Friday – the day to take a look at all seven PLoS journals and make my own personal picks. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
Taking the Lag out of Jet Lag through Model-Based Schedule Design:

Traveling across several times zones can cause an individual to experience “jet lag,” which includes trouble sleeping at night and trouble remaining awake during the day. A major cause of these effects is the desynchronization between the body’s internal circadian clock and local environmental cues. A well-known intervention to resynchronize an individual’s clock with the environment is appropriately timed light exposure. Used as an intervention, properly timed light stimuli can reset an individual’s internal circadian clock to align with local time, resulting in more efficient sleep, a decrease in fatigue, and an increase in cognitive performance. The contrary is also true: poorly timed light exposure can prolong the resynchronization process. In this paper, we present a computational method for automatically determining the proper placement of these interventional light stimuli. We used this method to simulate shifting sleep-wake schedules (as seen in jet lag situations) and design interventions. Essential to our approach is the use of mathematical models that simulate the body’s internal circadian clock and its effect on human performance. Our results include quicker design of multiple schedule alternatives and predictions of substantial performance improvements relative to no intervention. Therefore, our methods allow us to use these models not only to assess schedules but also to interactively design schedules that will result in improved performance.

Allometry of the Duration of Flight Feather Molt in Birds:

The pace of life varies with body size and is generally slower among larger organisms. Larger size creates opportunities but also establishes constraints on time-dependent processes. Flying birds depend on large wing feathers that deteriorate over time and must be replaced through molting. The lengths of flight feathers increase as the 1/3 power of body mass, as one expects for a length-to-volume ratio. However, feather growth rate increases as only the 1/6 power of body mass, possibly because a two-dimensional feather is produced by a one-dimensional growing region. The longer time required to grow a longer feather constrains the way in which birds molt, because partially grown feathers reduce flight efficiency. Small birds quickly replace their flight feathers, often growing several feathers at a time in each wing. Larger species either prolong molt over two or more years, adopt complex patterns of multiple feather replacement to minimize gaps in the flight surface, or, among species that do not rely on flight for feeding, simultaneously molt all their flight feathers. We speculate that the extinct 70-kg raptor, Argentavis magnificens, must have undergone such a simultaneous molt, living off fat reserves for the duration.

Will the Public’s Health Fall Victim to the Home Foreclosure Epidemic?:

While policy makers worldwide have scrambled to counter its economic effects, the potential health implications of home foreclosure have received little empirical attention. Home foreclosure can be viewed as a stressful life event of prolonged duration, with multiple phases of variable intensity. Although no studies to date have reported the specific health effects of home foreclosure, we posit that foreclosure may be associated with a range of psychological and health behavior outcomes that, in turn, might increase chronic disease risk. Susceptibility to home foreclosure might involve both compositional and contextual dimensions. Delinquency management policies designed to prevent foreclosures from occurring are arguably best suited to protect the health of those at greatest risk.

Cardiac Arrest during Gamete Release in Chum Salmon Regulated by the Parasympathetic Nerve System:

Cardiac arrest caused by startling stimuli, such as visual and vibration stimuli, has been reported in some animals and could be considered as an extraordinary case of bradycardia and defined as reversible missed heart beats. Variability of the heart rate is established as a balance between an autonomic system, namely cholinergic vagus inhibition, and excitatory adrenergic stimulation of neural and hormonal action in teleost. However, the cardiac arrest and its regulating nervous mechanism remain poorly understood. We show, by using electrocardiogram (ECG) data loggers, that cardiac arrest occurs in chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) at the moment of gamete release for 7.39±1.61 s in females and for 5.20±0.97 s in males. The increase in heart rate during spawning behavior relative to the background rate during the resting period suggests that cardiac arrest is a characteristic physiological phenomenon of the extraordinarily high heart rate during spawning behavior. The ECG morphological analysis showed a peaked and tall T-wave adjacent to the cardiac arrest, indicating an increase in potassium permeability in cardiac muscle cells, which would function to retard the cardiac action potential. Pharmacological studies showed that the cardiac arrest was abolished by injection of atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, revealing that the cardiac arrest is a reflex response of the parasympathetic nerve system, although injection of sotalol, a β-adrenergic antagonist, did not affect the cardiac arrest. We conclude that cardiac arrest during gamete release in spawning release in spawning chum salmon is a physiological reflex response controlled by the parasympathetic nervous system. This cardiac arrest represents a response to the gaping behavior that occurs at the moment of gamete release.

Shared Visual Attention and Memory Systems in the Drosophila Brain:

Selective attention and memory seem to be related in human experience. This appears to be the case as well in simple model organisms such as the fly Drosophila melanogaster. Mutations affecting olfactory and visual memory formation in Drosophila, such as in dunce and rutabaga, also affect short-term visual processes relevant to selective attention. In particular, increased optomotor responsiveness appears to be predictive of visual attention defects in these mutants. To further explore the possible overlap between memory and visual attention systems in the fly brain, we screened a panel of 36 olfactory long term memory (LTM) mutants for visual attention-like defects using an optomotor maze paradigm. Three of these mutants yielded high dunce-like optomotor responsiveness. We characterized these three strains by examining their visual distraction in the maze, their visual learning capabilities, and their brain activity responses to visual novelty. We found that one of these mutants, D0067, was almost completely identical to dunce1 for all measures, while another, D0264, was more like wild type. Exploiting the fact that the LTM mutants are also Gal4 enhancer traps, we explored the sufficiency for the cells subserved by these elements to rescue dunce attention defects and found overlap at the level of the mushroom bodies. Finally, we demonstrate that control of synaptic function in these Gal4 expressing cells specifically modulates a 20-30 Hz local field potential associated with attention-like effects in the fly brain. Our study uncovers genetic and neuroanatomical systems in the fly brain affecting both visual attention and odor memory phenotypes. A common component to these systems appears to be the mushroom bodies, brain structures which have been traditionally associated with odor learning but which we propose might be also involved in generating oscillatory brain activity required for attention-like processes in the fly brain.

Journal Clubs on PLoS ONE articles

What does it mean – a Journal Club? Read here and, if you want to do one, contact me.

My picks from ScienceDaily

Continue reading

Clock Quotes

However gradual the course of history, there must always be the day, even an hour and minute, when some significant action is performed for the first or last time.
– Peter Quennell

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 16 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs:

Objective: To compare expert assessment with bibliometric indicators as tools to assess the quality and importance of scientific research papers. Shortly after their publication in 2005, the quality and importance of a cohort of nearly 700 Wellcome Trust (WT) associated research papers were assessed by expert reviewers; each paper was reviewed by two WT expert reviewers. After 3 years, we compared this initial assessment with other measures of paper impact. Shortly after publication, 62 (9%) of the 687 research papers were determined to describe at least a ‘major addition to knowledge’ -6 were thought to be ‘landmark’ papers. At an aggregate level, after 3 years, there was a strong positive association between expert assessment and impact as measured by number of citations and F1000 rating. However, there were some important exceptions indicating that bibliometric measures may not be sufficient in isolation as measures of research quality and importance, and especially not for assessing single papers or small groups of research publications. When attempting to assess the quality and importance of research papers, we found that sole reliance on bibliometric indicators would have led us to miss papers containing important results as judged by expert review. In particular, some papers that were highly rated by experts were not highly cited during the first three years after publication. Tools that link expert peer reviews of research paper quality and importance to more quantitative indicators, such as citation analysis would be valuable additions to the field of research assessment and evaluation.

Blueberry-Enriched Diet Protects Rat Heart from Ischemic Damage:

Objectives: to assess the cardioprotective properties of a blueberry enriched diet (BD). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a major role in ischemia-related myocardial injury. The attempts to use synthetic antioxidants to block the detrimental effects of ROS have produced mixed or negative results precipitating the interest in natural products. Blueberries are readily available product with the highest antioxidant capacity among fruits and vegetables. Following 3-mo of BD or a regular control diet (CD), the threshold for mitochondrial permeability transition (tMPT) was measured in isolated cardiomyocytes obtained from young male Fischer-344 rats. Compared to CD, BD resulted in a 24% increase (p<0.001) of ROS indexed tMPT. The remaining animals were subjected to a permanent ligation of the left descending coronary artery. 24 hrs later resulting myocardial infarction (MI) in rats on BD was 22% less than in CD rats (p<0.01). Significantly less TUNEL(+) cardiomyocytes (2% vs 9%) and 40% less inflammation cells were observed in the myocardial area at risk of BD compared to CD rats (p<0.01). In the subgroup of rats, after coronary ligation the original diet was either continued or switched to the opposite one, and cardiac remodeling and MI expansion were followed by serial echocardiography for 10 weeks. Measurements suggested that continuation of BD or its withdrawal after MI attenuated or accelerated rates of post MI cardiac remodeling and MI expansion. A blueberry-enriched diet protected the myocardium from induced ischemic damage and demonstrated the potential to attenuate the development of post MI chronic heart failure.

Influence of Environment and Mitochondrial Heritage on the Ecological Characteristics of Fish in a Hybrid Zone:

Ecological characteristics (growth, morphology, reproduction) arise from the interaction between environmental factors and genetics. Genetic analysis of individuals’ life history traits might be used to improve our understanding of mechanisms that form and maintain a hybrid zone. A fish hybrid zone was used to characterize the process of natural selection. Data were collected during two reproductive periods (2001 and 2002) and 1117 individuals (nase, Chondrostama nasus nasus, sofie C. toxostoma toxostoma and hybrids) were sampled. Reproductive dates of the two parental species overlapped at sympatric sites. The nase had an earlier reproductive period than the sofie; males had longer reproductive periods for both species. Hybridisation between female nase and male sofie was the most likely. Hybrids had a reproductive period similar to the inherited parental mitochondrial type. Growth and reproductive information from different environments has been synthesised following a bayesian approach of the von Bertalanffy model. Hybrid life history traits appear to link with maternal heritage. Hybrid size from the age of two and size at first maturity appeared to be closer to the size of the maternal origin species (nase or sofie). Median growth rates for hybrids were similar and intermediate between those of the parental species. We observed variable life history traits for hybrids and pure forms in the different parts of the hybrid zone. Geometrical analysis of the hybrid fish shape gave evidence of two main morphologies with a link to maternal heritage. Selective mating seemed to be the underlying process which, with mitochondrial heritage, could explain the evolution of the studied hybrid zone. More generally, we showed the importance of studies on hybrid zones and specifically the study of individuals’ ecological characteristics, to improve our understanding of speciation.

Tree Species Traits Influence Soil Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties in High Elevation Forests:

Previous studies have shown that plants often have species-specific effects on soil properties. In high elevation forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, North America, areas that are dominated by a single tree species are often adjacent to areas dominated by another tree species. Here, we assessed soil properties beneath adjacent stands of trembling aspen, lodgepole pine, and Engelmann spruce, which are dominant tree species in this region and are distributed widely in North America. We hypothesized that soil properties would differ among stands dominated by different tree species and expected that aspen stands would have higher soil temperatures due to their open structure, which, combined with higher quality litter, would result in increased soil respiration rates, nitrogen availability, and microbial biomass, and differences in soil faunal community composition. We assessed soil physical, chemical, and biological properties at four sites where stands of aspen, pine, and spruce occurred in close proximity to one-another in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado. Leaf litter quality differed among the tree species, with the highest nitrogen (N) concentration and lowest lignin:N in aspen litter. Nitrogen concentration was similar in pine and spruce litter, but lignin:N was highest in pine litter. Soil temperature and moisture were highest in aspen stands, which, in combination with higher litter quality, probably contributed to faster soil respiration rates from stands of aspen. Soil carbon and N content, ammonium concentration, and microbial biomass did not differ among tree species, but nitrate concentration was highest in aspen soil and lowest in spruce soil. In addition, soil fungal, bacterial, and nematode community composition and rotifer, collembolan, and mesostigmatid mite abundance differed among the tree species, while the total abundance of nematodes, tardigrades, oribatid mites, and prostigmatid mites did not. Although some soil characteristics were unaffected by tree species identity, our results clearly demonstrate that these dominant tree species are associated with soils that differ in several physical, chemical, and biotic properties. Ongoing environmental changes in this region, e.g. changes in fire regime, frequency of insect outbreaks, changes in precipitation patterns and snowpack, and land-use change, may alter the relative abundance of these tree species over coming decades, which in turn will likely alter the soils.

Clock Quotes

When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it: always.
– Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

New and Exciting in PLoS ONE

There are 20 new articles in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley, Connotea, Stumbleupon, Facebook and Digg) with just one click. Here are my own picks for the week – you go and look for your own favourites:
General Intelligence in Another Primate: Individual Differences across Cognitive Task Performance in a New World Monkey (Saguinus oedipus):

Individual differences in human cognitive abilities show consistently positive correlations across diverse domains, providing the basis for the trait of “general intelligence” (g). At present, little is known about the evolution of g, in part because most comparative studies focus on rodents or on differences across higher-level taxa. What is needed, therefore, are experiments targeting nonhuman primates, focusing on individual differences within a single species, using a broad battery of tasks. To this end, we administered a large battery of tasks, representing a broad range of cognitive domains, to a population of captive cotton-top tamarin monkeys (Saguinus oedipus). Using a Bayesian latent variable model, we show that the pattern of correlations among tasks is consistent with the existence of a general factor accounting for a small but significant proportion of the variance in each task (the lower bounds of 95% Bayesian credibility intervals for correlations between g and task performance all exceed 0.12). Individual differences in cognitive abilities within at least one other primate species can be characterized by a general intelligence factor, supporting the hypothesis that important aspects of human cognitive function most likely evolved from ancient neural substrates.

The Time-Course of Visual Categorizations: You Spot the Animal Faster than the Bird:

Since the pioneering study by Rosch and colleagues in the 70s, it is commonly agreed that basic level perceptual categories (dog, chair…) are accessed faster than superordinate ones (animal, furniture…). Nevertheless, the speed at which objects presented in natural images can be processed in a rapid go/no-go visual superordinate categorization task has challenged this “basic level advantage”. Using the same task, we compared human processing speed when categorizing natural scenes as containing either an animal (superordinate level), or a specific animal (bird or dog, basic level). Human subjects require an additional 40-65 ms to decide whether an animal is a bird or a dog and most errors are induced by non-target animals. Indeed, processing time is tightly linked with the type of non-targets objects. Without any exemplar of the same superordinate category to ignore, the basic level category is accessed as fast as the superordinate category, whereas the presence of animal non-targets induces both an increase in reaction time and a decrease in accuracy. These results support the parallel distributed processing theory (PDP) and might reconciliate controversial studies recently published. The visual system can quickly access a coarse/abstract visual representation that allows fast decision for superordinate categorization of objects but additional time-consuming visual analysis would be necessary for a decision at the basic level based on more detailed representations.

Feeding and Stocking Up: Radio-Labelled Food Reveals Exchange Patterns in Ants:

Food sharing is vital for a large number of species, either solitary or social, and is of particular importance within highly integrated societies, such as in colonial organisms and in social insects. Nevertheless, the mechanisms that govern the distribution of food inside a complex organizational system remain unknown.
Using scintigraphy, a method developed for medical imaging, we were able to describe the dynamics of food-flow inside an ant colony. We monitored the sharing process of a radio-labelled sucrose solution inside a nest of Formica fusca. Our results show that, from the very first load that enters the nest, food present within the colony acts as negative feedback to entering food. After one hour of the experiments, 70% of the final harvest has already entered the nest. The total foraged quantity is almost four times smaller than the expected storage capacity. A finer study of the spatial distribution of food shows that although all ants have been fed rapidly (within 30 minutes), a small area representing on average 8% of the radioactive surface holds more than 25% of the stored food. Even in rather homogeneous nests, we observed a strong concentration of food in few workers. Examining the position of these workers inside the nest, we found heavily loaded ants in the centre of the aggregate. The position of the centre of this high-intensity radioactive surface remained stable for the three consecutive hours of the experiments.
We demonstrate that the colony simultaneously managed to rapidly feed all workers (200 ants fed within 30 minutes) and build up food stocks to prevent food shortage, something that occurs rather often in changing environments. Though we expected the colony to forage to its maximum capacity, the flow of food entering the colony is finely tuned to the colony’s needs. Indeed the food-flow decreases proportionally to the food that has already been harvested, liberating the work-force for other tasks.

The Role of Demography and Markets in Determining Deforestation Rates Near Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar:

The highland forests of Madagascar are home to some of the world’s most unique and diverse flora and fauna and to some of its poorest people. This juxtaposition of poverty and biodiversity is continually reinforced by rapid population growth, which results in increasing pressure on the remaining forest habitat in the highland region, and the biodiversity therein. Here we derive a mathematical expression for the subsistence of households to assess the role of markets and household demography on deforestation near Ranomafana National Park. In villages closest to urban rice markets, households were likely to clear less land than our model predicted, presumably because they were purchasing food at market. This effect was offset by the large number of migrant households who cleared significantly more land between 1989-2003 than did residents throughout the region. Deforestation by migrant households typically occurred after a mean time lag of 9 years. Analyses suggest that while local conservation efforts in Madagascar have been successful at reducing the footprint of individual households, large-scale conservation must rely on policies that can reduce the establishment of new households in remaining forested areas.

Encouraging Expressions Affect the Brain and Alter Visual Attention:

Very often, encouraging or discouraging expressions are used in competitive contexts, such as sports practice, aiming at provoking an emotional reaction on the listener and, consequently, an effect on subsequent cognition and/or performance. However, the actual efficiency of these expressions has not been tested scientifically. To fill this gap, we studied the effects of encouraging, discouraging, and neutral expressions on event-related brain electrical activity during a visual selective attention task in which targets were determined by location, shape, and color. Although the expressions preceded the attentional task, both encouraging and discouraging messages elicited a similar long-lasting brain emotional response present during the visuospatial task. In addition, encouraging expressions were able to alter the customary working pattern of the visual attention system for shape selection in the attended location, increasing the P1 and the SP modulations while simultaneously fading away the SN. This was interpreted as an enhancement of the attentional processes for shape in the attended location after an encouraging expression. It can be stated, therefore, that encouraging expressions, as those used in sport practice, as well as in many other contexts and situations, do seem to be efficient in exerting emotional reactions and measurable effects on cognition.

Contact Profiles in Eight European Countries and Implications for Modelling the Spread of Airborne Infectious Diseases:

For understanding the spread of infectious diseases it is crucial to have knowledge of the patterns of contacts in a population during which the infection can be transmitted. Besides contact rates and mixing between age groups, the way individuals distribute their contacts across different locations may play an important role in determining how infections spread through a population. Representative surveys were performed in eight countries to assess the number of social contacts (talking to another person at close distance either with or without physical contact), using a diary approach in which participants recorded individual contacts. The overall sample size was 7290 respondents. We analyzed the reported numbers of contacts per respondent in six different settings (household, work, school, leisure, transportation and others) to define different contact profiles. The identification of the profiles and classification of respondents according to these profiles was conducted using a two-step cluster analysis algorithm as implemented in SPSS. We identified seven distinct contact profiles: respondents having (1) mixed: contacts predominantly at school, during transportation and leisure time, (2) contacts during leisure time, (3) contacts mainly in the household (large family), (4) contacts at work, (5) contacts solely at school, (6) contacts in other places and finally (7) respondents having a low number of contacts in any setting. Similar contact profiles can be found in all eight European countries which participated in the study. The distributions of respondents across the profiles were similar in all countries. The profiles are dominated by work, school and household contacts. But also contacts during leisure activities play an important role in the daily lives of a large fraction of individuals. A surprisingly large number of individuals has only few contacts in all locations. There was a distinct age-dependence in the distribution of the population across contact profiles. In contrast with earlier studies that focussed on the contribution of different age groups to the spread of an infectious disease, our results open up the opportunity to analyze how an infection spreads between locations and how locations as work or school are interconnected via household contacts. Mathematical models that take these local contact patterns into account can be used to assess the effect of intervention measures like school closure and cancelling of leisure activities on the spread of influenza.

Cocaine Modulates Locomotion Behavior in C. elegans:

Cocaine, a potent addictive substance, is an inhibitor of monoamine transporters, including DAT (dopamine transporter), SERT (serotonin transporter) and NET (norepinephrine transporter). Cocaine administration induces complex behavioral alterations in mammals, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we tested the effect of cocaine on C. elegans behavior. We show for the first time that acute cocaine treatment evokes changes in C. elegans locomotor activity. Interestingly, the neurotransmitter serotonin, rather than dopamine, is required for cocaine response in C. elegans. The C. elegans SERT MOD-5 is essential for the effect of cocaine, consistent with the role of cocaine in targeting monoamine transporters. We further show that the behavioral response to cocaine is primarily mediated by the ionotropic serotonin receptor MOD-1. Thus, cocaine modulates locomotion behavior in C. elegans primarily by impinging on its serotoninergic system.

Sport Hunting, Predator Control and Conservation of Large Carnivores:

Sport hunting has provided important economic incentives for conserving large predators since the early 1970’s, but wildlife managers also face substantial pressure to reduce depredation. Sport hunting is an inherently risky strategy for controlling predators as carnivore populations are difficult to monitor and some species show a propensity for infanticide that is exacerbated by removing adult males. Simulation models predict population declines from even moderate levels of hunting in infanticidal species, and harvest data suggest that African countries and U.S. states with the highest intensity of sport hunting have shown the steepest population declines in African lions and cougars over the past 25 yrs. Similar effects in African leopards may have been masked by mesopredator release owing to declines in sympatric lion populations, whereas there is no evidence of overhunting in non-infanticidal populations of American black bears. Effective conservation of these animals will require new harvest strategies and improved monitoring to counter demands for predator control by livestock producers and local communities.

The Open Laboratory 2009 – the submissions so far

OpenLab logo.jpg
Here are the submissions for OpenLab 2009 to date. As we have surpassed 160 entries, all of them, as well as the “submit” buttons and codes and the bookmarklet, are under the fold. You can buy the 2006, 2007 and 2008 editions at Lulu.com. Please use the submission form to add more of your and other people’s posts (remember that we are looking for original poems, art, cartoons and comics, as well as essays):

Continue reading

The Science Prize for Online Resources in Education (SPORE)

Yup, I know this comes from our ‘competition’, the Science magazine, but it is a worthy cause:

The Science Prize for Online Resources in Education (SPORE) has been established to encourage innovation and excellence in education, as well as to encourage the use of high-quality on-line resources by students, teachers, and the public. In 2009, the prize will recognize outstanding projects from all regions of the world that bring freely available online resources to bear on science education.
Winning projects should reinforce one or more of the four strands of science learning recommended by the National Academies (Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8 [2007], National Academies Press; see also Bruce Alberts, “Redefining Science Education,” Science 23 January 2009: 323, 437; http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/323/5913/437) and be consistent with the science education standards published by the National Academies (National Science Education Standards [1996], National Academies Press) and the AAAS (Benchmarks for Science Literacy; http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/index.php).
Winners will be selected with the assistance of a judging panel composed of outstanding teachers and researchers in the relevant fields, chaired by the Editor-in-Chief of Science. Individuals responsible for the creation of the winning resources will be invited to write an essay that describes the resource for publication in Science in 2010.